Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

The "full clip" changes nothing about what he said.

Do you think the Republicans essentially lost it in the last week?
Regardless of what anyone says up to then the Democrats weren’t putting in an inspiring performance - it’s possible in my view that Republicans have given this one away rather than Democrats have won

Whatever about a prosecutor Harris was as far from a “highly competent politician” that you could possibly get .

Going back to Trumps 2016 run, there is quite literally the same posters on here for the last ten years, nearly all have not accepted any criticism of their side.

Presented without evidence…. So incompetent she's got a campaign that's been running for nearly 4 years on its heels despite being on the hustings for something like 110 days. Amazing performance, if she wins it'll be one of the greatest campaigns of all time. Enormously successful fundraiser, too.

And, as you know, her opponent has yet to win the popular vote in any election. Ever.

I agree -you absolutely can and I support that right without reservation or conditions

Is that all you have attacking the tweet less not forget the corrupt edited clip came from the X account of Aaron Ruper who is such a corrupt individual he has his own entry in the Urban Dictionary "A lying sack of **** who deceives people for a living, in the name of his political ideology. Every word that comes out of his mouth is a lie"

you can be competent in one area and incompetent in another - it really isn’t that difficult to understand - it’s basic human nature - not everyone is “great” at everything - putting Harris forward as a “successful” politician is just naive - she was right place right time - she would never have survived an election had Biden bowed out months previously to what he did - she’s grown the the role in the last few months and I respect her for that- but she was far from great - pretty much everyone on this forum throughout her early days as candidate agreed she needed to be carefully managed - so sorry I don’t accept this revisionist theory

Unfortunately, I think Trump is going to win. Momentum seems to be with him. The Trump team tried to score an own goal at MSG last week only for Biden to clear it off the line and score an o.g. himself. I just think that voting for Trump has been better than polling in the last 2 elections and the same will happen again. I hope to be proved wrong and can't understand how half the voters are picking such a vile person

Trump tries revising his attack on Liz Cheney, by repeating himself- while deliberately removing the death threat.

“All I’m saying about Liz Cheney is that she is a War Hawk, and a dumb one at that, but she wouldn’t have ‘the guts’ to fight herself,” wrote Trump on Truth Social. “It’s easy for her to talk, sitting far from where the death scenes take place, but put a gun in her hand, and let her go fight, and she’ll say, ‘No thanks!’ Her father decimated the Middle East, and other places, and got rich by doing so. He’s caused plenty of DEATH, and probably never even gave it a thought. That’s not what we want running our Country!

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/donald-trump-softens-attack-on-war-hawk-liz-cheney-doesnt-repeat-nine-barrels-shooting-at-her-jab/

• Trump knows he screwed himself with the remarks
• By not repeating them he knows they were absolutely indefensible (and some have even pointed out, possibly even a violation of his multiple paroles)
• ”if you’re explaining, you’re losing”
• It sure still sounds like he wants “DEATH” for the Cheneys

A Senator is politician. You seem to have memory holed that. The only revisionism is coming from you, trying to pretend Harris didnt acquit herself well as a Senator.

You claimed she was as far from highly competent as its possible to be. That is way beyond mere incompetence oh and again you havent remotely justified that either.

Your current post is a total shift in goalposts not even trying to backup your previous hyperbole.

So your original claim is absolute nonsense from start to finish. Utterly without merit or foundation. Just an attack on Harris based on absolutely nothing.

As for this: "pretty much everyone on this forum throughout her early days as candidate agreed she needed to be carefully managed."

Nope. That is your invention, again backed up by absolutely nothing. Your are in no positon to make such claims for "pretty much everyone" on the thread.

nope - it was by a landslide agreement in media and here that Harris at the start of her election needed to be well managed and scripted to give her a chance to make the best impact because her off script narratives were dreadful and would have canned her election chances before they began - and she did just that ie stick to script - so no it’s not nonsense