The Truth: The Mathematical Proof of God, The Holy Trinity

Numerology and its its cognitive ilk is a natural human tendency to find meaningful patterns in the world around us, lending itself to beliefs in conspiracy and supernatural agency. The overall cognitive tendency is called apophenia. All of us are prone to it, some more than others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apophenia

But by definition such a designer (should one exist) exists outside our universe and is unknown, and unknowable, to us.

A deistic creator is at least kind of plausible. A theistic creator is not.

I already did.

Ah, here.  My whole point concerns acknowledging that coincidences that prove consistent and coherent should be acknowledged, but that they exist through the natural act of cognition. For materialists and naturalists, the world and its mysteries – in the end - have perfectly natural and rational explanations, i.e., rooted in natural rather than supernatural explanations (rather than physicalists - you can be a scientist and use this empirical process, and still have supernatural beliefs). The humility here is that mysteries remaining are simply those that can’t be figured out by our limited minds, rather than resorting to the ‘The God of the gaps’. This is simply psychological faith in there being only a natural world, and not a supernatural one (faith, rather than Faith). The onus on naturalists to explain the way the world happens to be is much harder than for those that don’t subscribe to the metaphysical principle of Occam’s Razor, because otherwise the typical trump card, such as in theism, is the soothing balm of explaining how everything mysterious and inexplicable is explainable -  as “God did it”. It is soothing to think that mere mortals can never comprehend the real reasons behind actions that deities could have prevented, as Job’s story preaches, but that's a psychological need, not a metaphysical fact.

Confusion and doubt can thus be assuaged. Finding proof in numerology is not proof of deities - only a repetition of Aeschylus’ observation well over 2000 years ago: "The man who seeks for God, finds him." You see what you want to see. Cognition does the rest as imagination, and a fear of the death of an imaginary soul.

Does your first statement not self contradictory "the one true god" which then changes to 3 !

You're now just doing that all to common circular reasoning that people of faith do. It means nothing to anyone but people of your faith. It's just bad logic.

I'll give you an example to show you what I mean and the absurdity of the logic you are using.

Person of faith: 'Theres a cat living on Mars who created the earth and humanity, he's called The Great Purr-ator'

Skeptic: 'How do you know this?'

Person of Faith: 'Because thousands of years ago, The Great Purr-ator left us an amazing book, it describes how he created us and our meaning on this earth'

Skeptic: 'But how do you know the book he left us is true and not just made up gibberish?'

Person of faith: I know it is true because it was written by the Great Purr-ator'

Skeptic: 'But how do you know The Great Purr-ator is real, lives on Mars and created humanity?'

Person of Faith: 'Because thousands of years ago, The Great Purr-ator left us an amazing book, it describes how he created us and our meaning on this earth'

Ad nauseum. Round and round we go in circles, with no actual proof outside of your faith. It's meaningless.