Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

1234235237239240574

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Not a good look for Trump who constantly brings up age, "cognitive stamina and agility" etc. as things by which he demands the race be measured. Just yesterday:

    “It’s amazing, because I got three in four years,” Trump said of his appointments to the Supreme Court. “Most people get none. Because, you know, you put them in, they’re young. You tend to put them in young.”

    Trump says 'only stupid people put old' on the Supreme Court

    “Only stupid people put old,” he continued. “You know, you don’t put old in, because they’re there for two years or three years, right?”

    3 days ago

    “I believe it is very important that Kamala Harris pass a test on Cognitive Stamina and Agility,” Trump posted on Truth Social, baselessly claiming that “her actions have led many to believe that there could be something very wrong with her.”

    Trump wants cognitive ability scrutinized in this election…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    I hate things not being substantiated on either side so here is what I could find. Original journalism is MSNBC but other outlets seem to be confident enough in the story.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-stormy-daniels-hush-money-deal-election-b2630769.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,844 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    I see from Jack Smith in the last 24 hours that he is holding Trump directly responsible for all that happened at the Capitol on the 06th Jan. It might explain Trumps words about the "peaceful" behaviour of the mob that day and how he is, in his mind at least, distancing himself from their behaviour. Trump trying to distance himself from them with the words he used about them going to the Capitol conveniently forgetting that he said he would walk with them to it. He fears that he is losing the election and will face criminal trial for his incitement of and steering his "peaceful rally" toward its violent attack on the Capitol that day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,016 ✭✭✭✭briany


    It wouldn't be outside the realms of possibility, given Trump's tendency towards petulance and impulsiveness, that he would unilaterally cancel a spate of interviews, but if this is the case, wouldn't there be some signals within the Trump campaign staff that there is growing frustration with Trump's refusal to make good on these engagements? Is that story out there anywhere in the last couple of weeks?

    If not, then I cannot discount that it is really part of the Trump campaign strategy. It's long been a cornerstone of the Trump platform that traditional/established/mainstream media is to be regarded as the enemy, especially where they're not completely fawning over him. Pulling out of these interviews wouldn't hurt his standing with the base - they'd see it as him showing the middle finger to that part of the media space. Are there still middle ground voters to be won? Would he even be able to have a sitdown interview that was calm and rational enough to potentially win over some of these people. I'd have my doubts on that.

    It seems to me like he's going hard on the rallies for the base and then trying to pull in some more votes among the disaffected young male demographic by appearing on podcasts, topping that off with a very basic broad message of, 'Hey, the economy was good when I was president' without going into any detail. Those appear to be the three prongs of Trump's plan of attack, with maybe a side of partisan election officials (like that certification board in Georgia) on the day if that can be gotten away with.

    Another thing they'll be hoping goes their way is Kamala just not having enough of an X-factor or message to really rally voters to the polls. This one is more iffy since I suspect the election will mainly come down to voting for or against Trump more than Kamala running away with it as a popularity contest, and the Trump campaign is facing a possible bomb of angry young women showing up to the polls in force to keep him out of office. However, if they're not responding to polls, their impact will be pretty much impossible to predict before the results actually start rolling in.



  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    JD Vance has explicitly stated that Trump didn't lose the 2020 election. No prevarication - he didn't lose.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Not showing up at events where you can reach persuadable voters, in the closing stages of a coinflip election?

    That is 100% not normal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,523 ✭✭✭badabing106


    Hes had a few busy months. Hes doing rallies non stop.Added to that,Being shot at in an assassination attempt . Then a few weeks later, having another weirdo crawling around in a bush with a gun pointed at you. It can get mentally draining sometimes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,844 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Any revelations yet as to whom the call-taper and publicist is yet? It doesn't make sense to me, at the moment, why the attorney and client would tape and release the content of their privileged conversation. Umm, weird even…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,472 ✭✭✭Lewis_Benson


    He wouldn't be able for the steamy hot fries either, too much heat in the kitchen.



  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    They can do whatever they like with their private conversation. Undoubtedly Trump hasn't yet coughed up his fines over the court case so I could well believe that she would want to stick it to him big time.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,438 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    She did herself.

    Why the supposed "weird" mystery? Its easy to find out.

    You don't know why someone in Stormy Daniels shoes, who possibly got all sorts calling her, tapes her calls routinely? I can think of a few reasons, all of them sensible.

    And you don't know why she'd release the tape where someone who paid her hush money that was investigated and found to be a fraud rung her lawyer to offer her hush money to stay quiet? Really? Why should she not have released it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    And… he's running for POTUS?

    Frequent situations that crop up day or night, rain or shine, running around the world to be the leader of the free world, more assassination attempts, etc. etc.

    He's hardly the first candidate, or President, to have to deal with attempted assassinations.

    if he's not up for the job, he's not up for the job. It's not a job interview you get a handicap for, you'll be in charge of the nuclear arsenal and such. 'ah well, he's mentally drained, give him a break, let him have the job' doesn't slice the bread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,844 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    I was thinking that if the attorney had taped or recorded whomever it was called on behalf of You Know Who said, it would be worth its weight in gold as evidence, rather than the "you got to be kidding" exclamation from Stormy on hearing what her lawyer said about the contact, which could [pun on caution] be taken down, turned around and used against Stormy. Edit: deleted "as a weapon" inserted "evidence". That being said, it is minor when compared to defeating Trump's attempt to regain a hold on the presidency, which would assist Stormy and her attorney defeat Trump's attempt deny her justice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    "Today, Israel confirmed that Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas, is dead and justice has been served. And the United States, Israel and the entire world are better off as a result. Sinwar was responsible for the killing of thousands of innocent people, including the victims of October 7th and hostages killed in Gaza. He had American blood on his hands. Today, I can only hope that the families of the victims of Hamas feel a sense and measure of relief. Sinwar was the mastermind of October 7th, the deadliest day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust, a terrorist attack that killed 1,200 innocent people and included horrific sexual violence and more than 250 hostages taken into Gaza, including seven Americans living and deceased who remain in captivity. A terrorist attack that triggered a devastating war in Gaza. A war that has led to unconscionable suffering of many innocent Palestinians. And greater instability throughout the Middle East.

    "In the past year, American special operations and intelligence personnel have worked closely with their Israeli counterparts to locate and track Sinwar and other Hamas leaders. And I commend their work. And I will say to any terrorist who kills Americans, threatens the American people, or threatens our troops or our interests. Know this, we will always bring you to justice. Israel has a right to defend itself. And the threat Hamas poses to Israel must be eliminated. Today, there is clear progress toward that goal. Hamas is decimated and its leadership is eliminated. This moment gives us an opportunity to finally end the war in Gaza, and it must end such that Israel is secure. The hostages are released. The suffering in Gaza ends and the Palestinian people can realize their right to dignity, security, freedom and self-determination. And it is time for the day after to begin without Hamas in power. We will not give up on these goals. And I will always work to create a future of peace, dignity and security for all."

    Kamala Harris statement on Sinwar being killed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    .

    .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    I was highlighting our actual Trump fanboy who copy/paste from Twitter to pass off as their own comment. Others had got there before me though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 568 ✭✭✭joe35


    Could Trump be manipulating the odds to use post election day if he looses.

    2020 his reasoning that he "won" the election was based on the size of his rallies.

    With his rally sizes dwindling, he might look to use the betting odds as "evidence" that the election was stolen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,438 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    There's no results. There's no polls taken. All we know is how many votes.

    Michigan and Wisconsin are both trending for Trump right now. There's still 19 days and Trump is getting far more erratic, day by day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,016 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Documentary filmmaker Michael Moore has been sounding the alarm on his podcast that Harris not taking enough of a hard line against Israel killing innocents in Palestine might cost her Michigan since that state apparently has a rather high proportion of Arab-Americans living there. Personally, I think this is a damned-if-you-do-damned-if-you-don't situation for Harris since taking a harder line against Israel would probably cost her votes elsewhere. This isn't such a problem for Trump since his likely voters are going to be much more pro-Israel or just not so fond of Muslims/Arabs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,187 ✭✭✭I.R.Y.E.D


    Those very fine people aren't so fond of Jews either, just depends on the day and the news headline or latest twitter post that they can repeat.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    “Oh, you guys are at the wrong rally. No, I think you meant to go to the smaller one down the street.” - Kamala Harris to hecklers in La Crosse, Wisconsin, 10/17/2024

    Now that’s funny. And I do believe Donald Trump will be rankled by it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,472 ✭✭✭Lewis_Benson




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,994 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Anyone got predictions on what the immediate aftermath for both candidates being elected is economically. I don't mean their policies but how the stock markets and banks are likely to react.

    I'm presuming Kamala means no real change, stocks remain steady but for Trump, do they get a bounce like a new manager on a sports team or do they crash.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,016 ✭✭✭✭briany


    When you consider how thin skinned Trump is and how well-known his various insecurities are, the Harris campaign has been extraordinarily restrained in hitting Trump on these points.

    While there's a case not to get involved in a childish back and forth, I think there's a better case to keep Trump constantly mad and off topic. Or more so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,005 ✭✭✭scottser


    He's doing a grand job of looking like a shitehawk on his own, to be fair. They don't really need to go there.



  • Posts: 6,597 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Given that he will implement tax cuts for billionaires almost immediately it will have a negative impact almost immediately. The economic community have made very clear predictions about what will happen under Trump and it's not good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Had a look at the battleground polls for the first time in ages. They all seem to be swinging Trumps way again, some are very tight though. Appears that the Harris fizz is on the way out, and the more she does these interviews the less uncertain people are of her.

    Lets be honest here, if she were not running against Trump most would agree.

    Being self-interested, Harris would be a better bet than Trump, given his comments about the Corporation tax reductions. That could harm FDI. Trump has big questions to answer as well in regards to Ukraine. Harris is a better bet there too.

    But, Harris doesnt really impress me at all, but that is the abject state of US politics at the moment.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    OK, so we are fully swung around to her doing too many interviews now?

    It's also a very strange characterisation that "Trump has big questions to answer" about Ukraine. The issue isn't that his policy is unclear here, the issue that his policy is pretty obvious, he just isn't being honest about it.

    It isn't like it's comparing two differing policies that are just different approaches to the issue. One candidate intends to continue supporting the country being invaded. The other candidate won't say what he intends to do but seems likely to simply cut off support and allow the invading country to be complete its invasion without any pushback. That candidate also will not address concerns that he was in connect with the invading countries dictator after he was voted out..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,584 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    Judge Chutkan DENIES Trump's motion to pause the unsealing of Jack Smith's appendix to his immunity brief.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,313 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    OK, so we are fully swung around to her doing too many interviews now?

    No, I didn't say that.

    But these interviews aren't really going all that well for her.

    If she **** this up and doesn't win this race, it will be on her. Does she want to be the person to fall at the last hurdle and let Trump win? What a legacy to leave behind..



Advertisement