Advertisement
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Tesla Talk

1127128130132133136

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,505 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Hardly stale. Model Y is best selling car in the world (remember everyone mocking me for correctly predicting this 2 years ago?) and will get major refresh within months. Model 3 had its refresh a year ago and that was a big improvement over the old one. Both cars are best in class, with best tech, best spec, best efficiency, lowest price yet highest margin.

    They will be cash cows for a while yet…

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,821 ✭✭✭maidhc


    more or less neck and neck with the RAV4, which has been significantly updated at least twice since its introduction in 2018 and is a probably going to be completely revised in the next 12 months. I appreciate Tesla are selling facelifts as generational changes, and some are accepting of that, but even Detroit figured out that doesn’t really work for long.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,505 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Was impressive from the expensive RAV4 to become second last year, but it looks like it will have to yield that place to the much cheaper Corolla this year (the best selling car in the world for most of the past 20 years)

    But I reckon neither will be even in the top 5 next year and neither in the top 10 by 2028 unless both have evolved into competent BEVs by then

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,821 ✭✭✭maidhc


    By then the model Y will be as facelifted as the Austin metro! It might even have walnut trim and have a vanden plas model!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,053 ✭✭✭JOL1


    Tesla is a relatively new Company but as @unkel has shown its history shows that it continues to upgrade/improve its product offering with more planned. This is not unique, other car manufacturers adopt the same approach (BMW Series 3,5 & 7 launched in the 70's and still relevant, VW Golf (1974), Ford Fiesta 47 years of production).

    Launching new iterations and preserving the same Model name are not mutually exclusive. What is important is that cars remain competitive in the market, everyone can form their own view on that but Mod Y was highest selling car worldwide last year, Mod 3 has had a significant refresh and Mod Y will follow shortly …which is persuasive (to me) and a long way off from the label "stale" that has been thrown around



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,027 ✭✭✭wassie


    Tesla do also introduce new features into production at any time, which other manufacturers don't typically do, meaning a typical order will often get the latest version of the car available.

    When I ordered my M3 in 2020, I had no idea I was going to receive a 2021 refresh version until I collected it Dec 2020. Some surprise to see my new car with no chrome!



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,889 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    And then matrix lights with a simple OTA update.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,821 ✭✭✭maidhc


    Every manufacturer makes changes and introduce new features as they go, and have done so forever. Look at the Ford Sierra for instance, the car that was sold in 1992 barely shared a washer in common with the model introduced 10 years previously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,505 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    And even hardware physical updates can typically be got for relatively little money. You can upgrade the entire media control unit in a 2012 Model S for the same one that is in a brand new 2024 Model S for €1550, this means all software and functions are the same, so your ancient car with its ancient slow computer - with 3G internet and a no longer working internet browser LOL, is now a very fast modern computer with lightning quick screen and map and routing updates, disney, youtube and netflix, modern games and what not now included too (not that I would use any of those really)

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,027 ✭✭✭wassie


    In my experience most manufacturers don't incorporate new features in the middle of production runs. Typically they follow a traditional "model year" cut off for smaller upgrades or larger upgrade as part of a mid-model refresh.

    Tesla don't follow a typical cycle and have shown in the past to incorporate features into production at anytime and often without announcement outside of an model refresh. A few that come to mind are the heat pump, Hardware 3.0 and Lion 12V Battery. And software upgrades improving hardware as we all know happen all the time.

    Although sometimes it is debatable if all the upgrades are necessarily improvements - eg TeslaVision



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,519 ✭✭✭sk8board


    great set of results from Tesla tonight.

    As always with Tesla’s interpretation of GAAP accounting, the truth is in the details -

    €0.70 eps, vs consensus of €0.60. the delta is driven by a big increase in carbon credit sales (€0.06) and an increase in current liabilities increasing the cash position, perhaps temporarily (€0.04).

    They slashed costs in Q3, incl 10% headcount reduction, but delivered more cars - which is an achievement. Not sure if there was excess stock at the start of the quarter.

    auto margin is up from 14 to 17%, back where it was at the start of the year.

    So on the face of it it’s a super set of results - but as always, the details hide a slightly different story, albeit still a v good one.

    one blot on the copybook is that total auto revenue is down slightly, even though they sold more cars, due to price cuts, which can only go so far.

    Of note - the cost of delivering a car for Tesla (raw materials, factories, staff etc) is at an historic low of $32k, which is what’s driving the margins up to that 17%



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,921 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Tesla’s stock price isn’t reflective of their sales



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,053 ✭✭✭JOL1


    Yes it is ..or at least its one important metric …there is good bounce after market closed (10%) so the market has reacted favourably. Have just listened to Investor call. What ever talents you think Elon may have (or not have) public speaking isn't one of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 673 ✭✭✭DrPsychia


    I've read this claim so many times but have yet to see any official figures to verify these claims. I'm open to correction, but I think Tesla has not released any official figures, they instead lump MY sales with M3 sales figures. It's akin to Toyota lumping Camry sales with Corolla sales then claiming the Corolla is the best selling car in the world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,053 ✭✭✭JOL1


    These figures are reported on widely by multiple industry bodies and a quick google search will disclose the numbers. There is consistency in the reporting across the motor industry sites who monitor such things and I see no reason to doubt the veracity. Not sure exactly what gives rise to your scepticism. Two examples attached

    IMG_0375.jpeg IMG_0374.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,029 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    He was burned by Tesla with one of the fairly rare rattly MYs.

    You'd want to head over to the ID4 and/or Ioniq 5 threads to read about real misery though,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,505 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,029 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    DrPsychia



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,505 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Ah ok, classic case of love turned to hate then. Pity that happened. All that energy would have been better spent fighting Tesla rather than just post negativity and untruths on online forums

    Personally I have taken Tesla to court 4 times, and won all of them

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 673 ✭✭✭DrPsychia


    I believe he was referring to me. Yes I got a rattly MY, but they fixed most of the rattles to be fair. That's what is dislike about some posters on this forum. They try to discredit some people's comments as FUD or just being bitter because someone is skeptical, or offers criticism of the brand. Every brand should be scrutinized. @JOL1 to his credit offered some sources, and was respectful about it.

    I don't doubt that VW and Hyundai EV's give trouble.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 673 ✭✭✭DrPsychia


    Get off your high horses. I still like my Model Y, but am also critical of the brand and Elon, it's possibly to hold both views simultaneously you know.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,889 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Do what I do. Ignore musk and enjoy the car. Thats all I care about. None of his other shenanigans!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,654 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    It does get tedious though all the same. I was a musk coolaid fanboy until I reeeeally wasnt. He's gone off the rails and is costing the company. I also don't like the image that driving a tesla brings. In addition to people laughing at you for being a green eco warrior (which i amn't) you now get people assuming you're anti vax (which I amnt) or any of the other nonsense musk comes out with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,505 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    No high horse dude, like I said Tesla did me such a bad turn 4 times that I had no other option but to resort to legal action. You never hear me say they are perfect. Why didn't you do the same rather than bitch about it online if they left you with an inferior car with issues?

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 673 ✭✭✭DrPsychia


    For those knowledgeable about Tesla’s FSD model: As Tesla continues to train their vision model to manage new scenarios, is it likely that the model’s performance might degrade in other areas? I would assume that as FSD’s capabilities increase, so does the local compute resources required to run the more complex model in real-time. I’m drawing a parallel to large language models, where increasing the number of parameters to improve capabilities also leads to higher inference resource requirements. A model that is simulated and inferenced in the cloud will be far more capable because the resources available is many orders of magnitude greater than a than one ran locally on resource limited hardware.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,505 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    TSLA + 20% in a day. Has that ever happened before? 😯

    Feels a bit hyped, that's me sold at $255. Hopefully will buy the dip again within the next while. Although this is a risky enough strategy of course, might not get back on the ladder again

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,505 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    That's only natural, isn't it? HW3 (like my 2017 car that came originally with HW2 but was upgraded for free to HW3) can do FSD quite well, but the compute power of the current HW4 is far stronger. This in time will be replaced by HW5, etc.

    The difference we will likely be able to measure by stats like accidents or fatalities per 100 million miles. HW3 could end up 10 times safer than humans, HW4 100 times safer, HW5 1000 times safer, etc.

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,654 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    This is after some significant drops. It's still akin to playing the roulette wheel in vegas. There's 48 red, 48 black and 4 green slots.

    The stock price is so volatile because there's so much future growth, like over 100% of current size future growth, priced in. And the market is hanging on musks every word so it can go up or down by double digit percentages in a day. The real price, evaluating the company financials and industry outlook, is much lower than what it is now on the market. Different analysts would have different opinions (and I'm not an analyst at all, just work in finance for years with some of that in credit risk), but for me it's really overpriced unless you think Tesla can do another 3 model 3/Y product launches.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,505 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Tesla never needs to release another car again for the current share price to be justified. You make the mistake with many other people, that Tesla is just a car manufacturer like all other car manufacturers.

    My point is just that the day to day volatility is a load of nonsense. Only if an event happened that would have significant impact on the net present value of all future profit, is a leap up or down justified. I.e. if Tesla announced that from tomorrow FSD is no longer beta, it is allowed to be level 5 autonomous (no need for a driver), people can get fully comp insurance with Tesla and if the car **** up, Tesla is responsible. Something like that has a huge impact on total future profit if it happened. Or another one: if Musk died tomorrow. Not if the company sold a few thousand cars more or less than expected in one quarter or if the gross margin was one percentage point lower or higher 🙄

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 673 ✭✭✭DrPsychia


    why do you think Tesla hasn't released a FSD report/intervention data? Surely if it was as impressive as Musk claims compared to humans, it would woo investors and make the stock surge. HW4 has roughly 39% more compute than HW3 but there doesn't appear to be a significant improvement in reality.

    In terms of scaling, there's nothing to suggest it could be orders of magnitude better as you speculate. There's a limit where you need to throw significantly more compute to see relatively small percentage gains. So unless Tesla makes a machine learning algorithm breakthrough, I don't see them improving much with current hardware by simply throwing more compute at it, even HW5 and their camera only sensor suite.

    Its all good training these models on their Dojo stack but dealing with that inference load in real-time for billions of possible scenarios in a relatively slow onboard system is not possible currently, in my opinion. Time will tell, I could be wrong.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement