Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election - read the warning in the OP posted 18/09/24

1184185187189190574

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Harris should commit to making Liz Cheney her Secretary of State.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    "I know nothing about Project 2025"

    https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-says-project-2025-author-coming-onboard-if-elected-1966334

    "You've seen Tom," the former president replied. "You've seen Tom Homan. He's coming on board."

    If Trump was really trying to distance himself from Project 2025, he's doing a really piss poor job of it.

    More of this ilk, in the article, his handler Steven Cheung makes a droll statement about "all the damage dangerously liberal Kamala Harris has done to our country." Which utterly destroys their own talking points that she's supposedly done nothing for 4 years.

    And this guy he's bringing on is such a nice guy, calling for migrant concentration camps and still talking like he's going to double down on the child abduction policies:

    "I'm sick and tired of hearing about the family separation," Homan said. "I'm still being sued over that." He added: "I don't give a s***, right? Bottom line is, we enforced the law."

    I'm very certain the law says a few things about human rights and not a damn thing about abducting children from their families with no way to trace or reunite them. Nevermind all the horrible things they were exposed to in detention, like sexual assault. But Tim Walz doesn't do enough interviews so gosh, race is just too close to call.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,579 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I think Donald Trump is a repulsive, cruel human being and despicable politician who says & does miserable, indefensible things on a daily basis. He is one of the worst things to happen to modern politics, and I dearly hope he is humiliated in a month's time (though knowing there's basically a 50/50 chance he'll actually win given current polling).

    But I continue to object strongly to any suggestion that reasonable criticisms of Harris are in bad faith. To pick just a few examples… she has disastrously (for the planet) backtracked on several urgent environmental issues; her approach to the Middle East crisis is an amoral disaster; she has - as far as I've seen - failed to stand up properly for Lina Khan (maybe the most promising figure in the Biden administration) amid mounting attacks from billionaire donors - though we'll see how that plays out if she wins; she has abandoned her past support of Medicare for All; and in general her platform lacks real progressive or forward-thinking policies beyond fairly typical centrist Dem stuff. The neocon likes of Liz Cheney happily backing her shows there's a fundamental conservatism at the heart of the current Dem platform.

    Yes, she's infinitely better than Trump. But in a country that had genuine democratic representation rather than a two-party duopoly, several of Harris' positions would IMO be immediately disqualifying and honestly I'd consider morally indefensible regardless.

    We all know the multiple areas where Harris is a big improvement on the Republicans - from abortion rights to workers rights. Harris is an improvement over Biden in virtually every way, given Biden can often barely string a sentence together. I do continue to like Tim Walz, as despite some obvious flaws he's a good representative of a more natural and on-the-ground school of Democrat politics. But in many ways Harris is the 'Biden / Obama continuity' candidate which IMO is not the way to build a passionate, dynamic coalition or repair the broken social contract that has driven so many people towards extremists and nationalism.

    Harris' current media tour has revealed a trail of good, ambitious policies she has since abandoned, once core beliefs she has since frustratingly compromised on, and a few tricky questions she can't really provide satisfying answers for. If anything, I fear that refusal to embrace and fight for real change is exactly the reason why so many traditional status quo liberal parties in the western world - the Democrats very much included - continue to cede ground (and voters) to the far-right, while also continuing to alienate many more left-leaning voters who should traditionally be in their camp.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,362 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    when I was posting that I was thinking the same - I never want Michelle to go for the presidency - it will probably ruin my view of her 😀



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,027 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Not all of them are telling lies, the rest are just useful idiots, laundering talking points gleaned from dubious sources, hence the reason why they constantly dodge a request for citation



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,362 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I’ve seen some positive movements in the young voter ship in terms of shifts from Rep to Dem - now if these notorious non-voting group will just get off their lazy asses and away from their social media for a few hours and actually vote when the time comes….!

    And also the ethnic vote/ a notorious bunch of no-shows on the day



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,794 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    You're making the mistake of assuming that there is a thought process behind the trotting out of "tampon Tim". It's just what the MAGA social media is pushing, as is almost every other argument being made by the rape-apologists.

    warned and 1 day forum ban applied

    Post edited by Beasty on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 318 ✭✭Greengrass53


    That's all well and good but if she hadn't toned down on some of her policies she wouldn't have a prayer of getting elected. It's touch and go, as you say, anyway. So she had no choice or would you prefer she stuck to her guns and Trump walked it. I think not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 531 ✭✭✭Dingaan


    The majority of polls are trending in Trump's direction.

    Harris's behaviour of denying and not answering questions is not going to be an effective strategy. Her campaign slogan is 'A new way forward', yet she comes out and says there is nothing she would change from the last four years. Is that really going to motivate people to vote for her who are unhappy with the current direction of the country?

    Her honeymoon period is well and truly over.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There's plenty to criticise Harris and the democrats for. No one is pretending otherwise.

    It's just that the majority of people who are nitpicking on this thread while pretending not to be a Trump supporter are doing so while turning a complete blind eye to Trumps history and current behavior. Even when they are provided with direct examples and asked direct questions, there is no acknowledgement that Trump even does these things, never mind a defense or explanation. For example, Trump supporters have been claiming falsely that Harris and Walz have been avoiding interviews, but then do not make any mention of how Trump has dodged the 60 Minutes interview. Or harping on about how Harris is a war monger or uses violent rhetoric then just ignore when people point out some of the comments Trump has made.

    This keeps happening and it's obvious why. These criticisms are not genuine. They're attempts at point scoring that Trump supporters have no intention or ability to actually explain and defend.

    It just baffles me that they think it's effective in some way.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,594 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    In fairness there's a huge discussion which could be had regarding how hard it is to vote in many areas in America and often in those areas with larger ethnic populations. Literally having to stand in line for hours to vote. It's why in 2020 where there was more mail-in voting, largest voting turnout in history. Hell Trump talks about getting more votes than any sitting President, and Biden still got about 8m more votes than him.

    But definitely, getting people to actually go to the effort to vote is a huge thing, and that's where Harris replacing Biden has definitely caused the biggest shift, because even people who might have still preferred Biden over Trump may not have been enthused enough to go to the effort of voting for him. I think more people would be more willing to get out and vote for Harris.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    She notoriously hates the 'politics' piece - she never will.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,006 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Nor was it a Cat 5, the likes of which we've never seen (I'm paraphrasing Trump here)

    Sounds like both men listened to the people in the know and commented on it. We'll say they were both, thankfully, wrong



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,449 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    You're absolutely right, BUT when she's up against someone that is supported by something as heinous as Project 2025, sometimes you have to swallow that bitter pill and vote for the least wrong candidate.

    In an actual, proper, mature PR-STV democracy, I don't think either of these would be anywhere near the presidency.

    But we are where we are. Harris is BY FAR the least worst candidate in this two horse race. By clouding the waters with undue criticism (and it is often undue, as Trump is never held to the same standards) you are giving Trump an advantage.

    They are not the same. They are not equivocal.

    To get back to your point about change, I believe that is best done from the ground up. Follow the Republicans lead on that one. This whole overarch of Project 2025 started back with the Tea Party, separating from the Republican party. It is happening with the democrats, I believe. The ground force of the Democrats are made up of much more European looking, socialists than there ever was before. This will eventually filter through. Arguably, it is. Walz with his "crazy" socialism ideas of feeding kids for one. Harris with her "maximum pricing a family should pay a month for medicines" There's no way an old school Democrat like Bill Clinton for example, would ever have said such a thing. It's my belief that Bernie Sanders changed that party for good, by drafting in the idealistic youth and speaking openly about an America-friendly form of socialism.

    I have no idea how it will ever be anything but a two party system. The only way I can think of is if the Republicans split into MAGA and the Republican Party, which in a few years, will splinter the democrat party from the centre to the left as they become more and more annoyed at each other for not moving to the centre/being too leftwing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,794 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    The only reason I'd like her to even consider running is to witness the ridiculous, impotent rage from Trump and his acolytes if she did.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,742 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    There are so many variables at play here that accurately predicting things is near impossible.

    In theory , if all of the swing States were to fall the same way (in either direction) the result would be a blow out victory for the beneficiary.

    In isolation , all of those States are running inside the margins of error so each one could go either way , but the chances of ALL of them going the same way is pretty darn slim.

    It's all about turn-out at this point and perhaps that's where the Democrat money advantage might be telling in terms of just bombarding those States with reminders to vote.

    For the Hurricane impacted States , it will be interesting to see the effect.

    Clearly , early voting will likely be disrupted/reduced and perhaps even mail-in as well so the big question will be will the people that typically use those methods be motivated to turn up on the day to bridge that gap. The only one that's realistically in play for Harris is North Carolina so it's important for the Democrats to really target voters there - Especially the 10-15% of voters that polling indicates are currently planning to vote for Stein in the Governor race but Trump for President.

