Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Cork Airport - *Read Mod Note in First Post Before Posting*

  • 27-04-2015 1:49pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭denhaagenite


    Keeping the thread title general so that the topic is broad. I questioned the closing of the last thread and didn't get a satisfactory answer so I've decided to open a new one.

    It is no secret that the airport is withering because of huge unnecessary debt that was supposed to have been forgiven and rerouting of important flights to seemingly business oriented destinations. It's my suspicion that the DAA and the government are in cahoots about this, trying to deter any new business in Cork to retain business in Dublin and encourage more business to the West. This may serve to improve the West which I don't begrudge, however, it should not and cannot be done to the detriment of another region.

    In the same vein as the Save Cork Airport Facebook page (which I am not affiliated with), what can be done about this? As a Cork person living in another European city which is roughly the same population wise, but with a functioning airport I can't understand what the reasoning is. There is enough business for the whole bl**dy country, major hubs need to work together and not against eachother. Dublin is basically at capacity and the rest of the country is empty. Hospitals, schools etc etc are being shut down everywhere and centralised because there are simply not enough people.

    I firmly believe that the situation with the airport is nothing but a symptom of a much larger problem. What can be done in order to connect Cork with Europe and furthermore, the rest of the world? Many multinational companies deem Cork a fit place to do business, why are the Government allowing the DAA to block further development? There is a petition here for months now, why is it not even at 3000 signatures when the Facebook page has almost 25,000 likes?


    Mod Note: I have been asked to reopen this thread as a result of the recent news about Aer Lingus. I reopen it reluctantly, as I expect to have to deal with spats again and people with their own agendas pushing other airports etc. Let's be clear, this thread is about CORK AIRPORT and the future of CORK AIRPORT and nothing else so, please, if you want to discuss other airports then go somewhere else. I'll be watching this thread closely. Bans which were given out originally to some posters still apply so please do not post here again unless you want a complete forum ban (you know who you are). Now, let's play nice everybody.


«134567102

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,996 ✭✭✭two wheels good


    I went to read the petition and found a pretty photo of wild garlic and a caption saying "Save Cork Airport".

    I share your concern but frankly, an online petition or facebook likes will do little to prod the politicians into action.

    Instead why not email your TDs or councillors and demand some action.
    I wish I could think some specific action to demand. Maybe other posters could suggest actions - that are permitted under EU competition law.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭denhaagenite


    I went to read the petition and found a pretty photo of wild garlic and a caption saying "Save Cork Airport".

    I share your concern but frankly, an online petition or facebook likes will do little to prod the politicians into action.

    Instead why not email your TDs or councillors and demand some action.
    I wish I could think some specific action to demand. Maybe other posters could suggest actions - that are permitted under EU competition law.

    Au contraire, there has been a lot more movement in terms of meetings and plans that correlate with the growth of the Facebook page. This momentum has to continue. Never underestimate the power of viral media. I have blitzed the Oireachtas Directory but since I'm no longer resident in Ireland I don't have any local TDs. Good idea though, keep them coming.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,412 ✭✭✭Gamb!t


    I remember the Opera house was struggling ages back and the TD's were doing their best to keep it going.I dont see why they cant do the same for the airport.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭denhaagenite


    My best guess is that they really don't want it to succeed. Not go to the wall exactly, but not generate as much traffic as Dublin. It's politics, basically.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    Au contraire, there has been a lot more movement in terms of meetings and plans that correlate with the growth of the Facebook page. This momentum has to continue. Never underestimate the power of viral media. I have blitzed the Oireachtas Directory but since I'm no longer resident in Ireland I don't have any local TDs. Good idea though, keep them coming.

    Fully Agree.
    Part of the reason why writing to public officials has failed for so long, is because there is little public pressure, they reply privately and individually.
    It's the behaviour which TDs crave, as they are fully in control and can 'handle' the situation and even spin it.
    (If those water protesters had merely written to their TDs, it's unlikely we would have even heard about it!)

    Social Media, when it reaches critical mass, can cause an unbearable situation for public officials, as it hold them publicly accountable, but particularly when it highlights 'inaction' by individual TDs.

    Having said that, I agree with twowheelsgood in that an obscure petition which only has 3000 likes is evidently having little impact.
    Better to keep it concentrated on Facebook


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭denhaagenite


    Dannyboy83 wrote: »
    Having said that, I agree with twowheelsgood in that an obscure petition which only has 3000 likes is evidently having little impact.
    Better to keep it concentrated on Facebook

    Can't there be both?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    Can't there be both?

    If both could reach critical mass, certainly, but given the petition has failed to reach 3k, while FB is at 25k+, it appears to me that is not happening.

    The biggest problem though is the disconnect.
    That is, the fact that this situation arose out of the past government.
    So ministers shrug their shoulders and say - 'don't look at us, that was them'.

    The issue has to move on now, from 'who did it?', to 'who is prolonging it?'.
    This is the government of 'reform', after all.

    'Save Cork Airport' makes Cork Airport seem like it's failing due it's own inadequacies.
    'Unshackle Cork Airport' or 'Equality for Cork Airport' is more aggressive and points the finger of blame where it belongs imo.

    Journalists should also be tackling TDs about their 'inaction', putting them on the spot, holding them publicly accountable, 'giving them something to lose'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭denhaagenite


    It's posts like the above that make it so irritating that the first thread was closed. There is a need for ideas and action. The government are just ignoring it in the hope that people will forget about it and the Cork representatives seem to be pandering to the Dáil and DAA. It's a pure cover up and nothing else!!

    There needs to be real answers as to why debt forgiveness has been reneged upon for Cork when it's clearly working in Shannon. None of this "oh shur that's got nothing to do with it, it's marketing that's at fault, have some stickers"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,029 ✭✭✭Rhys Essien


    There is something red rotten going on behind the scenes.Cork has 1/3 the population of Dublin yet it has less than 10% passenger numbers.Stevie Wonder could see that thats not right.I have said it in the old thread that Dublins passenger numbers should be around 18m and not 21m.Corks figures should be around 6m.

    We are losing passengers to Dublin,Shannon and now even Kerry on European routes.This should not be the case.

    Whats drives me spare is the way some individuals like to think Cork should be on a par with Kerry,Shannon and Knock when we should be clearly second.

    At this stage Im tempted to start a Conspiracies thread on the whole thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭denhaagenite


    Agreed. Just some interesting figures from the website:

    • Direct flights to 12 countries
    • 36 destinations
    • Only 15 of these could be described as "business" type destinations
    • No less than 9 Spanish routes, a quarter of all destinations.
    • 22 Aer Lingus
    • 19 Ryanair
    • 2 Czech Airlines
    • 1 Fly Be
    And these flights aren't even running year round, it's just ridiculous. I even think the numbers are probably flawed as they still have Brussels up there. There needs to be flights to Berlin, Frankfurt/ Cologne/ Dusseldorf, Antwerp/ Brussels, Helsinki, Copenhagen, Bern, even Belfast!

    I think the best thing for Cork Airport to do is run targeted surveys to see what routes are economically viable. Ones which would be used. Canvas the multinationals for info, try and get some new airlines on board. It's easy to make a start on that but until control, both managerial and financial, is wrestled back from the DAA then it can't happen. You can <3 Cork Airport all you like but if they don't fly anywhere you need to go then you can't give them your custom over another airport.

    A political entity in Cork that made the airport their priority could do very well for themselves.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,892 ✭✭✭lisasimpson


    Ive said it before the whole cork airport situation needs to be highlighted on a national scale. Shannon on the past were v good at this. Maybe try to get support of those from the minster region working in the national media to feature it

    On another note, there was an article on the sunday independent last weekend about the increase in the number of irish people taking holidays aboard this year.in it it said the pressure in dublin airport with increasing numbers that holiday operators would like to see more charter flights from cork and shannon to help with the pressure at peak times


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,053 ✭✭✭Cosmo Kramer


    People looking to "save Cork Airport" need to forget any comparisons to Dublin which, unlike every other Irish airport, serves the entire island of six million people and is the main incoming gateway to the country rather than just the region in which it is situated.

    The main issue for Cork is the continued existence of the heavily state subsidised aviation relic 75 miles to the north at Shannon which serves much of the same regional catchment area. Highlighting the bias shown to that airport over the other Irish regionals should be your first step in terms of engaging with politicians on this issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭denhaagenite


    On another note, there was an article on the sunday independent last weekend about the increase in the number of irish people taking holidays aboard this year.in it it said the pressure in dublin airport with increasing numbers that holiday operators would like to see more charter flights from cork and shannon to help with the pressure at peak times

    I think this is a sticking plaster on a broken leg and should be totally ignored. For one thing, it's temporary, using Cork/ Shannon airports as overflow carparks for Dublin- f*ck off. For another, we should be trying to get people into the country not out of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭denhaagenite


    People looking to "save Cork Airport" need to forget any comparisons to Dublin which, unlike every other Irish airport, serves the entire island of six million people and is the main incoming gateway to the country rather than just the region in which it is situated.

    The main issue for Cork is the continued existence of the heavily state subsidised aviation relic 75 miles to the north at Shannon which serves much of the same regional catchment area. Highlighting the bias shown to that airport over the other Irish regionals should be your first step in terms of engaging with politicians on this issue.

    There needs to be an airport for the West too, just a far smaller one. It's a bit much to suggest that Clare/ Galway are in Cork's catchment area and Waterford in Shannon's.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,564 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    The evidence of what happening points to me of an active campaign by the government and DAA to wreck this airport.

    It's worse than that though. Corks public funding for infrastructural projects is woeful and way below what the likes of Limerick and Galway have got in recent years.

    Just remember what this government has done for Cork when you next go to the polls.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,562 ✭✭✭kub


    The evidence of what happening points to me of an active campaign by the government and DAA to wreck this airport.

    It's worse than that though. Corks public funding for infrastructural projects is woeful and way below what the likes of Limerick and Galway have got in recent years.

    Just remember what this government has done for Cork when you next go to the polls.

    The polls is where the problem will be, who will we vote for?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,996 ✭✭✭two wheels good


    Some comments prompt me to look up this recent article in the Irish Times which points out the gradual decline in population

    [ Having twice the population it now has so that it could compete with Dublin for inward investment was] .." what was envisaged by the Buchanan report on regional development way back in 1968. Commissioned by the government, it proposed designating both Cork and Limerick/Shannon as “national growth centres”, to counterbalance the development of Dublin.

    But although Athlone, Drogheda, Dundalk, Sligo and Waterford would have formed a “second tier” of growth centres – to spread the benefits more widely – there was such a fierce backlash from rural Ireland that politicians in power gave up and opted for dispersal.

    Thus, nearly every town ended up with an IDA “advance factory” while a laissez faire approach was adopted to the development of Dublin; in its gutless decision on Buchanan, made in 1972, the government allowed that the capital would continue on growing with no limits"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,449 ✭✭✭✭pwurple


    I even think the numbers are probably flawed as they still have Brussels up there.

    I agree, the numbers make it look like a service exists, where effectively none does.

    Brussels is twice a week, middle of the day. That is not a functioning business service. I flew with colleagues from a Cork-based company to and from Brussels in the last month. We all went through Dublin. Flight times/days were not suitable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,368 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    It is my opinion that Cork will never succeed under the strangling hold of the DAA. The DAA will just play Cork off Shannon and will end in both airports being completely broke and Dublin getting all the passengers from the services that no longer exist.

    If Cork is separated from the DAA, then Shannon and Cork can work together to try and get a few passengers back from Dublin. Dublin has a far larger passenger count then it should have proportionate to its population.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 781 ✭✭✭CINCLANTFLT


    I unfollowed the negative and odd Facebook page this week.... They linked to an old article about a guy going on a rampage a few years ago... They had been complaining earlier in the week that some people thought the tone of the page was negative... They pooh pooh this and then put up... And delete.... A negative story anyway...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,368 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    I agree, the page is very negative! Cork Is still a great airport, you'd sware it's just holding onto its last route!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The evidence of what happening points to me of an active campaign by the government and DAA to wreck this airport.

    It's worse than that though. Corks public funding for infrastructural projects is woeful and way below what the likes of Limerick and Galway have got in recent years.

    Just remember what this government has done for Cork when you next go to the polls.

    Annual €38 million of taxpayers money been used to support Shannon airport ... i can think of better uses.
    When Shannon Airport gained independence from the Dublin Airport Authority (DAA), it secured an estimated €38m annual rent income from nearby industrial land.
    http://www.independent.ie/business/wing-and-a-prayer-can-airports-rise-above-storm-31165712.html

    It should of been clear to Michael Martin two years ago that that money would of been used by Shannon to entice Ryanair to switch routes from Cork to Shannon. Money that should of been given to the taxpayers assets is instead been used to undermine Cork airport.
    http://www.independent.ie/business/irish/shannon-airport-business-model-a-race-to-the-bottom-ff-leader-claims-31182686.html

    I'd suggest Martin looks for a similar yearly slush fund for Cork airport. Like Shannon, Maybe get the government to hand over several hundred buildings that have rent going to the state and transfer it to support the airport and its passengers. Then add in a few thousand acres of state land for good measure. I say that half in jest, but it is effectively what has happened with Shannon.

    Shannon will do what it can to continue to undermine Cork airport while it is given money to do so as its in its commercial interest to take passengers from Cork, that is a failure by Cork Politicians. Noonan and co pulled a masterstroke for shannon while Martin and Mcgrath slept. Jeopardising Corks biggest asset should cost them their jobs as the local politicians.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,357 ✭✭✭✭leahyl


    Carnacalla and Mayomaffia, don't post in this thread again. Carnacalla, mods have had it up to here with you reporting every post that you don't agree with. Just don't post anymore, it's that simple. Barking orders to the mods like the report you just sent won't be tolerated either.

    If this continues, i'm closing the thread and handing out bans. Sick of it now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭Figerty


    Annual €38 million of taxpayers money been used to support Shannon airport ... i can think of better uses.
    When Shannon Airport gained independence from the Dublin Airport Authority (DAA), it secured an estimated €38m annual rent income from nearby industrial land.
    http://www.independent.ie/business/wing-and-a-prayer-can-airports-rise-above-storm-31165712.html

    It should of been clear to Michael Martin two years ago that that money would of been used by Shannon to entice Ryanair to switch routes from Cork to Shannon. Money that should of been given to the taxpayers assets is instead been used to undermine Cork airport.
    http://www.independent.ie/business/irish/shannon-airport-business-model-a-race-to-the-bottom-ff-leader-claims-31182686.html

    I'd suggest Martin looks for a similar yearly slush fund for Cork airport. Like Shannon, Maybe get the government to hand over several hundred buildings that have rent going to the state and transfer it to support the airport and its passengers. Then add in a few thousand acres of state land for good measure. I say that half in jest, but it is effectively what has happened with Shannon.

    Shannon will do what it can to continue to undermine Cork airport while it is given money to do so as its in its commercial interest to take passengers from Cork, that is a failure by Cork Politicians. Noonan and co pulled a masterstroke for shannon while Martin and Mcgrath slept. Jeopardising Corks biggest asset should cost them their jobs as the local politicians.

    I'm from the mid west region so people will know where I am coming from. I chatted about this with my Cork buddies over the years.
    I'm told that Cork Airport is built on a hill, prone to fog and can't be extended.

    Those alone enough limitations to put Cork at a natural disadvantage at this stage any any business model will struggle to cope with those.
    Shannon is getting rent money from the old Shannon Development land bank. That isn't free money, there is a responsibility for that work for the airport in terms of development and progress.

    From a mid-west perspective Cork has another problem. With the opening of the Shannon Tunnel anywhere north of Mallow is now easily in the Shannon Catchment. In fact the Catchment area of Shannon is now North Cork to Galway and into Tipperary.That gives Shannon a population base as large as Cork.

    It takes 3 tolls to get to Dublin Airport by road from Galway and the new Gort-Tuam bypass is going to make it easier to get to Shannon. The road to Cork from Limerick is one of the worst National roads in the country.

    As one poster said earlier, it's not Cork vs Shannon,, it Dublin vs balanced regional development.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭roundymac


    Saw on todays Irish Examiner that there is to be a review of charges at Cork Airport. Looks like someone is finally wakeing up. Can't find the link, you'll have to go routing yourselves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,562 ✭✭✭kub


    I would not at all be surprised if they raise them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,368 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    What if the DAA were convinced to raise them and scare Ryanair off completely? Then, it may trigger an actual government response.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,562 ✭✭✭kub


    I thought that a decision on charges was up to the aviation commissioner's office.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭keithclancy


    In other news:

    http://www.nltimes.nl/2015/04/21/large-investment-planned-for-eindhoven-airport-region/
    The government is investing a total of 40 million euros to improve Eindhoven Airport’s accessibility. Last year nearly 4 million people flew through the airport.

    Eindhoven Airport is a similar size to Cork Airport and it's thriving.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,368 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    In other news:

    http://www.nltimes.nl/2015/04/21/large-investment-planned-for-eindhoven-airport-region/



    Eindhoven Airport is a similar size to Cork Airport and it's thriving.

    One thing I will say, wait for Ryanair to switch to Amsterdam and see how it is then


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,472 ✭✭✭highlydebased




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭keithclancy


    Carnacalla wrote: »
    One thing I will say, wait for Ryanair to switch to Amsterdam and see how it is then

    Not a hope, Eindhoven Airport is owned by Schiphol Nederland BV. Unlike the DAA they have a clear strategy with focus on Amsterdam as long haul transit hub and Eindhoven Airport for Short Haul.

    http://www.schiphol.nl/SchipholGroup/Company1/Strategy.htm
    To accommodate such selective growth at Schiphol, Eindhoven Airport and Lelystad Airport are undergoing development as alternative airports for non-Mainport-related air traffic.

    DAA could learn a lot from that to be honest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,562 ✭✭✭kub


    DAA do what they do best, they look after Dublin Airport.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,368 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    kub wrote: »
    DAA do what they do best, they look after Dublin Airport.

    Its a state company, it should have the states interests at heart. Abandoning cork is not in the states interests.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭denhaagenite


    Carnacalla wrote: »
    Its a state company, it should have the states interests at heart. Abandoning cork is not in the states interests.

    This is really the heart of the problem. The DAA seems to see itself as some sort of Dublin- only organisation, and the government is also leaning that way. It's obvious that, for whatever reason, they all want Dublin and the surrounding areas full to absolute capacity. They seem to be thinking only of the short term, improving infrastructure so that it's absolute world- class but the thing is that can only go so far. There is a lack of housing, massive social deprivation and total traffic gridlock in the capital as it is, there is plenty of space in the rest of the country and branching out to other areas will not be to the detriment of progress in Dublin.

    They're acting like the country is a quarter of the size it actually is. There can be more than one city functioning at a similar level, and an airport is the heart of any city that functions well, especially since Ireland is an island on the periphery of Europe. We live 10 minutes from the airport in Eindhoven and would probably use it the same amount as we use Amsterdam Schiphol. It all depends on price, convenience, time etc etc. The growth of Eindhoven as a technology hub has really been in tandem with the improvement of the airport, and anyone who's been to Amsterdam recently will have noticed absolutely no difference whatsoever in the amount of tourism, trade etc etc there during the period of growth in Eindhoven. To suggest that Eindhoven is any kind of competition for Amsterdam is simply ridiculous.

    It would be interesting to see how the UK airports do things though, I don't have much experience of them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭roundymac




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭denhaagenite


    roundymac wrote: »

    He's trying to sit on the fence, giving the impression that he is concerned about the airport while not making waves with his colleagues. Sure, the debt isn't strictly a massive issue on it's own- money will continue to be made regardless of whether there is a debt or not. The aspect of the debt that makes it an issue is the control it awards the DAA (which is adamant that it is going to act as a rival) and the fact that they can dictate how much fees are at the airport.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,053 ✭✭✭Cosmo Kramer


    Eindhoven is a terrible choice for comparison to Cork. It has a huge catchment in multiple countries on its doorstep and can therefore offer destinations and, particularly, frequencies that Cork can never hope to match. Cork serves a single Irish province which includes three other airports also offering international flights. Of course it can improve from where it is at the moment but people need to be realistic here. Even with hundreds of millions of Euro being thrown at it Shannon is only achieving very modest increases in traffic and only at the expense of other airports, there is little or no net traffic increase taking place there despite rock bottom charges and fares being offered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭denhaagenite


    I'm not saying that Cork should be as busy as Eindhoven, but what is being done there to grow passenger numbers could be done in Cork as well. That's why I also asked how UK airports outside on London are managing.
    Even with hundreds of millions of Euro being thrown at it Shannon is only achieving very modest increases in traffic and only at the expense of other airports, there is little or no net traffic increase taking place there despite rock bottom charges and fares being offered.

    Exactly. Shannon really has very little to offer foreign travellers. There is absolutely nothing in the immediate area. The only reason the town (if you could call it that) even exists is because an airport was built there.

    Just remember, tourism is a red herring here. Cork needs to push the business angle. Flights to Geneva, Munich, Berlin, Dusseldorf, get the Rome flight back, Brussels, Antwerp....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,368 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Limerick and Ennis fairly close to Shannon.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭denhaagenite


    Carnacalla wrote: »
    Limerick and Ennis fairly close to Shannon.

    Please don't nit- pick, I said immediate area. Weren't you asked not to post in this thread? I'd really rather you didn't run the risk of it being closed. Lots of positive contributions here, I know I'm learning to look at things from different angles.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,368 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Of course I'm going to post, I have a vested interest in Cork Airport and want to see it succeed. Sadly some of the Fanboys here can't do that without a jab at Shannon. I responded because you are completely 100% wrong in the presumption that Shannon Airport has nothing to offer tourists. Shannon airport is closer to Limerick than Belfast international Is to Belfast.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭denhaagenite


    I am not shouting for tourism here. I am trying to appeal to the economic nature of the government, as I have throughout the thread. Shannon is a great place to travel to if you want to see the West as a tourist, but there is no point in saying that there would be as much interest there for large multinationals to have their employees travel to and from there.

    Please read the thread before posting pointless one liners that contribute nothing. I'm not a "fanboy" and I have nothing against Shannon Airport, until flights are poached because the DAA is afraid of the potential in Cork. Shannon should be supporting Cork if anything.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭keithclancy


    Eindhoven is a terrible choice for comparison to Cork. It has a huge catchment in multiple countries on its doorstep and can therefore offer destinations and, particularly, frequencies that Cork can never hope to match. Cork serves a single Irish province which includes three other airports also offering international flights. Of course it can improve from where it is at the moment but people need to be realistic here. Even with hundreds of millions of Euro being thrown at it Shannon is only achieving very modest increases in traffic and only at the expense of other airports, there is little or no net traffic increase taking place there despite rock bottom charges and fares being offered.

    It's not really, the Transport links between Noord-Brabant and Belgium/Germany are awful so they are out.

    Unless you go by Car from Dusseldorf or Antwerp it's not worth your while.

    Dusseldorf for example is three hours by high frequency public transport (every hour) vs 1hr 20 minutes by car

    There's a bus that takes 1hr 30 minutes but depending on the E34/A61 can take up to 3 hours as well .. or in the summer you could be stuck on the thing for up to 5 hours.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,472 ✭✭✭highlydebased


    . Shannon should be supporting Cork if anything.

    Indeed as any new air access outside of Dublin is to be welcomed however what seems to to be the case following a breakfast briefing with a Cork business association this morning is that the airport is keen on willy waving what it has over SNN i.e more routes and pax. They'd be better off focusing on working with tourism bodies to grow an inbound product and improving business access where possible rather than just being dead set on poaching pax back from SNN by heavily advertising London and Malaga flights in Limerick! Not quite sure if it's hit home in Cork yet but while years ago it was common to see those in Limerick/North Tipp and further afield to use Cork as a rule, access to Dublin is now overwhelmingly easier as we all know and sadly for Cork (and SNN) neither airport really get a look in anymore!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭Figerty


    I am not shouting for tourism here. I am trying to appeal to the economic nature of the government, as I have throughout the thread. Shannon is a great place to travel to if you want to see the West as a tourist, but there is no point in saying that there would be as much interest there for large multinationals to have their employees travel to and from there.

    Please read the thread before posting pointless one liners that contribute nothing. I'm not a "fanboy" and I have nothing against Shannon Airport, until flights are poached because the DAA is afraid of the potential in Cork. Shannon should be supporting Cork if anything.

    There is a huge multinational presence in the mid-west region; far greater than you give credit for. I can do a list for you if you want. draw a ring around Shannon airport and look at the list that is there. Draw a bigger ring around Limerick and do a count there...Then look at the medical device sector along the west coast and add that in.
    Shannon is massive when it comes to Tourism and Manufacturing. Nearly a million people visited the Cliff of Moher in 2013; almost 3 times that of Blarney. Bunratty has dropped out of the top ten.
    Cork is massive when it comes to pharma and manufacturing.
    The long runway in Shannon makes it critical for Ireland as a stand by runway. Turkish Airlines just made a major freight commitment to Shannon also to hub to the US.
    The most creative use of Shannon-Cork would be to land in either one, do the Wild Atlantic way from Galway to Cobh etc. Both should benefit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,368 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    The Save Cork Airport page are reporting that 8 of the first 10 flights to Prague are cancelled. Lack of marketing being the reason blaimed.

    Such a new route on an unknown airline in Ireland really should be advertised by the airport.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,380 ✭✭✭.red.


    Carnacalla wrote: »
    The Save Cork Airport page are reporting that 8 of the first 10 flights to Prague are cancelled. Lack of marketing being the reason blaimed.

    Such a new route on an unknown airline in Ireland really should be advertised by the airport.

    I think the first weekend of the prague is going ahead, its gone again for 4/5 weeks and coming back doing the prague/ibiza routes. The route had medium book loads and supposedly the aircraft is going to be used as a charter for the weeks its missing from cork.
    I can see prague as being a very good winter venue, not so sure as a summer one. Hopefully they realise this and dont cancel it due to summer bookings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 573 ✭✭✭rebs23


    http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/cork-airports-200m-debt-is-a-red-herring-328943.html
    Interesting article and a strange one. It begs the question as to why Cork cannot compete with "ultra low cost" Shannon and also why no "commercial" airport could compete with the Shannon incentives.
    Again it confirms the loss of passengers from Cork to Shannon as a result of incentives Shannon can offer.
    For all those from the Mid West on here wondering why so many in Cork are annoyed with the deal Shannon got. Please read the article. Why did one former state Airport secure a deal that allows it to effectively undermine another?

    As for the silly arguments about catchment areas and surrounding industry, there is simply a significant difference between the population of Cork and Limerick/Shannon and indeed the catchment areas. There are also a significant difference in terms of industrial/foreign direct investment employment between the two regions. To try to claim otherwise is utterly ridiculous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭denhaagenite


    So this German route that they keep banging on about. Where would people like it to be? For selfish reasons, I would vote for Dusseldorf. Maybe they could have flights (not daily) to Munich, Dusseldorf, Berlin, possibly using the same aircraft?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement