Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

11 Generator stuck in Dublin port for over a year because they are to heavy for M50

13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 922 ✭✭✭65535


    Why Dublin (again) ?

    Just send them to another port in Ireland, Foynes, Waterford, Cork, Ringaskiddy - then when on land they could be setup on a new site - the grid is a grid !

    You can add capacity anywhere on a grid.

    Whitegate in Cork Harbour would take them.

    The Old ESB Generating Station on the Marina in Cork would be ideal for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,212 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    but they’re not for the grid, they are bought by data centres for data centres…They are nothing to do with the grid and will only generate electricity for their owners (power hungry data centres)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,127 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    The generators are for data centres. Grid capacity is highly constrained in South Dublin so a power station co-located with the data centre was required.

    You could in theory plug the generators onto the grid anywhere but you'd have to reinforce the grid to the data centre to supply it. Additionally you'd also have to contend with losses on the grid.

    Little understood fact, is that the grid itself is the largest consumer of electricity in Ireland (and elsewhere).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,991 ✭✭✭kravmaga


    The point is they are in storage doing nothing, Microsoft and Evira should do a deal as I already mentioned as its quite obvious to all and sundry that the owners did not do their homework on transport and logistics planning.

    We could be having this convo in 5 years time , just because they are in private sector hands doesn't mean they cant be sold on from the port to another consumer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,942 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I might just add in relation to this

    This week we had a power interruption in our office (Dublin City Centre), other offices around us were also affected. Nothing to serious but a few PC's shut down. Third time this year, and I don't recall it happening before.

    The ESB have been contacted twice about it already. It was on Newstalk this morning that the ESB needs a lot of money for grid upgrade works next year and electricity prices are expected to rise again (€100 per year per home)

    I'm guessing that the Frequency dropped below 49.9Hz.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,670 ✭✭✭KildareP


    The grid has a limit to what it can carry. Transferring electricity over long distances also incurs losses.

    It's no good locating these somewhere on the west coast if the grid cannot carry the demand all the way across to the east coast where it's needed and if you incur massive efficiency losses in doing so.

    Better to locate your energy source as close to the demand as you can, particularly datacentres, as they're relatively constant loads that can shed significant demand from the grid in a very short space of time when margins are tight.

    As to why they've gone with diesel engines, the size of which have been relatively unheard of here, is I suspect because:

    (1) there wouldn't be a gas mains large enough to build gas turbine plant at the site,

    (2) if you fuel the engines with 100% HVO then you can claim your energy as low carbon and environmentally friendly and crucially;

    (3) future datacentre demand could be met directly by these plants, thereby bypassing the current effective moratorium on electrical grid connections for datacentres.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,864 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Your suggestion was that the Government 'give them to Ukraine'. Outside of the fact that it would take months to ship them to Odessa, so they would be of no immediate use (and transporting something their size wouldn't go unnoticed by the Russians), they aren't owned by the Government. Yes the private owners could sell them, but that is a lot different to giving them away for free as you suggested.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,300 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    they are for backup generation, if the grid goes down these will kick in. If the grid asks them to droP load, these will kick in. If there’s supply constraints these will kick in



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,991 ✭✭✭kravmaga




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,300 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    how?

    A cluster fcuk for who?


    Sure the accountants will work their magic and it won’t have cost much



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 737 ✭✭✭SVI40


    Could very possibly be for one of their existing data centres.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,517 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    The planning refusal was for a Google data centre rather than a Microsoft one, no?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,719 ✭✭✭Heroditas


    MAN are supplying 16 of these generators to Ireland currently.

    10 are bought by Bord Gais - 5 for Profile Park and the other 5 for just west of Athlone. The remaining 6 are funded by SDCL and are also being used to help with peak load generation or low renewable penetration on the grid.

    I'm actually not sure if the Indo article is 100% accurate re them being used in a Microsoft data centre 🤔 Microsoft received planning permission only in July last year to build a 170MW backup gas-powered plant so I don't think some of these generators are for them. The generators have been stuck in the port since the time Microsoft were granted permission.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,053 ✭✭✭1123heavy


    At first the sun reported they were for the national grid. Now it seems to have come out that they are for the data centres.

    These centres are a scourge. They offer no benefit to the population, negligible employment opportunities, their owners are tax avoiders, they drain our electricity resources and the cooling of them would have Irish waters steaming. Its insane what we have allowed to develop right under our noses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,212 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    And whenever they do get their diesel generators delivered and set up, they'll be reducing the air quality of wherever they are located… I'm glad there's none near me…

    Planning for data centres should only be approved on condition that they install renewables in enough capacity to cover their own operation. That can mean the roof full of solar panels (which obviously won't be enough) + either an additional solar farm offsite, or investor 'access' into a communal wind farm project thats set up for this very purpose (smallish buyers (data centres) can buy into larger projects for economy of scale)..

    Feck all this installing big fcuk off diesel generators….



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,651 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Planning for data centres should only be approved on condition that they install renewables in enough capacity to cover their own operation. That can mean the roof full of solar panels (which obviously won't be enough) + either an additional solar farm offsite, or investor 'access' into a communal wind farm project thats set up for this very purpose (smallish buyers (data centres) can buy into larger projects for economy of scale)..

    While I wouldn't object to any of this, none of these are remotely useful for the type of backup generation the diesel generators are required for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,212 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Fair enough… so just replace the diesel generators with battery storage… A Tesla megapack can put out 22MW for 24 hours before it needs to be recharged again…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,465 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Data Centres are not “small-ish” users of electricity. One Data Centre of the scale you see at Grange Castle uses as much electricity as 150,000 households.

    This is my industry, and it pisses me off to see these smug tech-bros claiming to be at the forefront of a “clean” economy while their lousy software belches tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere every week because there’s zero incentive to do better, and zero penalty for the pollution they cause. (Large-user electricity is not billed per kWh the way domestic is, and DC operators do not monitor energy use per customer, but rather divide it crudely based on hardware allocation, so there’s no benefit to writing software using more energy efficient methods).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,300 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    They’re dual fuel. So probably gas with diesel as back up..


    renewables aren’t dispatchable. These are back up. , so Renewables are zero use to them here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,300 ✭✭✭✭ted1



    No it can’t….

    That’s 528 MWh a mega pack is only 3.9Mw and run for only 4 hours , so that’s just under 1MW for 4 hours



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,942 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    Same

    Work in tech, not DC's specifically but Infra. A MASSIVE amount of the energy usage could be sorted if the crappy code that some developer has written was optimized.

    90% of the code out there is absolute rubbish, 8% is good and 2% is really good.

    I came across problem about 12 months ago where a developer was doing a sort in the most inefficent way you could possibly imagine…. 1,200 hours a month on CPU. I got them to put a fix in and the CPU usage is now down to approx 3 hours per month.

    And there are tens of thousands of examples of this, it's death by a thousand cuts.

    I dunno if we have any AI geared DC's here yet, but if/when they get going, Ireland will need to reassess it's energy policy.

    For those kind of industrial applications, you're back to fossil fuels or Nuclear. As there won't be enough space available for renewables with batteries. (I don't think anyway)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,465 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    @Beta Ray Bill - Agree 100% with that assessment. The efficiency problem is endemic, as it comes from the agile/start-up culture of “get something running, and deal with performance later”. Because of how data centre pricing is structured, for most applications, it is cheaper to just throw more computers (and thus more electricity) at an inefficient data centre application than actually take some time to make it more efficient - it’s only when you get to hundreds of millions of users that the cost/benefit starts to favour a re-engineering.

    Honestly, if we applied the same approach to roads, we’d have traffic crawling carefully along twelve-lane dirt tracks, because it was cheaper to widen the dirt-track than to build a proper road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,412 ✭✭✭gjim


    The efficiency of modern software argument is orthogonal to the argument about DCs. Get rid of DCs and you'll be running the same inefficient code on-prem - it will consume just as much if not more energy. When you take into account the lower utilization and efficiency savings from operating at scale, significantly more.

    I also have dealings industry - we buy massive amounts of compute for intensive simulations. We used to have our own on-prem racks of machines but hiring compute when needed is far more efficient given our utilization patterns.

    This discussion is like someone looking at a massive coal burning power station and seeing that it's filthy… and suggesting we all move to using home diesel generators instead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,300 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    when do you run your simulations ? Are you conscious of running them outside peak hours and when renewables are available



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,412 ✭✭✭gjim


    To be honest no we don't deliberately time runs that way - but by accident or design the runs are generally kicked off in the late evening. But occasionally they are re-run during the day. It's an interesting point that I hadn't thought about - I'll ask the system engineers whether cloud compute prices vary this way but I haven't heard this mentioned. Previously we used an on-prem 400-core cluster but utilization was actually quite poor - a bit more than 30% - which is a massive waste.

    There's a load of research on how cloud computing is much more energy efficient than on-prem. Typical numbers I've seen are that cloud is about 80% more energy efficient than on-prem. A quick google gave me this link: https://pcg.io/insights/3-reasons-public-cloud-reduces-energy-costs/

    I mean, almost every industrial process gets more efficient with scale and computing is absolutely no different.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,794 ✭✭✭horse7


    Correct me if I'm wrong but the weight is nearly 500tons, what truck could haul this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 852 ✭✭✭gossamerfabric


    The cloud computing footprint of my Department's landscape would be easily 30% larger if not for me and in the last week I have managed to get the build procedures changed so that we will consume about 15% less on future builds. There was considerable diplomacy required to push that through. This isn't my responsibility but I am able to exert influence in the absence of anyone interested in reducing our footprint. I used to have some other gatekeeper staff members who had a goto solution of throwing more CPU and Memory at any problem and if it worked then the build procedures for similar applications would be applied to anything else built from that point onward. It wasn't coming out of their salary so they didn't care.

    Most Colleagues in my Department are completely oblivious to the footprint of our landscape because it is in a lights out datacentre mostly off-site and they don't have access to the console for the Cloud provider, not that the console from the Cloud provider gives any good tips about resource consumption reduction.

    I was invited to a private consulting session with the Cloud Provider who was looking for ideas how to be more sustainable. From the start it was clear it was a greenwashing exercise on their part. Their console suggestions for CPU and Memory reduction were totally inappropriate to our solution so we continued using our own tools to identify underutilized VMs based off data we collect ourselves.

    The committed usage discount model for our cloud provider doesn't lend itself to resource usage reduction but through my efforts at least our committed usage is not as large as it otherwise would have been.

    I have had Colleagues saying I am saving only cents because they haven't a clue about the cost or the footprint.

    The problem with Software is that unlike in old industry the Bill of Materials(where it exists) is not reviewed obsessively and with SaaS or DBaaS we are even further abstracted from the cost of the product/service provided and the relationship between it and what is being paid for it is completely broken.

    Our landscape is huge but we are just one department in our company so I am really still tilting at windmills. Others elsewhere will squander more than I can save.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,465 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    @gjim I wasn't arguing against economies of scale, but the way that outsourcing computing hides the impact of inefficient systems. On-prem is far worse, of course, but its also an environment where high costs due to poor systems design are more likely to be noticed and fixed. Committed Usage discounting is one of the factors I was taking about when I mentioned how DC pricing disincentivises making software more efficient.

    But while DCs are able to deliver at a better monetary cost, the environmental cost isn't really that much better. The cost savings are due to economy of scale, and the way very large users are charged for power.

    Apologies for dragging this off topic though... Generators, Dublin Port.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,942 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 705 ✭✭✭rgfuller


    Looks like some of them are finally being moved to Grange Castle - late Sept through to early Nov.

    https://www.sdcc.ie/en/news/notice-of-transportation-of-exceptional-abnormal-loads.html



Advertisement