Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Kerry Co Op Shares

13468937

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    It's saying 1cent/litre for 5yrs on agriland.…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,298 ✭✭✭awaywithyou


    has to be more than that.. 350million.. 15% of 1.4billion is 210million… need another 140million… milk pool is 1billion litres.. 1c per litre is only 10million per year.. thats 50million.. wheres the other 90million coming from?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    It's 15% of 1.7 billion..250/260million...bank /plc loan 43 million...they have 70/80 million in coop account saved in account..it said 1cent/L per year in agriland article



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,254 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Kerry group is expecting a dividend of 7.5 million on the 30% they will still hold. The equivalent for which Kerry coop investment is 17.5 million the 1 cent levy gives you a total of 27 million

    150 million borrowed at 4.5% over 8 year would be repayments of a bit less than 25 million per year. It could be carried out by leveraging within Kerry Daries itself. Not sure how much existing debt the company has.

    From it's Company report Kerry co-op has about 20 million in cash reserves. That woukd mean total borrowing required of about 120-130 million. If you say it fast it's not too bad

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,390 ✭✭✭kerry cow


    what is wrong with supplying Dairygold or glanbia ?
    Forget the plants ,

    They are not needed


    rationalisation it called



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,100 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    The processing infrastructure is held together by good intentions and cable ties apparently, plc has purposely not been maintaining/upgrading it as they thought they'd of got shot of it at this stage....

    When you see the money tipp co-op spent upgrading their plant and issues/cost over-runs, it would pale in comparison to what the above could potentially swallow -up



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭kerry_man15


    They've been holding back some of the dividend from us every year to accumulate 10's of millions in the kitty and we still have to take a haircut with this new deal. They are ripping us off for sure!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    I thought they had a way more cash in bank...they must have spent a lot the last few years....I suppose they'll keep the latest dividends from Kerry plc to top it up ..…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    You'd wonder why the dry shareholders would vote for it either, apart from it being age related. It appears to be a poor deal, one would wonder should listowel be mothballed. The agristores and mill would serve everyone better if they were sold off too. Ironically, I'd say there are more independent agri merchants in Kerry than creamery linked ones, which is something you don't see as much in other areas of the dairy country. Most private merchants and millers are more competitive and provide a better service too, in my experience.

    I wonder what plan B is?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,630 ✭✭✭straight


    I just love the guys that say how much better than us the farmers were in the 70's to build up the Co-Op.

    In the first place you can only exist in your own era and not be judged against completely different circumstances.

    Also if those great men didn't sell the whole thing off to the stock market then we wouldn't have to buy the whole thing back now again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,298 ✭✭✭awaywithyou


    and that is the truth of it…. how braindead were they to give it away and now going spending 500 milllion to buy it back… and we think its only our govt that squander money



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,298 ✭✭✭awaywithyou


    in response to Cap.in.hand

    have you Co-op shares..?? do you get the annual report in the post every year… have you looked through the accounts?? our Co-op board would put our Government to shame when it comes to squandering money… as much as the childrens hospital will cost.. at least there will be something to show for money spent… co-op board are spending money and have NOTHING to show for it… but you can be sure they have lined their own pockets for our benefit of course



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    I have...not a lot.but it makes me a shareholder...in fairness I just look for what dividends are being paid to us every year and a quick glance at the accounts



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭ginger22


    Well there is no doubt that if the whole thing was shut down in the morning trucks would roll in from other processors and your milk would still be collected.

    As regards the farmers having sold the milk processing in the first place, a lot of additional wealth was created on the back of that decision. But that is not much consolation to a young dairy farmer with no PLC shares.

    You must remember that the Kerry CoOp board's loyalty will always be to the CoOp, whether farmers benefit from is existence going forward is another matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    As a shareholder if the dairy farmers supplying milk are not interested in supplying milk to Kerry coop then Kerry coop should be liquidated and let Kerry plc deal with it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,630 ✭✭✭straight


    Maybe so. Milk suppliers haven't been asked. All we know is that we are out of contract in 2026. Not that the contract means anything, because kerry have already broken their contractual commitments.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    This recommendation has been put to shareholders by the coop board members and advisory committee members who are milk suppliers ... I'd believe they would lean towards a higher milk price return to milk suppliers and a lower dividend return (if any) to shareholders....as a shareholder I'd say we'd never again get a dividend.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,254 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    They did not sell it they floated it on the stock exchange and created the largest Irish agri company. As years went by they recieved significant returns on there investment and many still have significant PLC holdings outside the Co-op structure. At present an orginal one pound co-op share has 6.15 plc shares linked to it with a value of nearly 600 euro. I think some orginal dispersals saw plc shares handed out but no co-op shares cancelled. Along the way some dairy farmers got co-op/plc shares related to there milk production in particular years.

    Even at today's valuation the Kerry daries is worth only a fraction of what the Co-op holding in the PLC is worth about 1.7 billion, however a significant amount of co-op shareholders are no longer milk producers and do not want to invest in the new dairy business.

    A compromise has been reached releasing about 80% of the Co-op value back to all shareholders and reinvesting the remained into buying Kerry Daries which some milk producers think is crucial. However it entails a contribution from dairy farmers.

    Every dairy farmer will have to look to see if its in there interest. For some former GVM suppliers and suppliers who transfered in to supply milk to Kerry from Clare and Limerick( many of these did it to access quota during the 80's and 90's) and do not have significant co-op holdings, these also have more options to transfer to another milk processor it may not seem an attractive proposal but the lad milking cows in Dingle and Cahirciveen have not got those transfer options.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,630 ✭✭✭straight


    Floating on stock market is selling as far as I'm concerned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭kerryjack


    Will these new shares in this new company have a value and could they be traded in the grey market like before, we don't know yet how many shares we are going to get and what value they will have rough estimate that a lad with 100 Kerry co op share will be giving away 15 and that times 6.25 that's close enough to 9 K invested in new company at today's Kerry group price



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha...

    Erm no, I doubt it, my guess is that your 15 shares will probably have an unrealisable value of €1.27 each.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,335 ✭✭✭cute geoge


    What this giving away 15 shares in every 100 co op shares about?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭kerryjack


    I can see how you would be a bit pestimidtic Castle keeper and Yes of course there is a lot of ifs there, will this new company be profitable and more importantly will they get the right people to run it because, let's face it we know Kerry co op had little purpose the last 40 years and they still managed to squander millions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭ginger22


    Well I think the present Dairy Ireland management will be coming with it. So I don't think it will mean good times for farmers. The bottom line will be more important for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,335 ✭✭✭cute geoge


    On Radio Kerry some Tom Fool from Kerry co op declaring it will secure the future of the factory in Listowel ,a fat lot of good that is to any man miking cows. A factory that is well gone past its sell by date and by all accounts foundations that are subsiding into the flood plains it was built on. Any shareholder is sill only getting a marginally better price then selling on the grey market when the 15% reduction is factored unless they also getting a share in the new equity .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 228 ✭✭ftm2023


    For anyone that might be daydreaming about trying to get this JV voted down - I’d like to share my own personal experience

    In 2019 Kerry Co-op came up with the “cash for shares” scheme. To summarise you’d to pay up to 58% income tax, PRSI, USC on the sale of your shares.

    You got no PLC shares, just a cheque and the co-op sold the shares and when you applied for the scheme you’d absolutely no idea what price you’d get for the shares.

    The board kept back 0.22 of each co-op share and before the vote refused to tell us what plans they had for that “haircut money”, there was talks of renewable energy etc which didn’t fill me personally with hope considering there was directors at the time saying they were going to borrow hundreds of millions against the whole lot of the PLC shares held by the co-op for an “exciting new project” they had in mind.

    Ultimately only 7% of shareholders ever took part in the “cash for shares” scheme, that number speaks for itself. I personally literally did absolutely everything humanly possible to have the scheme rejected. I felt it was a very poor deal and if we took that then the board would have said “the shareholders voted for this so it’s what they wanted” so I felt it was important we voted it down.

    In the end despite it being a poor deal and a massive backlash to the extent that the chairman at the time stopped chairing the shareholders meetings that were held before the vote (cos of the stick he was getting) they still managed to get 65.9% support and I only beat that chairman we had at the time by 17 votes. I personally was responsible for him being the first kerry co op chairman in 5 decades that got beaten at an AGM in a shareholder vote.

    In conclusion, despite the 2019 “cash for shares” scheme being a poor idea, offering a reduced share ratio, talks of colossal money being borrow for a mystery investment and to cap it all off - up to 58% tax, they still managed to only lose by 17 votes.

    This time it’s a tax free spin out of 85% & people will be getting 1 “new share” for each 1 current kerry co-op share they hold & a 5.4c/L of a payout on the arbitration debacle. I ask anyone who thinks this is going to get voted down - do yourselves a favour and don’t bother going back to Killarney on the day of the vote, stay at home and spare your diesel that day. Alternatively I’d wager a bet with any of those of you who believe this JV will be voted down. When 65.9% of people voted to pay income tax on their shares you can be beyond certain that no matter what at least 80% no matter what will vote for this tax free spin out



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭Castlekeeper


    You're spinning.

    It's not a tax free spin out. CGT will have to be paid on any and every PLC share sold.

    Plenty low income people sold reasonable amounts of shares under the last scheme with very low income tax liabilities andcwere in fact better off.

    No scheme will suit everybody. I didn't vote for the last scheme anyway, but at the time, it was seen as a medium term arrangement.

    Au contraire this new deal is being presented as a final answer and each one of those new shares is worth SFA.

    There is nothing on it for the farmer or the shareholder.

    A proper co-op liquidation and let Kerry PLC make what they will from a sale of the business would be better for everyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,630 ✭✭✭straight


    What is the 5.4c/l paid on. Is it on every litre supplied from 2020 to 2024. Or 2015 to 2024?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 337 ✭✭raindodger


    what year or years are they paying the 5.4c?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 228 ✭✭ftm2023


    No Castlekeeper. I’m not spinning. You don’t understand it. The average shareholder owns about €110,000 worth of shares and are in their 60’s or 70’s. They can pass on those shares to their kids and the children will each stay well below the €400,000 capital acquisition tax (inheritance tax) threshold. The kids can then sell those shares and pay absolutely zero tax whatsoever on them. If you don’t believe me then ring IFAC tomorrow morning and have them explain it to you. I’m right. The average shareholder will just be willing the shares to their kids, don’t think you’ll see many fellas buying sports cars out of the shares.

    In liquidation there’s 1/3 of the shares gone immediately in tax. When you lose 1/3 of anything it’s hard to come back from that.



Advertisement