Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

1309310312314315574

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,848 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Who could write up a three hour script for anyone, especially Trump who likes to wing it? Yes, it should be interesting, if unedited…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,304 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    The “mob” though is the Republican Party - whilst yes some republicans have spoken out they’re in the minority overall - I wouldn’t give a toss if it were just a couple of million rednecks doing what rednecks do but it’s not - that’s what’s scary about all of this - is winning the presidential race more important than flushing your dignity down the toilet as a republican voter? Because that’s what they’re doing here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,640 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    The pernicious influence of religion in the US has conditioned believers to believe lies. As the religious leaders, profit from having lots of believers, it's a vicious cycle. And as CFTrump can easily be bought, the religious leaders throw their influence behind him. So, he can lie all he wants - did you see the lie the other day posted here about 'up to birth abortions?' That's not a redneck posting it here, that's likely someone regretting the sensible support for Irelands abortion policy, and lashing out using a lie the religious leaders promulgate.

    The pernicious influence of the American Educational industrial complex is also to blame. They've been peddling low-quality education for decades, preaching left-wingitty policies that miss the elephant in the room - Chinese kids are better education that American kids. This has been going on for generations now, and is a big explanation of why China is pulling ahead of the US on so many fronts. They're severely handicapped by their massive overpopulation problem, they're trying to come to grips with that and having some success, but that, too, will take generations to resolve. They're at least trying, the US is making no efforts there. As a result, we have generations of American kids whose parents have ensured they didn't have to work too hard, attacking teachers who have the temerity to point out that Bobby or Sally really earned the F they got. And the teacher's unions never back up the teachers.

    This has metastasized into the Moms for Liberty types, again pushing religious-based lies into the classrooms. Burning books in the USA, my father and uncles who fought in WWII, my Mom and her sisters who worked for the war effort, are rolling in their graves. Banning books…amazing

    Plus, there's the venal types like the US Oligarchs buying votes through any means necessary - conveniently changing endorsement policies for the newspapers they own despite objections from their employees whom I'm certain those oligarchs praise as the best hires they could've made.

    And the out-and-out bad actors like RuZZia using their useful idiots and manipulating more idiots via social media.

    So, even if Harris wins (I repeat I think she will, and handily), nothing will be fixed. First it starts with the education system, give it some backbone and end the parental over-influence, and likewise instead of forgiving loans, do a real analysis of how well so many of these so-called universities provide degrees and how effective these degrees are. Maybe bring in some Chinese data analysts to do the work if the Americans aren't up to snuff.

    TL:DR: America is bad due to actions from both sides, and has a lot of issues to investigate and resolve, none of which will be easy.



  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If you strip out all the GOP poll dumping things haven't moved for weeks. That puts Harris ahead as she was three weeks ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,807 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    IMG_8842.jpeg

    I think Bezos believes a Trump win is very likely. Harris needs a fairly massive October surprise or the polls to have been wrong (again)……but as it stands The Teflon God Emperor has the winds in his sails…



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The polls are wrong. Over eighty GOP bought and biased polls have been dumped over the last fortnight. This is prep for the efforts to steal the election by claiming Trump was ahead at the end. Strip out these polls from the averages and Harris is still ahead as she was three weeks ago.

    Bezos may want a Trump win and so has spiked the endorsement - but it hasn't changed the fundamentals one inch.

    If you don't compensate for poll dumping you haven't a chance of understanding where this election is actually at.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,848 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    Bill Gates has been doing this sort of thing for years , bankrolling media outlets and yet nobody had a problem with it.

    Newspapers should not be endorsing political candidates at all in my opinion and I'd prefer if they had always kept out of this business and let people decide for themselves.

    I don't actually like Bezos reason for not doing this if it's to suck up to Trump as it's cowardly.

    Problem is the left have zero problem with people they like using their power to influence media, you can't say it's OK for Bill Gates to pay to influence media an then at the same time Bezos shouldn't be allowed to do it.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Which newspaper that Bill Gates owns did he prevent from giving an endorsement to the candidate he didn't like?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,807 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    I have heard this theory a few place and I hope it’s correct…. but democrats are definitely worried…. I listened to a report about door to door canvassing and the main takeaway was that Trump’s name recognition is what will carry the day



  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Its definitely the case and the fact that you are worried shows it's working.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭eoinbn


    So the national CNN poll that has them level is a GOP poll?

    The CNBC poll that has Trump 2 points ahead nationally is also paid for by the GOP?

    I am sure there has been some poll dumping but the momentum is with Trump. The undecided voters are making there mind up and are breaking for Trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭TinyMuffin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,304 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I’ve watched about 15 mins of this - just randomly flicking through in 2-3 minute segments - I’ll take a longer look later but so far, Trump actually comes across as a normal politician, answering questions- he’s not ranting or dancing or whatever - there may well be ridiculous aspects in the interview- but I just haven’t seen them yet as I’ve limited time to watch it.

    It’s a huge contrast to his rallies- if he behaved like I’ve seen him on this video so far, at his rallies he’d probably be way ahead in the polls - that or else, he’s just doing an act that he thinks his fans want to see, I dunno .


    Getting bozos and musk onboard is pure Republicanism - keeping the rich happy - if he wins we’ll likely see attempts to promote the business interests of these two gentlemen - fast tracking space research and the rollout of driverless cars by reducing red tape for example .


    To be influenced by this video you first have to watch it - hard to see too many people play the whole thing - but so far he presented well enough surprisingly but especially when compared to his rally’s.

    VERY hard to call this election - listening to the small bits I played it sounded just like an “ordinary” Republican candidate - so maybe it’s this that Republicans are voting for - keep the rich happy so the money keeps flowing, drill baby drill - let the good times roll and stop worrying about tomorrow .

    I’m conscious none or very few of us are living in America and even fewer have a vote - I think it’s not a bad idea to “seek to understand” - there’s a lot of “noise” out there in this election that is easy to get distracted by but bottom line for republicans probably hasn’t changed an awful lot in terms of what they want in a presidential election and candidate - security, law and order, look after the rich and keep the oil flowing - certainly Trump is promising that - whether he delivers or not is another matter


    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hBMoPUAeLnY&pp=ygUPSm9lIHJvZ2FuIHRydW1w



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,817 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Do you trust the 538 poll average? I mean technically you are correct, Harris is 'ahead' in that, but her lead has most definitely narrowed over the past week and if she wins the popular vote by her current margin of 1.4% her chances of victory in the electoral college are pretty slim…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,304 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Great post - and yes, I do believe there are bad actors on both sides- Democrats are not all sweetness and light .

    Education system too is completely underfunded- classrooms are over crowded teachers underpaid and a shortage of them - the wealthy are shunning the public schools and going private leaving that system to the underprivileged


    America has dropped in world rankings in maths and science- two of the key subjects that are most certainly going to be required for a successful nations people both today and into the future. And don’t get me started on book banning and what not that goes on- a total side show when there are much bigger issues to sort.

    It feels like the rich are voting for republicans in this election to achieve what they always want achieved- to preserve their way of life and protect and grow their income.

    But some of the poor are also now intending to vote republican- not necessarily the under funded teachers type poor- it’s the very uneducated poor who are thinking Trump might help them in some way - I think whatever he’s said at his rally’s has probably resonated with them - even if it’s just “America’s broken and I’m going to fix it” or words similar to that - that would resonate with someone who’s not well educated and facing a life of under privilege - and there’s a lot more people like that in America today who vote, than there was in the past



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,572 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    She's actually behind in 538, I think it's more that polling is biasing for Trump for safety and that isn't necessarily correct. It's hopefully not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,438 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Yep, I'm not trusting the polls at all anymore. I think polls and markets have been gamed to death.

    I would hope that something could be done about it, legislatively speaking. It's illegal to game the stock market, so it should be for political polling and gambling markets.

    How you would do with that, is above my pay grade. I've no idea.

    It's incredibly frustrating, but time will tell. November 5th could do with hurrying up all the same



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,817 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    presume you're referring to this?

    I was talking about this

    as just an average of polls, not trying to extrapolate from that to predicting the outcome…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,304 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    That’s my reading too - everything else is just conspiracy theories - the polls are bloody tight - it’s as simple as that. Theres been way too much focus on Trump the individual - yes he’s an odious creature- but the principles of Republicanism is the only thing voters are interested in and if that isn’t reason enough then you can throw in the Democrats going far too left so there’s a natural rebalance from swing voters.

    Harris opposes fracking - I fcking hate the idea of fracking too- I think its impacts are well known and it’s killing the environment and the people living there where it takes place - but she rolled back on her previous statements on banning fracking - I understand why she did that but it showed me that Democrats probably went too far left for the countries comfort - and there’s a natural adjustment ( punishment might be an appropriate word in there minds ) for doing so.
    The voters will speak on election day - it’s as simple as that. Hopefully we’ll see good democracy in action and a peaceful transition of power no matter who gets in



  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Absolutely not, all those poll dumps should be excluded from the poll averages. Most don't publish their methodology so any attempt to compensate for bias is pure guesswork.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,304 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    The margin of error in the polls is reckoned to be at least twice the standard 3% quoted - but no matter what way it’s sliced and diced essentially the polls are too close to call it’s that simple -and yes I’m in agreement with you - right now Trump is gaining momentum - it doesn’t mean he’ll win but it makes Harris position far more difficult to make an impression on swing voters at this late stage of the game


    https://theweek.com/politics/2024-election-polls-accuracy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,572 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,031 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Di you understand the difference between bankrolling, and influencing?

    And by influencing, I mean expressly direction them to go against the selected editorial board position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,016 ✭✭✭✭briany


    What metrics should people be looking at aside from the polls to get a clearer idea of what's really going on?

    Early voting is underway in many states and we're getting hard stats back from that. As often stated, the election comes down to seven states and they all allow early in-person voting, so we can essentially get a decent picture of the entire contest going into election day, assuming that most registered Democrats vote for Harris and Republicans for Trump. Those who break will be impossible to quantify before time.

    Like, the early Pennsylvania returns have Democratic votes ahead, but I've also read this talk of the 'firewall', the number of votes Harris needs to be ahead by in order to weather the in-person Republican surge on election day.

    Is this the case or not? I don't know, but if we're not going to talk polling, then maybe with a week and a half to go, early voting data should be the crux of the conversation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,848 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    That does lead me back to Liz Cheney and her talk some weeks back about starting up a new Republican Party to draw republicans away from Trumps mob party as it exists with the RNC. Her name has baggage so I don't give it much hope when the GOP senators who should be blunt publicly with Trump in a capitals letter in WaPo, NYT and the LA times: **** off back to your golf courses with your pension and stay there don't have the bottle to do so. The words used by Spike Milligan describing Prince Charles as an grovelling illegitimate person spring to mind and should be applied to any GOP Senator who refuses to return to being a Republican and dump Trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,211 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Interesting time at the Washington Post. Their refusal to endorse a candidate interpreted (correctly in my opinion) as a favour to Trump, has been "justified" by CEO William Lewis:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/10/25/washington-post-endorsement/

    Weasel words as they say that they are merely returning to their old policy of non-endorsement. THey sure choose an intereting time to do it.

    There appears to have been a huge reaction against this, from readers as well as from several WaPo regular columnsits

    Pretty virulent reaction reported in the Guardian:

    https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/oct/25/washington-post-will-not-endorse-presidential-candidate



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,848 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    That's not poor coordination on the part of the campaign manager, that's the boss throwing the schedule set up for him to maximize the number of his party voters meet and greet him at their rally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,472 ✭✭✭Lewis_Benson


    trump gets to be lawless, Harris has to be flawless.

    SSeems to be the way it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 531 ✭✭✭Dingaan


    The data from the Rust Belt isn't going to tell you much as there is pretty much only absentee and mail-in ballot data. You are tracking how ballots are requested and the percentage of these returned.

    Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada, in comparison, have pretty comprehensive information available. Georgia, in particular, provides detailed data, including voter turnout by race, which is useful for gauging voter enthusiasm.

    As it stands, this should be worrying for Harris's campaign, especially if you reasonably assume correlation between states.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The in person Republican surge is not going to happen this time. Most of the early Republican voters who have already turned out voted on the day last time. They learnt their lesson last time and are voting early. This means that only newly registered voters could create that surge and most of them are going to be Dems.

    The only data which can be trusted this time out is early voter data and this is not easy to interpret, but so far it doesn't look bad for Dems. Only an overall low turnout will scupper the Dems and so far that doesn't look likely.



Advertisement