Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Cork Airport - *Read Mod Note in First Post Before Posting*

1168169171173174177

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59 ✭✭whispering1


    Runway in Cork Airport closed until 16 30. 3 incoming planes diverted to Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Plenty of diversions today. Airport remains closed. Faro flight diverted to Knock 😅



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,752 Mod ✭✭✭✭yerwanthere123


    Was very surprised to see that! That must be extremely rare right? Have only ever seen Cork planes diverted to either Shannon or Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,688 ✭✭✭Acosta


    That might well be a first. I've never heard of it happening. Was up near the airport earlier. A ridiculous amount of snow around the place up there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭Captainsatnav




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,648 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Istanbul would be a great addition given Turkish Airlines' ever growing global network. They've recently added Sydney and Melbourne which would definitely help make the case from Cork. One stop from Cork to Australia would be quite the draw.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 710 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    Lisbon and Madrid just seem like such small easy wins. Although I’m sure if the numbers stacked up they’d be served already



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 400 ✭✭Frostybrew


    Article also mentions adding a new pier and new gates to the southern side of the terminal, to facilitate capacity expansion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,497 ✭✭✭Curb Your Enthusiasm


    Turkish and JetBlue feeding into their respective hubs would be a game changer.

    AL seem to have given up on ORK. When they're adding services, they're removing others. Total joke.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,778 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    5 year time horizons, as mentioned in the article, are worthless. The airport has been 5 years away from long haul hub connectivity for the last 25 years.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 124 ✭✭TheBrownBird32


    4 years ago the management were saying they would have a transatlantic route secured within 3 years. Today they’re still saying 3 years🥴



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,951 ✭✭✭thomil


    It seems like transatlantic routes are the nuclear fusion of Cork Airport - Always three years away, regardless of the year…😶

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 178 ✭✭Astral Nav


    Good news if they get THY in. Re the Atlantic, highly unlikely. The runway is too short. It's been discussed elsewhere. Any existing aircraft is going to be payload limited on most days and that is not profitable, even more so with a second Minster airport up the road with decent TA routes and an impending motorway to it. Cork airport has been at the trying TA game for years. They got Norwegian in but only by lobbying in the US for the airline to get some beneficial treatment on all US flights (they were using Thailand based contracts for crew, go figure). This irritated the rest of the main stream airline industry and pilots and then it was ended because of the aforementioned payload/runway length issues, or maybe just used as a wedge for the previous and then abandoned, who knows? Either way, helped drive down crew working conditions at the time and get an economic advantage over other carriers but still ended up with no TA routes. Why would anybody want them to get another TA operation?

    Post edited by Astral Nav on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,778 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Globespan were Knock not Cork right? As far as I remember Norweigan were being touted as the first transatlantic carrier to operate from Cork.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 178 ✭✭Astral Nav




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,951 ✭✭✭thomil


    Oh jeez, where to even start with that?

    The Norwegian operation ended because the airline as a whole was beginning to collapse, simple as. They had overextended themselves with their massive expansion of operations all over Europe, not just their transatlantic operations. It’s worth remembering that the airline had gone from 46 aircraft in 2009 to 166 aircraft by the end of 2019, placing massive orders for both the Boeing 737 MAX8, Boeing 787 Dreamliner and Airbus A321, all financed by loans. They started flying long haul not just from Oslo, which was their home market, or from Ireland, but also from Germany, France, the UK, and other European countries. Ireland was actually just a small part of their operation That’s what eventually broke the airline once the loan costs started eating into the profits, with Norwegian operating at a loss from 2017 onwards despite ever increasing revenue.

    This wasn’t helped by the grounding of the 737 MAX8 following crashes in Kenya and Indonesia, which robbed Norwegian of its workhorse for the Irish transatlantic operation and a lot of its other long range narrow-body operations. Norwegian tried to keep the operation going with regular 737-800s, but that just wasn’t going to work out as while the -800 could operate transatlantic from Cork, it suffered massive payload penalties compared to the MAX8, which was able to operate out of Cork with minimal restrictions. Eventually, with the debt situation escalating and the MAX8 not likely to fly again anytime soon, Norwegian pulled the plug first on its CEO and then on its Irish transatlantic operations in 2019. One year later, in 2020, they were down from 166 aircraft to just 7. They’re back up to around 87 aircraft now and are raking in the cash, but have given up on long haul.

    As for Cork not being able to handle long-haul aircraft, including the new A321LR or XLR, I just don’t buy that. Will it suffer payload restrictions? Yes, but that’s not exactly unusual, as most modern aircraft cannot actually take off with both a full load of passengers/cargo and a full load of fuel. That exceeds their Maximum Take-Off Weight by a considerable margin. Given how little business Cork seems to be doing with underfloor cargo, we should expect even transatlantic flights to be quite a bit below their MTOW, given that any aircraft will “only” have to carry passengers and luggage. The bigger question is how a Cork flight would fit into a prospective airline’s business plan, which is the real wild card here. The only airlines I can see as prospective candidates for Cork would have to have a strong presence on the US East Coast and have the A321neo or A321LR either on order or in their fleet, whilst also not being tied into an alliance with Aer Lingus. That really only leaves Delta and JetBlue. Yes, the latter has a codeshare agreement with EI, but that’s still way less restrictive than being members of the same alliance.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,648 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    The rumours of Delta serving Cork in 2020 with a 757 that got scuppered by Covid were probably the best shot Cork ever would have at a decent transatlantic service. The 757 is an excellent aircraft on short runways and would have been up to the job but alas the youngest 757s in the world turn 21 this year so it's unlikely at this stage.

    The A321LR was struggling to Washington off Dublin's runway which is nearly 500m longer than Cork's. Cork-US on a A321LR is not happening.

    The only realistic solution to getting handy US access from Cork is here: http://www.corklimerick.ie.

    Shannon being an hour away is good for Cork and good for Shannon. If Shannon was easily accessible to Cork it'd make the US routes more viable and may help increase routes and frequencies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,778 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Not a huge fan of using Cork to subsidise long haul routes for Shannon. The M20 will significantly increase competition between the airports and using Cork's pax to promote a rivals long haul could threaten short haul (particularly hub) viability. Keep in mind that this isn't just Transatlantic, for example, a post M20 daily Emirates flight at Shannon would be a major threat to the beleaguered Cork Amsterdam service.

    I would rather the airport fulfil its remit and get the best possible deal for the region it's supporting. That means either having a realistic strategy for long haul that includes a business case for extending the runway or accepting the limitations of the current infrastructure and refocus the apparently considerable long haul route negotiation efforts to European hubs, including Dublin, for connections. People driving from Cork to Shannon instead of transferring at London, Amsterdam or potentially Dublin is bad for the airport.

    Post edited by snotboogie on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,913 ✭✭✭lisasimpson


    Look the M20 won't impact Cork too much. The Shannon authority is more interested in developing its property portfolio rather than the airport. They are v poor in promoting and marketing the airport compared to Cork and any promotion only seem interested in transatlantic

    Cork will continue to thrive even if the M20 is eventually built. Istanbul would be a great win for the airport I'd they got it. So many possibilities from it as a hub



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    There’s no hope of transatlantic with that runway. Extending it by 500m would open up a world of possibilities and would be worth the massive investment required



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 211 ✭✭TheBetsy


    I don't understand why they keep saying every three years that transatlantic is three years away, but never once have they suggested the infrastructure is not there for it. You would have to assume they are acutely aware of their own limitations, so why not make that publicly know? The more you shout about it the more likely you are to get backing and support. None of these useless articles even question management on why they keep pushing out the three years or never raise the point that the best aircraft for the job (A321LR) are actually not capable of getting off Corks runway with a full load.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    On a slightly related point, the airport also has other shortcomings which act as a little "push" to send passengers to Dublin.

    For instance local connectivity. I'd love if they spent some time lobbying for good transport integration to/from the airport. You can't make 0600 flights using public transport, most people can't get home from late flights using public transport. It's a small thing but it counts. The bus link (their only public transport link) has a 30 minute frequency which is NOT proposed to be upgraded for Bus Connects. Yes I know most of us drive and taxi's are usually available, but a lot of the most price-conscious passengers are hopping on buses to Dublin Airport. Cork Airport is basically putting a 20-40 euro tax on these passengers, which, with a bit of lobbying could be massively subsidised by the local bus network.

    Further afield, there's CityLink buses going from Galway and Limerick to Cork Airport, but again they're very limited. There's no link in from Waterford or Kerry, which are often Cork Airport users.

    It's not like this will make or break the airport, but it's just another "push" factor to Dublin airport: for that 0600 flight (the connector to London or Schiphol) you can get to Dublin Airport from Cork City centre for around the same price as it costs to get to Cork Airport. That's just stupid. For people with less disposable income and more time, they're uncompetitive. And nobody even mentions it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭PreCocious


    I think that Transatlantic is a red-herring. It's the only thing journalists and politicos bother asking about. If they were serious about the airport they'd be asking/demanding better land connectivity (as mentioned above), better connectivity to non-holiday destinations and a more regular schedule rather than the way Ryanair slots in Cork flights as a top or tail to leverage plane usage. (The flight to X goes on a Monday at 09:00, every second Wednesday at 17:00 (except when that Wednesday is the first Wednesday) and Saturday at 23:54).

    When we had TA people moaned because it wasn't to the right spot in the US and anyway pre-clearance is a major bonus for Shannon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,688 ✭✭✭Acosta


    If there was regular transatlantic services, they wouldn't be long building a pre clearance facility. And once it's there, it would be another carrot to wave in front of an airline that might be interested in Cork.

    Whatever about the debate about the runway length, if a flight to New York can operate, it will do well.

    The place needs more all year round European non sun destinations more than anything. But that doesn't mean they shouldn't be exploring routes to the East Coast of America, or anywhere else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,778 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    To be fair it’s not just journalists who bring this up, the airport have repeatedly trumpeted their efforts for long haul and went as far as reporting to the media on an agreed upon route that never started. It does not seem like a red herring to the people running the airport.

    On one hand I can understand their point, it’s an easy way to get likes to say that Cork should focus on European non sun routes or “connectivity to European capitals” (not having a go at you, I mentioned this too) it’s a whole other thing to identify which routes could actually support 5 times+ per week connections year round. That’s the enduring allure of New York and Boston and possibly Abu Dhabi, Doha and Philadelphia. That and the diversification from Ryanair and the spend associated with passengers who take these flights. Realistically TAP and Iberia would be 6 flights a week combined seasonally, JetBlue or Delta have the potential the be 15+ per week year round.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 951 ✭✭✭lordleitrim


    Is there a bit of too much projection from a certain number of posters here about preferred new direct routes from ORK? They keep going on about or almost mocking the abundance of sun routes but if that is where and what the demand consistently is for, then the airlines are going to facilitate that. They don't launch routes or add frequencies to places with the intention of them failing. They obviously have research that says the sun routes are where the masses of the ORK catchment area want to go above anywhere else such as Doha or Philadelphia or Abu Dhabi.

    So criticising the existing or yet to commence airlines for not flying to where you want to go and scoffing or groaning at additional frequencies to Malaga or Lanzarote etc is kind of pointless if their market research shows there is less demand or profit for your wish list routes.

    I'm not saying it's wrong to have a wish list or such routes should never happen if there is actual demand and viability,just that it's wrong to condemn the airlines for not flying there just because you and a few others that like your posts want to fly there and hence it should therefore be viable. That's a very flawed assumption.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,778 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    On the routes you quoted me on, the assumption is that the routes aren’t viable because the airports infrastructure can’t support it. On the sun routes, I was responding directly to another poster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,101 ✭✭✭Pen Rua


    A US preclearance facility would almost never be needed / built at Cork. I think there are just over a dozen pre-clearance facilities (majority in Canada) and Ireland already has 2. It's not something the Dept of Homeland Security just seem to go about building willy-nilly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I think your post is slightly mischaracterised. There's a difference in people's heads because some of the "sun routes" (let's both call it that) add little economic value outside of the direct flight itself. It's an amenity for Cork locals and it keeps airport numbers up, but it doesn't bring back tourism, investment, workers, etc and doesn't offer onward connectivity. It's a "final destination" only. A flight to Iceland would be similar.

    Some "sun routes" are very different though: Lisbon can be valuable for connections to South America, Barcelona is a major economic and population area etc.

    So people aren't being disparaging of the users of the "sun routes", just that people in this thread are desiring destinations that offer more than just Cork passenger direct destinations. For instance it's a shame that we can do Faro year round (sometimes with two carriers) but can't get Lisbon.

    TLDR: it's not the "sun" aspect that people are turning their noses up at, that's why I think your post is slightly mischaracterised.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,688 ✭✭✭Acosta


    As there's already an existing agreement between both countries, I would imagine there would be a lot of lobbying for one in Cork. Probably only if a route or two established itself over a long period of time.

    Either way, I doubt it would be a deal breaker for most people who would be happy to travel out of Cork to New York or Boston.



Advertisement