Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

From the Trump Joe Rogan podcast:

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/10/26/politics/trump-joe-rogan-podcast-income-tax-tariffs/index.html

Even more nuts than his proposal to eliminate tax on overtime earnings. MAybe in a few days he will warm to the idea of eliminating all taxation. 🤣

Everyone on here is convinced Harris has won this easily? You've obviously been reading r/Politics on Reddit and got mixed up.

Few, if any, on this thread think that Harris has won it easily. Most, if not all, observe that it will be massively tight.

Joe Rogan interview

Joe : Right

Trump: talks for 15 mins

Joe: Cool

Trump: talks for 15 mins

Joe: Right

Trump: talks for 15 mins

Joe: Cool Cool

Trump: talks for 15 mins

3 hours of nothing.

@EltonJohn69

Campaigning with Cheney is an attempt to convert republicans who are hesitant to vote for a democrat…. Though it might do damage to potential Muslim voters who remember her father being responsible for bombing of the Middle East.

Is there any evidence that Cheney is even doing anything positive for Harris's numbers? Is there anyone going, "Well, I can't vote for Trump, but I couldn't do it Harris, either. That is…. until I saw Liz out there."

If there is one thing that could potentially unite the Democratic left wing and Republican MAGA people, it's hatred of neo-cons, and Cheney is the daughter of the guy who'd be front and centre of the Sergeant Pepper album cover of American neo-cons. To me, it just completely fails to read the apparent political mood music of the USA.

As for Rogan, he is a meat head and often easily led or gullible, as you say. To me, this is more of a reason for her to do his show than not. Why? Because if he comes at her with his bro-ish, meat head concerns about trans stuff or immigrants being given a voting card as soon as they cross the border, she can forcefully push back on that if she has anything about her at all, and that will reach at least some people who will never be reached by a thousand CNN interviews.

yeah I think it would be a relatively easy interview for her when compared to the Fox News cauldron of interruptions and trap door questions. Maybe she will still do it. But maybe she didn’t want to commit to three hours, there must have been some stumbling block….i guess Charalamgne the God is the closest she got to the manosphere podcast audience.

Who knows if Cheney will pay off, I assume her team considered all the pros and cons…… but if she does lose I’m sure it will be on the list of the many things she got wrong and the opposite will apply if she wins.

Bill Gates has been doing this sort of thing for years , bankrolling media outlets and yet nobody had a problem with it.

Which publications does Gates have editorial control over? SQURREL!

You can pretty much ignore what this poster said.

…while everyone on here seems to be absolutely certain Harris has this won easily that it's a no contest.

What?

The general consensus "on here" is that it's a 50/50 race so far and it's pretty much a toss up who's getting into the Whitehouse in November.

Having just joined the forum, of course, you may have missed that.

Absolutely.

Looking at this solely in the context of this election is comparable to focusing on a hurricane like Helene in the context of the climate emergency.

America having gotten to a place where such a character can come so close to the power and literally steamrolled through the host part he took over as they completely folded in opposing him is the big story. He is devoid of Presidential skillset, intellect or evidence of any competence. And coupled with a lifetime of bluff, bluster and BS. And on top of this, actual acts of crimes directly related to their revered constitution. And it appears close to have of America wants this as President.

That, is a problem, and not one that will be immediately fixed if he loses.

all seem to suggest certainly Harris will win and dismiss Trump or any suggestions of Trump winning.

Can you quote/link some of these comments please, should be easy to do if there are so many of them.

Trump does paint a pretty funny picture in fairness to him

“bad thing will happen to our country if Harris wins”

“The Chinese respect me “

“Putin respects me”

How are lads buying this ****? That’s his foreign policy. That’s it !
it’s going to be all down to his persona ???
what happens when he’s gone? Is it only his persona that can demand respect ???
I honestly thought that as time went forward humanity got better and smarter.
To think that Donald Trump is going to be the leader of the free world for the foreseeable future in 2025 and 26 etc is utterly depressing.
He talks about the danger of nuclear weapons. American isolationism will lead to a proliferation of nuclear weapons. The Ukraine war has demonstrated in the starkest terms that having nuclear weapons is the ultimate safeguard against invasion. Even more so with American policy dependent on the type of persona that demands this mysterious “ respect “.

Instead of writing that you could have backed up your claims. Seemingly it was prevalent on the thead that most were sure of her victory so it would be trivial to prove it ... but nope.

Given you have been utterly unable to support your claims do you withdraw them?

Because otherwise your claims of "interpretations" appears to be your get out clause to make stuff up without evidence. And thats a bad faith argument.

You made a claim about the content of the thread. You had several opportunities to either withdraw it or support it. The claim was such it would be trivial to prove.

So textbook bad faith argument when you do neither.

Didnt take long to establish your claim was garbage seeing as you have had several opportunities to support it and you are utterly unable to.

Remember you were the one who seemed to be bothered there were claims about the election with "nothing to back them up".

All we have established is that it is your claims that have nothing to back them up.