Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Sinn Fein and how do they form a government dilemma

1376377379381382392

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,478 ✭✭✭pureza


    under the circumstances

    But on closer inspection,SF need to look at how to grow their vote

    It dropped by nearly the population of Cork city where as numbers voting for FF and FG rose

    You can’t fish in a left wing and centre pool at the same time so you’re going to need some sort of hybrid or find a way to marry FF which might lose core voters too

    You know the difference between a negotiated programme for government and individual party manifesto’s,you do ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,773 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Plenty said they don't want to be governed from the juggernaut too Brendan.

    Fault-lines remain the same. Nobody has gone away.

    En garde, off we go again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,773 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Both parties said the crisis's will be significantly reduced.

    This we now all know.

    Let's see how they do, hiding behind that early excusing of failure ^^^ ('ah it was X who wouldn't let us put the measures in the the PFG') won't cut it Pureza.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It is clear that very few posters on here appreciate the difference between election manifestos and negotiated programmes for government. The art of compromise, essential to politics, is lost on the hard-core SF supporters in particular.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Your enthusiasm won't be matched by excitement in opposition. Sinn Fein are tired and dated, without even having got into government. People don't believe EOB on housing, they don't see how a thug like Cullinane could fix health, so they don't vote for Sinn Fein. Yet, those are the tired old politicians that we will see rolled out again. Maybe MLMD could freshen things up by rolling out Ellis?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,773 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Pre-emptive excuse making is very transparent.

    If as you guys say, the public endorsed FF FG to be back in government, the buck stops with FF FG.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,478 ✭✭✭pureza


    who’s hiding? The bar is the programme for government

    Period



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,773 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Yes. We know this. That's what every government concocts, a PFG based on the promises made by the parties of the coalition. Correct me if I am wrong but they all said they had solutions, well now is the tie to see if they are serious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,796 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    i think they done brilliant tbh. after the concerted campaign of bullshit that was lead against them and the right wing'd 'get them out' ers etc, they've shown they have as much voting power as either ff or fg. I dont think they have issues growing their vote to be fair



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,117 ✭✭✭StormForce13


    You'd want to have an exceptionally poor grasp of statistics to claim that falling from 35% to 19% is "doing brilliant" or that "growing their vote" from the 24.5% that they achieved in 2020 all the way down to 19% shows that they're on the way up!

    The main thing that your comment suggested to me that your expertise in bullshit is second to none!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,773 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    FF actually crashed the economy and lost nearly 25% of their actual support in a GE managed to 'grow their vote' back to be the lead party by 9 seats.

    Those writing off Irish political parties that lose support for specific reasons do so at their peril.

    Carry on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,266 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    SF's vote management improved but there was a definite in overall support. Also I would argue that the SF PR machine is not as effective as it once was. It used to be head and shoulders above all the other parties on that score. Bit of a rethink/revamp needed.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,266 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Logically on the general question on how SF form a government etc. They basically want to be FF 2.0. Populism 1930's for the 2020's.

    But the problem is FF are in situ already. SF have arrived late to the game and somehow expect to take over? They have some notions altogether if that is the case.

    In fairness to SF they did a fantastic job at crushing Labour/Joan Burton along with PBP. Where the two leaders representing the "working class" but brought up in leafy suburbs of Dublin MLMD and RBB, painted the genuine "working class" Joan as part of the "establishment". All because of water charges in Dublin.

    SF have a much more difficult job to tarnish current FF and FG, as there are no major scandals, the country is doing well economically etc. What SF need to get that 10 -15% is a major FF/FG scandal while keeping their own nose clean. And dodging any incriminating new historical information each January, from the archives.

    I doubt that is going to happen for decades. As FF/FG are middle of the road centre right and occasionally centre left if the humour takes FF - they won't rock the boat. The Irish people like slow and steady governance not constant turbulence that other countries seem to favour these days.

    The Irish government is one of the few incumbents in Europe to stay the course, that is what the Irish electorate want. That is FF/FG's mandate. I notice that SF are always very quick to crow about their own "mandate", but never seem to acknowledge any other parties "mandate". I always get the impression that SF use the term "mandate" as code for justification of "The struggle".

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,266 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Mary Lou looked knackered as well, tired and worn out. I think there is a lot of bluffling form SF quarters.

    I think it was Katie Hannon who asked Mairead Farrell why did SF not make a pre-election deal with parties they would like to go to government in. Instead of trying to figure a deal out now?

    There was a long pause and worried look on the face of Farrell. And off she went waffling not saying anything. It was the long pause and the worried look, that was telling for me. As Farrell knew well that SF made a major error there. But she couldn't say it.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,051 ✭✭✭CrabRevolution


    "Mandate" is a useful term for them because it's meaningless. It's the term for whatever logical contortions are required to claim the public chose SF to govern.

    We're told the public rejected FF and FG, so neither party should be part of the next government as they've no mandate. But for some reason a FF + SF government would be OK because they magically do have a mandate despite the biggest party of that pairing being a party SF claim the electorate rejected.

    It's also apparently unacceptable for FG to be in government because they only have the 3rd highest number of seats. According to SF this means they've less of a mandate than SF and FF. Yet SF also campaign for all the left wing parties to gang together to form a government. This would naturally entail the 4th, 5th, 6th etc. largest parties going into government. By SF's logic surely those parties would have even less of a mandate than FG? No, it's OK because this would be a SF government.

    The most ridiculous thing about all these arguments is if they were true they wouldn't even need to be said. SF wouldn't be wasting time arguing about voter numbers, mandates, trends, the public wanting change, the FF/FG duopoly etc. if they had enough TDs on their side to back up their argument. They'd just get their TDs to vote for them and viola they'd be the next government.

    Reality is on FF and FGs side. Which is why they're currently forming a government, while SF are just talking away about mandates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Excellent analysis and straightforward talking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,117 ✭✭✭StormForce13


    There's a considerable difference between a slap on the wrist and a kick in the bollocks, Francie pet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,117 ✭✭✭StormForce13


    Any word on whether the current Taoiseach is going to pander to Mary Lou's ego by allowing her to meet him so she can give him the benefit of her extensive political experience?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    He should meet her out of courtesy but end it after five minutes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,117 ✭✭✭StormForce13


    It's one thing to end it, but how will he get her to leave Government Buildings once she's got her foot in the door! He should probably agree to meet her in his Cork constituency office, just to be on the safe side.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,773 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Your theory falls apart almost immediately as nobody claimed

    the public chose SF to govern.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,773 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You cannot distinguish between a 25% drop in support and a 5% one? OK, as I said, carry on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Ahh these people fire out mandate and they haven't a clue what it means or why it should or shouldn't be relevant. Let them bang away



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,245 ✭✭✭standardg60


    There is no greater compliment to a post being bang on the money than cropping a few words from it in a very weak attempt to claim something the poster never said.

    You're better than this. At least both Mairead Farrell and EOB stated in the aftermath of the election they would talk to the other left opposition parties in the hope of forming a broad coalition of change parties. ML then rode roughshod straight over this clamouring for a coalition with FF!

    Some in SF will get into bed with anyone as long as it leads to power, while some seem to be sticking to their principles, I foresee a heave tbh.

    Knowledge is learning something, wisdom is learning from it, intelligence thought of it first.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,773 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I seen nobody claim ‘the public chose SF to govern’.
    The poster is wrong to claim anyone is contorting to claim that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,245 ✭✭✭standardg60


    The poster didn't claim anything of the sort.

    In fact, the only person who is claiming such is ML, hundreds of thousands seemingly voted for MM to form a coalition with her, despite the fact he had expressly ruled it out and her preference was to form a government without him. I can only see one person being true to their word now, while the other seems willing to ignore their support in the pursuit of power. It's a wonder you are so supportive of those who really don't care about the wishes of their electorate yet think MM is wrong to ignore his.

    Knowledge is learning something, wisdom is learning from it, intelligence thought of it first.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,773 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The poster didn't claim anything of the sort.

    Yeh they did in the first paragraph.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,117 ✭✭✭StormForce13


    Maybe not, but I am fully aware of the difference between a slap on the wrist and a size 12 hobnailed boot in the goolies.

    Incidentally, I fully intend to "carry on" - with or without your permission; you may be a leading member of Sinn Fein's Remedial Spindoctor Team, but that doesn't make you a moderator.



Advertisement