Israel are going to start WWIII

Is asking for something you know is not possible really "asking"?

They have deliberately set up beside the UN posts.

Of course. The "asking" ruse was merely to give them an excuse later if they took out a few of them for the craic

Zionists not happy with the peacekeepers staying to document their atrocities.

Israel have no right to be even there

What about some evidence?

It's already been established the israelis have made many lurid claims about mass rapes, babies heads been sawed off, babies being cooked in ovens, babies being sliced out of the wombs of pregnant women, etc.

Absolutely none of it has been shown to be true. israel has instead refused to co-operate with any investigation. It is 100% projection by the israelis to dehumanise the Palestinians so their genocide can be carried out. Clearly it works.

Your failure. Not "You are failure to".

Ta.

I don't know how to make this more clear but I have absolutely no interest in reading and\or responding to your pathetic takes on this or any other topic on this site to be honest.

Hamas are accused of war crimes. Israel has entitlements under International Law to respond. But they are not entitled to go ahead and commit their own war crimes.

Three Hamas members are under review by the ICC for war crimes:

• Extermination as a crime against humanity, contrary to article 7(1)(b) of the Rome Statute;
• Murder as a crime against humanity, contrary to article 7(1)(a), and as a war crime, contrary to article 8(2)(c)(i);
• Taking hostages as a war crime, contrary to article 8(2)(c)(iii);
• Rape and other acts of sexual violence as crimes against humanity, contrary to article 7(1)(g), and also as war crimes pursuant to article 8(2)(e)(vi) in the context of captivity;
• Torture as a crime against humanity, contrary to article 7(1)(f), and also as a war crime, contrary to article 8(2)(c)(i), in the context of captivity;
• Other inhumane acts as a crime against humanity, contrary to article 7(l)(k), in the context of captivity;
• Cruel treatment as a war crime contrary to article 8(2)(c)(i), in the context of captivity; and
• Outrages upon personal dignity as a war crime, contrary to article 8(2)(c)(ii), in the context of captivity.

Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant are also under review by the ICC for war crimes:

• Starvation of civilians as a method of warfare as a war crime contrary to article 8(2)(b)(xxv) of the Statute;
• Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health contrary to article 8(2)(a)(iii), or cruel treatment as a war crime contrary to article 8(2)(c)(i);
• Wilful killing contrary to article 8(2)(a)(i), or Murder as a war crime contrary to article 8(2)(c)(i);
• Intentionally directing attacks against a civilian population as a war crime contrary to articles 8(2)(b)(i), or 8(2)(e)(i);
• Extermination and/or murder contrary to articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(a), including in the context of deaths caused by starvation, as a crime against humanity;
• Persecution as a crime against humanity contrary to article 7(1)(h);
• Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity contrary to article 7(1)(k).

Israel is under review by the ICJ for the crime of genocide.

I've never said that Israel are entitled to commit war crimes, and indeed I've said the oppôsite several times.

I really don't know why you would imagine otherwise. I'm not going to keep repeating it, I can't see the point.

I didn't say you did say that… And yes, you have said the opposite on many occasions.

I was simply responding to this part of your post:

Israel is entitled under international law to try to prevent another such war crime using military force, even if that leads to the death of Palestinian civilians as a direct result of Hamas' strategy of using Palestinian civilians as human shields.

The bit where you say "…using military force, even if that leads to the death of Palestinian civilians…" is dealt with in International Law. So provisionally, yes, Israel can do what you stated - but within the bounds of law. I was simply pointing out that they have done what you said they are entitled to do ("use military force") and in doing so, Israel has possibly committed war crimes. As has Hamas.

It's anti-semetic.

Now if you'd be as good as to provide a quote/post number where Sand said this………………..

More deflection.

i've asked you on a few occasions now if the well known "Jews rule the world" trope is antisemitic or not.

You have refused to answer because you damn well know that it is.

Once you admit that it is, you're goosed, because your friend was the one posting it.

I may well be intellectually deficient, but, you on the other hand, are intellectually dishonest, and there's no excuse for that.

Good.

So we're in agreement that whoever posted such could be rightly termed antisemitic, which he is.

i told you I don't know the post number. Boards is awful for searches. You'll have to do some legwork to find it. 3 or 4 days ago. It's the only post of his I relied to.

He's not on his own. Israelis in the US are among the wealthiest - I wonder if they're funding the fight?

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2024-04-04/ty-article/.premium/record-breaking-42-israelis-feature-on-forbes-world-