Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1462463465467468520

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,178 ✭✭✭trellheim


    Just leave the 46a as is - that would solve the N11 capacity and the NCR issues, and then you can expand the service to include the E1 and E2, that would be a genuine improvement in service for all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,816 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    That’s just not going to happen, and frankly if you think it is then you’re rather naive.

    The NTA might make small tweaks but they aren’t going to start making major changes such as that after all of the rounds of consultation that happened to get to this point.

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,816 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    We don’t know that is the reason. I’m careful about taking rumours as fact.

    That’s always the case with any consultation process - people always zone out and then protest when it moves to implementation phase.

    Despite the consultation process for the revised network having the highest response rate of any public consultation held in the history of the state, some people are still trying to maintain that it never happened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,178 ✭✭✭trellheim


    But effectively it did not. There was no local engagement on the NCR at all bar a leafleting campaign, and of the leafleting campaign - I still have the booklet - we were all delivered the H spine leaflet , not the B or the E ( or even the O ) so everyone said "doesn't affect us" . Were there any local meetings either for the infra or the bus changes - not in the slightest. BC has had absolutely terrible consultation.

    By comparison in recent time DCC had several consultation local meetings in the parish centre for the proposed pavement changes at Hanlons corner, where info was readily available, suggestions for improvement were taken on board face to face and the argument could be had

    There's a right and a wrong way to do it, and NTA have no idea how to do it. Witness them trying to ram through the E in the middle of a GE campaign, paddy power wouldnt have taken a bet on it being deferred. tone deaf and stone deaf.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,816 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I’m sorry but we have been through this before.

    Even if they did send the wrong booklets (which I’ll accept is very poor), were you unable to access www.busconnects.ie which would have been clearly advertised in those booklets?

    There were very clear explanations on the website.

    This thread was opened here by me at the very start of this process in 2017 and you have been online on these boards all through that time. Are you saying that not once did you look at a thread entitled bus network changes and think “maybe this could affect me?”.

    There were adverts in newspapers, reports on all radio and TV stations, adverts on the sides of buses and on bus shelter panels all over the city.

    Sometimes you do have to take on some personal responsibility and not be completely spoon fed as you seem to think you should be.

    Clearly you’re one of those people who zoned out!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,178 ✭✭✭trellheim


    You want an honest answer ? There was no campaign I saw , no local meetings , no dates , nothing. I saw no TV ads and heard no radio ads.

    When this was originally mooted I firmly believed it was pie in the sky another thing that will fall by the wayside as did everyone I know.

    I'm trying to point out the difference between proper consultation - by providing examples of a good consultation - DCC - vs a terrible, brutal one - BC.

    Did I zone out ? No.

    I post info I see here on our residents whatsapp groups and without fail nobody else - 100+ houses - has any info on it at all.

    That petition mentioned above got a lot of traction on Whatsapp because people were annoyed at the lack of input or info from the NTA - and it was another resident who had posted it on the group in question.

    You ask me what's happening in the Grangegorman SDZ and which buildings are going up next and I can tell you - because , again, they are very good at communicating to the local area and keeping people informed.

    Less than 4 weeks to go and is there any signposts on the NCR 46a signs to say its going away ? Not on your nelly.

    Does the Bus connects map represent what its going to look like - no - for our area

    a: 11 route not marked along the NCR

    b: N2 marked incorrectly as going up infirmary road

    etc etc. Now you might well say "thats the plan on the map not the planned reality" well thats the first busconnects map when you google, and so you have to go back a long way to find that in fact the N2 goes a different way and the 11 - even though its not "busconnects" is being rerouted because they cant get the O going . Again comms terrible - no map is better than a wrong map.

    https://busconnects.ie/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/A3-Big-Picture-Map-11.04.24-B.pdf

    Just like to add the only reason I stay on here is because its the ONLY decent source of information.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,259 ✭✭✭Daith


    What? The changes to the 46a have got more media coverage than any bus service? Joe Duffy was on about it!

