Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Luas Finglas

1252628303135

Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,641 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    LOL it took them 4 years to build a crap cycle lane on Griffith Avenue that isn't much more then a concrete curb!

    And most of the cycle lanes will be coming as part of BusConnects which pre dates him by a few years.

    And I stand by at my utter disgust at his carry on about Metrolink before becoming Minister, it was pure NIMBY nonsense. Your above quote doesn't change my opinion at all, watching this projects evolve over the years, I see little input from him on then or strong public support.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,533 ✭✭✭Westernview


    I'm not trying to change your opinion just contesting it. I'm looking forward to seeing how much more his replacement will achieve in terms of juggling the need to providing transport and energy infrastructure while at the same time reducing carbon output, improving rural connectivity, reducing urban congestion and overcoming objections from the public and vested interests. And all carried out in the face of horrendous social media abuse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,557 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Well given all we are likely have for likely the next hundred years is ffg governance, maybe now, they actually will actually start to deliver infrastructure...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,533 ✭✭✭Westernview




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,044 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Our best chance of meeting climate targets is building PT and energy infrastructure no?

    There should be quality electric powered PT available to everyone in the city’s- that’s what we should be aiming for.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,533 ✭✭✭Westernview


    I agree with that but it's the greens that brought in the 2:1 PT/roads ratio. FF/FG are more likely to reduce that ratio.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,641 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I don't see that as likely, there simply isn't that many road projects left to do and the PT projects are vastly larger and more expensive then the remaining road projects.

    Metrolink and DART+ will easy top 10bn+ combined, while basically the only "major" road project left is the M20 at 1 billion.

    I always felt the 2:1 ratio was actually shockingly low and very conservative. Looking at the projects ahead of us it will easily be 5:1 if not 10:1. I feel that was an easy fillet to throw to Eamon as the other parties were looking at a greater ratio anyway, you know what with the projects they themselves put forward.

    I mean delivering the planned transport projects and energy projects is how you actually deliver on our carbon goals and deliver on your other points.

    When you stop and think about it, the fact that in 4.5 years of Eamon Ryan being Minster of Transport, not a single major public transport infrastructure project has even started construction, not even a single offshore wind farm started construction, is pretty damning!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 234 ✭✭Bsharp


    To be fair, the two slowest parts of the process are planning permission and business case approval, neither of which sit with that department for major projects approval (DPER) can be directly influenced by the Minister.

    The business case for Finglas Luas was submitted about 18 months ago. It's held back for delivery because its a major project and not included in the current National Development Plan 2030. It's bureaucracy, however, if everything within the NDP was subject to change then we'd have no plan for investment.

    The problem is that we should be spending money on the projects in the NDP, but they're all stuck in the planning system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,044 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Well you can blame the planning process and ABP which would be correct, but how many times did Eamon highlight this?
    How many times did he put pressure on Darragh o Brien to take ownership of the issue?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,533 ✭✭✭Westernview


    If you believe FF FG would deliver far more infrastructure with the same attention to sustainability and climate considerations you are pretty naive.

    Unlikely we will get to find out as the Greens will probably form part of the government again anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,648 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    As one of the most pro roads investment posters here, I think that ratio will actually increase in favour of PT in the coming years. There aren't many roads projects left to be complete, and once the Galway bypass, M20, M21 and M28 are done this decade there will be even less. There is however absolutely critical PT projects like Metrolink, DART+ x4, future DART tunnel or equivalent, Cork Luas etc. It'll likely be 3:1 before it goes less than 2:1.

    I'd also point out that the famed 2:1 ratio is a theoretical goal that varies over time. It's not going to be exactly 2:1, nor has it during this Government term. Some years it could be less than 2:1, other years it could be 15:1 if Metrolink is u/c and we're between roads projects.

    As for the Greens, Eamon Ryan is gone now and the party seems to be heading in a different direction under new leadership and doesn't seem to have the same passion that Eamon Ryan had. I disagree that PT investment in a new Government requires Green involvement, as @bk pointed out, MetroLink, DART+, BusConnects are all pre-Green 2020-2024 projects.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,533 ✭✭✭Westernview


    The ratio may well increase for the reasons you say but I believe that's inspite of rather than because of any specific emphasis on PT over roads. Most of the roads have already been built but there were conflicts between Ryan and Varadkar on funding for road projects as Ryan directed funding to PT.

    I never said PT requires Green involvement but I strongly believe that the same level of green and sustainable projects wont happen without the Greens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,728 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    In any government, that sort of thing happens behind closed doors and not in public.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,436 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    That Luas... Finglas, you say?

    Enough of the Green-bashing, please. We all know there's an election coming. I deliberately don't go near the political forums here for a reason...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,044 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    It would highlight to the public where the actual hold up is in delivering these major infrastructure PT/energy/housing projects.
    Anyway this is off topic and back to Finglas Luas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,612 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    could the last few pages be moved to a separate "What have the Greens ever done for us" thread?

    Mod: Given that there is a GE about to be declared in the next week or so, and this is not a politics forum, then such a thread will not be allowed. It would just degenerate to a stream of anti-Green nastiness. It would add nothing to anything.

    Post edited by Sam Russell on


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,648 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Indeed. Lets get back to Luas Finglas please.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,247 ✭✭✭Daith


    Is there any details on the route it will take from Broombridge to over the valley in Tolka Valley park? I don't mean the route in general, but just from Broombridge to the park.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭Telchak




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,247 ✭✭✭Daith




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭MayoSalmon


    Yes..same with the DART and same with the Metro.

    Amazingly..none will happen before 2050



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,118 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    7 years for 4km of tram track. Our system is broken. Too much beauracracy and every Tom, Dick and Harry NIMBY gets to stick their ore in and obstruct and delay with objections and endless court cases and judicial reviews. That's only after the ludicrous length of the planning process.

    It's actually an emergency for the state now and our future prospects.

    Post edited by Kermit.de.frog on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 305 ✭✭Thunder87


    13 years actually 🙂 It started in 2018 and went for public consultation in 2020. And the current date is presumably based on a timely planning decision (very unlikely) and no judicial reviews (possible)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,247 ✭✭✭Daith


    There's two pinch points with this plan. The area at Mellowes Road where it goes very close to some houses, and probably the pitch at St Helenas.

    That's where I can judicial reviews, unless that new planning bill stops them



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,648 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    https://businessplus.ie/news/finglas-luas-cost-rise/

    Estimate looks rather high for 4km of suburban Luas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,247 ✭✭✭Daith


    It does have to go over Tolka Valley Park, which is a valley. Can't imagine that's cheap.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,339 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Internationally, benchmark costs for tram is $50M/km. So this project should only cost €180M. Throw a bit extra in for the Tolka bridge would bring it to above 200M.

    Crazy that with a range of 300-600 million (already beyond the pale) it is still described as probably going significantly above that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,436 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    As you’ve quoted it in Dollars, I'm guessing that that $50M/km (source, please?) is a global average, and includes a range of projects, from greenfield to ones like Luas Finglas that has to negotiate an existing urban environment. Heavy LRT investment in China, where construction costs are artificially suppressed by indirect subsidies, is also going to pull that figure down.

    Short line projects will always have higher per kilometre costs than long ones, because they need the same setup and teardown tasks as a big project, and structure costs on bigger projects are divided into a longer overall length of track. €300 million would be a low estimate for a short line that has two major bridges on it, at Grand Canal, and Tolka Valley.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You also have to remember that Ireland self-imposes restrictions like no working at night etc.



Advertisement