Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1879880882884885909

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,486 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    It has been discussed many times already on this, your opinion or what your builder said doesn't matter.

    You can build up to 25sqm garden room but legally you need planning permission to use it as a dwelling. Even the companies selling them tell you this on their sites.

    "It’s important to be aware that you are not permitted to live in buildings exempt from planning permission or use them as sleeping accommodation."

    https://gardenhouse24.ie/planning-permission-garden-house-ireland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,600 ✭✭✭fliball123


    We also got it through a legal challenge so its not opinion its fact and once you met the criteria of space left after the build and your build with existing extensions cant exceeda certain square meter not sure if its 25/40 this we did this a good few years back now and there must be a definitive emergency exit to the side of the house oh and it cant be more than 3 meters in height. As I say you can build what you like and call it an office space/garage/gym room/cinema but what you actually do with it after it is is your call they are not checking it. Sure even your link states this clearly read it again

    https://buildtech.ie/blog/what-can-i-build-without-planning-permission



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,486 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Here's another one for you. Disproving your opinions. You definitely didn't go through the legal channels as it's clearly not permittable under planning regulations.

    https://lawnpod.ie/blog/planningpermission

    Garden Roomscan be used for almost anything, but under exempted development, you are not permitted to use your Garden Room for living purposes or sleeping accommodation. So long as the use case is non-habitable then you are free to build. This means that Granny Flats or overflow accommodation must apply for planning permission before being built.

    I'm not arsed dealing with you anymore, if I said they sky is blue, you'd tell me it's green.

    I deal in facts, you deal in opinions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,600 ✭✭✭fliball123


    So do you accept you can build a dwelling in your garden without planning? yes you can and are you telling me if a family decided to put a bed out in that room for someone to sleep in that the authorities would come over and knock it down can you show me one case where this has happened? We did go legal with it now we didn't say we were going to use it for extra living space we put a gym into it but what your not getting is when the dwelling is built you can do what you want with it the authorities are not going to be knocking at the door to knock it down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,486 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    This is not rocket science, you just don't understand what the word dwelling means "a house, apartment, etc. where a person lives".

    https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/american_english/dwelling#:~:text=%2F%CB%88dw%C9%9Bl%C9%AA%C5%8B%2F,and%20a%20number%20of%20offices.

    You can build a garden room for an office, gym etc. without planning permission once it's under 25sq/m. You cannot legally build a dwelling without planning permission.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,618 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    This has been done before - much of Europe has apartments as a large share of housing stock, and Eurostar over/under occupation methodology is flawed. Having a separate kitchen and dining room, or living room and kitchen/diner counts as extra rooms which determines whether house is under/over occupied.

    A 2bed house with separate kitchen/diner and living room would not be over occupied even with 4 people living in it.

    A 2bed apartment with one large kitchen/diner/living space would be over occupied with the same 4 people living in it.

    Open plan living makes the same floorspace home seem over occupied



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭hometruths


    When it comes to housing in Ireland it is amazing how often the data is flawed when it doesn't support the narrative.

    In this particular case it must be very seriously flawed to skew us so far from the average. You'd wonder why the EU continues to publish such flawed data without at least acknowledging the issues.

    A 2bed apartment with one large kitchen/diner/living space would be over occupied with the same 4 people living in it.

    If the four people are two couples, it is not overcrowded according to Eurostat. Only if they are single people over 18.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 174 ✭✭Bocadilloo


    Am literally in shock at how the property market is going at the moment.

    West of Ireland, a 4 bed semi I sold back in 2015, has just gone on the market. Took me 9 months to sell at the time. It got an offer immediately of 200k more than I sold for. House was full of problems. The price being paid for a poor property is scary. Are we getting to that period again??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 675 ✭✭✭dashdoll


    I know it's Dublin but I'm currently struggling to get a 2bed apartment in D16/D18 for under 400k. Most are VERY basic and going for 30/40/50k over asking....its frightening tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,486 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    It's the location that you're looking in unfortunately. You may have broaden the search area greatly to get something half decent for 400k.

    We paid 385k in Nov for a 2 bed house in Swords.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,298 ✭✭✭Blut2


    "Ireland will need to build 93,000 homes a year meet demand between now and 2031, according to a new report by stockbroker Davy.

    Last year there were only 30,000 homes built in Ireland, which fell short of the Government's official target of 33,000 and far below projections by the then Minister for Housing Darragh O'Brien.

    Davy's forecast is based on its estimate that the population will reach six million by 2031.

    The report says the housing shortfall is now 230,000 homes."

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2025/0205/1494832-davy-on-housing-market/

    We're just a casual 60,000 odd homes off whats needed, per year, now, and rising rapidly it seems. Hitting one third of whats needed is an utter disaster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    And that's just to keep up with current demand.

    I've little doubt that the population will reach 6 million, of course…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11 Bookmarker_n


    I'm sure the buyers of a 2 bed terrace for 550k are sweating it listening to Trump. 😂

    C'mon Trump, tariff the hell out of us to crash this pompous economy!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,486 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    I'm pretty positive that they are not as prices are expected to rise by a further 10% this year.

    Even with some tariffs it won't crash the economy and it's odd that you'd want the economy to crash as it would negatively affect either yourself or family and friends.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11 Bookmarker_n


    Won't impact my family. Siblings sitting on price increases of 40-100%.

    Me? Won't impact me. Unless I lose my job, but at this point why bother working when there's no chance of owning a home? Might as well be on the dole and getting HAP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,486 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Not if the economy collapses, they're not looking at those profits, if they lose jobs it will affect them also.

    If you lose your job it will affect you, unless you're earning minimum wage, you would not be better off on the dole and HAP (not even guaranteed). Inflation wouldn't stop immediately, you'd have less money and cost of living continues to increase so you'd be worse off.

    Even if you and no one you knew weren't negatively affected by it (extremely unlikely), hundred of thousands if not multiples more would be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    And exactly that, there is no point in working hard because there is no reward.

    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    This is a very good point. If I were a young man and had the choice of either seeing things continue as they are or having it crash, I would probably take option two and take my chances. Things carrying on as they are means working with no hope of a meaningful life, but option two is at least a shake up.

    Before anyone calls me out on this, I'm not wishing for crash. I do, however, fully understand why someone would.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,298 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Well theres pretty a substantial monetary reward. I know I personally would rather not live on 230euro a week on the dole, it would be a massive downgrade to my life.

    As I'd imagine it would be for almost every working person whos used to a far higher income than that.

    For all the talk of "oh its so much better on the dole, why even work" I guarantee the people saying it have never actually tried living on the dole for long. I graduated into the 2008 recession so got to experience it first hand, and its not fun. You're constantly broke, and constantly having to engage in ridiculous schemes with the department of welfare to get them to keep paying you.

    And the same thing with just giving up and "getting a free house" - waiting lists are 10+ years in most councils these days, so good luck with that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    A year or two ago I tongue-in-cheek suggested pretty much the same thing. Not because it was a good remedy but because government policy will never actually allow prices to reduce significantly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,879 ✭✭✭Villa05


    it's odd that you'd want the economy to crash as it would negatively affect either yourself or family and friends

    As does prices and rents rising at 3 times the rate of inflation, this can cause an economy to crash or will exacerbate a crash when it arrives.

    We had a link to an article earlier that deducted that voters while showing concern about rising prices were not compelled to do anything about it

    I suspect similar feelings are felt by those not benefiting from economy/work

    Looka across the large pond for examples



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    The state will not do anything to arrest house prices and rents. Indeed, it (or rather the people who run it) will do everything to perpetuate growth, consequences be damned.

    Property prices will only fall here when some external situation changes, and the state cannot interfere in the market directly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,937 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Agree with this.

    Also revise property tax in very populated areas like towns and cities, reducing tax for number of occupants.

    Might encourage some to downsize or rent out instead of sitting on partially empty property where each square meter is in high demand .

    People won't have to pay more btw just get a reduction if fully occupied .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭The Student


    There are a sector who the above is very attractive too. I see it all the time where you have "single" mothers in their late twenty's with either two or three children getting their "forever home". With waiting times of ten yrs or so the above would suggest people go on the housing list once they turn 18.

    Why work/better yourself when the benefit system gives you a better standard of living than working/bettering yourself does?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,298 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The maximum Jobseekers rate as of this January is 244euro a week. What exact sort of "better standard of living" do you think you would have on that?

    And why aren't you quitting your job to do it tomorrow and live the better life if its so easy to live the high life on it?

    For housing specifically, there was nothing stopping you going on the housing list yourself at age 18, either. Anyone earning under 40k pa is eligible for it, which presumably you were at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,152 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    If your 2,500pm apartment is paid for via housing subsidies and your dole money is on top of that, plus any other medical cards benefits and so forth; you are afforded a lifestyle that an average single income earner could not afford.

    Ita not a lifestyle I would personally choose, but I sympathise with the unfariness for those working and stuck in their parents box room, with no hope of ever being able to afford to rent their own place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭The Student


    I am not quitting my job because I am working full-time since I was seventeen and have achieved a degree, masters and professional qualifications all while working full-time.

    I was brought up in a working family were you worked rather than rely on welfare. We took any job we could get as we are workers. Always were and always will be.

    I started working full-time in 1988 when the country did not have a pot to piss in and every family had at least one member of their family emigrated looking for work.

    Our welfare system was not as generous then as it is now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    On the flip side though, if you could get a job, it was easier to get started in life. My parents bought a house in Dublin 3 in 1988 when they were in their mid-20s, and they both had very ordinary jobs at the time. Mom wasn't even working full time. The same house today is 700k or so.

    Now I'm not the type to claim that everything back in the past was better because it wasn't. However we should not presume that everything has improved in the last few decades either. Ireland has certainly become more wealthy, but that has brought with it a plethora of other problems, namely the growing inability of younger people to build a life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭spillit67


    There is no need for any incentives or regulations on offices.

    There is nothing being built for completion beyond 2026 in Dublin in terms of offices per JLL.

    https://www.businesspost.ie/news/no-new-office-blocks-schedule-for-completion-beyond-2026-jll-ireland/

    Indeed, given the lead times on new developments of say 36 months or so, a medium sized one in Dublin would likely not be completed until 2028 at this point. It is highly likely we will see a shortage in 2027 as market sentiment again over compensated on the office.

    Notions that the government should stick their oars into commercial like this are misguided and show people have no learned from the residential construction crash where government tinkering in the early 2010s made things worse.

    If the government are to step in with incentives, it should be to be for the conversion of small office spaces into residential (ie returning places like Georgian Dublin to being houses).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,260 ✭✭✭spillit67


    It all comes down to housing costs and security.

    Housing costs have distorted things so much. Indeed you can make a fairly cogent argument that someone on €40k (social housing limit) with their social house is more secure than someone on €100k who is in the rental market.

    I do think 98% do want to work (look at the long term unemployment rate and our demographically skewed disability data and participation rates, there is a number who simply do not want to work). There is definitely a few who do not & don’t get punished for it. Arguably that is the price of living in a society so we have to accept it. I do wish it wasn’t denied by so many people on the left of politics. It is perfectly possible to be left wing and want all of the State intervention under the sun and also acknowledge there will be people taking the piss. They have no issue with calling it out at the other end of the spectrum with the rich, but deny this motivation at the other end of the spectrum. It is a bad way to communicate to the majority imo, the most successful social democratic parties in Europe have historically not shied from it. It seems to be a more modern thing.



Advertisement