Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Independent Golfer Ireland

1679111225

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15 adoall


    also think the 3 year rule is window dressing and will be easily circumvented



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,295 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    No offence, but I'm not sure you've thought that fully through.

    • There aren't that many opens at weekends, not in my area for sure (south east). But a plethora of opens during the week, fourballs, seniors/juniors/ladies, mixed gents & ladies
    • If you live in area where you can play opens for 15, 20 quid (at that price I'm assuming mostly senior opens or very rural) you can probably get a membership for well under a grand too, like maybe 750, 800, maybe even 650.
    • By the time you finished chasing and travelling to your opens and your ranges and par 3s and paid your iGolf fee you're probably most of the way towards your 750 or whatever you have to pay for the club in your area. Which you could use to play there whatever day and time of the week you want just around the corner without all that hassle of travelling. And it actually also entitles you to play all those opens without a question.

    Like I said before, it might suit some. But I think when people do the maths and think about travelling and the arranging of the matey groups and everything else it's not gonna be such a no-brainer and the band of players for whom this will truly make sense will be probably narrower than you think.

    On the surface 25-40 w career n family commitment. Can only play 6-12 per year. Makes financial sense but being restricted to weekends makes things awkward w opens and travelling and getting all the mates together. Also that group doesnt seem to like being away from home for golf for 6 or 7 hours. They always crying about slow golf I need to get back home already.

    Or on the other hand a gang of retirees. They have a senior open lined up in their vicinity nearly every day Mo-Fr. Heaven sent for them. But they're retired and like their comfort too. They like a clubhouse w friends and a grub and a card game and a bet on the tv with the racing channel on. And statistically their demographic group is relatively strong on the spending power. Retired, no mortgage, they might just simply pay membership on their local for convenience and Sunday - to heck with the grand - and do their rota anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 802 ✭✭✭Scarab80


    We charge €20 at the moment for open comps, this is below our society rate, which again is below our green fee rate.

    Our society rate is obviously discounted because we will get big groups in. Our open rate is discounted because we can avail of similar arrangements at other courses. €20 is not the cost of a round of golf, especially not a comp round with prizes, it is our most heavily discounted rate available only to members of other clubs. It is baffling to me as to why igolfers think they will be able to avail of this discounted rate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 443 ✭✭REFLINE1


    https://irishgolfer.ie/latest-golf-news/2024/10/05/igolf-clubs-fear-losing-out-on-attracting-younger-members/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,634 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    I think people are underestimating the anger that is out there from clubs towards Golf Ireland. It is seen as a decision made by unelected officials, railroaded through, despite strong opposition from the vast majority of clubs in the country.

    As mentioned previously, eleven clubs in North Leinster are formulating their response to the scheme. Another eight clubs in South Leinster have already decided that iGolfers will not be allowed enter their club competitions. A meeting is also planned for clubs in the Midlands.

    Golf Ireland have badly misjudged the response from the clubs. Clubs are discussing withholding their annual Golf Ireland subscriptions. The is also talk of a vote of no confidence in the Board of Directors at the AGM, a vote which, in the current climate, would pass.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,876 ✭✭✭coillcam


    Meetings have already taken place with Golf Ireland and amongst clubs themselves in previous months. This is what brought in the 3 year stand down period as far as I understand. Unless, there is going to be a new batch of them…

    Clubs withholding subs to Golf Ireland is bananas stuff and could adversely damage cash flow. Which has knock-on effects to staff and various programs, international teams etc. That could easily trickle back down to clubs. There is no need to be escalating this further to a "strike" situation and going nuclear. It's quite simple for the clubs that want iGolf. Don't accept iGolfers for comps and/or put a premium rate in place.

    By all means vote and have motions at the AGM etc, but pulling money is not going to help anyone. Do they think this is some sort of industrial dispute like teachers or nurses pay?

    Remember that R&A were directly threatening to position a private company in charge of iGolf if GI didn't run with it. That would have next to zero accountability to clubs than GI, you can be sure it would do everything to make a profit. This would be a significantly more dangerous situation.

    Like it or not the R&A/USGA want iGolf type programs all over the world. It's already in other countries and will be more widespread. You have to find a way to balance club concerns and live with it.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,044 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Withholding of GI subs seems pointless, clubs hold enough power here without having to resort to that.

    Ultimately iGolf relies on people being able to play multiple courses. Since you're only going to be able to play Opens, and most clubs only do 1 Open a week, the system only really works well if you have multiple courses in your locality that have Opens on different days.

    If a club doesn't like the scheme then either don't allow iGolf members to play or charge them a big enough green fee that it offsets their concern about the scheme.

    If enough clubs do this the scheme will be limited in its attractiveness anyway. GI can sell has many iGolf subs as they want, ultimately it's the clubs who will decide who can play and when.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,921 ✭✭✭spacecoyote


    Technically, opens aren't the only option. They're the only option to play a competition, but they can always play general play rounds, paying a normal green fee



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,479 ✭✭✭Miley Byrne


    But they can do that (pay normal greenfees) regardless of whether they have signed up to igolf or not



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,921 ✭✭✭spacecoyote


    Yes, but can't maintain a handicap without the iGolf membership



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,479 ✭✭✭Miley Byrne


    Oh sorry, yes. I hadn't thought of that actually. Would playing general play rounds by paying a green fee (and entering it on GI) be enough to maintain a handicap or do you need to play a certain number of comps?



  • Administrators Posts: 55,044 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    You don't have to play any comps.

    But signing up to iGolf to play casual golf seems pointless. You could just maintain a handicap using one of the many free apps instead if you just wanted one for casual golf.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,709 ✭✭✭blue note


    I never realised why clubs were actually running opens. I always thought they were doing it for the money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,479 ✭✭✭Miley Byrne


    I wasn't suggesting people would sign up "just" to play casual golf but if you can maintain an igolf handicap by just playing casual golf then that would allow you to play in classics etc. That seems a bit mad to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,921 ✭✭✭spacecoyote


    They are of course looking to make money, but also it is a community thing.

    I do think that it is a big hit for some clubs, so I get the reticence.

    Losing 1 member for a club needs a lot of iGolfer rounds to compensate for that 1 loss. So you can argue its silly to give up green fees from iGolfers, but they probably think...if the whole thing disappears, the lads who don't want to join a club, but still play golf, will still pay a green fee, and the lads who want handicaps and competitive golf will join clubs ultimately.

    If they get 1 of those joiners or keep 1 member who was considering changing to iGolf, they've covered 20 or so (or more) iGolfer green fees immediately



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,295 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    It's def'ny added income and very welcome, but it's only a small percentage of the budget. Very low single digit %. I'd say if you lost just 20 or 25 full members to iGolf you'd all but negate that added 'opens' income annually.

    Opens are a win/win for members & clubs. Members can play elsewhere in a comp without paying full whack and the clubs have some added income. I think the concern for the clubs is clearly about possibly losing members to it. And from a members point of view maybe some irrational or not thinking of where is the justice them playing (and possibly winning) here for 'perk' rate when they have no home club to offer to play at.

    Post edited by CalamariFritti on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭paulos53


    If it is true that many clubs are going to stick together to make it difficult for iGolfers to play on their course then it won't be long before other clubs spot an opportunity to boost their finances by welcoming them.

    The England Golf website has a link with offers for their iGolf scheme. Some clubs are running iGolf only open competitions, some are offering special introductory membership rates or discounted green fee rates, club pros are offering discounted lessons etc.

    Given a bit of time, I am sure that the same will be advertised here. How long can clubs afford to turn away iGolfers if they see a club down the road making money from the scheme?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 755 ✭✭✭ShivasIrons


    Regular Open competitions are not win/win for clubs and golfers. Below cost selling of golf diminishes the value of membership, this lead to the proliferation of distance memberships for handicaps. These clubs became the enemy for fulfilling a need created by the clubs themselves, and now iGolf is becoming the enemy instead.

    The reality is clubs who host weekly open competitions are making a mistake and they need to look inwardly. With the fees that clubs charge there is little revenue to be made from them

    By all means, host an Open week to give potential new members an opportunity to see the course but hosting regular open competitions will make members whose play is low and diminishing leave the club.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,295 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    I think people in favour of iGolf vastly overestimate the income from opens. Plus iGolfers would only be a tiny fraction of that again.

    Post edited by CalamariFritti on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,106 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Exactly

    However, the clubs that are going to charge ‘extra’ for iGolf members are just throwing money away because that money will go elsewhere.

    Can’t imagine accountants/treasurers would be too pleased with that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,295 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    I dont know is that true or not. In the summer I regularly play opens in my area. I work up some flexi or take the odd half day and play some weekday in an open with likeminded friends on a course we like within an hours drive or so. Just to play somewhere different.

    If that open wasnt there I probably wouldnt bother playing that day. Or I might play 9 holes after work on my home course but that would be casual and not generate any extra income for my home club or anyone.

    Similarly I play in our own weekly open quite a bit. With the proximity you can easily tee off after 4 in the summer for a few months and get an 18 hole comp in. I pay the members/competition fee which I wouldnt be paying otherwise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 994 ✭✭✭bobster453


    I was talking to a chap on sunday at the club who is a member of another club known for distance membership and his son who lives and works in dublin was with him.

    The son was just out hitting balls on the range and isnt a member anywhere and said he joined igolf because he doesnt play much and no point paying a few hundred for distance when he gets his handicap for 65 euro.

    However when i told him he wont actually get it until after 20 rounds at either open or green fee rates, rather just an intial one after 54 holes, he said it will take him about 3 years to play 20 rounds but may be less if he gets into the game.

    I can see how in his case it makes sense.

    Where clubs will feel it is in new younger players not transitioning to membership of their local club, thereby not attracting fresh ideas and impetus and younger committee members.

    It is here to stay like it or not.Clubs need to redouble their efforts into junior golf, catching and nurturing members at an early age and imbuing them with a love for the game and creating an atmosphere that makes junior players want to join their local club.This will offset any negative effects of igolf to a degree.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,044 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    This argument doesn't really stand up to scrutiny though. Different clubs already have different green fee rates for different types of visitors. Clubs have a price for green fees, what they believe their course is worth to play.

    In other to generate some more revenue they will hold an Open, where they try get members of other clubs to come play their course and pay a green fee. The members are happy to offer this reduced rate because it is reciprocal, members of club B can come play in the open of club A for a reduced fee because members of club A can go and do the same at club B. With visitors without GI membership there is no reciprocation, so they can't play in the competition for the reduced fee. The same is true of iGolf members, there is no reciprocation.

    As far as a club is concerned, there is no difference between an iGolf member and a visitor without any GI. So why would iGolf members expect to get the benefits of members of other clubs?

    The problem I suspect many clubs have here is this iGolf is marketed and promoted in a way where Golf Ireland clearly expect clubs to treat iGolf members the same as full club members, but as far as clubs are concerned they don't see why they would do this. It doesn't make sense for them on any level.

    This talk of people just going elsewhere if they aren't treated the same as full members is all well and good, but that's not a new thing. You would hardly rock into the pro shop of a club with 40 euro green fees and tell them you're only going to pay 30 because the club down the road charges 30, and they can either take your 30 or you'll go down the road instead.

    It's also not like they'll have a ton of choice either, since unless you want to play casual golf your schedule is entirely dictated by what clubs have opens on the day you want to play.

    The more I think about iGolf the more I am fine with it, but I still don't see why iGolf members would be treated the same as full GI members when it comes to fees. IMO, either:

    1. iGolf members get no Open discounts or pay a surcharge and are eligible to win prizes
    2. iGolf members pay the discounted rate but are not eligible to win prizes.

    You're paying your 65 quid a year to have an officially ratified handicap. Nothing more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,709 ✭✭✭blue note


    Or if they get two igolfers each week in their open they'll cover 4 memberships. I don't think there will be much of a difference in terms of revenue for the clubs, but the biggest impact they'll see is if they don't allow them.

    I don't think revenue is the sole reason for holding opens - it's probably the only way to hold a mid-week comp too. But the way some people are talking about it, you'd swear the money was irrelevant. If a club can get 30 visitors each spending €35 between comp fee and pro-shop / bar that's about €55k. Add in members spend and it could easily be €60k. After costs it's probably still worth 50k to the club. That's important money to keep clubs going. If you think about the member clubs that don't do weekly opens (not counting the really big name courses)- they're the richer ones, the ones that can still charge entrance fees. Malahide down the road from me don't, St Anne's don't, Milltown, Clontarf, Grange. I'd go as far as to say that if clubs don't have to do a weekly open because they need the money, they probably won't bother.

    I think clubs would be mad not to accept them anyway. It won't just be the igolfers you'll lose, you'll find that their playing partners will choose their mate over a course and it won't just be the igolfer the club will lose out on some weeks. And if they're hoping to get these igolfers as members it'll be a negative against the club if they didn't let them play in their comps as an igolfer.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,044 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I would imagine most clubs have mid-week members only / invitational competitions. Maybe even more than 1 in many cases? You don't need an Open for that.

    I think the whole accepting / not accepting is not really the big question. I think most clubs will accept them.

    The question is whether or not they should be entitled to the benefits offered to members of other clubs, namely a discounted green fee and eligibility to win prizes. I cannot see how it makes any sense that they would be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,106 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Midweek open comps are incredibly common - it’s a way to keep a flow of players coming in. An open comp is far more attractive than straight up green fees, hence why most do them.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,044 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    No I know midweek opens are incredibly common, I was replying to @blue note 's suggestion taht clubs hold opens midweek because its the only way they can get enough numbers to hold a comp. I was just saying that most clubs will have members only competitions mid week as well. Opens are usually held on quieter days.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,044 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    IMO, the happy outcome here is iGolf members can play Opens but they pay full green fees with no Open discount. This way, everyone wins.

    1. Clubs get more revenue from more entrances to their Opens
    2. Clubs maintain the benefit of discounted green fees for full GI members
    3. iGolf members get to play cheap, competitive golf and win prizes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,106 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    iGolf Members will probably avoid the courses charging green fee rates for open comps. Thus, those clubs will lose out on revenue they would’ve been making (be it thru entry fee or pro shop spend or restaurant spend) - it would be stupid.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 393 ✭✭kyleman


    The only problem with that is they will have to avoid a huge number of courses so.



Advertisement