    "Less than 4 weeks to go and is there any signposts on the NCR 46a signs to say its going away ? Not on your nelly."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,816 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Sorry, but you’ve just admitted that you thought that the plan was “pie in the sky” when it was published.

    That’s no one’s fault but your own I’m afraid.

    If you can’t take some personal responsibility to read up on it then there’s not much else that can be done about it.

    With any phased plan there are always going to be interim routings - that’s just a fact of life.

    There are now maps on the page on the TFI site for the changes in this phase to existing routes (which I agree should have been there from the outset) -

    https://www.transportforireland.ie/getting-around/by-bus/phase-6a-e-spine/

    I’d expect timetables to appear no later than three weeks before the implementation date.

    As for this thread - I’ve updated it personally with every single bit of news that I’ve found online since the very start - hence I just don’t buy your claim that there was no way of knowing about it.

    You clearly do know how to use the internet - the information has been there in full view all along!

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,114 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Launching the Metro will be a lot easier.

    Dedicated route, and no drivers!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,178 ✭✭✭trellheim


    That is not what I meant. This thread is updated regularly and credit to all who do including yourself.

    I am referring to the original consultation and lack of local engagement. My own feelings are irrelevant here.

    I've provided at least two examples of consultation done right.

    At this time I am keeping up to date with it, but I will strongly come out against anyone who says there was extensive prior consultation, because for me and my local area, there was not.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    How can we expand the population by 100k every 12 months, with 35k in the Dublin region, and still never have enough bus drivers, year after year.

    How many do we need?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,816 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Well back in 2018 there were 33 public face to face roadshows about the plan all over the city.

    IMG_2680.png

    There was plenty of scope at those to interrogate the NTA and frankly that’s what caused changes to the plan.

    Many TDs and councillors across the city also held local meetings and updated their constituents in newsletters and online, and if yours didn’t well then you ought to be asking them why they didn’t.

    There were more public events as below for the second round of consultation, but as a citywide project expecting multiple local meetings is pushing it I think. Views could be expressed via multiple means.

    IMG_2681.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,178 ✭✭✭trellheim


    From the list above I can see (1) adjacent - not local - meeting that was never publicised in my area. I've given you two examples of decent ( and ongoing) local consultation that everyone in the locale knew about and was well publicised. When Irish Rail do work I get flyers in the door about noise and so on and to consult on whatever infra they are planning - I've had plenty of opportunity so it is perfectly possible to consult in a proper fashion.

    Planning permission - to take another example - lasts for 5 years. The meetings you mention above are from nearly 7 years ago and now they are planning to impose when things are quite different ?

    And, as well, there is still no notice up on bus-stops that the 46a is being lost in less than a month.

    You and I have very different views here and I don't expect either to convince the other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,816 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    This is nothing to do with any planning permissions or infrastructure, this is the network review which is a citywide project.

    The core bus corridors project (i.e the infrastructure) is a completely separate project from the network review, which is something I feel that you’ve not really grasped from the outset.

    Again, these meetings were all advertised on the BusConnects website, posted in national newspapers, publicised by local politicians and I posted them here.

    There comes a point as I’ve said before where you have to just take some personal responsibility to read up on these things yourself.

    I’m quitting this particular discussion at this point, because I think you’ve demonstrated to me that you just didn’t bother to look!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,046 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    To be fair there was never a consultation on removing the northside 46a route and replacing it with a leaser frequency service. The consultation involved the O bus being in place. There was never talk of a reduced frequency service. This is annew diktat from the NTA



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,049 ✭✭✭thomasj


    To be fair was it meant to be ? Wasn't the O route meant to come in alongside the E spine at one stage ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,203 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    You should be ashamed or at least embarrassed for not knowing what you're talking. BusConnects map with all the proposed routes was published on the website years ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,178 ✭✭✭trellheim


    Not as far as I recall.

    The northern end of the 46a never really fitted into the NTA's plan as they did not want to make it into a spine and if all your crayons are really big ones then this didnt fit their thinking . Currently you can't turn right from the NCR to go northbound at Phibsboro so if you want to run spines up through Ballymun and Botanic they have to come up Broadstone so that meant that didnt fit the 46a which goes up Berkeley Road to get to the NCR and then westbound

    The idea was that you'd change outbound from a spine to the O at Phibsboro (for the E) or Hanlons Corner ( for the B whenever it launched ).

    Inbound in reverse - O to B or E or even down to Heuston for the LUAS

    Because the O is not yet ready ( and there is no sign of it whatsoever ) that is why the lesser frequency 11 is being rerouted to the NCR ( and the route number being kept the same, with the potential to cause tremendous confusion ).

    This doesnt take into account

    1. Electric Single decker buses being the O planned fleet to replace a chocka 46a double decker
    2. Traffic on the NCR being chocka for most of the peak - admittedly a moot point but does need to point out the utter lack of bus priority anywhere on the NCR bar I think 200 metres westbound outside the Mater ?
    3. The B = 39a and the LUAS inbound from Heuston are already strong competitors for the most crowded public transport in Ireland and shoving O transfers onto them is a recipe for making things worse ; the E will be no slouch either for crowds.
    4. The N2's ability to soak up even a little bit of this is lost to suck up NCR traffic because its only serving a single NCR stop on the outbound run now , and none on the inbound (because the planned infrastructure for the O and N2 is not yet there )

    There's an argument that "some people will need to transfer" yes but I keep on saying look at the 46a loadings after Parnell St it doesnt empty out at Phibsboro !

    Short term the E might be delayed as it might get used as a political weapon before the Government is formed, and for those saying "never happen" well it happened a few weeks ago .

    Also the 11 may end up being permanent but if they made it same freq as 46a I'd be happy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,046 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    I think you've misunderstood. There was never a proposal to replace the 46a with a less frequent 11. That is a very recent proposal which has not been put to public consultation



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,203 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    It doesn't even matter. We have too many people whining because of changes. 46A temporary substitute in place - and people are still unhappy (whether they know or don't know about).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,046 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    It doesn't matter to you perhaps but it matters to people who's daily commute is worsened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,203 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    So what that it worsened. They shouldn't be crying babies, but adapt to the changes like normal adult beings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,937 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    Are all of the bus routes operating between Dundrum Co. Dublin & Newcastle Co. Wicklow able to run a normal service today?

    The routes that I'm asking about is the 44, 45a, 63, 84, 145, 155, 184 & 185.

    Glencullen is covered in a lot of heavy snow as per the RTÉ News live feed about the wintry weather this morning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,689 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    no snow anywhere near the coast, just rain, so the 145/155/84/184 should all be fine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    The final phase of the Bee Network in Manchester went live today. Now in full operation. Not quite the same as Bus Connects but this is how long it should have taken to roll out BC the first phase launched in 2023. It's now 2025 and the full network is launched.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Why can we not just issue work permits for bus drivers? How many drivers are we short of rolling out BC?

    Given that 150k people immigrated into the country in the 12 months to April and similar numbers in the previous year, how is it not possible to hire a couple of hundred bus drivers.

    Post edited by BlueSkyDreams on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,816 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    That didn’t involve anything like the levels of network and service expansion that BusConnects does though.

    I think you’re comparing apples with oranges.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,203 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    While I'm not certain, but I have the feeling that Dublin Bus should drop their standards to be more flexible in the market... Those who imigrate, if they have a good English, would be more educated and most likely work in the offices. Those with poorer English would work in retail/services. And with poor English in the warehouses... The question is how much Dublin Bus are motivated to support those with poor application? Can Dublin Bus be considered for an easy entry for those without a D category license?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I am not suggesting we drop the standards. I mean put licensed drivers on the skills shortage list and issue work pernits to get them in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,689 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    how do you know they're not doing that already - the NTA head was talking about the driver shortage quite recently and saying they're already doing everything they can to recruit more drivers. Every driver in the EU can already work here without a permit. The main problem is there's nowhere for them to live.



Advertisement