Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

1537538540542543574

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,196 ✭✭✭Mr.Wemmick


    Agree with this.


    There was so much she could’ve picked up on that Trump ran away with. The trans issue for example has been blown and whipped up to such an extent it’s difficult to see the wood from the trees.

    All KH had to do was have the courage to say Trans rights will be protected, but not at the sacrifice of the rights and protection of women & girls. The issue is one hell of a mess and the failure of anyone to take a pragmatic approach to ironing it out is simply astonishing.. little wonder many women voted for Trump on the back of the promise to get rid of the problem.
    Needless to say, he’ll not sort it out only inflame, divide people and dramatise it even more.

    “The fact that society believes a man who says he’s a woman, instead of a woman who says he’s not, is proof that society knows exactly who is the man and who is the woman.”

    - Jen Izaakson



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,723 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Absolutely - but that's not how Trump works, and not what his supporters expect of him. And TBF Kamala Harris was extremely light on policies too. She tried to sell a "dreams and good vibes" candidacy herself. Yet posters here are claiming that Trump won because the Democrats were too noble. It seems to me that they tried to best Trump at his own game. And that was never going to win.

    Although to be frank, when that assassination attempt failed, that's when I felt Trump was probably going to win. And that wasn't Harris' fault. Not directly anyway. So maybe there wasn't much that anyone could do after that.

    Would a different Democrat candidate - maybe Pete Buttigieg for instance - have been able to change the whole atmosphere of the election so that that either didn't happen or didn't matter? Who can say?

    But I'm certain that if the Democrats double down on labelling a "right wing bigot" anyone who isn't up for drag queens being paid massive amounts of taxpayer funds to do shows in public schools, they aren't going to do much better next time out.

    Maybe it's even great really - but if parents don't want their children there, and don't want to pay for it, it's just not going to play well at the polls. Seems silly to waste so much electoral capital on something like this. And then to double down over it….

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,723 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    All KH had to do was have the courage to say Trans rights will be protected, but not at the sacrifice of the rights and protection of women & girls.

    Yep - this. Absolutely.

    But they couldn't do that because … - well, I can't really understand why not, but then I get into trouble on here regularly for refusing to call men women, so maybe I just don't have the right mindset to grasp it.

    But I can guarantee that talking down to women, and saying things like "Why do you care when it's only a tiny minority who are invading female spaces and women's sports" is only going to get more and more women's backs up. Because every male who takes a prize in a women's competition, affects multiple women, and every male who plays in a female team not only takes the place of a woman but increases the risk of injury to all the women who play against that team. And so on.

    In other words, the only way that "It's only a tiny minority" argument works is by considering that the effects on women, who are 51% of the population, are unimportant. Presumably because they are women.

    And that's not going to be a winning strategy in the long term. It also partly defangs the abortion issue as a reason to vote for the Democrats, by making it a "6 of one, half a dozen of the other" thing.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,196 ✭✭✭Mr.Wemmick


    It’s this nonsense idea that you can’t protect women or girls without eroding the rights of another group of vulnerable people and vice versa. Safe spaces are there for a reason and to allocate separate safe spaces is a pragmatic issue, one that should be quite easy to sort out.

    It’s bonkers that this issue became politicised in the first place and to see the left gift wrap and hand it to Trump to run with is beyond idiotic. He’ll not help either group as he doesn’t have clue how to unravel the mess to improve the issue for everyone involved. Trump will just shout one side down as he always done. No surprises there.

    “The fact that society believes a man who says he’s a woman, instead of a woman who says he’s not, is proof that society knows exactly who is the man and who is the woman.”

    - Jen Izaakson



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 678 ✭✭✭engineerws


    Iraq Body Count project (IBC) is a web-based effort to record civilian deaths resulting from the US-led 2003 invasion of Iraq.

    versus

    The Lancet 

    began as an independent, international weekly general medical journal founded in 1823 by Thomas Wakley

    . Since its first issue (Oct 5, 1823), the journal has strived to make science widely available so that medicine can serve and transform society, and positively impact the lives of people.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,723 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Oh yeah, for sure - one thing Trump doesn't have is principles. Other than his own interests, I don't think he believes in anything.

