Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

No such 'valid' argument has been made, unless you're talking about some conspiracy theory dog whistling along those lines which is never spelt out or supported with any real evidence because it would make the source look ridiculous.

In the context of the US President, they are one person, they cannot run the show themselves or be on top of all things at a low level. They have staff, cabinet for that, to advise etc

Remember Trump told us he picks the best people.

Well, "the best people" he picked in his first administration are now openly critical of Trump, comparing him to a dictator and a fascist and the vast majority refuse to endorse Trump. This is unprecedented in modern elections.

An accomplished Prosecutor and politician. She'll consider the advice of her teams but where appropriate she'll have the final say. I have no concerns about her being in such a role.

Meanwhile Trump, I have no confidence in his ability to make basic decisions. His admiration for Hitler, his love of tyrants in general. If he was a dating profile, he'd be a red flag, running for president and the alarm bells are ringing. Plus he seems incapable of maintaining a coherent thought these days.

No, I'm not arguing he is a 'tough boss' to work with. "Tough boss" does not appear anywhere in my post so that is an entirely bad faith deliberate misrepresentation of what was posted. The word that appeared in my post was dictator and fascist.

The people who are coming out calling Trump a dictator and fascist are in some cases retired generals. It is not merely my opinion, it is the considered verdict of those who worked closely with Trump and saw the reality of his Presidency.

Absolutely desperate stuff trying to wave that away as ruffling a few feathers.

These are the people Trump picked for his first cabinet. They are people from the Republican side of the spectrum. The criticism they are coming out with goes way beyond your spin of it and don't pretend otherwise with nonsense about HR.

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump meets the definition of a fascist and "prefers the dictator approach to government," his former White House chief of staff said in a series of interviews with the New York Times.With less than two weeks until the Nov. 5 election, John Kelly, a longtime critic of Trump's, told the Times that the former Republican president had no understanding of the U.S. Constitution or the concept of the rule of law.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-prefers-dictator-approach-former-chief-staff-says-2024-10-23/

It is not just a few individuals, it is also 40 out of 44 of the cabinet secretaries Trump picked who now refuse to endorse him.

That's not being a tough boss - that is someone who is not a fit and proper person to be President.

Exactly is this the gotcha, absolutely nothing to see here move along.

I don't think that's the video that was originally being mentioned, as it was previously stated that the video happened at a dinner thrown by a donor or something.

That said, this close to the election and even given Trump's history, you have to take all sorts of things like this with a huge grain of salt. Unless it's someone who is speaking directly about their own experiences and we know they definitely had interactions with the candidate (say for example the likes of John Kelly talking about Trump's praise of some of the things Hitler did and wishing his generals acted more like Hitler's generals), it's hard to give these things any credibility.

1. Nothing she said was incorrect. If it is, please point out where.
2. Both "assassination" attempts involved registered republicans, unlikely to take anything Harris said seriously.
3. You have absolutely no clue as to the motive of either men involved. You are assuming exactly what fits your supposed narrative.
4. Again, you, like the other poster, have completely ignored General Kelly calling Trump a fascist and saying he admired Hitler's generals. For some reason, you don't comment on that, nor allege that any future attempt may be his fault.

Given all of the above, your post doesn't hold water.

it’s trumps team stating he said this?

John Kelly was his WH Chief of Staff.

You, I and others have referenced General Kelly's comments.

For the casual observer can I point out. General Kelly is not just some random Army General(Marine General actually, he is Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men), he was Donald Trumps Chief of Staff. It has been said the second most powerful person in the USA is not the Speaker of the House or the VP, it is the President's Chief of Staff.

Just saying, for context.