Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Amazon WFH Policy

17810121315

Comments

  • Posts: 12,694 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Anyone think being in a position to half office costs is a big driver of this? Let alone to be running costs of a physical office heat, air con.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 593 ✭✭✭SodiumCooled


    You can fight it also, some will be successful others not. Our mandated full RTO is being successfully pushed back on by some workers, being strongly enforced on some workers, and non-compliance being ignored for some (my current situation since the mandate in February this year). I am more confident that not when it comes to a head I will be authorised to be hybrid but ignoring as long as possible is better for now.


    As for working from the office prior to the pandemic - it’s a different world now and things have changed both for people individually and also in the general attitudes to work. Our family life is now all arranged around fact one of us is WFH everyday and while we have no desire to change the setup it would be difficult even if we wanted to.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You're welcome to take a dim view of whatever you like. In other words, your view really doesn't matter.

    Fortunately, your approval is not required for those who chose to prioritise their work/life balance over taking a promotion.

    Moving on now, because your pettiness is both boring, and beneath me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,173 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    If it matters to you so little why keep responding? Its fair enough if you want to take it easy WFH and avoiding any extra responsibility but it does somewhat dilute your authority to speak on what makes a productive work environment, good management of staff etc.

    In my opinion of course.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,233 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Drop in the ocean for the Amazons and the Dells. Not so much for smaller companies. Its a big consideration and I know a few who are delighted with remote working.

    Amazon making people come back in 5 days a week but hot desking them. Fúcking grim.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,150 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Grim for Amazon workers alright. I’m finding people I work with who have been WFH since 2020 mostly fulltime, have started to appreciate and look forward to meeting up in the office at least once a week - I’d hate 5 days a week but once every week and some weeks twice is my best ideal blend

    The big challenge really is - if companies have massive buildings gathering dust Mon-fri coz all staff WFH, that’s where I’m seeing a more aggressive approach from employers to get all staff back near fulltime- I’m for going in voluntary every week 1-2 times - that will keep many execs happier - especially if they can see their offices buzzing with life most days



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    Of course AI will play a massive part in the future of business and companies have to embrace it. But the day there isn't room in a business for a good sales person is the day that businesses ceases to exist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,217 ✭✭✭digiman


    My payslip difference from experience working in Irish and large US companies, you can also see salary data on the likes of level.fyi and blind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,405 ✭✭✭witchgirl26


    What? I worked for a US multinational and got a pay increase by moving to an Irish business. And also didn't have to do calls at stupid hours of the day to accomodate the US (they never had to accomodate us), work-life balance was better, I don't have to fight for any "perk" I might actually be entitled to.

    Look I get that US companies have big deep pockets, but it doesn't mean everyone working in one is earning so much more than if they were to do the same job in another business that is not US owned & HQ'd.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,233 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Ive worked pretty much remotely for 10 years now, after leaving a 5 day a week US multinational and theres isnt a hope Id do a job that requires 5 days in the office again. I go in for 1 day and thats plenty.

    The big companies couldn't give two sh1ts about their employees and will sack/make redundant anyone they like at a drop of a hat after a bumpy quarter. Youre merely a $ sign on an excel sheet that can be deleted as the last round of redundancies at Intel, Dell, IBM et al proved. Reckless stuff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,150 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Totally - everything else such as engagement scores and what not is either window dressing or a stick to beat poorly performing managers with



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,506 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    Absolute nonsense.

    Tesla have already eliminated dealerships when they started up and they’re selling like hotcakes.
    if you price your product accordingly then they sell themselves.

    Give it 5-10 years and you’ll see I’m right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,173 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Tesla have a very narrow product offering to be fair



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 180 ✭✭HurlingBoy


    While I am a big fan of the hybrid model I seriously doubt that there are metrics out there to say that workers are more productively or even equally as productive at home. I would think also as we move further away from the Covid years that productivity levels WFH would have dropped. Depending on your stage in life WFH will either be a benefit or a hindrance. For the worker with a young family and long commute it's a no brainer and a huge benefit. For the young graduate possibly in a house share working in your bedroom is not healthy and they miss out on the social aspect of work and also will learn more and build up softer skills working in the office. Companies cannot give the benefit to one worker and not the other and that is the big challenge for employers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 428 ✭✭the14thwarrior


    the only reason i worked from home is that the government told me i had to work from home, and i had to take a different job.

    My "real" job is service based and cannot be done at home. My team's job is the same, albeit some of them want to do their paperwork from home, which really cant be done. And phones are not forwarded / forgotten / and things that need to be looked up can;t be looked up, as its nearly all paper based..

    as many others have posted, WFH will suit some people.

    but for me, I have been shocked at the sh$t that goes on. and no, not on their lunch break. and no extra hours afterwards.

    Just saying.

    and micro managing? give me a break. a day in my shoes………..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,147 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    " I find it funny.

    People who worked in office before the pandemic are making so many excuses in relation to not wanting to return to the office."

    The fact that you write "excuses" instead of reasons is quite telling as to where you stand. And that's fine, you're entitled to that opinion, as are others.

    If a company decides to bring everyone into the office - they can. It doesn't automatically mean they may have entirely valid reasons for doing so. And how many times is that decision the result of just one personality. The interesting part is when one company in a particular line of work wants it's employees to come in all week, whereas another company in entirely the same line of business, is more than happy to let it's employees work from home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 318 ✭✭Soc_Alt


    That fact that many employees can't or refuse to grasp this concept is scary.

    Within Multinationals, If employees feel their role or teams role can be performed remotely and they actually promote that idea within their company, they are being extremely foolish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 318 ✭✭Soc_Alt


    Why would you think your employer owes you are reason to return to office?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,506 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    Because a lot of people were hired under a WFH or a permanent hybrid policy which some companies are now walking back on.

    A lot companies are enforcing this simply as a way of forcing people to leave.



  • Posts: 4,229 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Applying for a promotion and then turning it down does not look good and benefits nobody.

    Not applying for a promotion is fine if you have a good reason for doing so.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,147 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Announcing a move from full remote-working to five days in the office for several thousand employees without attempting to explain the reasoning/rationale behind would obviously create issues.

    Management through HR has been singing the praises of WFH (large drop in employee sick days, happier workers, no problem hiring talent, etc) - so yeah, my employer would be expected to give solid reasoning behind such a move.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 318 ✭✭Soc_Alt


    Bingo!

    If it is written into your contract, people might have a case but everyone else which I would say is most people in these sectors won't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,697 ✭✭✭Sono


    weak managers want to go back to the office 5 days imo.

    personally speaking I have proven I can work at home and be trusted to work from home and get everything done, meet deadlines etc. My manager trusts me and we have an ok relationship. It seems the noise about a return is coming from higher up the chain, it will be interesting to see how it plays out anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,217 ✭✭✭digiman


    It will be different for everyone of course, my point is that for the high paid jobs in these companies (alot of which are software engineer roles) the salaries are a lot higher and if you want a new job quickly then be prepared to take a big paycut. E.g. in US companies, a new grad will get €100k, someone with 10-15years experience is on about €200-250k. There are not many Irish companies paying more than €100k for any type of role today for engineers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,122 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    Only the FANNG+ are paying that much money. And only if you are exceptional or lucky. There are many US MNCs (and others) paying approx 100k for software engineers with decades of experience.

    Edit ... time for me to look for a new job ...🙄

    Screenshot_20240923-183857.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 593 ✭✭✭SodiumCooled


    There maybe some on this money at these levels but it’s not the norm from my experience. The MNCs certainly pay well but grad developers on 40 - 50k would be more standard and people with experience in managerial roles probably in the 100 - 150k bracket including shares which are often a significant part of a pay packet as you move up the ranks.


    When you move down from the mega corporations the pay in smaller MNCs can be very middle of the road also and bettered in smaller Irish firms.


    In many cases its other less top level roles that really pay well in MNCs, people in maintenance technician roles, calibration etc can be on 100k plus with shift allowances etc are taken into account for what are often sitting around waiting for something to happen type jobs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 803 ✭✭✭Infoseeker1975


    I have worked from home long before Covid; lots of people thought I was mad then the views changed when they tried it themselves. The reverse scenario here will make some people think outside the hamster wheel again. Obviously your finances determine a lot of your life choices, personally I can easily survive on what I am earning, I could earn significantly more though it would result in a lot of changes, I choose not to. If asked to work in the office, then I would do it though I would look at alternatives & move on when I find something.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,217 ✭✭✭digiman


    Yes, it is the FANNG companies that I'm referring to as per my original post, it's probably being lost though as the thread grows :) :

    Digiman: "I don’t think the job market for folks in Amazon is all that great, sure you might get easily a job elsewhere but you will probably be taking at least a 50% pay cut unless you can land a job in the other large US companies like Google, Meta, Microsoft etc. and these companies have had a lot of layoffs in the last 18months and are not hiring that much at the moment."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,147 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    A couple of comments in this thread about people slacking off at home.

    Not many comments about slacking off in office. I've seen plenty of 2 hour lunches, strangely long disappearances, 1 hour group desk conversations, long breaks



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,594 ✭✭✭Deub


    I am sorry but I don’t believe you. For the same job, MNC don’t pay their employees twice the average market salary.



Advertisement