Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

LUAS Network + Future Expansion

145679

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 285 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Like others have said Heuston-Connolly is already a massive bottleneck. I think the best thing for TII to focus on for know is new alignments through city centre to increase capacity as much as possible. Especially since there are a lot of untapped routes and connections through CC that would be great for a tramline, and would massively improve light rail connectivity and capacity, making a much stronger network. Two lines through CC is not sustainable, and while eventually I think they will run out of CC alignments, I don't think will happen before Luas post-2042 is complete. Additionally more CC alignments should help shift Dublin away from its bus dependence which also isn't sustainable.

    Personally I am hoping that they will look at a Cork Street-SSG-Ringsend option, or at the very least Cork Street-SSG with a later extension to Ringsend. It would allow there to be no overlap with the Green and Red line except at their interchanges, which would really increase light rail catchment and I think would allow a lot more journies to be Luas-Luas or DART-Luas transfers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 285 ✭✭PlatformNine


    More Luas capacity in general honestly. Our bus network is fairy strong even with all its flaws, and BC will likely do wonders, but our dependence on busses isn't sustainable. I am really hoping that the next transport stategy will push to fast track Luas post-2042, as I can't imagine it wont be needed well before 2042, let alone well after 2042. However despite it being needed I don't think there is the political will in power to do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 161 ✭✭OisinCooke


    I definitely understand this and agree with what you’re saying, I was just enquiring about the existing Connolly to Heuston shuttles. As they are already taking up a city centre path, would it not make more sense to continue them out beyond Heuston…? I could be missing something glaringly obvious, but just wondering…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,817 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    There's low hanging fruit with the city centre red line. The slow running speeds could be fixed tomorrow and was the result of an overly conservative approach to safety when the Luas was new and people thought it was a danger unlike anything ever seen before. It also doesn't get enough traffic priority at junctions. They could probably close one or two stops. Ultimately they should just cut and cover the whole stretch and space out the stops more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,729 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    A tram is not a metro - it’s supposed to have more frequent stops.

    I’d love to know which ones you’d remove and why.

    Also, which junctions are you referring to in terms of priority, while recognising the potential knock on effects of what you are suggesting on the city bus service?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,015 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Before tunnelling the luas we need more luas capacity. A second East-West line and perhaps 2 north south lines should be added



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,100 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Well, ML will be another N-S line.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Given the success of the bus gate on the quays and how fast buses are moving on the quays now, here is my suggestion.

    Run a BRT (single decker multi door bendi bus) from Heuston to Connolly along the quays. Pretty quick and easy to implement and it would have the advantage of not putting extra strain on the red Luas line (and actually take some off).

    It would be popular with people getting too and from Heuston as you wouldn't be competing for space with people going to/from Lucan or Tallaght. You would be getting on an empty bus at Heuston, you could even have it serve platform 10 in Heuston. You could even possibly extend it through the port tunnel to Dublin Airport (Yes I know complaints from DC/Aircoach).

    You could do it with double Deckers too, but less attractive.

    Of course this would only be a "short term" quick fix that could be implemented in a few months. Longer term, you could plan on upgrading this service to another Luas line. Yes, run a Luas line down the quays! It could be used by both Luas and buses.

    You would be adding East to West capacity, Lucan and Tallaght trams could split between going down the quays or the current red line.

    Had we to do the Red Line over again, it would have had made more sense to make the quays a Luas + Bus + bike/pedestrian only corridor and put the cars heading to the car parks down Abbey Street. In retrospect it makes much more sense, the fact they left the cars on the quays and routed the red line down basically back streets showed the thinking at the time that cars ruled and public transport was something to be pushed off to the side.

    With cars greatly reduced on the quays, they are a fantastic opportunity to massively increase East to West capacity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    If a Luas line was on one side of the quays, another Luas line on the Thomas Street to College Green axis, access for the few cars that would need to come into the city could be two-way on the other quay.

    All north-south through traffic would cross the East Link, West-Link or the South Circular Road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,512 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Maybe not feasible currently (infrastructure constraints around Heuston), but this could even take on the responsibility of the 99 to provide a Phoenix Park to Connolly connection. Obviously not if the end goal is to head towards the airport, though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,443 ✭✭✭VonLuck


    Great idea. The 99 is completely underutilised and I would fear it will get scrapped for making huge losses (although I imagine they knew this going in). It regularly has no one on it at certain times of the day.

    It should run from Ashtown train station with a series of stops within the Phoenix Park, then stop at Heuston and the next stop would be Connolly. It would give huge connectivity between the two train lines, as well as providing a useful public transport to various points in the park.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,817 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    The red line outside the city centre on-street section operates much more like a metro. The problem with red line is mostly in the city centre is capacity and speed related, with capacity being restricted by the slow speeds and conflict with other traffic. Even the busses are faster than the red line going into town.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 161 ✭✭OisinCooke


    Very much agree with the speed and general better priority at junctions, an easy and obvious fix, but disagree strongly however with the stop-spacing, as another user mentioned, it is a tram and not a metro and so frequent stops, especially in the actual centre of the city is very important.

