Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1862863865867868943

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    We should see those 2 things happen this year, as commercial construction has flatlined and there will be a diversion of resource to residential.

    This is one of the reasons the govt are confident of breaking the 40k new homes mark this year.

    The new planning act also comes into effect, which will make judicial reviews much more difficult to implement and will help shut down a lot of nimby protests about new homes being built.

    We stil need immigration to provide services, maintain MNC jobs and so forth; so limiting it is a balancing act.

    We are at full employment with job vacancies everywhere. We need workers.

    BusConnects, as an example, looks like being delayed yet again because we dont have enough drivers and we havent had enough drivers for literally years.

    Every bar, cafe, hospital, retail store in Dublin is crying out for staff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    How would you deliver a balanced immigration policy, considering the number of open job vacancies in the country?

    We clearly need more workers to provide essential services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    We need qualified, skilled, workers who will actually work.

    Unqualified immigrants, some of whom don't even speak English, are not helping the housing crisis by sitting in housing, at great cost to the state and Irish tax payers, not working.

    Its completely possible to tailor immigration to maximise the former, and minimize the latter.

    You still tying to equate all immigration as being the same, and all as needed, is either you being deliberately obtuse or pushing a very damaging bias.

    ie for example:

    employment123.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I am not pushing any bias, just asking what kind of policies we could implement to bring in the workers and not the non-workers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    You've been told that repeatedly in this thread - copy Denmark's asylum policies to reduce the numbers of asylum seekers arriving by 90%, reduce the numbers of non-EU lower income / less skilled / less essential work visas issued (the starting point for them currently is €33k pa, barely above minimum wage), and reduce the numbers of non-EU student visas greatly for a start.

    It would be possible to shave off 30k-50k a year arrivals with very minimal negative economic impact (quite the opposite in fact..), and none whatsoever on housing sector building capacity. That would effectively be adding tens of thousands of housing units a year to our output.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    With regard to employment, we went from one extreme to the other. Back in the 80's there was high unemployment but if you did have a job, you could afford accommodation. Now we have full employment and even labour shortages, but most of those jobs don't get you a decent place to live. I would say this is also a bad situation.

    Now no one is saying we go back to the 80's but a case can be made for some sort of balance in the economy.

    It starts with asking ourselves exactly what the benefit is to society of a lot of these jobs. For example, it is a lot easier to get takeaways of various types delivered to your door and the variety is much greater than in the past, but how much does society benefit from this service, particularly given that the delivery people, the cooks and and associated workers need a place to live and there's a chronic housing shortage. Maybe we can do without some of these in return for cheaper and more widely available housing?

    Another example might be office cleaners. Sure, if we were to reduce unskilled immigration into the country, there would be fewer people willing to do these jobs and wages might have to rise to attract people. This would mean that corporations would have to pay more for their cleaning services, relatively speaking. But these costs are negligible compared with their other costs such as marketing and product development.

    And even the large multinational corporations that have moved here. I'm not suggesting we get rid of them but I would question whether increasing their presence would be good for the country. Increasing their presence would put further pressure on housing and services and may not be to the overall benefit of the people. Yes it would increase GDP and the Government's tax take and those are good things but I think the mistake we've been making is thinking they are the only consideration.

    The sort of immigration we should perhaps be looking at is people who will benefit society as a whole. For example, we might be short of medical expertise in a particular area and consequently people have to travel abroad to get proper treatment for certain illnesses. Here, it would be beneficial to society to have a consultant with that particular expertise brought in.

    Another example might be people expert in the quick and cheap assembly of modular housing that has been manufactured abroad. Again, an immediate benefit to society.

    Again, I am not taking about doing away with all other types of immigration but I think gradually our policies need to start changing direction. Just because the market can take more people at minimum wage level does not mean it should.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Asylum seekers are less than 20k of the 150k immigrants that arrive each year, but lets say the tougher conditions mean we only get 10k.

    Low skilled jobs doesnt mean low value. If nobody from the EU is filling jobs in hospitals, retail, hospitality and care, then we need people from outside the EU.

    We could reduce the numbers of non EU students, but how many are there and what impact would it have on the overall immigration numbers?

    Maybe we could reduce immigration by 30k annually with the above approach. My main concern would be the low skilled jobs going unfilled and the impact to public services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Diecouraging MNCs and the employment they bring would be the last thing we should be doing.

    If those jobs go, they are very difficult to get back. Our best educated youth will then follow those jobs out of the door and wont be quick in coming back to Ireland.

    We have done the hard part by attracting and retaining the MNCs; accommodating the employees should be the easy part.

    We need to build more homes! That should be the focus: Not focussing on cutting employment opportunities for irish citizens, simply because we havent built enough houses to accommodate the population.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,702 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    I believe housing completions, unbelievably, are to fall... this housing emergency for some, is get a richer scheme for those in power, that's why it will get worse for some and better for others. Prices are still rising at an alarming rate... at this stage your best bet, is to get yourself on the housing list as soon as you can if you're young and get as good as free housing, or pay e2400 a month for your one bed apartment in certain areas of Dublin, that are as good as free if you're in social housing …

    If they were serious about housing, they would actually put a freeze on commercial development, for at least 2 years, no more data centers, divert available resources to housing and hotel etc.

    If they wanted to increase supply, here you go, for example , you crane one of these or a larger one, onto an existing site, that is serviced, the definition of sustainable, won't happen though, no money in it to gouge out of working people for decades...

    https://www.donedeal.ie/gardensheds-for-sale/garden-room-portable-cabin-portable-office/33944179https://www.donedeal.ie/gardensheds-for-sale/garden-room-portable-cabin-portable-office/33944179
    Post edited by Idbatterim on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,702 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Here's a solution, maintenance free. Factory built, highly insulated... crane it in, hook up to services , done...

    https://www.donedeal.ie/gardensheds-for-sale/garden-room-portable-cabin-portable-office/33944179

    https://www.donedeal.ie/gardensheds-for-sale/garden-room-portable-cabin-portable-office/37032336

    https://www.donedeal.ie/gardensheds-for-sale/garden-room-portable-cabin-portable-office/37032336



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,035 ✭✭✭Villa05




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The article isn't saying completions will fall in 2025 or 2026, it is saying commencements will slow this year and next because of the large uptick in commencements at the end of 2024, brought on by a tax incentive deadline in December 2024.

    Completions this year should top 40k for the first time since the tiger days and then increase further in 2026.

    Also note that one of the challenges faced by the construction industry, according to CIF, is labour shortage.

    We continue to see labour shortages in almost all industries, despite the levels of immigration into the country.

    How do we ensure we increase employment in the construction industry, as well as other essential public services, during periods of net immigration?

    Not all of these vacancies are "skilled" roles. We need more people to fill all skill level jobs, not just degree/third level employment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Modular homes could well be part of the solution. Is planning an issue with these?

    The govt have touted similar solutions for IPAS for a few years now, but I dont think many have actually been delivered. Why not?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    2nd and 3rd on the list are a food processing company and a care facility.

    Proves the point again that employment from overseas is not just about high skilled roles.

    If companies cant fill their jobs with Irish/EU citizens, they do need to look globally for staff.

    This applies to all skill level roles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,702 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    If You put up one of these on your land, max 25 square metre without PP, you're not meant to live in them. I.e they shouldn't have a bathroom and kitchen. Worst case, you get inspected and they tell you to take out bathroom or kitchen. What are they going to do, put a guard outside every night, to make sure it's not going to be lived in? Lol...

    Those scum, create a depraved situation and then tell you what they will and won't permit. You dont ask in this country, you do. Several of my mates have these up on their parents property in Dublin. Ten thousand saved a year minimum in south Dublin, to live in a **** house share. They can be craned in and out and sold at any time, used as garden room , gym, rented out.. they are a brilliant investment...

    These modern small homes are luxury compared to many of the **** hole rooms in rented houses... I should know, I am frequently in these dumps as part of my job.

    But look, don't listen to me, go put, spend hundreds of thousands in rent from your early twenties on, into your late 30's /40' s etc.. be a walking poverty case and bow to your government overlords...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,917 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I don’t work in the sector but from the outside I’d heard a lot of doom and gloom around the IT sector here in 2024.

    This paints a very a positive picture if permits are up 2023.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭greenfield21


    This is really bad advice, and shouldn't be allowed here as it will cost someone alot of money, if you're going to build a shed in your back yard to live in you will require planning permission.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    It depends on where the permits are going. I think people assume IT, but 2nd and 3rd on that list are a food processing plant and a care home.

    Both of those businesses issued more permits than Google, Intel, Microsoft or Meta...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Having a legal pathway for modular homes to be accepted and pass planning requirements is the key, if we want modular to be part of the national housing solution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,035 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Do we know if jobs in I.T. grew or rather the skills gap grew.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,702 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    a shed is what you store your lawnmower it etc… It will amaze you, but these structures, low and behold, are built from steel, timber, they use the exact same building materials, that are used in houses… believe it or not, they dont create special "shed" materials…

    What is your advice, given you reject this? Live at home long into adulthood? house share in a kip for a fortune, blowing through tens of thousands before you realise, "oh ****, this is actually a serious probem that I should have considered much sooner?"…emigrate?live in a tent?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,702 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    These units are allowed in the US and Australia, no doubt in far more countries, but I came across those countries when I was researching it on youtube. Read about the huge numbers of benefits they bring. But they have one collossal downside. You would put a serious dent in demand and allow people to house themselves for next to nothing… That is why they wont permit them here. There is no money in it for the big boys…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,702 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    what shed? I wouldnt suggest living in a garden shed. I would suggest building a garden room, like a staggering amount of people have… They are rampant now, gained massive traction during covid, for obvious reasons, you can see it from all of the garden room companies, posting pictures of their finished product, often including bedroom…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    A good question. Other European countries have already done this though limiting illegal immigration. Whilst is only a small amount of the total number of immigrants arriving here, it would be a good start. Beyond that, and working within the law, I'm sure that a lot could be done to limit or actively discourage immigration from non-EU nationals.

    I'll fully admit that I'm not an expert on what is or isn't legally possible in this regard, but I do not accept the premise that 150k* people will arrive here from overseas each year and that nothing can be done to limit this number.

    *this is the total figure that comprises all legal and illegal immigration, including returning Irish citizens. To avoid a repeat of a recent misunderstanding, I am not suggesting barring Irish citizens from entering or indeed anything that breaks the law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The 150k breaks down as about 65k irish and european immigrants and 40k work permits from outside the EU.

    I think most would agree this 105k is welcomed and required.

    Then we have roughly 20k IPAS, which could potentially be reduced if benefits are less generous.

    That leaves about 25k, which includes foreign students and Ukranians.

    Not sure if there are other groups that comprise the 25k?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Agreed that there are some forces at play that dont want to see large scale modular homes built.

    However, modular developments on the outskirts of towns; or even new, smaller, modular settlements, away from existing towns, should be achievable.

    There will be a two tier housing market. Modular homes will not cost or resell at the same level standard homes in established areas do, but they could certianly help alleviate the housing crisis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    For anyone who is interested, here's the breakdown from the CSO:

    https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-pme/populationandmigrationestimatesapril2024/keyfindings/

    "I think most would agree this 105k is welcomed and required."

    This would, I think, depend entirely upon the individual's position. If one is struggling to find a home, pay the rent or is homeless, then I doubt that they would feel this way. I personally believe that sentiment towards immigration has shifted in recent years, and some polling has been done that would back this up.

    Why do you think that nearly 100k NET population rise year on year is a good thing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Approx 65k europeans (including irish citizens) arrived, but approx 48k of the same grouping left.

    There is only a net increase of approx 17k amongst this cohort, for the entire country.

    Approx 21k non EU nationals & IPAs/Ukranians also left during the 12 months to April 2024, which offsets the approx 85k that arrived down to a net increase of approx 65k.

    The other approx 20k increase is natural, births vs deaths.

    We can see that the largest net increase comes from the non-eu narionals and IPAs, but it is difficult to find a comparison that shows the composition of that 65k increase.

    How many work permit holders left, vs the 40k that arrived, for example.

    How many Ukranians left and how many arrived?

    How many IPAs left vs the 20k that arrived?

    I cant find any of those comparisons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    But you didn't answer my question. Why do you think that 100k NET immigration is required or welcome?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I didnt say that.

    I said the 105k returning irish, europeans and work permit holders will be broadly welcomed, because they are delivering employment and services to the country.

    This group does not constitute a net increase of 105k people anyway, since 50k - 70k of the same grouping left the country during the same period.



Advertisement
Advertisement