Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

you insinuated that I didn’t believe Julia Roberts had the “right” to do that - I most certainly did not say that- we’re done here.

If Fox News wasn't hypocritical it wouldn't exist.

In the same program this morning they made an entire outrage theater out of Biden's 'garbage' comment, set up in one of their favorite diners to stage the inhabitants chanting 'we are trash' (don't call it weird)

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-friends-diners-chant-we-are-trash-we-are-trash/

Which requires you to turn off your critical thinking and presume that Biden wasn't talking about the comedian and anyone else who agreed with his comments about Puerto Rico being floating garbage.

Following that, they had the gall to overclock their critical thinking skills to try and spin Trump's comments last night that fantasized about Liz Cheney being in front of a firing squad, admonishing Liz Cheney for interpreting that as a threat to have her executed or get her assassinated, and arguing 'you know that's not what he meant!'

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/she-knows-better-fox-friends-ridicules-liz-cheney-and-drudge-totally-irresponsible-reaction-to-trumps-guns-at-her-face-comment/

I don't know decide for yourself what did Trump mean when he said “Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrel shooting at her. Okay. Let’s see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face.”

Sounds to me like he's talking about having her executed by firing squad. How can you interpret it differently? The couch-dwellers tried to interpret it differently, but I really don't follow their thought process:

“So he was just talking about how she is a warhawk. And would you have the same point of view if she was actually at war?” explained Brian Kilmeade before reading Trump’s statement aloud.

“So to me, I get totally the context of that,” Kilmeade said. “Tucker had an event. He joined Tucker’s event. Tucker is doing live shows all across the country, and he was asked about one of his chief critics who’s campaigning against him. So people are portraying it as if he’s saying Dick [sic] Cheney should be in front of a firing squad assassinate, be shot or assassinated. Obviously, you can you understand Trump You understand the context.

He didn't say 'how'd she feel if 9 Iranians or Hamas had guns trained on her though, he said "let's (let us) stand her in front of 9 barrel[s] shooting at her."

Weird how republicans worry about their wives exercising their constitutional right to vote...

If the head of one party insisted that if he did not win the election, he meant that some-one had managed to access and alter the votes of multi-million voters to make him lose AND contrarily that if he won the election, it meant that there had been no vote-altering at all…. No one's votes were interfered with at all and everything was ok after all.

Remembering that it was several weeks before the voting began that the party leader began making the claim on the result of the vote, please explain to me how anyone who came up with such a variation to explain away a lose or a win should still expect to be taken as a credible person?

Nationally, as the 2020 exit poll was national and I assume the split you gave for the early voting exit poll of women voters was national also.

In the case of Georgia, even the figures you provide show it's down vs 2020. There's only 100k mail in ballots unaccounted for. So it's looking like early voting will be down. Still impressive as there's no Covid. Georgia, Michigan or Illinois don't report the party affiliation.

The rest do
PA: DEM -45% / REP -6%
NV: DEM -48% / REP -22%
AZ: DEM -32% / REP -13%
NC: DEM -27% / REP -8%

So the national figure I quoted is reflected in the swing states.

Now play the whole clip of what Trump was saying about Liz Chaney rather then dishonestly clipping it. Desperate stuff from the Democrats and the media. He is clearly speaking about politicians like her sending kids and face enemy guns in their faces thanks to the likes of her and her father

People usually arent armed with a rifle if they are in front of a firing squad are they now.

Its utter desperation by Cheney and the media trying to insinuate he was talking about a firing squad.

Is it any wonder people dont trust the media when they try to spread lies like the above ?

Even Joe Walsh who hates Trump said "Trump did NOT call for Liz Cheney to be executed. This is what’s so wrong with our politics today".

Was he talking about himself when he referenced elites not going to war?

They're also reporting from sources in the Harris campaign team that undecideds appear to be breaking for them by over 10 pts.

WaPo journalist

https://x.com/mviser/status/1852397136060596423?t=4XmgaDOpEASHLbQfxgHDIw&s=19

Harsh, many politicians and indeed their kids have served with honour, unlike any of the Trump clan; I mean Vance at least was a photographer in uniform, and remember that Biden's late son served with honour

That’s just one of the ways to influence voters - “all these women are doing it why don’t you?” - it’s influence 101- no different to the tactics Republicans have used throughout

It’s also coercive behaviour - it’s a sign that there’s something a whole lot more wrong with the relationship if one party - male or female- is forcing their partner to vote a particular way - call 911 would be my response if I heard that from someone or 999 in Ireland - there’s obviously an abusive relationship in play

I'm also thinking about Nixon (Watergate), and Reagan (Iran-Contra). Calling her 'the worst in history' certainly feels like low effort hyperbole.