Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Kerry Co Op Shares

1568101137

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,274 ✭✭✭alps


    There is no capital gains on death. Most will hold the shares until then. The tax free value can be distributed to family with large tax allowances for that transfer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,254 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Dairygold might, but Dairygold deal mainly in milk powder at present they are trying to diversity away from that. It great when milk prices are high( like Polish and Dutch beef) but the floor falls out of it when there is a surplus. Tirlan to get the milk down to it plants would cost 5-8 cent/L in extra transport costs. Tipp would probably be 3-5c/ L. Maybe Co-ops will start fighting but I doubt it. Much more likely they will rationalise and merge.....like Arrabawn and Tipp. Within 10 years there will probably only be 2-4 Co-ops in the country and they will be geographically based.

    Anyway tge highest paying co-ops are the West Cork ones I doubt if I would want to be dealing with Tirlan as they are masters of expecting you to buy there overpriced fertlizer and ration to give you a market price

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,099 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Explain how it would cost 5-8 cl in transport costs to get a load of milk to belview from kerry,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,254 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    What in a load of milk 28-30k litres. 3 hours extra return journey @ minimum 100 euro/ hour.

    300 euro divided by 28000 is 10c/L. It's actually more than a 3 hour return journey from north Kerry

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    And if you're going doing nothing with the shares bar carry them to the grave what difference does it make anyway?

    Maybe they should be a clause in that they have to go to the 12 grandchildren altogether? By which time Kerry shares might well be worth €5 each anyway?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,099 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Can you not do basic maths? 28000 litres multiplied by 10 cents is 2,800 euro, taking your figures and actually allowing 600 extra a load versus delivering to a Kerry plant would add 2.15 cents a litre onto haulage but you'd have zero issues getting a haulier to do it sub 2 cent a litre



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,254 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Because A&B shareholders see mainly C shareholders selling onntge grey market getting 40-60% of the actual share value. When there children inherit them they become C shareholders

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 228 ✭✭ftm2023


    To the poster that said it was “a load of rubbish” that if Kerry paid out the €50m and then the vote failed that it would badly effect the share price… you’re really showing your lack of business acumen. I see my wife with her job, she knows to the penny what revenue & profits will be for each year between now and the end of the decade… and you think Kerry Group can make a €50m goodwill payment to us and have nothing in return and that won’t effect the share price?

    A few of the posters on here remind me of “the big bad wolf” in the children story “The Three Little Pigs” - you can huff and puff like the big bad wolf but you won’t blow apart this JV - it’s going through

    Much more is going to come to light at the shareholders meetings regarding the 5.4c/L and the arbitration. In a nutshell the co-op’s legal team has told the co-op they will not get any more money than that if they go back to arbitration and with the case the PLC will put forward they may get absolutely no money whatsoever in arbitration and that the co-op’s directors would be personally responsible and open to be sued if they turn down the 5.4c/L and ultimately lose at arbitration. I’m not a solicitor or a director but when any of you go to the information meetings you can have it out with the solicitors and senior counsel etc tell them that they’re wrong



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭kerry_man15


    They have spent a fortune on lawyers fees over this time and reward the board handsomely for doing very little. The returns from Kerry Group holdings would be the same if there was no board and we'd get higher dividends.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭ginger22


    There is a lot of emotional comment on here with the last while. Now nobody hates the PLC more than me who have been stealing from me for the past 10 years but we have to put all that aside and make rational decisions. There is no point in talking about "what if's", lads need to look to the future. The reality is the CoOp have been dealing with a ruthless shower and this is the only deal available. Dreaming about getting more money from arbitration is just that , dreaming. Without this present deal no arbitration would ever be paid out. The PLC have their mind made up they are getting out of milk processing one way or another. Apparently the food brands are worth 350 million on their own so we are getting the milk processing for 150 million. The Kerry milk pool is about 1 billion litres so @ 1 cent per litre over 5 years that is just 50 million contribution from suppliers. Doesn't sound like a bad deal to me.

    Bear in mind also that the present management will be coming with the deal. While I may not like them personally I would have great confidence they they will run the business efficiently.

    Anyway this deal is certain to get accepted by the majority. As to who you will be selling your milk to going forward, lads are always free to switch to another processor.

    Finally I am willing to take some pain to get away from the present shower.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    65 to 75% has been more like it vs 85% here, and when you take value fluctuations into account its not the "great success" being proclaimed here.

