Transgender man wins women's 100 yd and 400 yd freestyle races.

That’s a fair point, it can be established in-utero where the equipment to do so is available. That’s what I mean by established - no need for the inverted commas.

It doesn’t have to be unfortunate or avoidable when something can be done about it - like the organisation changing the eligibility rules for competition. It wouldn’t be the first time the rules were changed, as they did when the IOC dropped the previous requirement in their guidelines that males had to undergo an orchiectomy -

“To require surgical anatomical changes as a precondition to participation is not necessary to preserve fair competition and may be inconsistent with developing legislation and notions of human rights,” it added.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/jan/25/ioc-rules-transgender-athletes-can-take-part-in-olympics-without-surgery

I didn’t address your question because it was nothing to do with the point I had originally made. Just like you haven’t addressed the point I was making which was Coe’s obvious confirmation bias. There’s zero chance of anyone winning gold medals at the Olympics if the rules of competition inhibit their participation at the earliest stages, doesn’t matter how genetically blessed they are.

As Babs Keating(Tipp GAA man) once famously said "you can't train donkeys to win derbies"

It’s only a misnomer if one is a subscriber to the theory that gender exists as an entirely distinct concept from sex. It wouldn’t make any difference what a person who is transgender would claim. AllforIt has made it clear on many occasions that he doesn’t subscribe to the concept of gender. The whole concept of trans is “the other side of”, and if one does not subscribe to the concept of gender as a distinct concept from sex, they’re being logically consistent when they use the term ‘sex change’ to refer to the intervention process - whether it’s social, medical or surgical.

All these concepts have practical implications, which is why the discussion isn’t only really concerned with sex when an athlete competing in the women’s events can be accused of cheating on the basis that they don’t look like a woman, or, in at least one case, a girl -

https://archive.ph/pYDUb

Once again your whole point is based a false premise.

It’s only a misnomer if one is a subscriber to the theory that gender exists as an entirely distinct concept from sex.

That's not at all accurate.

Whether somebody subscribes to the idea of gender exists distinctly from sex, or not doe snot change the fact that sex cannot be changed. Neither side holds that view, thus in all cases "sex change" is a misnomer.

The claim that its not about sex is incredibly ignorant.
Your ability to be consistently wrong about fundamental aspect is bizarre.
Have you manged to form a logical argument why male sex hormones and male puberty don't exist.

Once again your whole point is based a false premise.

It isn’t. It’s based on not seeking to overcomplicate a relatively simple concept. Sex is understood to have many different meanings, and it was the attempt to establish psychology as a legitimate scientific discipline that psychologists came up with ideas relating to gender, gender identity, gender roles, gender stereotypes, gender expression, etc.

Those people of a socially conservative view (such as myself), will use the term sex as an all-encompassing term. This is by no means unusual in the Western world, and by way of example, Judge Gorsuch’ opinion in Bostock:

In Title VII, Congress outlawed discrimination in the workplace on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Today, we must decide whether an employer can fire someone simply for being homosexual or transgender. The answer is clear. An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what Title VII forbids. 

Or take an employer who fires a transgender person who was identified as a male at birth but who now identifies as a female. If the employer retains an otherwise identical employee who was identified as female at birth, the employer intentionally penalizes a person identified as male at birth for traits or actions that it tolerates in an employee identified as female at birth. Again, the individual employee’s sex plays an unmistakable and impermissible role in the discharge decision.

I understand that other people have a different view, and that different approach exists in Irish law in the Gender Recognition Act:

18. (1) Where a gender recognition certificate is issued to a person the person’s gender shall from the date of that issue become for all purposes the preferred gender so that if the preferred gender is the male gender the person’s sex becomes that of a man, and if it is the female gender the person’s sex becomes that of a woman.

Exemptions exist for sports and various other activities:

https://www.ihrec.ie/guides-and-tools/human-rights-and-equality-in-the-provision-of-good-and-services/what-does-the-law-say/exceptions/

I think it’s best if we park it there Enduro.

It means that his father already being a coach in athletics meant that Coe was always more likely to be successful in sports than someone whose father wasn’t an athletics coach, but like many parents will want their offspring to follow in the path they had already established.

Pure nonsense. There are so many athletes around the world who's parents have no association to their chosen sport. Yet again, you show your ignorance with a simple sentence. Do your research for gods sake.

Discrimination based on sex is wrong, the fact there are laws agaisnt it doesn't back up any of your BS.

The point of the example of Gorsuch’ reasoning is because in that case, the law which applies does not include gender; however it was interpreted to mean that their employers were liable for unlawful discrimination against homosexual or transgender employees on the basis of sex.

You’re also going to have considerable difficulty at some point when you become aware of single-sex schools which do not include sex testing in their admissions policies.