Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Amazon WFH Policy

13468916

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,035 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    As long as the company replaces those roles with someone more Dublin based, they probably arent too concerned.

    The situation probably worked out well for everyone.

    Those that made the leap early were probably more likley to get a fully remote job than people trying to do the same thing now, as the RTO movement gathers pace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,035 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I think this is an unspoken reason for companies wanting staff in the office.

    Managers will say they are not sure what Jimmy is doing and they are online/offline all day. Kids arent in creche anymore....hmmm.

    You cant have one rule for Jimmy because he has little kids and another for everyone else, sure just bring them all back into the office and problem solved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,035 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Where were all these staff based up until 2019 or even early 2020?

    Companies do have a responsibility to support the well being of their employees, of course. But that doesnt mean they have to accommodate requests to work from home, when such an arrangement is not stipulated in the contract that the employee signed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,649 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    They actually haven't filled all those roles yet. Can't get staff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,809 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    firstly tone down your language ,

    Secondly just because whatever outpost of the civil service you work in has adopted them doesn’t mean they work in all scenarios, we do business in a lot of southern European countries and they require wet ink , notarised and apostilled documents for certain things , try doing that from home.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,035 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The poster listed some of the positives of office work, better collaboration on projects, team bonding and so on.

    If they were fully WFH they would miss out on those benefits and so would the employer.

    Company loyalty is a big factor in RTO. If someone is hired and is WFH full time from the start, they don't meet colleagues and may not really feel part of the team. Equally, the rest of the team may not bond with them either, because they have never met them.

    That employee is probably more likley to move jobs than someone that felt a connection to their team and had built personal relationships with colleagues.

    Employee churn is a big cost to business, so having a whole team of folks that aren't invested in the company is a major risk.

    It's easy to become a mercenary if you are fully WFH and that's a risk to the employer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,035 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    They will in time.

    And once the roles are filled, they don't have the problem again as anyone applying thereafter knows the office time expectations.

    Makes for a smoother ride in the long term for the business.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,150 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Scanning, print and sign. No sign of the paperless office there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,535 ✭✭✭techdiver


    I've always said that companies that do this simply want to reduce staff numbers and this is a cheap coercive way to do so without redundancies.

    Second to this, with the loss of good will from workers who do stay they will not get this magical "improvement in productivity" that they yearn. You think staff that are forced to commute 3 to 4 hours a day will be as productive as they were at home? Complete myth.

    My company implemented the same full return this year with no evidence of any issues in productivity. It was simply the ego maniacs at the top who feel uncomfortable not seeing their vanity project office space filled with miserable people. The stupidity of forcing people as part of a global team into an office to then attend virtual teams meetings the same as they did at home. All whilst being more miserable and more tired. Genius management!

    It's dinosaur thinking from dinosaur managers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,150 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    If you don't know what you staff are doing unless your standing over their desk watching them the problem isn't WFH.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,603 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    I also wonder how many of the employees are commuting 90mins each way to the midlands?

    They must live miles away. Again, not the fault of the company if an employee chooses a job with an unmanageable commute.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,035 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I understand your point but If they are working in the office, you dont need to stand over them. You know they are not minding the kids.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,530 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    There are going to be a lot of miserable dogs howling and barking all day all over the country, and driving the neighbours mad, if people have to go back to the office full time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,150 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Similarly it's easier to change jobs than deal with a dinosaur management culture. Might find somewhere with an easier to commute to also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,530 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    I don't really care so much for AWS workers as they get great benefits, salary, share options etc ... it's just the rest of us plebs who might have to go back full time if this becomes a precedent.

    One huge advantage of covid for me is that I can work from home and also the company actually started cleaned the office properly and regularly since covid. But the 3+ hours per day, especially in Winter is a complete depressing waste of time and money and health.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,649 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Cyrus, on every single thread I've seen you post on relating to WFH you are always completely negative. You look for trivial reasons to argue why more people should be back working from offices, and why employers should make them go back. It gets tedious.

    If, in whatever role you do, there is a need to send paper and ink documents abroad, that still does not mean someone needs to be physically present in an office five days a week to do it. Maybe you need to look into modernising your practices.

    And before you try to throw shade at my "outpost of the civil service" again, (and by association, all civil servants) I also deal with international companies on a daily basis. I was also involved in developing DPER's Blended Working Framework for the entire civil service, so you'll be disappointed to hear that a return to 5 days a week in the office is not going to be happening with this employer, (unless full time WFO is something the employee wants, and asks for themselves - then they will be facilitated.)

    Give your constant negativity a rest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,150 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    What you're inadvertently admitting is you've no productivity or output metrics. People can be sitting at a desk doing nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,809 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    I don’t actually , I have a blended set up myself 3 days in the office 2 days wfh, works great. I take issue with people advocating for fully remote roles because it happens to suit them and their reasons are largely self serving. So you have misrepresented me again.

    If you understood my post around documents that need to go abroad you’ll understand modernising our practices wouldn’t matter even a little bit to a civil servant in Spain or Italy would it ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,809 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    lot of exaggeration about people’s commute in this thread , 4 hours a day ? That’s an outlier



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,649 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    On the contrary. Two of the roles I mentioned were technical specialists and all attempts to replace them have failed. Admin staff have left and not been replaced.

    There is a difficulty recruiting and retaining staff, especially in the more junior admin grades. Living costs in Dublin are expensive, and WFH at least allows staff to minimise the impact on their pocket if they can live/rent in another county and only have to commute into Dublin once/twice a week.

    Off the top of my head, we currently have staff commuting in from Wexford, Waterford, Cavan, Galway, Leitrim and Limerick…. to mention a few.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,035 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    They can, but I think most companies accept that if people are doing nothing in the office, it will be noticed.

    If nothing is being done from home, they wont necessarily notice.

    I agree with you that some companies have better ways to monitor productivity, but many do not.

    I am not a manger personally, but i have heard various people question "what does Jimmy or Mary actually do from home, i'm always doing the work" etc.

    The perception is real that some people dont work well from home and if employees think it, you can be sure the managers are thinking it also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,150 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    In my experience the vast majority of places have no metrics on productivity. This thread has many examples where it's obvious people are locked into obsolete work and management processes, because they reveal them constantly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,150 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I don't agree. Because if they are asking the question "what does X do" they don't have metrics. Equally saying I know if X is in the office they are working is also saying you don't have metrics. It's the same flaw in logic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 767 ✭✭✭Kurooi


    I hope the leadership in companies that go against WFH and flexibility realize that they're cutting out a significant portion of the talent pool, and the better talent at that. Good people with strong CVs have better options, they can work for companies that give them better terms and generally more autonomy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,150 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    You don't have assume anything. You can look at the census and see average commutes by county. In my section we have about 10% of people 2hrs or more away from the office. The census is one thing, but you should know your people.

    Mine is about 2 hrs there and back. And I really notice how more tired I am on those days. Because most of it is standing on a train, clinging to a handle playing sardines, and trying not to catch anything.

    And it's going to take time to recover when I get to the office, and I'm not taking a call or opening up the laptop when commuting. So the office has lost that flexibility from me on those days.

    I'm sure we'll be replaced by AI without these issues. But good luck getting your ai to fix your printer for your paperwork lol.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,150 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    The company has no choice but to hire them due to the housing crisis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,649 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    I don't have to misrepresent you, anyone can read your posts and tell by your attitude.

    On another point, when I was working in a Dublin City Centre location 18kms away from my home (also in Dublin), I routinely endured a 2 hour a day return commute, but 3 hours was not at all unusual or infrequent, especially if it rained! And amongst my colleagues, I certainly wasn't an outlier at that. But I guess we must have all been collectively exaggerating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,809 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,150 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    We are the same. It's very hard to get people. Even when you do, it's left huge gaps in business knowledge and experience that we've never got back with the new people. Lot of churn also. Obviously easier for people to get new jobs, than it is for organisations to hire people.

    When you dealing with other organisations we hear the same back. Lack of resources. It's a real struggle to maintain contacts with them because they also have a lot of churn.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,150 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    If you mean me I missed a comma, 2hrs total, there and back.

    I have in the past done 1:30 each way and for a while 2 hrs each way. But I'll never do it again. In hindsight it's never been worth the reward. Theres always been a better return for my time doing something else. It's along the 80:20 rule.



Advertisement