Advertisement
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Tesla Talk

1126127129131132136

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,493 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    €4k is rather expensive for the 7 seat option, iirc it was $3k in the USA when it was introduced many years ago

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,191 ✭✭✭innrain


    My understanding is that it's 2.5k option before VRT. Cash price is adding 2688. I'm kinda on the fence for it's usefulness but if I put it in balance with quicksilver I'd probably opt for the seven seats option. I see in the states white is premium now

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭gabbo is coming


    Same. Xc90 diesel a fabulous car and we also have a MY. But cannot fault an xc90



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭sk8board


    Q: have Tesla delivered anything commercially successful at all since the Y in 2019 - And with what we currently know for the next few years, could they go 8-9 years without a new commercially successful product?


    they’ve announced a tonne of ‘stuff’ over the years, but nothing that could be considered delivered and commercially successful, I think 🤔

    (I wouldn’t consider the Semi or the cybertruck to be ‘delivered and successful’; yet anyway - and R&D/capex costs are unlikely to ever be recouped - they’re really just halo products)

    Maybe the SUC is a commercial success, but it’s hard to know, and it far predates the Y announcement in 2019.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,858 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    I would consider the constant sales of the 3 and Y a commercial success?

    Same way the constant sales of ID4’s are a commercial success for VW.

    Same way the constant sales of Seals are a commercial success for BYD.

    I suppose it’s how you compare commercial success to similar brands or if you hold Tesla to a different set of parameters.

    Post edited by Gumbo on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭sk8board


    you didn’t read that at all did you? 😂

    You saw someone question Tesla and you jumped right in

    I said “have Tesla delivered anything commercially successful since the Y in 2019”

    OF COURSE the 3 is also a commercial success ffs - absolutely no one would say otherwise - alongside the Y. Both contribute 90% of the revenue of a 700bn enterprise.

    The energy dept contributes almost all the remaining 10%, and theres some leasing and carbon credit revenue - all pre 2019.

    My question was simply that the most recent of those commercial successes is the Y, 5.5 years ago.

    There’s nothing in the pipeline that we have visibility of, for the next few years. All the projects and concepts are niche/luxury products - not mass market commercially successful things that a 700bn enterprise needs to be churning out almost annually



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,858 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Yes, read it all. I suppose it’s like asking what will,bmw do next? Another 5 series? What will tesla do next? Another Model 3?

    Tesla are not a mass model car manufacturer, not like bmw, vw etc it will be small range of cars for a very long time IMO

    That seems to be working, it’s another choice of car, in a sea of other cars.

    But yeah, you feel great having a go, and get the usual likes from the trolls (can you see me).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,050 ✭✭✭JOL1


    Your question is framed in a negative way. By any objective standards Tesla has continued to grow "commercially" since 2019 and have a number of new products in development (mixed views are to be expected). Their existing product range continues to evolve - Mod 3 Highland (significant change and improvement to previous Mod 3), Mod Y scaled to achieve the status of the worlds best selling car 2023 (and due a refresh Juniper to enhance its attraction), Tesla charging tech/connectors being adopted as the standard by most other Automakers in US, with ability to commercially leverage their SUC network (post 2019) all contributing to commerciality reflected in Revenues. Ford got 47 years out of the Ford Fiesta and the car (same name) was commercially successful but nobody could argue it was the "Same product" I would be surprised if the lower cost smaller EV does not feature in its line up in the near term, broadening their market appeal to different segments. Over the next 8-9 year window I suspect there will be more products/enhanced products introduced - some in the offing and some not yet conceived.

    Screenshot 2024-10-20 at 00.13.13.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭sk8board


    oh my god lads, the question was honestly pretty simple - nothing at all negative, it’s just a fact :)

    they announce new concepts and projects all the time, but no commercial successes have been delivered since the Y in March 2019, nor have we an visibility of a huge commercial success for the coming few years.

    they can live off 3 and Y revenue for many more years, upgrade them like the Fiesta or Golf, but manufacturing 2 cars is not what Tesla is about, and certainly isn’t what the SP is built on.
    That was the only point I was making.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,519 ✭✭✭spakman


    pointlessl



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 626 ✭✭✭felonious_Gru


    Tesla model Y ( bought March 2023) owner here with thirty thousand km on clock

    Replaced front tires six months ago, anything usually expected for service after this amount of mileage?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,493 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    What do you think Tesla is about? You seem to think it is a car manufacturer?

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,858 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Seems to have worked for VW and Ford and BMW and all others.

    It’s the motors forum so all I’m interested in is the cars. I couldn’t care about the other projects they work on, bots or otherwise.

    What do people want? A cheaper car or a smaller car?

    Smaller than the 3 or cheaper than the 3, or both?

    Maybe give a comparison to what you want to hear? What are Audi doing differently? What are BMW doing differently? Nissan etc etc

    To answer your simple question, maybe you don’t read up on the revenue details like @JOL1 posted above that demonstrates continued commercial success 🤷‍♂️

    Genuine question. Give us an example of commercial success that you think Tesla should be achieving?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,687 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Tesla will never have a fleet of models, they will still be making the 3 and Y in 10years time without a self competing option

    My stuff on Adverts, mostly Tesla Pre Highland Model 3

    Public Profile active ads for slave1



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,858 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    I said that earlier too. I believe that’s the way they will stay too. I don’t think it’s viable to make a smaller car than the 3 or a cheaper car than the 3 currently. Especially when that car is €37,500 compared to its competition, Seal, ID7, ID3 (small) etc

    Realistically, they’d need to get a car into the sub €30k racket so as not to take sales away from the 3 and I can’t see that happening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 459 ✭✭padjocollins




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 673 ✭✭✭DrPsychia


    🤦‍♂️ so when roughly 85% of your revenue is car sales, you're apparently not a car manufacturer. Pure nonsense



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭sk8board


    Exactly - they trade at 8-10x a car manufacturer - so they’re definitely not a car manufacturer; however the non-car revenue strategy just seems to be a wheel of fortune spinner.

    Investor sentiment relies on events like last week to show what the future strategy is - genuinely no one believed a word of what they showcased.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,519 ✭✭✭spakman




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 673 ✭✭✭DrPsychia




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,015 ✭✭✭MojoMaker




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,687 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Current revenue, Tesla's current value is not based on it's current revenue which is vehicles. They would be better off splitting but Elon is already stretched across too many ventures and how he gets on with his new startup XAi is beyond me

    My stuff on Adverts, mostly Tesla Pre Highland Model 3

    Public Profile active ads for slave1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,050 ✭✭✭JOL1


    True to say that Tesla has a lot of embedded sources of Revenue (some realised others in development). Doesn't necessarily follow that it is "better off splitting, some Investors like the diversity play of not having "all their eggs in one basket". For any new technology there is a lot of money in R&D with failures along the way..each an opportunity to learn. The impossible always seems impossible until its not……

    Screenshot 2024-10-21 at 12.22.19.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭sk8board


    what are the sources of revenue that are ‘in development’?

    Again, I stress that this is a 700bn enterprise - meaning any new source of revenue would need to be multi billions annually to help justify the SP.

    the future sources of revenue are not clear at all for the next 3-5 years, apart from 3 and Y.

    It’s just constant promises and downright lies.

    Re your space X pic - the Space X stuff is amazing, absolutely incredible - but it has almost zero bearing on Tesla; musk just wants to associate both companies with each other when one of them has done something cool. Marketing 101.

    Musk said the roadster will use space X tech to levitate, right?

    Post edited by sk8board on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭sk8board


    https://podcasts.apple.com/ie/podcast/ride-the-lightning-tesla-motors-unofficial-podcast/id1025399574?i=1000673739492

    This is the ‘unofficial’ Tesla pod - they say that with just 35k cybertruck deliveries and 40k production, across 10 months, and chart topping Q3 numbers (fan foundation series deliveries), Tesla has binned the massive $100 reservation list and are now offering a cheaper version for immediate delivery, with no waiting list.

    The pod is ‘concerned’ Tesla won’t get remotely close to the 250,000 annual production target and will need price cuts to get sales.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,220 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Apparently the range extender is after being delayed and the specs have been pulled back a bit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,050 ✭✭✭JOL1


    "what are the sources of revenue that are ‘in development’?" Potential source of revenues are Robotaxi, Enhancing FSD which "if" successful opens up huge potential for software revenues and(or) sale to or licensing to other auto-manufacturers, development of smaller/cheaper Model 2 (it hasn't been cancelled more that Robotaxi was prioritised). I am not trying to persuade/change your views (you have made them clear) but all of these are in development whether you think they will generate revenues or not..which is a view.

    "..would need to be multi billions annually to help justify the sp". Justifying the share price is not for you (or me) to determine, this is done by the market whose collective views are all factored into determining the share price. Given uncertainty around a lot of these factors there is huge volatility but the best absolute (fact not opinion) is the daily share price as it is traded in volumes on a daily basis, bought and sold. Other than that it is just a "view"and we all can /do have views.

    " the Spaceex stuff is amazing…but has zero bearing on Tesla". Yes it is amazing and this was "my" example (not Musks Marketing 101), to illustrate in a crude way that things/technologies that once would have have seemed impossible are only so until they are shown to be possible and along the way there are many failures. In my view, and you can form your own, this is a fair analogy.

    Will leave matters there as we both understand each others view points



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,821 ✭✭✭maidhc


    I think the point being made is that the cars are going stale and they are the main Revenue source. BMW have a clear roadmap to keep people buying and upgrading and always have, they moved from the outstanding e39 to the Bangle cars, then toned things back, and the future is the also roadmapped with the nieue klasse (spelling?). They would be history if they had just kept selling the e39 as good as it was.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,858 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    BMW sales are being propped up by their ICE cars. Their EV roadmap is not great. Proof is in the numbers. As good as bmw are they need to make an effort. They i4, i5, i7 are just continuations of the 3, 5 and 7 series. Same for the IX range. Still nice cars though.

    It’s good that you mentioned bmw as Tesla would appear to be copying them in their model release/facelift process.

    E39 released in late 90’s. Refreshed in 02’ish.
    E60 released in 2003 and refreshed in 2007.
    F10 released in 2010 and refreshed in 2013.

    Model 3 released in 2019 and refreshed in 2024.
    model Y released in 2022 and refresh due in 2025.

    I guess all car brands release refreshes before changing them significantly. As I’m sure all manufacturers do, Tesla and bmw are not special in this regard.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,433 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Referral credits look to be back in France, Spain and the UK (and possibly other European markets that I didn't check) but not Ireland it seems



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement