Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1824825827829830907

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,614 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    I for one can't wait until we suffer similar social issues as USA and Canada due to lack of affordable housing.

    All those homeless people really add a lot of culture to the cities



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,594 ✭✭✭tigger123


    It's up to us (the electorate) to steer the ship on various issues of public policy, including access to housing. There are many ways to approach it.

    Just because other countries approach it in a certain manner, doesnt mean we have to follow suit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,871 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Yet the most unproductive sector in the economy (construction) are able to increase margins by up to 20% in the last 12 months



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 267 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    It really has a feel of the "Roaring 20s" in the Irish residential property market. If we were to list the pillars of economic prosperity which have supported the economic boom the last 10 years (it is fair to say this borderline hyper-growth has been going for 10 years by now), we would see that some of these pillars have started to shake and yet residential property keeps roaring along;

    A) Pharma - obviously it's difficult to say if this sector is really faltering that much when COVID was a temporary boon.

    B) Big tech - job cuts, hiring and salary freezes have been the story of the last 3 years.

    C) Commercial property - crashing as hard as the residential market did post-08 and seemingly on life support given long-term expectations with WFH.

    D) Finance - a big sector which contributes a lot of payroll taxes and is going strong.

    E) Residential property - booming.

    F) SME sector - the highest number of enterprises and employees so arguably the most important barometer as to the health of the real economy. Seemingly reasonably robust despite insolvencies creeping up.

    Overall, the high-growth areas have calmed down other than residential property while the SME sector is stable, definitely not booming. Therefore, there must be something at play in the residential property market which is causing it to boom in practical isolation to the rest of the economy.

    Hmm….I wonder what might be going on there and who might be steering policy and resources to keeping the residential property market buoyant?

    The only way the residential property market does not decline and keeps rising is if the whale involvement can be sustained at the current level and beyond; who wants to bet the house on the State being able to keep propping up the residential property market at these levels?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    Plenty of countries who are far better. We don't need to follow the countries which are far worse.

    We should strive to follow the countries who do better at housing and other areas like health and infrastructure.

    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 641 ✭✭✭J_1980


    and yet so few enter the market as salaried tradies or self employed, preferring cushy bullshit white collar jobs (partly private, partly public sector) that get them nowhere while waiting for the “socialist revolution” - i.e. left wing coalition 😂


    not going to happen for these rentpigs 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,209 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Are they the most unproductiveor do too many want everything handed to them. Specifications for build quality and certification is getting crazy in this country.

    The concrete for foundations and floors is species at 35N, in the UK its a 5-1 mix which is 18N. Engineering look for certs fir everything abd try to certify nothing g themselves. On self builds you have to get a certificate for the radon barrier,which means using a specialist fitter, it's a minimum of 1K over .material costs. Tgey can do the barrier membrane in less than an hour in a 2k sqft house.

    Engineers no longer want to mark out house on site and do not allow blocklayers lay out house. They want the GPS outfits to do it. It costs about 1.5k.

    The amount of steel used in houses in this country is crazy. Engineers are over specifying all the time.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,578 Mod ✭✭✭✭spockety


    This is an interesting specimen to keep an eye on. 700K for more of a 'knocker downer' than a 'fixer upper' in Tallaght. Pretty hemmed in, not a huge amount of land, limited capacity to build a 2nd property on it etc. The needed renovations would probably cost about 300K all told. So you'll have sunk €1,000,000 into it realistically. Surely this asking is way overconfident, even in the current market?

    https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/21-oldcourt-cottages-ballycullen-dublin-24/4830748



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,209 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    It's a semiD cottage so you will not be knocking it down any development will have to take the other cottage into considerations However its has access onto two roads and the site us about 0.3 of an acre IMO.

    The E ber rating is deceiving as it was build in the 1900 so is probably stone wall construction. It's probably relatively easy to heat. There is a granny flat at the rear so probably gauranteed two houses on the site each with separate access.

    The house is liveable in at present the granny flat is probably of basic 80/90's construction.

    So if you had two properties on 0.15 of an acre or thereabouts each with separate access in the 110 sqM bracket is 600k each a realistic figure

    Would a set of well off elderly people along with a son or daughter and there family consider it as an option

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,209 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Not Tallaght other side of the N81 South of Firhouse. Is that Ballyboden St Enda's side of tĥe country.

    It's very easy to say something is or is not worth the money. I just looked it up on landdirect and just looking at it it has the potential for two houses. Whether tgey are worth the.money or not in another matter. But from what I see it's not Tallaght.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,291 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Debatably Tallaght or not either way its on the wrong side of the M50 well out West, its not exactly prime Dublin real estate.

    Certainly not worth requiring the guts of a million (700k asking + at least 200k rebuild) to turn into a livable house I'd think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,877 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    It's Ballycullen, not a great spot to be fair. For me tallaght starts at the old mill and stops at the village.

    It's worth what somebody will pay for it though. There's a finite amount of houses currently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56 ✭✭spot555


    With Minister Chambers not going ahead with improving the tax situation for investing in things like stocks/shares and savings accounts in the upcoming Budget, it seems to be full steam ahead for continued increases in house prices due to no other types of investment being attractive in this country.


    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/financial-services/2024/09/19/government-plan-to-spur-households-to-invest-misses-budget-deadline/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,291 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Turns out the government's recent focus on commencement notices was completely irrelevant to the real world, as many analysts tried to point out.

    Dublin's population is still rapidly increasing, while house construction numbers are actually static. Its no wonder prices are still increasing by 10% odd a year:

    [quote]
    The number of new homes for the private market under construction is marginally below levels seen in 2022 despite government claims that record levels of development are underway, a state task force has found.

    New research published by a state-commissioned task force has found there were more than 17,500 private market homes under construction in Dublin in the second quarter of the year, compared to 16,600 in the first quarter.

    This represents an improvement on the level of residential building in Dublin in the middle of 2023 when just 15,300 new homes were being built.

    In 2022, however, there were more than 18,000 private homes being built during each quarter.
    [/quote]

    https://www.businesspost.ie/news/revealed-housebuilding-activity-in-dublin-below-levels-recorded-in-2022/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭scrabtom


    The Central Bank has just stated that we are only on course for 32,000 completions this year, not the 40,000 that Simon Harris is on about.

    They reckon it will be 2026 before we get near that figure.

    Disastrous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Meanwhile from the CSO:

    In the 12 months to the end of April 2024:

    • The population in Ireland rose by 98,700 people which was the largest 12-month increase since 2008.
    • There were 149,200 immigrants which was a 17-year high. This was the third successive 12-month period where over 100,000 people immigrated to Ireland. 
    • Of those immigrants, 30,000 were returning Irish citizens, 27,000 were other EU citizens, and 5,400 were UK citizens. The remaining 86,800 immigrants were citizens of other countries.
    • Over 69,000 people departed the State in the 12 months to April 2024, compared with 64,000 in the same period of 2023. This is the highest emigration figure since 2015. 
    • There was a natural increase of 19,400 people in the State comprised of 54,200 births and 34,800 deaths.

    https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-pme/populationandmigrationestimatesapril2024/keyfindings/#:~:text=Net%20migration%20rises%20in%20the%2012%2Dmonths%20to%20April%202024&text=There%20was%20net%20migration%20of,2023%20and%2051%2C700%20in%202022.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭theboringfox


    Housing crisis across Europe and Ireland is one of few with growth in residential construction. It is far from a disaster. There is significant increase in supply occurring and things will improve. You cannot create more plumbers, builders, electricians, carpenters in short space of time and need to avoid over supply that in part led to bust in 2008. We are in much better state than a lot of countries looking forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭scrabtom


    I think it's quite obvious we're not in any risk of over supply.

    There has been a definite improvement in house building over the term of this government, but it will be very disheartening if that stalls and we see the same amount of completions this year as last.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,291 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Our population is increasing by 100,000 a year. We'd need approx 40,000 new housing units a year just to house this population increase. We're building approx 35,000.

    Nevermind replacing older housing units (estimated at 5-10,000 units a year), or helping to reduce the severity of one of the worst housing crises in the developed world (a deficit of approx 200-250,000 estimated already).

    And to top it off the housing objectives, and projections, for the next 5 years come nowhere close to the 60k housing units a year we'd need to be hitting. Our completions rate is increasing by about 3,000 units a year, which might sound good in abstract but it means it will take us almost a decade from today to hit an appropriate level.

    How is that combination not a disaster? The situation is already terrible, and statistically only getting worse every year, and theres absolutely no sign of it improving in the next 5 years based on current projections. Thats a disaster by any objective measure.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,661 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Our population is increasing by 100,000 a year. We'd need approx 40,000 new housing units a year just to house this population increase. We're building approx 35,000.

    Obviously the amount we need to build to house this increase depends on the average household size of this increase. 40k per 100k is an AHS of 2.5. If we're building 35k a year that will house 100k at an AHS of 2.85. Our current household size is 2.74. In 2011 when there was no housing crisis, when we in a period of chronic oversupply, it was 2.73.

    Nevermind replacing older housing units (estimated at 5-10,000 units a year),

    Oddly enough obsolescence has been a bit of non issue since about 2018, as the number of renovations bringing uninhabitable houses back into use has outnumbered the number of houses becoming obsolete.

    one of the worst housing crises in the developed world (a deficit of approx 200-250,000 estimated already).

    The deficit of approx 250k is also wholly dependent on assumptions about average household size. Many of those assumptions could be described as shaky to put it politely.

    How is that combination not a disaster? The situation is already terrible, and statistically only getting worse every year, 

    Statistically the situation is only as terrible as how you choose to interpret the statistics.

    If you're determined to view a problem as an unsolvable disaster then it will remain an unsolvable disaster.

    Post edited by hometruths on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭scrabtom


    It's not an unsolvable disaster but it is definitely a disaster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 628 ✭✭✭Ozvaldo


    This country is a joke ,corrupt little kip.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,291 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Its extremely unlikely that the immigrants coming to our country have household units anywhere near as large as native Irish, given the vast majority are single adults - not family units. 2.5 is regarded as a conservatively high household unit size estimation for them. In reality its likely under 2.0, which would require substantially more than the above conservative figure of 40k housing units required.

    And the statistical nit picking doesn't change my overall point whatsoever - even with your 2.85 figure our out of control immigration and population growth by itself eats every single house completed. Nevermind making any dent in the housing crisis, or replacing a single existing housing unit.

    The situation isn't an unsolvable disaster by any means, note I never said that. My point was the situation is currently an unmitigated disaster, and is going to remain so, based on past, current and stated future government policy.

    If we had a government aiming to complete 60k housing units a year, and taking measures to achieve this ASAP the crisis would be far more solvable. And ideally who had aimed for this years ago. But we didn't, and we don't.

    Or if the supply side was being ignored if we had a government aiming to follow Denmark's example and reduce our number of asylum seekers by approx 90%/25k arrivals a year, the demand side would at least be helped. But we don't have that either.

    So at present, and for the forseeable future, even ignoring the many other factors in our housing crisis the population growth vs housing units built data all by itself very clearly shows the housing crisis is only going to get worse.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,661 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I think it is absurd to suggest that single adult immigrants either expect or require an AHS of less than 2, but this is not the thread for arguing that contentious issue. Suffice it to say you're unlikely to hear any politicians suggesting that anytime soon.

    And to be fair, I'm not statistically nit picking - I'm citing the actual statistics of our current average household size of 2.74 and the 2011 household size of 2.73.

    I have yet to understand how an average household size of 2.74 in 2022 is evidence of a chronic housing shortage with a deficit of 250k houses, whereas an average household size of 2.73 in 2011 was totally inconsequential during period of undisputed oversupply.

    The idea that there is a 250k deficit of houses that we're not making any dent in is totally predicated on the assumption that our household size should be 2.4 rather than 2.74.

    There is no deficit at 2.74. So if you are of the belief, as I am, that we somehow ought able to survive with approximately the same AHS we had in 2011 during a period of oversupply, then the housing problems are nothing like as disastrous as you claim.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭scrabtom


    What about all of the people in their 20s (and older) living with their parents?

    What about all the older single people and couples who would love to rent or own their own place but cannot?

    Is it ideal that people live in their parents home later and later in life with no independence, and that people in their 30s live in cramped single rooms in shared houses with a load of randomers?

    I think it's blatantly obvious that a huge amount of people in Ireland now fall in to those groups, and their lives would be much fuller if the housing market was in a place that allowed them to not be in that situation anymore.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,661 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I am not disputing there are problems with the housing market, I'm disputing the idea we have a 250k deficit that is growing by the day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,614 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    It is stupid to look at average household size alone and conclude from that we have no issues.

    AHS alone does not tell any story about deficit or surplus of available stock. Prices do though, supply and demand do, and population versus housing for sale and housing for rent also tell that story far better than the AHS metric.

    I am not aware of anyone else in this country who claims our housing deficit is not that bad. Do you believe that all the various experts, analysts and policy advisory groups are all wrong in their estimates of housing deficit?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭combat14


    the fun will start when all the single males want to bring their 25+ family members with them into the country - the country still has a lot of building left to go



Advertisement