Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Fighter jets for the Air Corps?

1174175177179180217

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,167 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I would have said more the Government lost in its attempt to have the case thrown out, whether or not he actually wins anything is to be seen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,789 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Which is worse for the Goverment?

    A. It comes out we are depending on the UK to protect us?

    B. We are trully Fuc@ed as there is no deal with the UK?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,807 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    That depends on whether or not it is appealed to the Supreme Court, and in giving both sides time to consider the judgement, Justice Cregan seems to assume thats exactly what will happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,167 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I see the comment section on UKDJ is taking a rational stance on this…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Hopefully the extent of this will come out during the course of the court proceedings.…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,052 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    An excuse, we don't have any security in the air it's a well known fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,167 ✭✭✭sparky42


    you don’t really believe that do you? Besides it’s mostly along the lines of “ungrateful bastards”, “why won’t we allow the RAF here”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,789 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I actually really hope craughwells case is fully sucessfull as it will show weather as i said before that we are either been supported by the UK or we are really on our own.

    This will lead to either LOA 3 and air Policing aircraft or a typical irish responce of ah well lets roll the dice



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,167 ✭✭✭sparky42




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,807 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    1. We need our own fully independent, 21st Century standard air defence capability. No ifs, ands, or buts, and it should be procured without delay.
    2. No legal action or decision of the judiciary should be able to force the civil power to disclose information that may compromise or otherwise adversely affect national security - especially if that case is naked self-promotion and of no obvious benefit to the petitioner or anything he purports to represent.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,364 ✭✭✭source


    If the action of the state is, or is likely unconstitutional then it 100% should be challengable by any citizen in the state. Irrespective of whether it affects national security or not.

    Craughwell believes that the current arrangement is unconstitutional and has brought a challenge as it should be.

    The constitution is not a buffet where the state can pick and choose, if they are indeed going against the constitution then that needs to be reviewed and challenged. The state should be providing for our security only within the confines of the constitution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,807 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Fair enough, but considering that very little of the Constitution actually shapes defence policy, and that neutrality isn't even in there, then the Craughwell's case is prima facie without merit. At least with regard to its constitutional element.

    And by the way, the Constitution IS a buffet that the PARLIAMENT chooses to legislate within. And if its not fit for purpose in some way, the people are rightly asked to change it.

    Post edited by Larbre34 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,364 ✭✭✭source


    But neither you or I are constitutional lawyers. So we are not qualified to make that call and that us why being able to bring cases like this are so important.

    The whole world already knows that we cannot defend ourselves, we've just released a public report that confirms it. A legal challenge like this won't make us worse off, but may tip the government's hand to make us better.

    Worst case scenario is that the court decides that the agreement isn't unconstitutional and we continue with LOA2.

    On your last paragraph, that is the exact point I'm making but from a different viewpoint, they legislate within the framework of the constitution and not outside it. Yes we can change the constitution, but we haven't even had official confirmation that the agreement exists, nevermind a decision on it's constitutionality.

    The case is important as it will 1 formally confirm whether the agreement exists or not and 2 confirm whether or not it is constitutionally sound. If it is, then it continues and the population is aware of the agreement. If not then it cannot stand and the government is forced to either change the constitution or provide a better ability to defend the country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,167 ✭✭✭sparky42


    you assume there’s enough interest in the British military by their public?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,167 ✭✭✭sparky42


    and yet by any margin the British military has declined over the last 14 years of Tories (and really longer with the GWOT)without much public protest or complaint, hell I wonder how many “Joe public” would know about the RFA strike, or the laid up hulls both RN and RFA, or the small size of the RAF, or any of the hundred and one issues they have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    WIth all the money the government has at it's disposal that they are splashing around.....they should splash a billion on buying a proper "Air Force".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,167 ✭✭✭sparky42


    They want to buy votes, spending on defence won’t do that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 368 ✭✭mupper2


    And how could we forget Johnny Mercer's take on historical crimes committed by British forces in Northern Ireland….he won't be missed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,167 ✭✭✭sparky42


    the suggestion of 2.5% is clearly being stated “as the economy can support it” over the lifetime of the government, it’s not something that is likely to happen swiftly, let alone their current 2.3% is a bit of clever accounting by sticking pensions into the total.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Exactly...Doesn't leave much over to buy some nice new kit. Tis a bleedin scandal but it seems to be what the electorate want!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,807 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Doesn't that depend?

    Is it a step towards an end goal ?

    Or an end goal in itself ,as an end goal it doesn't do much than our current trainers ..

    And if we replaced our current trainers with pc 21s would we be in much the same place as with jet trainers ,but for far less cost

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,167 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I had to laugh at the Senator posting about how we used have “JETS” and now we don’t and how terrible that is, as if said jets were actually anything other than trainers themselves with no additional capabilities or value.

    As you say, if it’s the end point then it’s value is questionable, even if it isn’t it’s questionable whether we should spend to run our own jet training system or use others imo? Also cart before horse, no point until we have the radar systems up and running, let’s see if the reports about an order in the next month are true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    I assume European radar manufacturers are a little busy at the moment, -doesnt mean we shouldn't join the queue though - how many radar stations would we need to give a fairly accurate picture of the nations airspace , we do have the advantage of many coastal mountains,

    I suppose ,at a minimum 1 station far north ,1 station south or south west , and 1 somewhere east or south east , can they be co-located with existing air-traffic control radar stations ?

    How much security would a radar station need ?

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 127 ✭✭RavenP


    The Irony is, AFAIK, Irish airspace is already more or less covered by the primary radar heads at Dublin, Cork and Shannon. There are a few gaps caused by mountains, but not many. THere used to be a good map from the IAA. What the Irish primary radar cannot do is see beyond Irish sovereign airspace into Irish Controlled Airspace or other areas around Ireland's actual sovereign airspace needed to warn of intruders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Emm. As far as I know….them PC21's can't carry a weapons payload



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,364 ✭✭✭source


    Armament

    Hardpoints: Provisions provided for 4× under-wing and 1× centerline external store stations, capable of mounting up to 1,150 kg (2,540 lb) of payload of air-to-ground weapons to operate in the counter-insurgency role.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    The only real reason to move to a pc-21 would be to use it as an advanced trainer .. before moving up to a fighter jet of some sort ..

    Although if they were purchased as direct replacement, they'd be a step in the right direction..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,099 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    "And that's about all we can do...we're not going to be flying planes, shadowing planes, and that's not going to be a reality, let's be honest."

    We are the only non-microstate in Europe that can't do this. Surely it's embarrassing to speak about who you allow and don't allow in your airspace without the means to enforce it. It's cringe worthy.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2024/0923/1471491-israeli-flights-martin/



Advertisement
Advertisement