    I also see what you mean about the quays, it would have been nice with the original Red Line plans, but realistically it’s too close to the current Red Line to make it anyway feasible for another east-west alignment. I think a Fatima - Cork St - Kevin St - Cuffe St (and beyond to Ringsend, via ideally an ML and DART link) route through the south city centre is the best option in terms of opening up the most parts of the city for rail-based-PT while not encroaching on the Red Line or DART Underground

    And again while this is true, another north- south tram alignment would be great, if only for opening up route flexibility. A route from Clanbrassil St - Patrick St (new EW line link) - Church St (RL link at Four Courts) - Constitution Hill (GL link at Broadstone) and beyond, or Dolphin’s Barn St - Cork St (new EW line link) - Marrowbone Lane - Bridgefoot St - Mellowes Bridge - Queen St (RL link at Smithfield) - Brunswick St/North King St - Constitution Hill (GL link at Broadstone) and beyond would be two great options for a new line and could help with cross city routes from the southwest and south to the north, northwest and northeast. Just my own thoughts though but I think that at least 2 north-south and two east-west alignments would be required for a fantastic city centre tram network



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    FWIW re: stop spacing on the red line, Smithfield and Four Courts being merged would be the one thing I'd suggest, they are barely a tram length apart.

    The alternative would be separate the 2 stations further, but the areas they would then serve don't really have trip generators currently



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,612 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    that section of the Red Line is so slow you might as well have the extra stop, you'd just end up with more bunching of trams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 238 ✭✭scrabtom


    From my experience so few people get on or off at the Four Courts that it's only ever stopped there for less than 30 seconds anyway. That might be different at rush hour though.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I also see what you mean about the quays, it would have been nice with the original Red Line plans, but realistically it’s too close to the current Red Line to make it anyway feasible for another east-west alignment. I think a Fatima - Cork St - Kevin St - Cuffe St (and beyond to Ringsend, via ideally an ML and DART link) route through the south city centre is the best option in terms of opening up the most parts of the city for rail-based-PT while not encroaching on the Red Line or DART Underground

    I get what you mean, but I think that is the wrong way to look at it. It isn't about destinations or being too close to the Red Line, it is about adding East to West capacity to the network. The Red Line is at capacity along this route and this could double that capacity for a relatively low cost.

    If we end up building out a future comprehensive Luas network that replaces many of the core bus routes coming into the city, then we will need all the capacity we can get in the city center. In other European cities with comprehensive tram networks, it isn't at all unusual to see tram lines going down parallel streets, it just helps them add capacity where needed.

    And don't get me wrong, still do your East - West line further south too. Three East to West lines like this would give you a capacity similar to the North - South Metrolink, but at a much lower cost.

    The idea is for a relatively low cost, add lots of city center capacity to help handle an extensive future Luas network. To be honest, I don't see how you could deliver the Luas 2050 Vision without doing this. How could the Red line handle a new Blanchardstown line and Clongriffin Line feeding into it!

    Looking at the Luas 2050 Vision, they most be thinking about adding a Luas line to the quays, it is the only way it could work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    how is the red line at capacity? arent the trams much shorter than the green line? is lengthening the stops the problem?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Yes, you couldn't put a longer tram at the Busaras stop. Now maybe you could move the stop, but options are tight and limited around there. There are also other locations that would need to be moved or dealt with. I don't think it is impossible, but would likely need some CPO's, moving stops, etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Ok, so how about upgrading the red line, leaving the existing bit between heuston and the point as is, but turn the rest of it into a metro? going underground shortly after the naas road? Could this then be used as the heavy east - west spine that we need? serve heuston station and several other areas, terminating perhaps at the new irish glass bottle site etc?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,436 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Sounds very much like DART Underground, which would also do wonders for relieving congestion on the Red line.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Easy, run a new line parallel down the quays. Could be part of the new Blanchardstown and Clongriffin lines. Doing this would be WAY cheaper then either doing a Metro or DART Underground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Or just send Red Line down to College Green, Lucan Line down the Quays and Blanchardstown/Clongriffin use the existing Red Line.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Yep, that is definitely an option and would make more sense, avoids Blanchardstown/Clongriffin crossing the red line.

    Or perhaps Blanchardstown/Clongriffin down the current red line, Red line down the quays and Lucan down one of the proposed options further south.

