Conor McGregor Megathread *Mod Warning in OP Updated 20th April*

Ok - I was judging her based on a past case in relation to ptsd and past relationships. Maybe this was not the best approach for an argument. There is plenty wrong with this case without having to go back further.

But my point stands that there are plenty of inconsistencies in this case from her side and speculating on the jury’s decision should not warrant name calling and quite frankly just being outright rude while attempting to shutdown any discussion.

And posters are free to check how extreme your early posts are. You've toned it down because you know it comes across terribly. You have developed a strong opinion of Hand based on what amounts to rumours which you've read on God knows where.

Sample of one of your earlier posts which isn't exactly you just asking questions below.

He's an embarrassment to his family at this point and she's not much better. I wouldn't class her a hero smashing bags of coke on two day benders leaving her kid and now ex partner behind sending seductive photos to celebrities who she friends with threw Dee's side of the family. I'm sure everyone here disagrees with my feelings but sure look we all have our own opinions.

McGrregor’s actions since the trial have been DARVO. A well established set of behaviours of offenders.
Deny

Accuse

Reverse Victim and Offender

He thought he had absolute impunity to act any way he pleased. He is finding out now that civil law is a lot different to criminal law. The slow wheels of the Gardaí and DPP aren’t turning here to hold him to account.
While the damages he has to pay and any legal fees are a pittance to him what he can’t handle to being told he is wrong and being told what to do by the Court. He can’t shout at a judge, or roast them on Twitter (again) and trust his heavies to have his back and make it all go away.
No doubt his lawyers would have told him to settle with Nikita before this came to Court to avoid exactly what is happening now. He thought he’d win the case and a jury of his peers would side with him. But when you’ve surrounded yourself with snow blowers and sycophants for a decades, you forget the rest of society is out there too who don’t adore you.
Journalists have been waiting for years for the truth about him to be in the public domain. They can write what they want about him now as what ‘good name’ can he claim in a defamation now?

What you need to do is first understand the basics of what you are trying to talk about. "Seriousness" in the context of a civil trial relates only to the damage caused and for which you have a metric in the form of monetary damages. The purpose of the civil action is merely to compensate you for that damage. It is agnostic as to whether I knocked down your boundary wall between our gardens with a JCB costing 50k to fix, or whether I knocked you off your bike causing you to be out of work for a year. The damages are not a "punishment" in a civil context.

In relation to your "murder", that language pertains to a criminal charge. If you cause the death of a person you could be taken to a civil court and held civilly liable for that death you caused. If you would like a recent example of this, a certain barrister who shot a man was recently acquitted of both murder and manslaughter. However he is facing civil actions from the deceased's partner and also at least one other person who happened to be present at the time.

He'll have been looking for tips off Trump, Hegseth, RFK Jr, Musk, Guilfoyle and McMahon. What a time to be a sex pest!

There's GOT to be a position for Tate somewhere there. Wonder when they will attempt to flee to the US

A lot of Yanks think he will be the next president of Ireland. The poor feckers haven't a clue how it works over here😂

https://www.instagram.com/mcgregorfansclub_/reel/DFExrvMhy-N/

McGregor thinks he'll be president also it seems unless hes off his biscuit here talkin nonsense.

He'll do anything to avoid fighting again

Off topic, but I can't see CMcG running for President.

If, as reported in the media, that he got agitated under cross examination, what would he be like with 24/7 scrutiny? The rules and decorum of the HC wouldn't apply.

I look into the distance and think, is that 'men in white coats' on the horizon I see?

Is good to see that he went our and bought a suit that fits and is not two or three sizes too small

Well, yes, there have been people found guilty of murder, on the balance of probabilities, in a civil court.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-37504674

"In June 2009, Liam Campbell and Real IRA leader Michael McKevitt were two of four men found liable for the atrocity.

The civil action was brought by relatives of some of the 29 people killed in the 1998 bombing in the County Tyrone town.

The relatives were awarded £1.6m in damages.

No-one has ever been convicted of murder in relation to the car bomb."

I think Ian Paisley Jr. would be just as likely.

I think US immigration only look at convictions rather than civil cases and you'd be a brave immigration officer to block his entry on his way to Trump's inauguration.

Hopefully Irish immigration can block his return

Who's going to vote for a convicted rapist? Even most of his former fans from his UFC days have abandoned him. No one wants to be associated with utter filth like McGregor.