Dispute with mod

No, they wouldn't just move it. As things stand under the charters it is valid to have threads on same issue in both places.

I have suggested it in the past, especially in light of the lack of CA mods. It seemed to make sense to me to have the US Politics threads there and there alone.

There appears to be a reluctance to do so due to the higher standards of the Politics forum. It does beg the question as to whether the standard there is perceived as too onerous and is discouraging use of it and whether it really makes sense to have such overlapping forums if mod capacity is limited.

Same here, I received my first warning ever since I registered over 12 years ago. I feel like packing Boards in if a moderador refuses to allow posters post facts about biological facts. I am female and feel I need to speak about safe spaces for biological women. It feels like a slap in the face by a man protecting another man.

if you feel someone is backseat moderating you can report the posts.

I did and I’ll continue to do so thanks 😊

Its always the same people doing this, brazenly and pathetically trying to maintain the pretence that they have the sites best interests at heart in their interactions.

Its clear as day what they are up to.

Indeed- I’m also not shy these days about reporting posts for badgering and baiting - I’ve learned the hard way that there’s no point in engaging with them , so reporting is the only thing open to me.

all of the above especially twisting what you said or a completely insincere challenge just to see if you react and respond - it’s a “playbook” - but even calling this behaviour out here is good as it brings that behaviour out into the open and the more we talk about it and label it the less chance the cowards have to act that way - these idiots hate to have their tactics called out- they much prefer staying under the radar

I’ve asked before but don’t think there was an answer given, can the mods, or admins, put users on “ignore” for each other? Like an override or something?

Is there/was there a rule in Feedback about not being allowed to post until an account was 3 months old?

That'd be handy in this forum too.

Frank did you get any resolution ultimately

I believe the modern term is,

"Touch some grass"

😂

Fūck sake. People are clearly fücking morons who just can't follow simple requests or instructions. Why would anyone bother modding with such wilfully stupid cūnts to deal with.

Wânkers that HAVE to have the last word and win the internet, they clearly want to be martyd and banned so they can go to their echo chamber of choice and whine about how they've been treated.

FÙCK OFF, then kindly fúck off again.

Like I said the best feedback I can offer is to put a clear definition in the charter of transphobia.

This will inform posters on what boards considers transphobia and they can action people who are transphobic.

There was a rule made by former Boards employer Niamh back in 2019 I believe, on the subject.

For a start, knowingly, deliberately and repeatedly misgendering someone is transphobia.

Nearly ever second poster over on the BK thread is guilty of doing exactly that.

So if warnings were given on that basis, they were deserved, imo.

It's at times like this, you miss the 9point system where if a mod of a forum wasn't online, other mods could all apply points on a user, who would be forumbanned.

I'm assuming the mods of helpdesk have much nicer things to be doing today. Fair play.