    Lots of potential options, I suppose it would depend on which are the busier lines and the max capacity of each.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    I don't think another luas down the quays etc is worth considering, it'd way cheaper than DU or a metro. But it's also a total joke of a system in comparison...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Not exactly, my plan opens up major transport capacity, for the huge amount of industrial units around the nass road, to be turned into residential, as per plans...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 161 ✭✭OisinCooke


    I think there’s no way around it, DART Underground NEEDS to happen, it’s not about getting people from Heuston to the city centre, or taking pressure off the Red Line, it’s about maximising the capacity and usability of the Northern Line and the Kildare Line - the two only fully grade separated (and hopefully soon enough, quad-tracked, and therefore IC-and-stopping-service-separated) lines in the country to create a near Metro style DART service, and no Lucan - Ringsend metro or east-west Luas line can ever achieve anywhere near this.

    This is not in any way to say however that we don’t need more east-west Luas alignments, the fact is we needed them 20 years ago. In an ideal world, the Red Line would be cut and covered between the Aishling Hotel and George’s Dock, but I fear this is unlikely to happen.

    Separating the city centre section with the Naas Road and beyond sections of the Red Line and converting the latter to metro, while a nice idea, is unfortunately also very unlikely, and not a fantastic plan overall. The line is rather unsuitable, with a great number of graded heavy intersections and tight turns. I agree though that a capacity and frequency upgrade is needed on this line, and while extra trams in this outer section is very feasible, this becomes much more of an issue when they reach the city centre.

    I like the ideas of having 3 separate lines for the 3 separate routes - Red Line, Lucan Line and possible future Blanchardstown Line but I think a line down the quay is the wrong idea. A better solution would be a line down Cork/Kevin/Cuffe Street, and another down Thomas/Dame Street. This has the same effect but opens up far more areas to Luas than a line down the quay which would be only 150m away from the Red Line at most, while also keeping a very equal spacing between the 3 lines - about 500m to 750m. I know that the idea is not to increase catchment but rather capacity, but I think there’s no harm at all in having extra city centre tram access, especially to places like Temple Bar, Christchurch and St Patrick’s.

    Going back to the Red Line city centre capacity, I believe DART Underground plays a critical part in this. Once open, it will become the primary desired way to get from the city centre to Heuston and therefore will alleviate huge pressure off the Red Line in the city centre. While not a full solution to the need for extra trams, it will certainly hugely improve tram capacity for people in these suburbs who’s trams home won’t be packed with Heuston commuters who will all instead be on DU hopefully. This combined with better priority for Luas at junctions in the city centre, and maybe sending some Red Line trams down either of the other 2 city centre routes which may be quieter, would really make a great difference to the feel of the Red Line in the suburbs and city centre.

    Tram length on the Red Line could very easily be increased to Green Line levels too, as outside the city centre there is plenty of space to increase platforms. Within the city centre there isn’t however, so the Red Line would need to use the new south city route (which could be built brand new from the start with increased length platforms) instead of the Lucan Line which would use the city centre portion of the current Red Line - Luas Lucan follows a route through much less dense suburbs than the Red Line so could easily survive with shorter platforms.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I’ll be honest, I don’t really want to discuss DU here, as there are other threads for it and it has already been discussed. Given the Dart+ Tunnel report, unfortunately I believe the project is dead and that we won’t see it in our lifetimes, so I’m working on that presumption and given the topic of this thread, looking at the alternative options and more at what would need to be done to deliver the Luas Vision 2050 network.

    I agree completely that outside the city it would be trivial to upgrade the red line stations to support 55m trams. I previously went looking at every station on Google Maps to get a feel for it and while of course there would be some work to do, like moving track switch overs, etc. it really doesn’t look difficult at all. It is the city center section that constrains it.

    That is why I like the idea of the quays, given the space available there, it should be trivial to build all the stations to 55m spec.

    I totally understand the attraction of Cork/Kevin/Cuffe Street, however the issue is where do you go from there, it just ends at Stephen’s Green. By comparison along the quays you boost capacity right into the Docklands. It would also help support all the new lines on the North Side of the city, Blanchardstown, Clongriffin, Balgriffin lines, while your Cuffe Street routing wouldn’t help there.

    Also another point, if you take the current red line and move it all the way down to cuffe street, you are going to have lots of angry current red line users as now it doesn’t go where they need and they have to transfer. By comparison moving the red line just one street south shouldn’t be as controversial. I know this shouldn’t matter, but look at the controversy about the BusConnects E-spine and the NCR.

    I’m definitely not against the idea of using cuffe street, hell maybe even do that too and have different trams take different routes like is common all over Europe, a real network!

    But I do think the people are over focusing on destinations, I don’t think it is as important as capacity and flexibility.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,265 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    The Heuston - Point part is the slow bit. After that it's a lot quicker. There's no point putting it underground outbound after Heuston. The city centre is the problem. It still doesn't have signal priority ffs.

    FWIW I don't expect DU to be built within most of our lifetimes, it'll probably be 50 years before they see sense.

    Post edited by Hotblack Desiato on

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    How can DU be dead, with the population exploding the way it is ? Also whatever figure it will cost, will be an absolute pittance in the scheme of our annual budgets... our best hope is, they start fining us billions for our emissions breaches



Advertisement