    All the reasons you wouldn't vote for Robinson apply to Trump as well , so they need to really make that point to those people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 571 ✭✭✭Stanley 1


    Yes, that Lara Loomer is changing his nappy and tucking him in down at Merde de Lardo, now she is top batshit class.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,417 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    The general trend in polls has been for Harris, nationally, way ahead, and ahead in most swing states.

    Harris has been going for multiple interviews blowing the trump loons rhetoric of avoiding questions out of the water while their leader plays to the same audience with incoherent babble noises.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,457 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    The polls need to stay as narrow as possible in order to avoid apathy.

    People need to be determined to get out and vote particularly when so many obstacles are purposely put in their place.

    I imagine the tactic of voter suppression will be widely expanded upon if Trumps get in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,362 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    yeah I’m similar - that and the female vote- I mean FFS- you have a woman of ethnicity left leaning - it’s really not going to get much better than this for you😀



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,717 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    But I continue to object strongly to any suggestion that reasonable criticisms of Harris are in bad faith. To pick just a few examples… she has disastrously (for the planet) backtracked on several urgent environmental issues; her approach to the Middle East crisis is an amoral disaster; she has - as far as I've seen - failed to stand up properly for Lina Khan (maybe the most promising figure in the Biden administration) amid mounting attacks from billionaire donors - though we'll see how that plays out if she wins; she has abandoned her past support of Medicare for All; and in general her platform lacks real progressive or forward-thinking policies beyond fairly typical centrist Dem stuff. The neocon likes of Liz Cheney happily backing her shows there's a fundamental conservatism at the heart of the current Dem platform.

    There has been precious little in the way of genuine criticism of Kamala Harris on this thread or, indeed, many other places too. Most of the criticism that's bandied about comes not from honest positions, but from people who have demonstrated an extreme bias and utterly dishonest and insincere stances in order to prop up their golden idol.

    Genuine criticism of Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party is welcome and there's quite a bit to be critical of, as in some of the items you've posted above. However, a lot of that criticism can be levelled at the Republican Party as well. And, frankly, while her and the Democrat's stance on the Middle East is awful, that is because it's an American stance and not a party one and no matter who is in power in the US, that stance will remain whether it is criticised or not.

    The problem is that both parties are right leaning, one more than the other, so the points you have raised won't be getting any salve from either entity.

    But…and this is very important…in a two horse race where the lesser of two evils is the least damaging choice, it's important not to let the trees get in the way of seeing the wood.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,449 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    I believe this is why the Harris camp is reluctant to publish their fundraising amounts for September, lest people think she'll walk it or stop donating), and will be pushing it out to as long as legally possible (October 26th, iirc)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 531 ✭✭✭Dingaan


    I'll ignore that second part of your post because it's just all over the place.

    No high quality polls has Harris way ahead. That's a falsehood.

    You will see some statistical noise from poll to poll, what's important is the trends. Go to 538 who weight polling agencies by grade, and look at the overall trend. Most battleground states are trending in Trumps direction.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,742 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Indeed - Polling showing Harris running away with it could actually be counter productive in terms of people actually voting.

    Democratic voters in the US have an awful tendency toward ennui when it comes to voting.

    They seem to need a "cause" to rally behind instead of just getting out and voting as a matter of course.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,523 ✭✭✭badabing106


    Kamala is seeking the vote for "change" in this election and she was asked that exact 64000 dollar question yesterday. This answer speaks a thousand words

    warned and 1 day forum ban applied

    Post edited by Beasty on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,717 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,417 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Show me where trump is gaining, or has momentum, on the national polls? The battleground states are close but are majority falling to Harris right now.

    This was your statement:

    Harris's behaviour of denying and not answering questions is not going to be an effective strategy.

    During a phase where Harris is everywhere answering questions and trump is running away and hiding behind "truths". You cannot consider your point as credible in any way.

    Though I do understand why you want to run away and hide from it in the same way that trump does. These type of traits are not desirable in a person and certainly not in a presidential candidate.

    I await your coherent answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 571 ✭✭✭Stanley 1


    warned and 1 day forum ban applied

    Post edited by Beasty on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,651 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Convicted Felon Trump might've repeatedly violated the Logan act in his convos with Putin. CFTrump bragged about it during the debate.

    I wonder about his meeting with Orban at Merde-a-Lago, too.

    https://www.newsweek.com/russia-trump-logan-act-harris-debate-vladmiri-putin-1951875



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,863 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    indeed- the “change” candidate wouldn’t change a thing her administration did over the past 4 years- LOL



Advertisement