Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Luas Finglas

12930313234

Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,229 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Somebody from ABP is in here…..

    Got Decision today from them, out of the blue!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,817 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Maybe Finglas Luas shouldn't swing towards the current airport or ML location - for example if the long term plan is to develop a terminal 3 at Dublin Airport to the west of the main airport apron/runway then the current terminus would be well located to continue north towards a potential T3 versus a terminus that travels further northeast/east



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,631 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    There is no plan to develop Terminal 3 to the West of the airport!

    The land to the West of the airport is owned by a private company who have floated the idea of a Terminal 3 on their land, but it isn't zoned for it and DAA have no interest in it and paying this company hundreds of millions to buy the land.

    Instead DAA are quietly planning to expand capacity of the existing terminals by converting hangers to the North East of the Airport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,774 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Replacing, not converting - Ryanair might be OK with using shed terminals but nobody else is!

    Also replacing cargo and flight kitchen facilities beside T2.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,631 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Yes, good point, wrong word used there, FYI for others reading this, they are going to knock the existing hangers and other facilities in that area and replace them with a new building as an extension of Terminal 1. Also big expansion in the Southern Apron.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,721 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The long term plan is not for a T3 to the west.

    They do plan long term for satellite terminals to the west connected by internal underground people movers to the central area where passengers will enter/exit the airport complex.

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,555 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The land is zoned already for Dublin Airport (not that it would be a problem to overcome regardless). But that's also why its not worth what they keep trying to extort out of the DAA, as they are the only eligible buyers anyway. They keep floating the idea of a private terminal, but they have no right of access to the airport proper so it's just a non-starter.

    I would imagine that if a third terminal is eventually needed that is where they would look to put it, but it is all beyond the time horizon of any official plans.

    Anyway, with regard the topic, it doesn't matter. The luas is far too slow anyway for an airport connection.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 200 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    The Finglas Luas line should have went to the airport. The excuses against it are irellevant. So what if too slow and under capacity. This would only further the case for the Metro.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    are you serious? that glacial joke of a system, for an airport with 34,000,000 passengers through its front doors and 50,000,000 passengers, based on growth of 1.5 million passengers a year, which there would be, if there isnt a big recession and the cap is lifted… before these fools, would ever have that planned, receive permission, that alone is now what? based on metrolink? a five year process… LOL! five year construction easily, so ten years... Also it would cancel metrolink, I strongly reckon, as do others on this forum, that is exactly why they terminated it, where they did…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,687 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    I am convinced many of our infrastructure planners in Ireland never had a train set when they were a kid. 6 year old me, at about 4am one christmas morning figured out that with a hornby trainset, the tracks had to link up for the train to go.

    As someone who used the Luas daily for about 15 years, there is no denying, it is extremely sloooow. Too late now, but it would work so much better with multiple straight lines, rather than the two meandering lines we do have.

    As you said, if the Luas went to the airport, the powers that be would be like "Great, job done. We dont need to look into improving this for 40 years now - well after we're all pensioned off hehehe".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Overall, 2024 was a year of growth despite daa’s effort to dampen demand, with a total of 33.3m passengers through the terminals, a 4% increase on 2023 numbers. Including connecting and other passengers, the total number of passengers using Dublin Airport in 2024 was 34.6m (+3.3% vs 2023). On 171 days of 2024, the airport managed more than 100k passengers a day, demonstrating its operational capacity to manage 36m passengers a year. Given the strong demand for travel in and out of Dublin Airport, daa estimates that overall numbers would have been even higher had it not been for the terminals passenger cap and daa’s initiatives to dampen demand to comply with planning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 303 ✭✭Thunder87


    The obvious extension is along the road to IKEA and connecting to the metro at Ballymun. It ticks the airport box and it's a short, mostly straight extension along a road with a verge along much of the alignment so shouldn't even be all that complex or expensive

    https://maps.app.goo.gl/9yy4Sv7JEEEbRfMf6?g_st=ac

    Post edited by Thunder87 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,247 ✭✭✭Daith


    Yeah, I think connecting to the Metro is the best option. It would be nice to have one connection to some non bus transport to the Airport that means you don't have to go to the city centre.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,443 ✭✭✭VonLuck


    Makes complete sense. I do wonder how they would squeeze it in along some stretches of that road though. The Luas might have to share the road with vehicular traffic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Truthfully unless a third terminal is built, which I can't see happening in my lifetime, I don't think it make sense to extend Luas Finglas to the airport. Even if Luas Finglas was extended to the current airport, I think most passengers would rather switch to ML before getting to the airport rather than taking the Luas the entire way. In general I think ML and the DART airport link would be the preferred option for most passengers, either directly or by transfering from another mode of transport.

    The area where I could see a direct Luas as a better alternative is between ML and the northern line, and north of the canal. But that isn't an area that could feasibly be served by Luas Finglas, and would likely have to be a branch of extension of the Luas Balgriffin concept.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 754 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Metro West should be considered here as well, which was planned to connect to Metro North at Dardistown. Luas Finglas could simply connect to Metro West at Meakstown.

    You could also continue Metro West to connect with Clongriffin instead of building a heavy rail spur. You could then consider extending Luas Finglas all the way to Ashbourne.

    That's an extra 13 to 14km through green fields with only one intermittent stop (at most) really needed. It could be done in 15 to 18 minutes given the 70kmh top speed of the Luas trams.

    7c4fe3f89d33f8a3d5346f1f4487192c-289576286.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭gjim


    consider extending Luas Finglas all the way to Ashbourne

    Oh god no. The urgent need is for public transport capacity in Dublin - not in green fields in county Meath. Ashbourne has a motorway link - a frequent shuttle bus link would offer superior service at a fraction of the cost. The expense of trams or metro-like infrastructure should be reserved for high density routes - not for traversing farms and fields in the countryside.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭PlatformNine


    To clarify, I think Luas Finglas should still be extended, just not all the way to the airport. I quite like the idea of extended Luas Finglas to the Northwood station, and I think after ML is complete it should be considered, as it would be a good connection for northwest dublin to have. And I would have to check, but I believe the plan is to develop a lot of high density housing around the Northwood station, so having a connection between that area and Charlestown SC could help reduce the number of local car journies. I am not sure of what a timeline for this could look like, but for a relatively simple 2-3km extension I think it could be delivered in a short time frame and sooner than we might think. The idea just needs to be picked up by TII, and more importantly they need to make sure an alignment is saved.

    I also think what I said above makes the connection specifically to Northwood important, especially compared to connecting it to MetroWest. I have a lot of thoughts about MetroWest, but this isn't really the place to discuss that. However an extension to Luas Finglas to Northwood doesn't make it connecting with a MW Meakstown stations impossible, it just wouldn't be as good of a connection (about 100m apart).

    Additionally, I will say. There is no good reason for sending a Luas/tram to Ashbourne. It is too slow and too urban centric of a transit system to be sent through 13-14km of green fields, our Luas lines, as lite-metro as they may be, are still designed for urban areas. Ashbourne will likely need a better connection to Dublin given its size and growth over the past 10-20 years, but that wont be as a Luas. If it ever does recieve a rail connection it would likely be as part of greater metro NW project, with an over ground section running along the M2. For any transit system to compete with private car traffic in Ashbourne, it needs to be able to get to at least the M50 reasonably quickly. That realistically means top speeds of at least 100km/h through those green fields and a Luas just won't do that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 754 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Agreed on Northwood. The connection to Charlestown would be very valuable.

    On Ashbourne, to be clear, I don't have a strong opinion on it, just throwing out an idea. The difference between 15 minutes on Luas (to the M50) versus sub-10 minutes on 'something else' is somewhat inconsequential if the M50 to CC section cannot be made faster, which is unlikely in the medium term.

    I'm v surprised to see how big Ashbourne is. Almost 16k people at last census and growing by 20-30% every 5years!! It will need some connection at some point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,017 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Ashbourne will not grow by 20-30% every 5 years if a closer TOD is built.
    Build an area near Charlestown SC close to quality transport links with high density accommodation and Ashbourne won’t grown at that rate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,359 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    If extending Luas Finglas, I think it would be better to follow along Melville Road to get to St. Margaret's Road. Melville Road has industrial estates along one side which would be much easier to take space from that than residential units. The industrial sites may also be redeveloped in the future so better have the Luas beside it than

    We should forget about Metro West, it isn't happening for the foreseeable future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,017 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    If you want PT to bypass the M50 and provide an alternative, then metro west needs to be built.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,359 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Not for this thread but no, Metro West is not the only option. A public transport only bridge linking to bus lanes on either side of the Liffey, articulated buses and modest enough bus infrastructure improvements would do the same job at a fraction of the price.

    The R113 and R136 on the south side and R121 and R843 north of the N3 have long unobstructed bus lanes, it wouldn't be hard to connect it all up and have multiple high capacity, high frequency bus routes operating across the same bridge and linking with BusConnects Spines serving practically all of west Dublin. The area is outer urban/suburban with a mix of residential, commercial, industrial and recreational sites spread over a vast area, it needs large coverage of multiple routes, it can't be served by a single corridor. Further Metro efforts have to connect higher density areas with the city centre.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,247 ✭✭✭Daith


    Its a pity there's no bus link from Ashbourne to Broombridge for the Luas and Dart.

    And it's a pity there's only the 40e, running every 30 mins from Finglas to Broombridge at the moment too.

    There is a new bus service scheduled from Finglas, but it will go down the dual corridor to Broombridge. If it went through Finglas West and South and then to Broombridge, it could offer a good connection alternative than waiting for the Luas to be extended



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 754 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    It may be outer suburban but over 300k people live on the corridor between Tallaght and Blanch. This broad area is relatively high density with 3000 per sqkm despite significant green areas and industrial.

    It has 3x major centers in Tallaght, Lucan and Blanch. A Metro West line would intersect with 2x Dart lines, the Red Luas and future Lucan Luas. The potential of this corridor is enormous and shouldn't be underestimated.

    I agree though - an essential first step should be a proper public transport corridor for buses with a new bridge over the Liffey.

    ***Is there a Metro West thread we can reignite?!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,017 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    yeah agreed, the problem is to link these roads up you would have to go through Castleknock Golf course and Luttrelstown golf course.

    We need a new thread to discuss this or the old metro west thread!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,774 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Opening some space for residential developments and public parkland isn't a bad idea…



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,323 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    This thread is for Luas Finglas and I think it’s very clear because of the specification of light rail that Ashbourne should not be served by an Luas extension. The only two viable options are to leave Luas Finglas as it is or extend it to Northwood.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Lads could you have initially, later to be turned into rail, that would initially to take buses and maybe lorries off the m50, followed by a metro west system later usimg the road. Linking the n7 and airport...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,774 ✭✭✭✭L1011




Advertisement