    Especially, as others have pointed out, when the remainder is being returned to the PLC for questionable value deal, and when the coop has been a white elephant for a long time.

    The ambition of some A and B shareholders night not be to become C shareholders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 228 ✭✭ftm2023


    Excellent post Ginger22. Genuinely agree thoroughly with you. People are behaving emotionally and saying irrational things. I think a lot of people on here need to take a deep breath and look at the numbers.

    Would genuinely be curious how anyone gets on that reaches out to another co-op. Had been speaking to a few insiders at one particular major co-op and my understanding is that they’ll happily take on 1 or 2 suppliers here and there that want to leave as long as they’re side by side with their own suppliers already but they won’t be making any big swoops that could cause a ripple of any sort.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    Credit due to you FTM for keeping us abreast of those developments on a ongoing basis for the last while before finally coming to fruition this week...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,626 ✭✭✭straight


    As I have educated myself more it seems like a fair deal and I'd have to say fair play to people for finally getting it sorted. It's just a pity the way it was communicated so poorly. It's not like to the kerry lads not to keep their cards closer to their chest before the time is right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,298 ✭✭✭awaywithyou


    if FTM is who i think he is… he and his family will reap enormously from a yes vote…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    You're getting off to a bad start accusing people of being "emotional".

    We're seeing triumphalism and winning at the bookies touted as having superiority towards calling things out fair and square in response to presentations full of spin being rightly highlighted.

    Of course the board have done the best they could, so did the last one, and the one before it.

    The relationship between the processors and farmers is always very imbalanced, and those with the power have used it, those without have stopped resisting.

    Here's what we have, the final answer, take it or , well, just take it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    That's the luck of the draw.....lots of coop shares hoovered up for years waiting for this to happen



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭kerry_man15


    So all shareholders are going to have 15% of their current holdings tied up in the new venture? Is this correct? When will we ever get a chance to get that money out?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    We'll be owners of the new coop...that's about it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    He has a high profile alright...they certainly did rock the Kerry coop cradle at the AGMs



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    ….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭kerry_man15


    Glad I reduced some of my holding a few years back when the grey market price was strong. Don't like them taking 15% of the value of my holdings and putting them in a new venture I've no interest in and unlikely to get my money back any time soon, or ever! Thought they didn't like having so many shareholders but now they're glad to dip into everyone's pocket to fund this. For every 100 shares you own they're keeping about 8.5k towards the new venture, based on current Kerry Group price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭kerry cow


    it’s a stitch up job ,

    The plc could sell to anyone else ,

    And kerry co op could be liquidated to satisfy the shareholders in full , no hair cut ,

    But the suppliers are bait for the plc and co op


    stitch up job

    In the ifac survey , something like approximately 60 % favoured this type of deal , but 40% didn’t and a very large percentage didn’t even reply ,

    So it’s built on a house of cards



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    They always was going to be a trade off ... Recieving actual plc shares is a bonus though for that trade off



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭kerry_man15


    Is it though? How do you think the Kerry Group share price will go after they offload the dairy processing? It's already down 30% over the past couple of years. On todays prices you'll get about E480 in Kerry Group shares for every 1 coop share from this new proposal. Grey market price has always been about 5 x Kerry Group price since the redemption scheme was launched (E450 on today's price) so not much difference.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    You'd be hoping they'd increase in value to at least €100 + in the future...who knows...they could easily go the opposite way again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,298 ✭✭✭awaywithyou


    if this deal gets through… will it be bad news for the Producer Group organisation?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭ginger22


    I suppose it will depend on the price they will pay for milk but I suppose most lads will be waiting to see how it all pans out.

    I think the biggest risk will be the leakage of some very large suppliers in other processors catchment areas. If enough go it could be a downward spiral. The only hope would be if the food brands can deliver enough profit to prop up the milk price.

    I certainly wouldn't be interested in signing up to a long term supply agreement. Once burned and all that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭kerry cow


    I think the producer group won’t be effected if the vote succeeds ,

    in fact it bring clarity , vote passes ,

    The co op get to buy the goods ,

    They then issue new contracts ,

    The boys that stay , pay ,

    The ones that want to leave join the producer group ,

    That’s the way its goes ,

    So let’s get on with it , and stop spinning wheels .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,334 ✭✭✭cute geoge


    That can not be true ,CGT is unavoidable unless you have a capital loss elsewhere to balance against the gain .



Advertisement