Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Vice President Kamala Harris vs Donald Trump 2024

1227228230232233294

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,777 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Oh he'll sell. He's a self-interested dimwit who doesn't know how business works. I'd be shocked if he even really understands how stocks work beyond the whole idea of stock ownership eventually earning you money.

    Also he needs the money, badly. Sure, the whole GOP warchest goes right into his pocket right now, but that will stop in November. Then all he'll have going will be the various branding grifts and the inevitable "Save America Legal Fund" to pay for his ever growing legal costs. He also faces Trump Org. getting gutted by New York State for tax evasion, so a couple of ill-gotten billions on the backs of his MAGA nitwits is likely something he'll want to do.

    The hardcore MAGA cult will feel hard done by, but Donnie will just say that Commie Kamala stole their share value and that only he can get it back for them. They'll keep voting for him, but others may be put off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,940 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Was she lying or was she unable to see what the whole world could see?

    It's called being supportive of your team mate. Christ knows how many times MAGA heads have had to agree that black is white because Trump said so.



  • Site Banned Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    Being supportive of your team-mate is very different to actively lying to the public which you are supposed to serve.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    I have to say, being on the side of the Democrats at the moment is fascinating. They have such a strong bench that whittling that down for the next cycle will be tough! I was watching Buttigieg dismantle a Fox news host the other day, and casually throw in that most Fox viewers don't realise violent crime is down from when Trump was in charge because they don't report that. He's only 42, but he would have to be favourite to get the Presidency in the next 20 years. The man is a superb talker and not afraid to cross the aisle to discuss policies with them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,494 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    'active lying' is a big claim you haven't remotely justified.

    There's a world of difference between Biden being in a 25th amendment situation and one where he is ok to carry on until end of term for President but not up to the demands of another election and Presidency.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 532 ✭✭✭Dingaan




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,040 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Hahahahahahaha

    That is the funniest line that this thread has delivered so far. I assume you have MAJOR issues with Trump opening his mouth and delivering lie, after lie, after lie?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,766 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    So, the long-time GOP types are publicly not supporting Convicted Felon Trump because they don't like him anymore? Is that it? You see, these GOP types have other options, like shutting up about CFTrump, but they're coming out and saying they won't support him.

    Democrats, too, have options other than supporting Harris, yet, her popularity grows. And she's only been the candidate for a couple months, otherwise had the backoffice job of VP.

    People are liking Harris more because they're learning more about her, listening to her speeches and policies. They didn't know her well before, though she was pretty popular in her home state, which for the record is the world's 5th largest economy on its own, she was their elected Attorney General, which is a BIG TIME JOB as well as Senator. Attorney General, by the way, is more than prosecutor, they run an enormous, complicated organization.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    This is active lying to the public:

    image.png

    Let's not pretend it's serious criticism of Harris, that she's a 'liar to the American people' for holding the opinion that Biden was up to the job for 2 more terms. That is separate from the fact Biden chose to step down after his campaign advisors showed him he had lost his path to re-election victory, that is separate from an opinion on whether he is mentally or physically capable of the job, whether or not he still had the votes from the American public.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,777 ✭✭✭Rawr


    I sense she is a capable canditate for the role of President. We've yet to see if she would be a good President, but that's almost always true of a new canditate for the role. We didn't get to see much of her in the VP role, but that appears to be typical of a VP. We didn't really see much of Biden for a lot of Obama's time either.

    She's not new to politics and appears able to actually perform functional roles in government and lately has shown to be able to project a message & theme for their campaign. She also made the choice to bring Walz onto the ticket which appears to be a sign of some wisedom. She appears to be educated, and not a blithering idiot, unlike the GOP's pick.

    You're main message when posting here appears to be: "Harris is not good, she's only liked because she isn't Trump". I'd disagree on first point, and on the second is only partially true. She is liked because she is not Trump, but I would add that I believe that she is also liked because is Kamala Harris.

    You are very focused on the unsuitablilty of Harris, I must then ask….how do you feel about Trump?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,940 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    More that she wasn't in the public eye as much as the president which caused that IMHO. Since she's been much more public and campaigning etc that's completely reversed.



  • Site Banned Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    Joe Biden was undeniably not sharp as a tack. He absolutely wasn't ready to lead America into a second term. They were lies she told.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,878 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    Just checking on my current Ignore List

    Untitled Image


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,494 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Nope. A lie is a big claim and you haven't come close to it.

    He looked like he was ready until it was apparent he was not and the polls were bleak. Requires no lies.

    Your negative claims about the Democrats are getting bigger, and getting further and further from any evidence to back them up.

    All the while, when it comes to Republicans it seems to be hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Their bench is so strong this cycle that they're pulling hundreds of endorsements from the other bench, and not from "RINOs" either, but from some people who have been Republican strategists and officials etc. since the 1980s, back before when Trump was still a Democrat or a Reform Party member.

    I feel really good about this election.

    In an open letter, first written about on Monday by USA Today, 238 people who worked for former President George H.W. Bush, former President George W. Bush, former Arizona Sen. John McCain and Utah Sen. Mitt Romney call on their fellow “moderate Republicans and conservative independents” to join them in backing Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, over Trump and his vice presidential pick, Sen. JD Vance of Ohio.

    https://apnews.com/article/kamala-harris-republican-endorsements-1371966c9be8ac4e0e6b3e1e126edbc9



  • Site Banned Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    If I am being honest, I can't see any victory as anything except a dumpster fire. So I don't have a preference really, I am utterly disillusioned by the lack of quality of both candidates.

    I think the love for Kamala has been over-egged but apparently, having that opinion is like catnip for a certain amount of posters who accept nothing on this thread except hatred for trump and trump only.

    I've gone out of my way to avoid mentioning the man. There is already enough hatred being posted by 99% of the contributers but very little about any shortcomings the VP might have.

    In a discussion forum, I would have expected a little more balance and less people just repeating the same stuff. It's a little odd that there are so few people mentioning anything negative about one of the candidates.

    But I have the brief.

    We shall not mention anything bad about Harris.

    I'll leave you guys to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    The debate with Biden was 27th June. She was on 16.8% net unfavourable. (53.6% unfavourable and 36.8% favourable)

    She was nominated to be the candidate on Aug 5th. By that time her net unfavourability dropped to 5.9% (48.7 Unfavourable and 42.8% favourable)

    You're correct* in that around the times of the debates, she was unfavourable, but look at how much she has grown that since and in such a short amount of time. It shows that the more people are aware of her, the greater her favourability is.

    She is currently on 1.9% unfavourable (47.6% unfavourable and 45.6% favourable) that trend is only going one way.

    The fact is, she's quite a likeable, relatable person, with a good, strong teammate in Walz.

    *Just for the lulz… On 27th June, Trump had a net favourability of 11.2%, on Aug 5th that had dropped to 8.5% and it currently sits at… 9.7%.

    We never hear how highly unpopular Trump is, do we?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Those are opinions.

    That is some molehill you're digging up there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,766 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Interesting factoid: George HW Bush is the only sitting VP to be elected POTUS since 1836. I'd forgotten Nixon was sitting VP when he lost to JFK, Hubert Humphrey was beaten badly in 1968, Gore barely lost to Bush II, …

    https://apnews.com/article/kamala-harris-incumbent-vice-president-election-defc726ac5a8db8ef0ba9a756fd8eec5



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Ah stop, you'll turn this place into an echo chamber

    \sarc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,494 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    "If I am being honest" ???

    I must have missed the bit where you gave an honest appraisal of Trump.
    You seem very free in your opinions on Harris.

    If you've looked at Trump and you've looked at Harris, and can't tell the difference between them quality wise, that is completely discrediting of any judgments made in your posts about their "qualities".

    You seem more bothered by 'hate' for Trump, than the hate that Trump spews.
    He is a fascist, a racist, a rapist. He tried to steal the last election.

    It is obvious you are just here to defend Trump, and you can't defend Trump, so instead you attack Harris.

    We've seen this playbook before and it doesn't get any more convincing.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Site Banned Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    Yes. Of course I do.

    Does every mention of a negative towards Kamala Harris need to come with a caveat of "oh and Donald Trump is worse"?

    I think Donald Trump's faults are already well represented here.

    Or to be part of the gang, do I have to repeat them in order to actually say anything negative about Kamala?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    It helps if you want to maintain the shroud of "no preference"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,998 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption




  • Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Find something substantive to say against Harris and I might take your statements a little more seriously. I get it - you don't like her.



  • Site Banned Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭Yvonne007


    I have no vote, no preference but like to discuss issues.

    But apparently, any criticism of Kamala without a caveat of "but I love her too" will be met with derision and mockery.

    You guys can pretend to be having a discussion, but you should really rename the thread title to reflect that this isn't a place for discussion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,040 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    So I don't have a preference really

    I doubt anyone really is going to buy this, given your posting on the matter already and the efforts you've gone to to throw shade on Harris.

    If I am being honest

    A lot of folk are going to struggle with this too, frankly.

    I've gone out of my way to avoid mentioning the man.

    Oh, I'm sure that everyone has noticed that as well.

    In a discussion forum, I would have expected a little more balance and less people just repeating the same stuff. It's a little odd that there are so few people mentioning anything negative about one of the candidates.

    And now we have the crying, because people "in a discussion forum" are challenging your position.

    So, if we're to believe you, you cannot in any way say who you'd prefer to see win in November? There's no way at all that you can pick between one of just two candidates, even if both are flawed? It's just impossible for you to weigh up each candidate and say "well, even though they're not exactly the greatest choice, I have to go with X, because…" You're thoroughly incapable of saying that one of the candidates even slightly edges over the other?

    I'll actually go one further, the choice is not just limited to Harris and Trump. It's about which party leads the country. So, that means a choice between a MAGA led Republican Party with project 2025 as its central proposition and the Democrats.

    And you cannot, "honestly", make a choice between those two?



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement