Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

The decline of SF?

1151618202123

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    Compared to 20 years ago, the average shinner cumann meeting is a lot more squeezed middle than unemployed. The 'well healed' dont tend to share who they vote for, so Im not sure if the stereotypes you are clinging to there are of any value.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    exactly the protest vote didn’t go to SF this time and doesn’t look as if it will going forward so it comes down to policies in the next GE and as you said SF work to do because current policies are severely lacking



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    any vote that rejects the sitting government party is a 'protest' vote. Again, as P. Donoghue said 'a GE is a different ballgame.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,366 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Squeezed middle aren't well off, so we are probably talking about two different groups there.

    The well off who own property and pay the most income tax arent generally going to vote for their house price to fall and their incomes to be taxed even more.

    The squeezed middle will of course look for an alternative, i agree. But I think more and more people have realised that SF dont offer costed alternatives for that cohort anyway.

    In any case, overall first preference voting support for SF has dropped from 24.5% in 2020 to 21% today & they have now been overtaken as first choice by FG on 23%.

    Harris still seems keen to hold the GE next year, but there must be a strong case for an October election, post budget, while the parties in government are doing well in terms of support.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    yes but protest vote seems to be going anywhere rather than SF



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Maybe in an actual GE but in local elections and all opinion polls for GE it appears to be the case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Given the local results before the GE I will let you bask in complacency and maintain my point. A lot can change and very quickly too. Either way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,934 ✭✭✭HBC08


    It's not just working class who want this immigration sh1tshow to stop,it's the majority of people in Ireland .

    The first major party to give a nod in that direction will walk the GE.

    This was an open goal for SF,they sh1t the bed and have gone into free fall instead.

    It really is a remarkable collapse.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,788 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    so the shinners should have been out marching against immigrants shouting 'out out out!' catch a grip. The government - them lads in poiwer than none of you seem to want to blame, control immigration, not people in IPA centres. If you want to blame 'illegal' immigration, do something about brexit because illegal immigrants are driving down from the north.

    SF stance has never changed on immigration. the apparent voters SF lost (which I very much doubt ever voted SF) hang out with loyalists, smashing up shops of people who arent white. WTF wants those kinds of assholes?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭lumphammer2


    A lot of people in my wider family would not vote for Sinn Fein …. it is all for the same reason …. their ties to the IRA and association in their mind to the Northern Ireland violence …. the REALITY is SF are no longer even close to that era …. MLMcD and others were not even near any of that …. SF has evolved just like FF and FG once did too ….

    As it stands … and let's hope it remains so … most Irish want to vote for moderate parties …. thankfully the Trumpist copycats did v badly in the 2024 elections …. however issues that irk the people do need to be addressed …. housing etc …. on one hand and misinfo and social media inspired thuggery needs to be addressed on the other hand ….

    SF, FF and FG will for the foreseeable get about a third each give or take of the vote …. FF and FG are centre right and more natural partners …. the rise of another centre left party or the a rise in fortune for the other major centre left party Labour is needed for SF to form a govt …. that makes it more likely that FF and FG will form the next govt ….



  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    To be fair when SF were courting Gemma and her crowd, her links to loyalism and racists wasn't a problem for the party. Paddy Holohan association with "Tan Torino" (right wing agitator, former member of the RAF) wasn't an issue either.

    Sf cultivated an online army from the conspiracy nuts and it has now turned against them. Big mistake that the party thought it could control both the left and right wing conspiracy nuts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Your two gotcha's are not members of SF. One never was and the other was drummed out of the party. That you think this hasn't happened in other parties (or maybe you are willfully ignoring it) is gas.
    Party members will say and do the wrong thing and no longer have the whip or support of the party right across politics.
    And don't get me started on attempts to influence online. There was never any proof that SF were controlling 'an online army' their attempt to get people to advocate for the party online was open, and you needed to join the party to do it, they weren't sneaky and looking for 'anonymous accounts' to do it, but actual supporters. Given what it was turned into by fearful conspiracy theories (who willfully and hypocritically also ignored the more sinister advocate of 'anonymous accounts) they might re-consider making that call again.



  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Plenty of examples of SF members involvement in conspiracy theories and their promotion. Brian Stanley, Browne in Tipp, Violet before she left, Martina Anderson , the anti vax presidential candidate whose name i've forgotten. SF rise in support occured in the same time frame and opinion polls showed a higher belief in CT's among SF supporters compared to other parties. Ditto far right sentiment. Coincidence or consequence of a plan to recruit within that cohort?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The 'support' that is now looking elsewhere because SF won't support them?
    Where has it gone? Oh look FF and FG support has increased in the same time frame.
    SF don't want that support as it is not chasing it.

    Several of the people above apologised for their tweets/actions like members of all parties have had to do. That's a good thing in my book, are you being selective at all in the apologies you accept and the ones you don't? You also should look into the meaning of 'plenty'.



  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think after the review they realised they could lose their left wing base as well as the right if they continued with their ambiguity around immigration to increase support. They still are a bit soft on the right but do seem to have changed course.

    Not sure what you mean by accepting apologies? Those people were extremely active in conspiracy theory groups and helped promote them. Conspiracy theorists were like a moth to a flame once a mainstream party showed an interest. SF support increased with plenty coming from the CT community. When Gemma started CT were mostly a left wing phenomenon. It slowly morphed into right wing community.

    I believe they purposely tried to get votes from this group and were caught out when they started believing in Replacement Theory .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Believe what you want. That SF policy and leadership do not re-enforce any of this points to the fact that you are perhaps the purveyor of a conspiracy theory yourself. One man's sincerely held beliefs are another's conspiracy theory and all that.
    Of course you forget FG endorsement and support for Verona Murphy's toxic views before they too moved away from them officially. Similarly their incubation of ultra conservative people like Lucinda Creighton and her Renua colleagues before parting ways with them.

    As I say, you can myopically hold a view and cherrypick, personally I think all parties have rogue members and people who don't tow the party line, what the leadership and policy say is the important thing.



  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Do you consider all those in SF who support CT'S are rogue members? Stanley, Anderson, Daly, Browne?

    Why do you think that SF supporters are the least progressive of all the parties? Just bad luck?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,299 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The problem is that SF continue to display a lack of leadership on these issues. Only yesterday, senior party spokespersons were refusing to say that they supported the housing of immigrants in Thornton Hall. The crisis of leadership in SF is real, unfortunately for them, it is only one of the major problems. Without decent leadership at the top, they won't be able to address the hordes of conspiracy theorists in their ranks.

    Even their supporters on here dream up crazy CTs about the government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Progressive to me means having the ability to see what you said or did was wrong and apologising for it and altering your behaviour.
    Regressive is sticking with beliefs that have been debunked and policy that is evidently wrong and making things worse - immigration, housing and health being the headline repressiveness of the current government.

    I have never claimed any party in Ireland is a perfect model and I have voted for most of them.



  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ok so, why are right wing beliefs stronger in SF voters compared to all the other main parties? My theory is the influence of a significant cohort within the party that believes in various conspiracy theories such as anti vax, Jews using a lazor from space behind 9/11, the Brits microwaved Catholics, Great replacement theory etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I think those who believe those things are floating voters, willing to switch to differing parties if it suits. The rise in support for Independents and FF and FG as they harden stances shows that.
    Not worth chasing tbh.



  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Hopefully they stop chasing that vote soon but Browne (space lazors) is going for election again. Stanley , Daly and Conway Walsh too i assume.

    Still a lot of people in SF that would appeal to that cohort.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    It's 'a lot' now, not 'plenty' anymore.
    All very vague really.
    And I still don't see the party leadership or policy 'chasing that vote'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,253 ✭✭✭xxyyzz


    Yes, and it went on far longer than 2018. On Reddit they made r/Ireland unusable, any discussion of SF whatsoever would be downvoted into oblivion within minutes if it was deemed negative. This was going on up until last year, it seems to have eased off this year. I guess it wasn't a good look for the party when some absolute apes were throwing their weight around in discussions most of whom had some romanticised notion of the troubles and were born in the noughties.



  • Posts: 8,350 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The succeeded in harvesting the CT votes hence their supporters being the biggest believers in that sort of nonsense. They got the Gemma cohort votes by recruiting Browne, Holohan and Violet into the ranks and people like Pa Daly supporting her presendential push. I'd imagine the leadership had some say on who was allowed run for the party and who Pa Daly could publicly support.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,299 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    They are still at it, voting for Paddy Holohan for Deputy Mayor of South Dublin, sitting on the ditch over the use of Thornton Hall until they see which way the wind is blowing, the same in Dundrum, where they are using "consultation" as the reason to ensure that refugees are not looked after.

    It will be interesting to see the next opinion poll.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,587 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Holohan who was kicked out, Browne who apologised and Violet who lasted a wet week in her position?

    Yeh, great 'harvesting'.

    A small, secret group of people is responsible for making all major decisions in world politics

    25% of FF and 23% of FG voters believe the above statement.

    What about this one?

    Viruses and/or diseases have been deliberately disseminated to infect certain populations

    15% of FF and 11% of FG believe that one.

    Tell me this, how did FG and FF 'harvest' these supporters who believe these conspiracy theories?
    People in glasshouses…etc etc.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement