Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1378379381383384394

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,366 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    There were no level crossing accidents in 2022 where a train struck something, there was one in 2023 which while not fatal led to very serious injuries.

    In the 2023 incident there was someone in the cab who shouldn't have been there, not a factor but a breach of procedure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    No I don't need to read anything.

    There is no extra responsibility in having safety cameras on in driver cabs. That is a simple fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,991 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    The drivers just don't want the cameras in case they are caught on their phones. That's the truth of it. They have absolutely nothing to fear from a CCTV camera if they are just doing their job properly. They don't have to point at instruments while wearing white gloves and saying out loud what the instrument reads, like Japanese train drivers do. This is proven to have improved safety on JR by the way. All the Irish Rail drivers are being asked to do is quite simply nothing.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointing_and_calling



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,459 ✭✭✭highdef


    Exactly, the driver does his/her job in exactly the same manner, whether there is an in-cab camera or not. The enabling of a camera in the cab does not mean an increase in responsibility. The installation of a tracker in my company supplied car made no difference to my responsibilities, workload or how I conduct myself when driving.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,201 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Thanks for the fatality information. Great to see Ireland is the best performer. But most accidents are non-fatal, and even with no persons injured. Accurate and inteernationally compatible data on all (reported?) accidents is difficult to come by.

    I would imagine that momentary driver innatention, which CCTV might be trying to monitor, would be reflected in occasional SPADS and drivers not sounding timely warnings to people on or near the line. Many of the latter will never be reported - near misses. If CCTV helps to improve matters, it should be used, but try to avoid heavy-handed discipline, which may lie behind union problems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,494 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    if a driver is on their phone then they will be found out very quickly so cameras won't make a difference there, inspectors travel the network regularly and unannounced and under cover so as to insure drivers are doing the job.
    from nearly 30 years of using the railway i have never once saw a driver on their phone when they should not be.
    as for not stopping in time, very sadly that doesn't really exist as by the time a driver sees someone on the line in the best conditions it's generally already to late unfortunately if traveling at speed.

    so the not safety cameras being switched off or removed won't make a difference in any way to passengers.

    we are safe.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,772 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    I wonder why they use "per thousand km of railway tracks" in the stats? Wouldn't "per thousand km travelled" or something along those lines be better?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,751 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    First figure is very easy to find and verify. Second one is neither.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,366 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Typically metrics are presented as per million train km or million passenger train km or million tonnes train km to normalise



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I suggested, maybe two years ago, that we should have a separate DART+ Rolling Stock thread. The last couple of pages are exactly why I did so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    100% this.

    Most people who don't understand how railways work don't realise how strict and enforced the rules are. Railway rules are written in blood (IE someone's death has forced a rule to be created).

    I think in 2022 there were only 11 SPADs only two were deemed serious. (I know on the DART is a SPAD happens the brakes are immediately applied. It's possible that another train in the same signal block also have their brakes applied in the event a SPAD is detected, I don't know for sure if this system is in place)

    There are more speed checks carried out against trains than the Garda do are against Road vehicles in Ireland.

    There are inspectors everywhere.

    The records I posted above that were backed up again @KrisW1001 show that Ireland has the safest railways in the EU.

    So again, I ask the naysayer's: Given all the evidence above HOW is the addition of CCTV in the driver cab going to improve safety?

    This is clearly just something to punish drivers over trivial rubbish.

    In any case, all the union has to do is wait, they don't need to strike. The government will get involved when timelines project start to get missed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    The rules aren't worth the paper they're written on. There's no auditing on 99% the CCTV out there, so there's no way to check who watched it.

    And even at that, Irish rail could argue the subject of the recording is the Cab and not the driver in which case they could watch the CCTV when ever they want.

    Anyone who's actually gone through GDPR will realise how subjective the terms of reference in it are. The scope is so wide it serves an excuse to do nothing and anything.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,772 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    How would the inspector check if a driver is on their phone?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    If on a platform, they'll just walk up to the cab and look in the window.

    There's also CCTV on some sections track.

    The inspector can also just access the Cab from passenger area on the train, I've seen them just walk in to the cab between stations in the past.

    You have to keep one hand on the power handle at all times otherwise the train will engage the brakes, you won't have time or the dexterity to put the phone away quickly enough by the time the inspector opens the door.

    If you're using your phone while driving a train, you will be caught… and it won't be 3 penalty points and €120 fine either…

    Post edited by Beta Ray Bill on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,991 ✭✭✭✭murphaph




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    Maybe you should explain how it will improve safety first?
    I've done loads of splaining on this thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,991 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    I've already made the comparison with the airlines. Cockpit voice recorders have solved mysteries surrounding crashes that we have learned out of, to prevent the same mistakes being made in future. I see no reason why we shouldn't use similar technology on the railways. The "sure railways are very safe" argument is nonsense. Air travel is statistically even safer than train travel.

    So what would be an example of the "trivial rubbish" you speak about?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,456 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    Apart from the DART units, where the deadman is pushing / holding down the power handle, there is no requirement to keep your hands on the controls if you don’t want to.

    You can notch up and then take your hands off and the train does the work. The deadman is a pedal on the ground. When that beeps you lift your foot off the pedal and immediately put it back down. You have to do that fairly quickly.

    There is plenty of time and opportunity to use your phone if you wanted to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You clearly don't understand GDPR, particularly the rules around what CCTV can be used for and not used for.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,097 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Any updates on the DART+?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    If you don't want to read the posts correctly, then you'll keep making mistakes. You are the only one bringing up in cab CCTV as being extra responsibility. Nobody has suggested that.

    Highdef doesn't understand the extra responsibility of having more passengers on a train, and thinks drivers are just after a pay day. I could be wrong, but he seems to have a grudge against rail workers getting decent pay and conditions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,583 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    anything that's not related to cab CCTV I guess



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,831 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    You came in and made a sweeping claim about responsibility while the conversation was about the CCTV cameras. It's very understandable that people took you up as meaning the CCTV was the extra responsibility.

    It's about time you actually explained what you meant. If you done that earlier rather than being sarky about it and not answering when you were asked it would have been easy to clear up the confusion.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,358 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Mod: I think CCTV in the cab has been done to death.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,000 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    West has planning permission, but is facing a judicial review which won't be resolved for many months. The depot decision leaves the whole DART+ programme in doubt but IÉ are working on a revised submission for the depot. The delay will of course have impacts on the entire scheme and even the delivery of new trains as there is presently nowhere to store them

    South West has planning but can get a JR anytime until the 8th of January.

    Coastal north is in planning for only 2 months so there'll be nothing for another 2 years or so.

    Coastal south is om ice for the moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    I made no sweeping claim. I just pointed out a poster's bias against train drivers, and their confusion between responsibility and workload, which aren't the same thing.

    Other posters got confused about it, yourself included.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Irish Rail are currently making space, and building new roads to store the trains.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭scrabtom


    I've been told that Irish Rail has started looking at an entirely new location for the depot rather than trying again in Maynooth.



Advertisement