Andrew Tate

The saga continues.

Repo man

I haven’t looked in to Tate in detail - I have better things to do - but so far I think Jimmy Carr’s assessment is accurate: Tate is a 14-year-old boy’s version of what a successful man looks like. At that age, we men are walking hormonal disaster zones, obsessed with “getting the girl”. We’re like dogs chasing cars: if we catch one, we don’t know what to do with it.

Well, Tate “got” the girls … yeah. Um.

Because his behaviour and influence has an impact on peoples lives, regardless if they have ever met him or not.

Trying to raise children, boys in particular, is becoming increasingly difficult as parents spend more time trying to make ends meet that boys and young men spend more time online. That time online leads to exposure from toxic personalities like Tate, Peterson, Musk or even Ben **** Shapiro. Single mothers have it worse because most of the time child does not have a male role model, this position is replaced by some grifting asshole online.

It says everything about someones life because they actually give a **** about their children or younger people in general and how they are misguided by a bunch of pyramid scheme, rage baiting cryptobros.

Peterson - no doubt an accomplished academic in his time he has over time drifted further into mysoginy, conspiracy theories and other toxic positions, especially attempting to somehow paint a picture of the womans place in the world where men are clearly better in every way. He clearly finds greater financial benefit in the grift and becoming a charlatan than producing factual peer reviewed papers.

Musk - Where to start? The man lacks all morals yet has some sort of saviour complex. One example stands out to me is the time where he has Tesla buy a load of Bitcoin then announces they'll accept it as payment, dumping their bags on his OWN SUPPORTERS just to make sure their quarterly earnings look good from sales of "digital assets". The man is little more than a self centred, attention seeking child. He is not a genius and is in his position almost entirely due to good fortune. He is not the source of ideas in SpaceX, nor Tesla. He is a liability for those companies. He is toxic because he promotes nothing but selfishness, petulance and is just an all round toxic wanker.

Shapiro - Another charlatan who creates outrage material purely for the clicks and money. I doubt he holds any of his beliefs with any real regard, his arguements are often half thought out with misrerpresented data points to push an agenda. Sure, a master of the gish gallop but never engages in a properly moderated debate because he would get torn to pieces. See his interview with Andrew Neil where he hilariously throws his toys out of the pram and calls him a liberal once he faces an ounce of robust challenge. Shapiro only seeks to reinforce the prejudices that many in his audience hold.

They're all c**ts.

I would agree with a lot of that but I still wouldn't consider them toxic, at least nowhere near to the same extent as the Tate brothers. They're on a completely different level. I think most parents would prefer their sons listening to Jordon Peterson than Andrew Tate.

This is nothing more than dumbing down genuine grievances against these people and their positions. Not to mention falsehoods and half truths in this post alone.

Pitting people against minorities and the marginalised benefits only the wealthy. Grifters like these people benefit financially by consistently confirming biases and reinforcing prejudices.

So what if someone is trans? So what if someone has different pronouns? Why are people concerned with life decisions that someone they don't know makes?

Crypto is exactly the same type of bullshit. Sell dreams of financial independence while never delivering it. It is little more than gambling.

Na, Peterson and Rogan make the world a better place, for the other 4 it would be great to see the back of them