Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland's Refugee Policy cont. Please read OP before posting

178101213142

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Indeed. Particularly when those doing the criticising consistently produce borderline illiterate material with a proliferation of nonsense about the ‘far right’ or quote statistics that are not cited and clearly invented to support whatever tedious point they are trying to make.

    Then there are the homespun personal anecdotes when their mammy or auntie Mary were directly impacted by some nefarious force, invariably originating from the political ‘right’. As I suggested, some folks really need to take a long hard look in the mirror before questioning the intellectual capacity of tens of millions of Americans..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    No, but i do think someone is fundamentally thick if they think the person who had the unemployment rate peak at a staggering 14.8% during their term in office is going to be their economic saviour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,751 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    The 0.42% you're speaking of is the number of people who voted for far right candidates in the recent local elections isn't it?

    There's the problem with what you're saying, I'd wager nobody posting here is part of that cohort. I know I'm not, yet you'd still consider me to be far right regardless of the fact I've corrected you on that point repeatedly.

    I voted independent in the local elections, I'm a Centreist, something you believe qualifies me as a raging fascist.

    As for the post count, the people with the most posts on this thread are you Suvigirl and Megamanboo. I've posted a handful of times, go count yourself if you want confirmation. I incidentally have counted and know the numbers, but as you're being so rude I don't feel compelled to share them with you, particularly as gathering that information took a couple of minutes, which I'm sure you have to spare.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,320 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    The only lefties I know that are still lefties since college have no kids.

    When you are in college and have the comfort of Mammy's house then it's easy to say let them in because it has no effect on you.

    When you start growing more into your twenties and you want your own place and kids then as with human nature, you are not going to be shouting everyone in while you can't get anywhere to rent.

    I do feel for people who actually are in need but this farce has them living in a tent or a fire hazard old factory.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,123 ✭✭✭prunudo


    My feeling is that FG/FF will stay on the current plan of sitting on the fence on immigration for the election so not to lose votes to SF but in the new year will move back towards centre as Europe dictate a change in immigration policies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 334 ✭✭2Greyfoxes


    That graph is virtually impossible to read for those who are colourblind, such as myself. The middle is just one big block of colour, where I think it is meant to be several colours?

    Who ever designed it, needs a good talking too.

    Clever word play may win debates, but it doesn't make it true.

    Understanding and explaining things, is not the same as justifying them, if in doubt… please re-read this statement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 334 ✭✭2Greyfoxes


    Guess that one went over your mental altitude.

    Clever word play may win debates, but it doesn't make it true.

    Understanding and explaining things, is not the same as justifying them, if in doubt… please re-read this statement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,506 ✭✭✭sonofenoch


    Haven't checked this thread in quite a while, I see for some there is still no difference in immigration and immigrants/refugees/asylum they still all get lumped in as one thing and still get 'thanked' by the same bods 😄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,931 ✭✭✭ShamNNspace


    Maybe they had a look at who was running against him, held their noses and said No thanks, just like they rejected that vile woman the first time he was elected,in any case they're entitled to do this without being ridiculed and called thick, voters choose where to put the X on the ballot for many and varied reasons



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    And one of the varied reasons is because they are thick. Let's not pretend otherwise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 625 ✭✭✭dh1985


    We look down our noses at the people of the US. We are no better ourselves. Continually voting in both FF and FG and them not giving a damn about the people of this country. Micheal Martin was a key member of the early 2000's FF that bankrupted the country and FG are pissing away any prosperity we have on nonsense and unmitigated disaster after disaster. And yet they will be in power and bed together next year. A question of intellect needed closer to home than the US.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,172 ✭✭✭Jizique


    Indeed, FG ignoring their 6 Kerry councillors and opting for an all Ireland winning publican, FF going for Grainne Seoige, the public voting for tv personalities Mullooly, Ní Mhurchú, George Lee etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Inflation at 2% coming off the back of sky high figures continues to hurt the everyday worker hard. To put it in context:

    Loaf of bread in early 2020 - €1.49

    Loaf of bread in early 2024 - €2.45

    Loaf of bread in late 2024 - €2.49

    Meanwhile, wages for many have not kept pace with such rapid price rises. That's hurting families and workers very hard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Tolerant and inclusive to the end I see. The left never learn, do they? Hillary busted her chances of becoming POTUS by lambasting a vast swathe of the US voting public as deplorables.

    There used to be a difference - nowadays the lines are alot more blurred. Many economic migrants are using the asylum route to get into many western states. Why jump through hoops to get a work visa when you can rock up without a passport and cry 'persecution'. It's a much better avenue for most to do this - guaranteed income straight away and immediate shelter. With the recent changes to the law permitting refugees working - it's no wonder the numbers coming are exploding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,172 ✭✭✭Jizique




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,628 ✭✭✭Augme


    I've no issue with thick people being being part of society and given the same rights as everyone else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭maik3n


    Moving swiftly on from US politics.

    I guess perhaps it's a sign of THE times that the recent Pastoral Letter from the ICBC has received very little reaction.
    Although maybe it's just too early to tell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,208 ✭✭✭Damien360


    I'll be honest, it's news to me and I don't think many take a blind bit of notice of it.

    I read it and my issue with it is the net migration figures, which are often quoted. We are loosing 69k people every year without stating if that's Irish leaving or the new comers. A mix I suppose but even in my own industry, young Irish are leaving in their droves. That's taxpayers leaving and we are importing huge swathes of those just to go on benefits.

    It gives no mix for the 149k incoming of visa people (instant taxpayers) Vs those who will go straight to benefits. Safe to say, those in the tents looking for a free gaff are not from the visa system.

    It's a document that makes sense in an ideal world where a functional visa system operates to take in needed taxpayers and a space is left for actual refugees. Not economic migrants who have zero wish to integrate into Irish society.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭Gen.Zhukov


    I've no idea what you are seeing as I don't suffer from that - It's a very important poll to see and understand the stats/demographics within. I did a quick snip/edit of the first few lines if that helps - The sections in the middle with a white rectangle around it are the % of people that want a more closed policy re immigration

    IT poll 3.jpg

    Not to mention the fact that the "Sophisticated Irish electorate" managed to send a dancing jockey to the EU to represent us there (on a cool €1.2m pay over the 5 years I should add) - They were possibly too excited thinking about a day at the ploughing to give it much thought

    That's a level of sophistication I hope I never achieve



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Ah the old Catholic Church at it again, always swooping in to 'take care' of the poor and, keep them poor. Just the closet-gay faction of the liberal agenda. Seen it all before.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,617 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    I read it and my issue with it is the net migration figures, which are often quoted. We are loosing 69k people every year without stating if that's Irish leaving or the new comers. A mix I suppose but even in my own industry, young Irish are leaving in their droves. That's taxpayers leaving and we are importing huge swathes of those just to go on benefits. 

    It gives no mix for the 149k incoming of visa people (instant taxpayers) Vs those who will go straight to benefits. Safe to say, those in the tents looking for a free gaff are not from the visa system.


    Sure all you’d to do was look at the footnote? It links to the CSO data where it gives the breakdown you’re looking for:

    Immigration

    The number of immigrants in the 12 months to April 2024 was the highest since the year to April 2007 and consisted of 30,000 returning Irish citizens, 27,000 other EU citizens, 5,400 UK citizens, and 86,800 other citizens including Ukrainians.

    Emigration

    The number of emigrants in the 12 months to April 2024 was the highest since the year to April 2015 and consisted of 34,700 Irish citizens, 10,600 other EU citizens, 3,000 UK citizens, and 21,500 other citizens including Ukrainians.

    https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-pme/populationandmigrationestimatesapril2024/keyfindings/



    It's a document that makes sense in an ideal world where a functional visa system operates to take in needed taxpayers and a space is left for actual refugees. Not economic migrants who have zero wish to integrate into Irish society.


    It’s a document that makes more sense than your post where you refer to young Irish people leaving in their droves as taxpayers (wouldn’t they be economic migrants? They’re certainly not paying tax if they’re not domiciled here), and Ireland isn’t importing anyone (there’s laws against that sort of behaviour).

    The visa system functions just fine (the problems arise when people over-stay their visa - then they’re here illegally), the asylum application system does not, but there’s no immigrants or asylum applicants are going straight on benefits, because they don’t qualify for them at all. Only if they are granted refugee status are they are entitled to support from the State, and that’s always been the case.

    The term ‘economic migrant’ refers to people who are not seeking asylum - a completely separate category, which includes people who come to work here and do not require a visa, and people who come to work here who do require a visa. It doesn’t include people seeking asylum who are granted refugee status and may later be granted permission to work (after 5 months they can apply for a work permit -

    https://www.irishrefugeecouncil.ie/work-permit-and-employment )

    Immigrants aren’t required to integrate into Irish society in any case, though it benefits Irish society if they do, such as enrolling themselves and their children in education (with 90% of national schools controlled by the Catholic Bishops of Ireland, you think people don’t notice that too? 😂) and so on, to say nothing of the Irish people who themselves have no wish to integrate into Irish society, and nothing whatsoever about young Irish people who become economic migrants who end up overstaying their visas in other countries and becoming illegal immigrants, nor would anyone suggest Ireland is exporting anyone, because that’d be silly, just as silly as the suggestion that Ireland is importing anyone.

    As maik3n suggests - it’s probably too early to tell, but it’s likely to get a mention at Mass in the morning where there are plenty of immigrants among the congregation, and have been among the congregation at Mass every Sunday morning for years:

    Over this weekend at Masses celebrated in parishes across the island of Ireland, bishops will publish a new pastoral letter on welcoming immigrants, entitled: A Hundred Thousand Welcomes?

    A Hundred Thousand Welcomes? invites parishioners to reflect on how we welcome immigrants in contemporary Ireland, and the theme is informed by the parable of the Good Samaritan.

    The pastoral letter’s call to action encourages people to welcome immigrants and strive to help all newcomers belong to the life of the community; to reject voices that sow division; and, calls on State authorities to provide more resources to address local social and economic shortages that have been neglected for too long.

    https://www.catholicbishops.ie/2024/10/12/irish-bishops-pastoral-letter-on-welcoming-immigrants-a-hundred-thousand-welcomes/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,053 ✭✭✭_Puma_


    Donald Tusk, the saviour of Poland from "the far right ". Saying the quite bit out loud and calling the asylum system people trafficking.

    Some very uncomfortable days ahead for Roddy and his department , Helen and the likes of David Mooney.

    Expect a big pushback from people and NGOs profiting and working in the system in Ireland in the next few weeks.

    Their livelihoods are on the line.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx20186mjleo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 751 ✭✭✭Hungry Burger


    If Poland, a fellow E.U member state can do this, why can’t we?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,617 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    From the article - Poland can’t do it either:

    Under international law, countries are obliged to offer people the right to claim asylum. Tusk did not say how he would justify the move to his EU partners.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭lmao10


    The end of the article is pretty apt

    "“I never saw Donald Tusk as a human rights champion, but this is a new low,” Malgorzata Szuleka, a board member of the Warsaw-based Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights told the BBC.

    “There is a humanitarian crisis on the border, but it is also an open migration route. We need to find a place for a rational discussion that is not so populistically driven,” she added."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,622 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    They don't have to pretend they are children when seeking asylum in Ireland. They will not be deported even if their asylum application fails. 2% of failed asylum seekers were deported since 2014. And those 2% were probably seriously taking the piss. No, come to Ireland guys. There is no immigration department in Ireland. Just a rubber stamp welcome queue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 751 ✭✭✭Hungry Burger


    Depends on your definition of “can’t”

    They can in all reality, international law is routinely ignored.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,617 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    It doesn’t depend on anyone’s definition of can or can’t at all, it depends on whether or not what he claims he wants to do is legal or not. It’s not legal, which is also why Ireland can’t do it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement