Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

1376377379381382574

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,016 ✭✭✭✭briany


    He might do (I've yet to hear it) but the point is he is hardly the person to be lecturing others in honesty between spouses.

    It's just that in American politics especially, right now, we're seeing an awful lot of 'you can't tell me about X when you've done it yourself' and few could argue that this has led to a more stable political environment there.

    It leads us to a most interesting philosophical question and one so great, it's probably worthy of its own thread:

    In moral matters, what is the most important thing? The principle, or the moral standing to give one the right to lecture on the principle? 
    

    Not so much about Gingrich, here, but it's almost like a little snapshot of the kind of moral equivocation that is giving MAGA, at least, the self-granted licence to go as low as they feel like, and one thing I think would help take American politics out of its fatal-looking tailspin would be to get back to a common principle as opposed to scoring gotchas on the individual giving voice to that principle at a particular time.

    Just my thoughts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,030 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I think Harris will win.

    Everything that has happened so far this week has been in her favour in terms of what came out of the Trump rally on Sunday and the reaction to it in the days since.

    Trumps Garbage truck stunt was just that, a garbage stunt, it was always closer to the 4 seasons fiasco than anything to be proud of and with him stumbling while opening the truck, it actually backfired totally.

    I wouldn't be surprised if we find out next week that the campaigns had clearer ideas about the reality with respect to polls and that Harris wins by a wide margin. I'm hoping they fed in to the narrative about the polls being close so as to continually motivate people to go and vote. The Trump campaign has looked underfunded, poorly organized, low enthusiasm even if trying to project high energy for a while now and last Sundays rally was the single worst coordinated event of its kind by a party so close to an election that any of us have seen. Pretty much everything about the Harris campaign has looked sharp and professional and I've been very impressed with her, much more than I thought I would be. The absolute only thing that is making me nervous is those polls.

    But what do I know, it's all #thoughtsandfeelings, and thinking back to 2016 is still making me nervous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭combat14


    its similar to how the EU works to protect small countries like ireland from large dominant states like germany, france etc.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,622 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    There's more than a whiff of Angela Merkel about her. She seems to have no interest in pushing anything remotely radical, is more than happy to kick the can down the road and is an experienced politician.

    I think she'll win but it's going to be nerve-wracking because of how things work over there. She should win the popular vote comfortably enough but we all know that that's not enough.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 340 ✭✭ElitesTeam




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,622 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,622 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭combat14




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,558 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Yeah she'll undoubtedly win the popular vote, but probably not by the same amount as Biden in 2020. If anything, I'd say neither side will get as many votes as they did in 2020. Covid was such a monumental event that it meant it had to be made easier for people to vote early, use mail-in ballots etc, but it also encouraged far more people to vote due to the management of Covid and the events of 2020. Even though early & mail-in voting is still available in many ways, I'm not sure people are as pushed to cast their vote.

    Certainly though that works in Harris' favour more than Trump's, because those who would be more encouraged to vote for her compared to Biden would be those affected by abortion rights and those who were uninspired by Biden in 2020 and would have been even less inspired by him if he was still candidate now.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,622 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,294 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I could have posted that very same post months ago - I’m just not so sure now - when you get people voting for Trump who profess to “hating Trump” , there’s just something way more going on.

    The ethnic vote is also down compared to previous elections- extraordinarily Trump is getting a bigger piece of that pie than previous elections - it’s insanity considering what he actually thinks of anyone not white but there ya go- I don’t think you can legislate for that type of voter behaviour.

    As for secret Harris voters voting to keep abortion as an option or secret Trump haters voting for Harris? Again both speculated about months ago but with the polls the way they are, I reckon all of the above has been taken into account and more besides



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,305 ✭✭✭Guffy


    They have also claimed that he also went off script, which is plausible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,612 ✭✭✭Rawr


    I'm in a very similar mindset. I sense that she'll win but it won't be by a lot, and like in 2020 we won't know for sure until late into the week.

    There is also the possiblity of a repeat of the 2016 stupidity which will not be gone from my head until we are done with next week. That possibility is still there.

    However on the flipside, one daydream I have is an early North Carolina result where Harris wins the state. NC reports earlier, and if Harris actually gets the state, the Trump path to victory is severly kneecapped earlier on in the reporting. One even more fanciful daydream I have is Florida flipping. That's pretty much game over, we go from "kneecapping" to "removing an entire leg", but with the added bonus of this being the state where Donnie lives and where he likely will be during the results.

    That state flipping is pretty unlikely, but not impossible



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,949 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    What would be more depressing is history would show the only 2 EVER women candidates where both beaten by Trump to president

    He's never beaten a male to candidate ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,016 ✭✭✭✭briany


    @ancapailldorcha

    She seems to have no interest in pushing anything remotely radical

    She can't, is the simple answer. Some podcast I was listening to said that the coalition that Harris has built spans Alexandria Ocasio Cortez on one end, all the way to Dick Cheney on the other.

    That is a pretty wide spectrum that will contain a diverse number of interests and any attempt to specifically please one part of the coalition will píss another bit of it off. It is therefore highly fragile - a political house of cards.

    Whatever else we can say about Trump, we can say that his voter coalition is much stronger in terms of cohesion. He doesn't have to worry about his campaign team putting a comma in the wrong place on a written statement about Israel/Palestine or something. Whether his coalition of voters is larger in the key states, however, is a question we'll have to wait until some time after November 5th to find out.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,622 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Good point. It's a damning indictment of the US's political culture but this is a sensible point.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 255 ✭✭pad406


    I think Harris wins, reasons are (nothing to really back this up, just my own thoughts, though many have been expressed before)

    • There's a lot more voters, who, when push comes to shove, will vote for her, especially younger women in republican households.
    • New voters will more likely lean her way. And there's a lot of them.
    • Like all these things, the extremes (MAGA) are much louder and more vocal. The other side is always the quieter one
    • The MAGA turnout will be high, but those with less extreme views might just stay at home

    I even think Florida might be in play. I know it's one of the few where Trump actually increased his margin in 2020, but Clinton got reasonably close there (1.2%, approx. 100k votes).

    The worst part about the whole thing, is that even if she wins she has to win big, probably even greater than Biden. Trump wins by 5/10 ECs then it's all MAGA are great, Trump is great, it's the biggest win ever. Harris wins by 5/10 then the court cases over the stolen election will probably be still going on in Jan.

    Flame retardant suit is on, waiting for the outrage 😀



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,843 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    Eelectoral college is a good system, with so much of the American population being based in just a few small area Boston to Washington urban belt, Florida, California it means that if electoral college didn't exist the candidates could just ignore large swathes of the country and just chase voters in the highly populated areas and ignore people outside this.

    Because of electoral college people all over the country are important and need to be catered to in order to get their votes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,032 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,209 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Yes, lots of people are paying attention, and while Biden is older and slower, he is nowhere near the condition you are depicting. Why do you keep up with the same old character assassination which is so much of the Rapublicans' stock in trade. And 99% of the time Biden is 100% more coherent that DJT



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,726 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Both Parties cover such an incredibly wide spectrum of views such that no group is really properly represented by either party, although the GOP have been actively purging anyone not fully "MAGA" in recent years.

    There really should be 4 or 5 decent sized parties in the US if the system allowed for it - Running from the Far right Christian Nationalist types on one end through to the Social Democrats (AOC , Sanders et al) on the other end.

    As a result neither party can really run on "Policy" as their policies don't truly align properly among their own supporters ,so it becomes all about personalities and "stopping" the other side.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,148 ✭✭✭Smee_Again


    But they already ignore large swathes of the country because of the electoral college. Campaigning is largely focused on the swing states, if you don't live in one chances are there won't be much campaigning done by either candidate near you.

    And it means that if you live in a Red or Blue state and vote the other way then your vote is largely irrelevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    would be nice but they can’t because the constitution lays out the eligibility to run for president.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,807 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Eh? This doesn't make sense.

    If the electoral college didn't exist, then both sides would have to chase everyone's vote. No-one could be ignored. Democrats would have to campaign to get the Arkansas, N/S Dakota Dems out - Republicans would have to campaign to get the Hawaii, Delaware Republicans voting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,558 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    And yet because of the electoral votes which are attributed to some states, the majority of campaigning focuses on 7 States. So large swathes of the country are still being ignored. And when you have someone who could lose the popular vote by say 7 million people but win the EC and the Presidency, then the majority of voters are being ignored.

    At the very least there should be some metric where additional EC votes are awarded to the winner of the overall popular vote, like 10 EC votes. But the idea that the deciding votes pretty much boil down to about 250k people throughout 6-8 states regardless of the popular vote throughout the country, is monumentally stupid.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,726 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    100% - Outside of the 6/7 Swing States , the rest are ignored.

    If you support the "other side" in a heavily Blue or Red State your National vote is utterly worthless and no one cares what you think. And to be fair , they don't care about you all that much if you are voting for the winner either.

    I understand the desire to ensure "representation , but the current model just isn't it.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,622 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The states can distribute their electors differently. Some will follow the national popular vote, others in a winner-takes-all manner and others proportionally to the popular vote in that state. It's absurd and that's before we factor in the fact that it was designed to bolster the political clout of slave states via the odious three-fifths compromise.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,390 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    There must have been a typo and they didn't get the joke of calling Kamala Harris a CANT so it was removed.

    Otherwise the joke was fine 😄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,294 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I posted last night around this aspect - Harris does have polices albeit mostly Joe Bidens policies but besides that, Trump has grand statements- and he’ll “fix” everything - it’s very hard to compete with that if the public aren’t willing to be in listening mode and discourse mode



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,726 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    I've posted about the idea of a "popular vote bounty" before to give voice to all those "minority party voters" in the Strongly Blue/Red states.

    I read an article a while ago about how the Harris team were pursuing a "lose by less" approach in rural parts of Georgia rather than simply relying on the Urban areas to win the State. The idea being that if they lost those rural counties by 10 points instead of 20 it would help them win overall.

    Doing this at the National level by having a reward for winning the popular vote can only be a good thing for Democracy surely??



Advertisement