Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Election to be called Fri - predict outcome

12930323435164

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,100 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    The aforementioned G Seoige is 1/10 I'm afraid 😐️ (90% chance of winning).

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,186 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    Yes Cluedo, Boyle Sports are offering odds on some cons. Not all, but about a dozen or so.

    https://www.boylesports.com/sports/politics

    I#'m specifically waiting on 1 or 2 cons as i have my suspicions on a couple of outsiders (well they should be)

    I can't remember when Joan Collins was first elected but i remember a good friend of mine telling me to back her as an absolute cert (he was from Drimnagh) and won close on 600quid placing a few smallish bets with PP & Boyle



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,930 ✭✭✭JVince


    ah come on. You are showing ONE MONTH's figures and wildly claiming it was the ftb grant that did it.

    The economy took a drop for a while in 2002 and house prices stuttered.

    They had DROPPED in 2001 when the ftb grant was there.

    December 2002 saw a 0.7% increase in new house prices.

    2003 - the year after the ftb grant was abolished saw new ftb house prices soar by 14.7% - here are the published figures -

    First time buyers V. Second time buyers:

    House prices for first-time buyers and second-time buyers increased by 14.7% and 13.4% respectively in 2003. The annual growth rate for first-time buyers and second-time buyers in 2002 was 11.8% and 13.3% respectively.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 538 ✭✭✭CONSI


    I had a labour candidate actually come back to my house after one of his group said I'd be interested in talking to him, was actually refreshing not to just have a flier in the door.

    Sinn Fein promising 370,000 homes over six years. Easy to promise but where and who is going to build these homes. Its classic election one up manship…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,186 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    If MM puts in a strong performance gives them a bit of an edge with recency bias a potential factor (If such interviews do indeed sway a voter)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,763 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Two months in the space of three months, not one.

    Where's your December 2002 stat from? The same PTSB series? If its from another, its not going to be the same baselines. You should link to something like that, like I did with mine.

    The figures you've given there are not for new houses, just FTB vs non FTB - FTBs buy second hand houses too - by the way. But they're also irrelevant.

    All your other full year figures don't matter - prices dropped, immediately, when the grant was removed; either directly or with fake "developer grants" - those not hiding the drop in actual prices. 2001 figures are also irrelevant as the grant remained constant throughout 2001.

    That the market was overheating and brought them back up is irrelevant. It would have been even hotter had the pointless margin guarantee remained.

    I know from elsewhere that you really, really dislike being proved wrong and I suspect this might be another case of a bad reaction to that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,794 ✭✭✭rock22


    Absolutely not. FF and FG are still relying on the private sector to drive this development. What is needed is the state directing the building of homes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,566 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I think it could really benefit them as party all round to stop just being different for the sake of it on absolutely everything. It’s tiresome to constantly be a detractor.

    If they came out and said ‘This economy is a phenomenal success. We think the proceeds could be better used to improve housing/health/infrastructure and the current gov are wasting the opportunity . Here’s how we’d do it. We’ll leave everything else alone’

    I think they could have much wider appeal.

    They’re tendency for idiotic policies and nonsensical positions on EU membership, corporation tax, property tax, more progressive income tax, reducing retirement age…whatever other way the winds blows means they are just too much of a risk to take.

    I’d be somewhat intrigued to see if SF could genuinely make a better fist of health and housing in particular. I doubt it, but I’d be willing to give them a go…but the risk they absolutely destroy probably the greatest economic success story in modern history is too high to give them a shot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    An alternative view is that demand dropped temporarily as first-time buyers, firstly, moved to buy before the cut-off, artificially increasing prices, and then delayed buying until they had saved some extra money. That this was temporary is shown by the rapid increase in prices the following year. Those who benefitted from the abolition of the grant and the temporary lower prices were non-first-time buyers with cash who moved in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,763 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    There was no cut-off, so that doesn't work

    It was announced that it was gone immediately. If you were already underway you could get it, absolutely nobody new could.

    There's no alternative view that works with the facts. Artificial support was removed, prices dropped for the single category of house with the artificial support.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    They only dropped temporarily, the beneficiaries were those with cash who could buy, and once first-time buyers saved the difference, the price went up.

    Schemes like HTB and the first-time grant give the advantage to first-time buyers. They squeeze speculators and second-house buyers out of the market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,817 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    All boils down to the candidate, Irish people have a tendency to vote for the person more so than the party.

    Some truth in that but needs to be heavily caveated

    FG are pretty much guaranteed a seat in every four- and five-seat constituency outside of working-class Dublin

    Plus FF & FG government ministers only lose their seats in the most extreme and exceptional circumstances

    which adds up to H-Mac being safe as houses…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,763 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    They went back up as the market was overheating.

    If HTB is removed, prices might also go up after an initial drop, due to other factors in the market.. It doesn't change the fact that HTB has increased prices.

    Two things can happen at once, you know.

    Second house buyers and speculators are already looking at needing vastly higher % deposits etc; HTB isn't pushing them out of the market. That needs to be done via taxation instead, if its actually something you want politically.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    And the mix of people buying will change if HTB is removed. First-time buyers will be squeezed out by those with cash, those buying second homes and institutional investors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,763 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    If this is your political goal, fix it via taxation not via giving builders extra margin.

    Second homes are not taxed anywhere near enough. Most rural holiday homes now pay under a third of the total property taxation as they paid pre LPT - €90 LPT vs €200 NPPR + €100 HC.

    Fixing this via tax makes the state money rather than losing it money by throwing it at developers helicopters and Maybachs in unjust guaranteed margin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    I agree about the greens. I see they want big increase in spending on transport, so I will give them a vote. If all the alternatives are looking to blow it all...



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,358 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    The state did a great job of building a cycle shelter. I think the state would need to be much better if the shelter had

    sides and was fit for habitation.

    But the shelter did come in at less than the average price of a house in Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,566 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Very impressed with Greens manifesto. Light on hard left wing tax & welfare policies.

    Ambitious plans on infrastructure, housing, climate, childcare.
    Locked in a high preference from me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,621 ✭✭✭Augme




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,640 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    They were already a high preference for me but still impressed with the manifesto.

    A lot of it is probably pointless as they won't get near certain portfolios in government but I like what I see in the ones they will. We are finally turning corners on public transport in this country and keeping that going is huge on my list of priorities.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,380 ✭✭✭thebourke


    anybody try this link votesmart

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/elections-2024/votesmart/votesmart-take-our-election-test-to-find-out-which-parties-and-politicians-align-with-your-views/a1537193874.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,566 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Agreed, although if there’s one thing the Greens have shown, they are effective as a minority partner having an impact. By staying consistent, on message and relentless on their core issues….even if they know it may not necessarily be popular with public.

    Very admirable in a world where it feels like no other party is willing to deliver the difficult changes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,353 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 529 ✭✭✭harryharry25


    Less houses were built between January and September 2024 than January and September 2023

    Housing output is falling

    Govt were handed their arse on RTE last night, Paschal looks worn out and tired, Darragh is just a joke of a man

    The debates are going to destroy the Govt, I expect the opposition to keep at the records in Health Housing and Justice and the Govt have nothing to defend themselves on, apart from a few shouts of won't someone think of the commencements



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,186 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    The debates won't be destroying anyone.

    Although i tend to agree that a few years in opposition won't do FG any harm.

    I note FF are pretty much joint favs with the bookies now for most seats, which is a fairly large change only up to a couple of weeks ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,566 ✭✭✭DataDude


    In all likelihood 2024 new builds will surpass 2023. 2024 will be the most houses built in Ireland for 17 years. It will also lead Europe per capita. As 2023 did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 529 ✭✭✭harryharry25


    Govt have promised 40,000 will be built this year

    According to all the experts they won't even get near 35,000

    Homeless numbers due out the morning of the election. Best of luck to the Govt trying to defend housing. We seen on RTE last night they can't



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,186 ✭✭✭wazzzledazzle


    But don't you think that's telling in a way that for us to be leading building per capita in Europe (it's a bit of an irrelevance really) how far we are behind other European countries, but again, you can't really compare like with like.

    I know they have different housing models in Central Europe anyway



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,566 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Housing for all targets

    2022: 24,600 (actual 29,662)

    2023: 29,000 (actual 32,548)

    2024: 33,450 (estimated 33-35)

    https://www.ey.com/en_ie/newsroom/2024/06/irish-housing-completions-forecast-to-be-strongest-among-19-european-countries-ey-euroconstruct

    Pretty easy case tbh.
    Biggest builders, fastest growing output, beaten targets every year. But don’t let facts get in the way of a good narrative eh?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,566 ✭✭✭DataDude


    We are far behind where we need to be because we lost 10 years of construction almost completely because we had one of the world’s biggest housing crashes. That’s pretty clear.

    How we have recovered to this level of building is absolutely remarkable and a huge credit to this current government. Rolling the dice to change following a remarkably successful few years due to issues created for very specific reasons two decades ago is very odd.

    Like man united sacking their next new manager after winning two games cause they’re still not top of the league!



Advertisement