Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1867868870872873943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    "Government decisions have been beyond stupid over the last 5-10 years. Every single decision has driven up house prices"

    The policies of the state were not stupid. They were aimed at doing precisely what they have done; driving up property and rent prices. Be under no illusion that any of this was an accident. A system is what it does, not what it's said to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,702 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    One hundred percent! Lets look at some of the big advantages of immigration, from a government perspective… Look like they are doing the morally right thing? CHECK! bringing in cheap labour ? CHECK Driving up property prices? CHECK Creating 1.8 billion euro for their mates in high places… CHECK

    "Earlier this year, a Business Post investigation found that more than 800 companies and businesses were paid €1.8 billion by the government to provide accommodation and other services to Ukrainians and those in Ipas…"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,702 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Get your 3rd level education or trade here, live abroad, for several reasons, have a bit of a laugh, then get the head down, earn far higher salaries than you would here and pay far less tax, as a mid to high earner. If you do want to settle, you come back to the banana republic and simply buy a place outright…

    I was out on saturday chatting to my mates younger brother, (going to hopefully graduate this summer) he gets E14 an hour, thats for a 12 hour shift, including working saturdays… If he stays living in dublin, lets say E800 rent for houseshare, E200 bills… OR you go to mini ireland in the sun, have a phenomenal life experience, earn far more money and have a far higher standard of living and life…

    You know exactly what you are getting if you stay in Ireland… dont act shocked..



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,619 Mod ✭✭✭✭spockety


    Hmm, I'm not sure if you're being funny or not.

    You do realize that the kind of supports that allow someone who can only afford a 250k home to in fact buy a home for 350k has a knock on impact the entire way up the market?

    It's not that it enables a buyer to buy a 600k property, it's that it distorts what 600k would buy you.

    Post edited by spockety on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,856 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    That isn't an artificial support. It's money passed to younger generations by those that worked and earnt it.

    Nothing wrong with supporting your family.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,856 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The bank lending caps are 4 x salary for first time buyers and 3.5 for 2nd buyers.

    Not unreasonable lending levels in fairness.

    House prices are impacted by the net wealth of the nation, which has never been higher and now stands at over a trillion euro.

    The number of households earning 100k or more doubled in 2 years, from 2022 to 2024 and will be approaching 400 thousand households now.

    A lot of people have a lot of spending power.

    Couple this with low housing supply & strong job creation and of course you will see house prices rise in desirable areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,856 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    So the subsidy does not enable the buyer to purchase the 600k home then.

    It might push the price of said home from 500k to 600k, but it does not help the purchaser buy the property; meaning they can afford to pay it anyway.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,619 Mod ✭✭✭✭spockety


    I'm not sure what point you're making.

    If you can't see that market interference in one segment of the market impacts what happens in a different segment of the same market in a slightly different way, then I don't know what to say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,856 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    If HTB and other subsidies didnt exist lower down the market, the asking price for the 600k home would probably be a little cheaper; lets say 500k to 550k.

    However, there are still only 50 3 beds in the area and there are still 100 buyers wanting to move to the area and they are all still capable of paying 600k+.

    The removal of subsidies lower down the chain doesnt impact the 100 buyers budget in the slightest.

    The 500k home is still going to sell for near 600k, potentially even higher, regardless of the reduded asking price, because thats what the market can afford to pay.

    We see plenty examples of houses going 100k plus above asking and these buyers are receiving no govt supports.

    If you want to bring prices down and in the absence of reduced demand, increased supply is the only answer.

    In our example, if there were 100 homes for the 100 buyers and the homes were priced at 500k to 550k, they would be much more likely to sell at that price, not the 600k we see when there are only 50 homes available for purchase.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,856 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Old KBC headquarters in D2 is also being turned into IPA accommodation it seems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 738 ✭✭✭GalwayGaillimh


    I see in the new program for government the Shared Equity Scheme is going to be expanded to second hand homes surely surely this will make prices for second hand apartments and homes jump , should be called the help to outbid scheme…

    Si Deus Nobiscum Qui Contra Nos



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd




  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    But no doubt you'll still get plenty of people arguing that these schemes are not inflationary, not least the housing minister.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I have argued that the existing buyer supports have minimal inflationary impact (indeed any reasonable analysis of the numbers would almost guarantee this).

    I think this will undoubtedly be inflationary simply as it will be possible to apply to a vastly higher proportion of houses than any of the existing schemes. I’m on the fence on the schemes to date, probably marginally in favour of them in the round (particularly HTB, more neutral on FHS)…even I think this decision is a bad one!



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I wasn't targeting you with the comment, despite our disagreement on the point! There are plenty of people who argue the supports are not inflationary. Importantly, IMO, both Central Bank and ESRI have published analysis that the existing supports are inflationary, so I'd disagree with the statement "any reasonable analysis" would guarantee they are not inflationary.

    Over and above that arguement to date, these extensions perfectly illustrate my problem with the supports from day one - the initial introduction of 30k HTB was just the the thin end of the wedge. Once govt starts supporting the market, it is next to impossible to wean the market off the support.

    Hence extending HTB instead of credit for tax paid to credit for rent paid etc, and FHS to second hand homes.

    And the extensions will continue, as the more they are extended, the more inflationary they become, and the more support that is required. It is a vicious circle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Why not keep going and say that someone on the dole is paying tax every time they buy something in the economy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Ozvaldo


    Immigration has resulted in prices going through the roof and the hopes of lots of local people are gone aswell as social cohesion-thanks to the government



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,856 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Someone working for an MNC is working and paying income tax.

    Someone on the dole is not working and paying no income tax.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,856 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    We need more housing for everyone, which is happening slowly, as we see the number of new homes built increase.

    We also need more workers to fill the jobs and there is nothing stopping local people upskilling and getting a higher paid job to move themselves onto the housing ladder.

    Its not as it the opportunites arent there for people. Funding for education is available as well.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I think this will undoubtedly be inflationary simply as it will be possible to apply to a vastly higher proportion of houses than any of the existing schemes.

    Thinking about this a little further I suspect it may not be a case of blanket extension across all second hand homes in same price brackets as existing scheme. It may be phased in for more recent builds or transactions.

    Eg - it applies to any property built since 2019.

    From governments point of view this can achieve the main objective of ensuring prices paid since 2019 are supported somewhat and also allows some argument that the scheme is not inflationary.

    It also provides further room to expand scheme as and when required.

    Will certainly be interesting to see the details.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Does anyone have a link confirming this commitment by the new (same) government. Can't find it on RTE website



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,078 ✭✭✭dasdog


    It's on page 43

    https://cdn.thejournal.ie/media/2025/01/draft-pfg-0fe27752-8d6e-4a16-945d-c8bdbf98088b.pdf

    First Home Scheme

    • Work with the banks to expand the First Home scheme to first time buyers of second-hand homes.

    • Extend the scheme to 2030.

    • Increase the First Home scheme targets in keeping with the increase in starter home targets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,702 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Honesty, if you can get social housing, the fortune you are going to lose, housing yourself any other way, is very questionable...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Social housing in Ireland is a system that's well beyond the point of being maladaptive. It was all well and good when it was about clearing tenements, but that's now decades in the past.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Id be suprised if this was the case purely due it creating confusion and complexity.

    They’ll say the price limits prevent inflation but that won’t be true. The price limits exclude the majority of new builds purely because there’s so little variability in pricing by region for new builds.
    Sure many second hand homes will also be excluded but nowhere near as many percentage wise (and it’s a far bigger pool to start with). It’s a really poor decision (in my opinion of course) and think it could cause significant harm but let’s see.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Perhaps I'm just being over cynical. Will look forward to seeing the details



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,037 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Maybe Donald trumps department of external revenue will pour cold water on these proposals, I'd doubt it though. Governments sole function appears to be to push up house prices, rents, energy and health care regardless of the cost to the state/economy



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Harris seems confident Trump's plans can be overcome with a bit of flattery and horsetrading. Another threat might not be quite so easily influenced:

    Leading pharmaceutical and IT companies have said they will quit Ireland if a proposed ban on so-called forever chemicals is introduced.

    Pfizer, Intel and other major employers are among firms that have sent warnings to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), which is considering the ban jointly proposed by Germany, Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden and Norway.

    Pfizer pharmaceuticals in Ringaskiddy, Co Cork, wrote that a total ban “would severely threaten the viability of this sector”.

    “Investment would more likely flow to outside the EU, where no such ban is applicable, such as to the USA or Singapore,” it said.

    Intel Ireland, a major part of Intel’s global IT operations, said the ability to continue operating in the EU “would simply not be possible”.

    The ECHA called for submissions on the proposal, but curiously the relevant department here decided not make a submission:

    The Department of Enterprise, which oversees chemicals regulations in Ireland, said it had made no submission to the ECHA on Ireland’s behalf.

    Perhaps Dept of Enterprise has found itself between a rock and a hard place.

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/top-pharmaceutical-and-it-companies-threaten-to-quit-ireland-if-ban-on-forever-chemicals-is-introduced/a490981537.html



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,464 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Extending first home to 2nd hand properties is insanity. Creating more demand for scarce sources of anything 100% of the time leads to higher prices. Then we are looking at more salary increases trying to meet them, inflation you cant shift, we are in grave danger of heating up the economy past the point of no return.

    What'll we see this year another 10% rise? Its completely unsustainable



Advertisement
Advertisement