    One of the things that sickens me about his election is the fact tht he will no doubt use it not just to escape the various court cases against him, but will surely exploit his position to enrich himself and his family just like some third world dictator.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,511 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I know. What's your point

    He explained it in the same op-ed.

    Progress does not come in a simple straight line. Even though we lost seats heavily on Thursday, I believe the manifesto of 2019 and the movement behind it will be seen as historically important – a real attempt at building a force powerful enough to transform society for the many, not the few. For the first time in decades, many people have had hope for a better future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,723 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    I see your quote there, though there's no link and I don't remember the detail - but whatever he claimed in 2019, he didn't win the argument because he lost the election, and then resigned. The present Labour Party is nothing like what Corbyn wanted to make it. I think that counts as losing.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,723 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Yes I realised that afterwards. I was referencing the quote from memory, not a newspaper article.

    Doesn't change my point anyway. He was delusional. That's why he lost the election even though people were angry about Brexit and Tory infighting.

    Although there are interesting bits that the Democrats woudl do well to heed.

    Like this:

    There is no quick fix to overcome the distrust of many voters. Patronising them will not win them over. Labour has to earn their trust.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,600 ✭✭✭monseiur


    Simply because they haven't a clue, they take their pointers from the lefty Democratic type media in the US, besides the vast majority of them have no perception of life outside the M50 never mind the USA😉



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,441 ✭✭✭thereiver


    The democratic party should have focussed on working class issues immigration. Cost of living the economy also the reality is a lot of voters won't vote for a female president trump we t on alot of podcasts that are listened to young men

    Harris went on one podcast listened the by women

    She should have gone on the no 1 podcast Joe Rogan she basically did nothing to engage with the young men voter

    trumps son told him to go on certain podcasts with a young male audience

    Young men don't watch CNN or msnbc news in general

    We are probably 2o years away from seeing a female president in America



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,441 ✭✭✭thereiver


    Trump has a way of talking straight forward simple that appeals to working class voters

    There might be a rule if you want to appeal to young male voters or else you can lose the election in all probability



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭manofwisdom


    Trump here in Ireland was always favourtie with the bookies and punters to win so not that shocking. It's was a intense campaign of mis-information including Elon Musk with his owned twitter (X) worked a treat this time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,723 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    I don't really believe that voters refused to vote for Harris because she was a woman. There are enough instances of genuine misogyny to go around, without needing to see it everywhere (not talking about you there - it's been claimed by Democrats)

    I agree that she needed to widen her efforts to appeal, or at least to talk, to less "obvious" groups for her, such as young men. But then she didn't seem to be visible enough anywhere really.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What's the story with the guy with the keys? We were told he couldn't be wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,440 ✭✭✭✭astrofool




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,052 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Trump has simple messages like, 'Hey, I'll fix everything. Believe me.'

    You know how there is this claim that working class voters feel like the Democratic party looks down upon them? They're bringing that upon themselves a bit when they clap like seals at simplistic and sweeping claims without even stopping to ask a few simple questions about how you get from A to B. Would you respect someone more if they bought some 'magic' beans for 100 euro at a jumble sale without asking a single question about what magical properties they had or some tangible demonstration thereof? Probably not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,066 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    But she wasn't a bad candidate though. She was painted as such, but there was no evidence to support this. And I say this without claiming she was perfect, she wasn't, no one is.

    Can anyone saying she was a bad candidate point to someone who would have definitely done better than her. Or would have appeared to do so.

    I'd imagine names would include Buttigeig and Newsome and Whitmer. But if any of these had run, and lost, we'd be here today saying they were a bad candidate because 'America isn't ready for a gay President' or, 'Americans think California is in a bad way and it's Newsomes fault' or 'Whitmer didn't have a big enough profile'. And in all cases, choosing someone other than Harris demonstrated a lack of confidence in the Democrat administration of the last 4 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,066 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    It's a sign of the world we're living in that when I read this, I clicked on the highlighted link to make sure the reference source wasn't something called The "F*ck Around and Find Out" Institute.

    Screenshot_20241110_210244_Samsung Internet.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,377 ✭✭✭trashcan


    I’m quoting the man himself when asked to explain his childcare policy. Not disagreeing with you for a second if that’s what you thought. Your sarcasm meter might be a bit off today ? When people talk about Kamala’s lack of policy I cant help thinking, yeah, but have you listened to Trumps answers when asked about policy ?

    I’ve seen a lot of analysis, and a lot of the post mortems, some of which I agree with, some not. The nub of it really does seem to be that policy doesn’t matter, or at least no one was delving into policy to any great degree. Trump knew damn well, for instance, that no-one was eating dogs, or kidnapping kids at school to send them for sex change operations. Didn’t matter. He knew enough people would lap it up. I know you’re not supposed to call the electorate stupid, but it’s hard to escape the conclusion that they are wildly uninformed at best. Now of course if you’re the Democratic Party in the US then you can’t come out and say that, but it really is the elephant in the room. Media plays a huge role in it I think. There is no real attempt to hold Trump to account, and he just won’t do an interview where he has to answer anything but the most softball questions. Could you imagine him in front of someone like Mehdi Hassan, or anyone who would actually push him for an answer or try and make sense of the garbage he spouts ? Not once did I see someone push back when he came out with some unintelligent nonsense to say “I’m sorry, what ?”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,792 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Policy will never matter as long as there's a significant cohort of people out there that willing to believe lies from a known liar and whose level of assurances for the promises he makes amounts to trust me bro. The demographic that he's lying most to, as well, isn't going to see anything from him either just like the last time.

    At this point I'm wondering if it might be a better strategy for the Democrats just to deliberately throw the next 2 or 3 election cycles on purpose and let voters who usher in their own misery wallow in it for a while.

    Some people really do need to be whacked over the head a few times before the folly of what they do sinks in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,607 ✭✭✭Dick phelan


    I feel like most Irish people don't understand how different America is to most of Europe. You simply can't apply our way of thinking to America. I mean how many Europeans would accept a society where people go bankrupt because their child has cancer? How many would accept 6 weeks maternity leave, a for profit prison system, little employment protection etc. they aren't actually like us very much in how they think. I think it's why the likes of the Irish Times are so shocked when someone like Trump wins. I admire many things about America but wouldn't want to live there in a million years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 962 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    America is a great place if you have a really good good job. If you don't life will be a bit of a struggle with long hours of work and possibly a few jobs on the go for a person.

    As for employment law, forget about it. It's nothing compared to here.

    Land of the free my hole.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,066 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I lived there for a few years and glad I did, there's a lot to like about the place.

    But there's a lot that puts me off considering to live there long term. It's a fantastic country in many ways if you are healthy and in a decent paying job. But even outside of the healthcare costs, things you mention like maternity care and also paid time off are generally much less attractive than in Europe. The 'Right to Work' environment also would not be tolerated in much of Europe. I thought it was dramatic seeing the whole 'grab your things, you're fired' on TV but it is is very much like that in a lot of non-union environments.

    I went from 24 days Annual leave in Ireland, to 10 in America. But don't worry, it would increase by 1 day a year every year until it maxed out at 15.

    Had a friend there, he had 4 kids (2 his, 2 his partners from previous relationship). He was at work and was having blackouts, losing his vision for a few seconds at a time. I told him to take off and get it checked out. He was telling me he could not afford to get sick. He would get no sick pay and he literally could not afford to miss work. And he was making north of $150k. He was telling me one of his daughters was in cheer squad at school and the cost of her to be on the cheer team was going to be about 2 grand for the year. Between membership fees, outfits and planned travel events.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 466 ✭✭Piskin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,880 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    At this point I'm wondering if it might be a better strategy for the Democrats just to deliberately throw the next 2 or 3 election cycles on purpose and let voters who usher in their own misery wallow in it for a while.

    I think they've got to expect or at least hope the coalition Trump has built will largely fall apart without the glue of his 'charisma'…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,040 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I'm really curious to see the difference between national totals for Harris vs down ballot Dems. It makes no sense that this would be an election with such widespread split ticket voting, where folks would vote for a Dem Gov or Senator etc, but not for Harris.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,040 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Tulsi Gabbard is a confirmed Russian influence agent. She's a real life Selena Meyer.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 914 ✭✭✭nolivesmatter


    It's scary the ways in which the US doesn't protect it's own people. And they all seem to subscribe to it.



Advertisement