Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1825826828830831908

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    In 2011 lending was on its knees. Public sentiment was that nobody should buy a house and unemployment was high.

    How do you think that's comparable to now, when lending is flowing, public sentiment is buy now or never get on the ladder and employment is practically full?

    Not even mentioning the immigration difference between the two time periods.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 88 ✭✭Candlel


    if they build more student accommodation that should free up housing for families and others.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,670 ✭✭✭hometruths


    As far as I am aware it is only the Housing Commission that have actually claimed a deficit of approx 250k, though they are comprised of various experts, analysts and policy groups.

    Yes, I believe they are wrong.

    Have you read the methodology they used to calculate this deficit? If you think that "AHS alone does not tell any story about deficit or surplus of available stock" then I suspect you might think their findings are somewhat implausible too.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,670 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The deficit estimate is purely concerned with the question of whether or not we have a sufficient total number of houses required to house the given population size.

    Lending conditions, public sentiment and unemployment are irrelevant to that calculation.

    If you haven't read how the Housing Commission calculated the deficit it is worth doing so for a better understanding of the estimate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    But that's a rediculous way to view it. We could stack everyone in pods and house the entire population in the greater dublin area if we wanted to.

    We have an under supply of housing for the current economic and population situation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,670 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Pods would be a future development.

    The deficit estimate concerns what we already have, both in terms of housing stock and population. It is an estimate for a given point in time - April 2022.

    I think we're talking about very different things - I'm referring to total existing housing stock and you're talking about available stock on the market.

    I agree that there is an undersupply of available stock on the market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    There are plenty of lunatics who would love to see people living in pods. However, what we will likely get are tenements. Indeed, these already can be found in some parts of Dublin. I've seen rented houses in Terenure with 20+ people in them, sharing kitchens, bathrooms and bedrooms.

    "We have an under supply of housing for the current economic and population situation."

    You are correct. the infinite growth model of economics is becoming unsustainable because the economy is growing too large for the country to support. Constantly importing people from overseas to keep things rolling is not going to work long-term, because it is not working now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 641 ✭✭✭J_1980


    detached houses seem to be in demand. Crazy bidding war.

    https://offr.io/property/grianan-37-belgrave-road-rathmines-dublin-6-d06kr22/109571



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    That's an odd one. The asking price was just under a million, but the initial offer came in at 1.5 million?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 237 ✭✭scrabtom


    I think there probably is a legitimate argument to be had as to the size of the deficit. I don't really think it's in any doubt that there is a deficit however.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,670 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I do think there is some doubt. The size of any such deficit shouldn't really be a mystery if you have solid data on population size and solid data on housing stock numbers. We do have this solid data, we even have it broken down for every LEA in the country.

    Simply citing a lack of building for a decade doesn't tell us anything without calculating what the deficit or surplus was at the start of the decade.

    So where and what is the data that supports the idea of a deficit? If there is no data that indicates a deficit other than a lack of properties on the market to rent or buy, what is that telling us?

    I am genuinely not trying to be a smart ass, I do believe if you go looking for the data to calculate a deficit, it can't be found. This is exactly why the Housing Commission ended up with all sorts of odd assumptions about preferred household sizes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,895 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    All that matters is what's for sale/rent in the market though.

    Who cares how many are in a house or how many you could technically put in every house. It's a moot point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,293 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Every single housing expert in the country disagrees with your analysis, that you insist on posting repeatedly in this thread. Its a really odd agenda to push so doggedly.

    ie

    "This underinvestment has led to a substantial housing deficit, with the Housing Commission estimating that the underlying shortage ranges from 212,500 to 256,000 homes based on the 2022 census figures. "

    https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/housing-planning/2024/05/21/housing-commission-report-leaked-findings-are-damning-indictment-of-government-eoin-o-broin/

    "Ireland’s housing crisis is ‘on a different level’ to other countries around the world – with population growing four times faster than new homes are being delivered.

    New research from Savills shows that for every new home delivered in Ireland, four new people are being added to the population.

    According to the report, some 3.8 people were added to the population for every new unit of housing delivered between 2015 and 2023 – a ratio of nearly four to one.

    It makes Ireland’s population-to-housing ratio “by far the worst” of the eight countries analysed – 14% higher than the next worst country, which was Spain.

    Ireland’s ratio was 80% worse than the United Kingdom’s and double Australia’s."

    https://www.newstalk.com/news/housing-crisis-irelands-population-now-growing-four-times-faster-than-housing-delivery-1755294

    etc

    The level of population growth we're experiencing is completely unsustainable for the number of homes we're building.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,670 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I'm not pushing it any more doggedly than those posters repeatedly saying we have a 250k deficit and the situation is going to get worse unless we build 60k+ a year. In fact, I'd say less so.

    You're quoting the Housing Commission report, I've read it, and Appendix 2. Have you?

    Regarding your "on a different level" article and the statement:

    According to the report, some 3.8 people were added to the population for every new unit of housing delivered between 2015 and 2023 – a ratio of nearly four to one.

    That's only meaningful in the context of how much existing housing stock there was and what size the population was in 2015. Nowhere in that report does it reference what the starting point in 2015 was. We did not have a housing deficit in 2015 terms of insufficient houses to house the total population.

    The comparison with Spain, the UK and Australia is also meaningless without stating what our housing stock was relative to theirs in 2015.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    I genuinely believe that if you were in the market looking to buy your first house your opinion of there being no real deficit would greatly change.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,670 ✭✭✭hometruths


    There's no doubt that people's opinions of whether or not there is a huge deficit is vastly influenced by whether or not they're trying buy right now.

    But that is not data that shows evidence of a 250k deficit. Not even close.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    You're consistently stating that there is no deficit though. While it may not be as large as 250k, a point that I'm sure is on the far upper range, there is most definitely some deficit that is not being addressed by the numbers of properties being constructed.

    The figures that you continuously use are from April 2022. A lot has changed in the market in 2 and a half years.

    Lack of supply is a good indicator that there is a deficit of properties. Report from BOI this morning in the Irish Times have stated that 40% of properties are selling at least 10% above asking prices. There are bidding wars on practically every property on the market.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/2024/09/23/many-irish-homebuyers-paying-a-minimum-of-10-above-asking-price-amid-intense-competition/

    Why is there such a demand in the market if we have no deficit of available stock? As others have stated there is now a larger % of people late 20's and 30's living at home with there parents. While the figure of 2.75 AHS you are using may not have changed much since 2011 the age demographic of these households have. These adults living with their parents want to have their own apartment/house but the available stock is just simply inefficient therefore there is a deficit in the market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,877 ✭✭✭Villa05


    There is significant increase in supply occurring and things will improve. You cannot create more plumbers, builders, electricians, carpenters in short space of time and need to avoid over supply that in part led to bust in 2008. We are in much better state than a lot of countries looking forward

    The winner of the

    "I'm alright Jack, to hell with you" post of the year



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,670 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The figures that you continuously use are from April 2022. A lot has changed in the market in 2 and a half years.

    I'm using April 2022 to discuss the deficit because a) that's the point in time when we have the best data available from and b) that's the precise point in time at which that the Housing Commission estimate we have an approx 250k deficit.

    A lot has indeed changed, but we know the size of the changes since then - increase in housing stock and increase in population. Calculations are simple and meaningful. That's the whole point, simply throwing out figures that have no bearing on a known position at a point in time are meaningless.

    As others have stated there is now a larger % of people late 20's and 30's living at home with there parents. While the figure of 2.75 AHS you are using may not have changed much since 2011 the age demographic of these households have. These adults living with their parents want to have their own apartment/house but the available stock is just simply inefficient therefore there is a deficit in the market.

    Undoubtedly this is a problem that needs to be solved.

    But the problem is the increase from the long term average, not the total amount of young adults living at home as the Housing Commission would have you believe. By European standards, we've always had quite a high % of young adults living with parents for a variety of reasons.

    There is no doubt a large proportion of this increase is due to a lack of availability and affordability, but how much?

    To muddy the waters further, this spike coincided with the change in inheritance tax law that allows you to be gifted tax free the home of your parents if you have lived in the house with them for at least 7 years.

    The merest hint of common sense would tell you that this law change would see a significant increase in young adults living with their parents, but we never hear about that as a cause for at least some of the % increase, because it doesn't support the narrative that people like the Housing Commission would have you believe.

    Take out the long term average, and whatever has been caused by inheritance tax planning, and you have quite a manageable problem that can be at least alleviated by policy intervention.

    But as long as the mantra is that this is a problem caused by huge 250k deficit of existing stock and the only solution is to build 50/60/70k a year and anything else is a waste of time, we're blind to any other potential solutions that may exist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,615 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    You are really grasping at straws here.

    The majority of young adults are not living at home just to circumvent inheritance tax rules - inheritance tax thresholds are so high in this country that it is not worth putting your life on hold for 7 years to save a pittance in tax.

    Many houses would fall entirely under the threshold also!

    Since 2011 our family sizes have declined, less people having children at all and those who do are having less, and yet our AHS is not declining as expected. Why? Because more adults are now living at home or in shared rental accommodation because there is such a deficit of supply.

    Genuine question - how do you explain house prices rising so dramatically in the past 8 years (2016 was well out of the crash so that is no excuse)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,162 ✭✭✭spaceHopper


    If the population grew by 98k but 149k were migrants or returning Irish migrants, then excluding deaths 50k people left the country. So the young are leaving in their droves then. For context about 60k did the leaving cert this year.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,670 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I didn't say the majority of young adults are living at home for inheritance tax reasons, nowhere near that, I said the spike coincided with the tax change. Which was entirely to be expected.

    It's naive to think that it is not worthwhile for people to play this tax law to their advantage, particularly given the threshold is €330k, the average house price nationally is much the same, and the boomers disproportionately own the higher value properties, particularly in Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I don't really blame them. Why pay taxes to a state that actively works against their interests for the sake of a ruling class that hates them?



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,578 Mod ✭✭✭✭spockety


    Assuming we continue to face supply issues, how do we see this playing out?

    Will we reach a point where a 3 bed semi in Tallaght hits €1M, and requires the purchasing power of a hospital consultant? Will we see compression at the top end, where the price difference between the average and the more expensive homes isn't as large as it is today, because the supply of people with enough money at the top end (1 to 2 million) starts to dry up?

    What's the prediction?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,615 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Pressure on central bank for 5x, 6x income mortgages.

    More government money/shared equity schemes.

    150k shared equity from govt in your home.

    We'll have FTB couples on combined 100k buying homes for 750k with almost no equity. What could go wrong



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,574 ✭✭✭Roberto_gas


    are you suggesting not to build as you may overbuild when you cant even build😜😜



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,574 ✭✭✭Roberto_gas


    natwest just announced 6 times income mortgage in UK !



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 310 ✭✭danfrancisco83




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,877 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The former Royal Bank of Scotland

    Rhymes, repeats, change the plaque at the front door

    Pick your poison



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    The state will pump money directly into market as long as it can whilst keeping the borders open. The banks will start lending more money to people. The people themselves will demand higher and higher wages. In other words, the funny money will be a-flowin', and the population will be a-growin'…

    Beyond that, we really don't know. This whole neo-liberal nightmare that we exist in could well collapse, or it could trundle along for a few more decades of decay. Either way, the good times are well and truly over, and I am not optimistic in the least for the future.



Advertisement