Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia-Ukraine War

1127128130132133208

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,727 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    either way, you'd hate to be one of his lookalikes these days….. as once he goes, their days are probably numbered too…..

    Swan Lake must scare the bejesus out of them!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,629 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,055 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Gerasimov might want to avoid windows

    The biggest news here is that command of this “counter terrorism” operation was yanked away from the military and … given to the FSB

    Just think about that for a minute, imagine if Mexican army invaded New Mexico and Trump instead of letting Army and Air Force deal with it told the FBI to handle it, insanity



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,617 ✭✭✭swampgas


    I suppose it might be down to trust and loyalty, or competence. As is typical in Russia, senior people like Gerasimov are appointed more for their loyalty to Putin rather than for any special competence. In fact too much competence can make you a threat and prevent you getting promoted. Either Putin is becoming frustrated at a loyal Gerasimov's incompetence, or Putin is losing confidence in Gerasimv's loyalty. Or both, or neither, who knows what might be going on in Putin's paranoid mind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,156 ✭✭✭Mech1


    Sounds like Putin is looking for a "off ramp" give him a vertical one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,629 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,055 ✭✭✭thatsdaft




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,420 ✭✭✭rolling boh


    Wonder what price Ukraine is paying for this move because it can't last and Putin will do whatever it takes to get Ukraine out .Should Ukraine do a tactical withdraw and target somewhere else ,I don't know but it looks a suicide mission if they think they can keep making ground inside Russia .Hopefully Ukraine can just keep Russia guessing and taking out a lot of the military boththe army and equipment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,830 ✭✭✭✭Headshot




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,267 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    What part of it so far looks like a "suicide mission"? Sure, we've seen videos of the UAF in vehicles being targetted with FPV drones … but usually followed up by them leaping out of the targetted vehicle and taking cover in the surrounding countryside. And then they go on to capture disenchanted Russians by the 10s and 100s.

    Similarly, we have hours and hours and hours of video footage of dead Russians lying all over the Donbas and other Ukrainian killing fields, but almost nothing showing dead Ukrainians. Sure, that could be a propaganda bias, but chances are it's more to do with the Ukrainians being better soldiers … and better humans.

    So as long as they don't over-extend themselves, there's no reason to think that Ukraine can't hold on to these captured areas for months if not years, with little additional cost in terms of lives or money compared to facing the Russians head-on in Vovchansk.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭rogber


    He makes an interesting point which I also saw on BBC: attacks on Russian soil actually more likely to get Russian population behind the war rather than turn them against it. Just basic human psychology.

    Still, Ukraine has nothing to lose at this stage, a morale boost was much needed and at the moment this is certainly providing one. The key thing is not to let their troops become encircled and trapped, but I imagine they have plans to prevent that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭rogber


    Are there any reliable reports on damage to civilian infrastructure and civilian casualties in Kursk? It's impossible to imagine there won't be significant cases of both though though very hard to know where reliable info would come from



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,251 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Who, exactly, is going to stop Ukraine from taking territory in Russia? It's not going to be Russian farmers with pitchforks, and the Rosgvardia won't be much better. If Russia is intent on doing whatever it takes, then that means taking elite troops and elite materials from other parts of the front and recommitting them to this pocket of Russian territory that Ukraine has carved out.

    The Russians can't really do maneuver warfare. They did a bit of it at the start of the invasion, with some notorious calamities and have been stuck relying on attrition via numerical advantage ever since. I can only assume that one reason behind Ukraine trying to rapidly expand their area of control is that they want to pull the Russians this way and that, keeping the battlespace open, and fighting the Russians on the run. The Russians had reconfigured themselves for a dug-in war, but this new front has put a bit of a spanner in those works, and Putin doesn't like it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,525 ✭✭✭RedXIV


    If you think about it though, all the Ukrainians need to do is sow chaos and confusion. I don't imagine the long term plan is to annex a slice of Russian land, instead, what we have here is a huge swathe of Russian land that is rapidly getting depopulated by it's inhabitants, either by evacuation or capture of POWs and by the looks of it, the idea is the spread that chaos rather than a targeted attempt to get to the heart of Russia. That would be too easy to counter, but this is destroying logistical routes, altering the prior understood borders of the conflict and surely it's absolutely crippling morale in the Russia areas close to this? Sure if you're on the other side of the country you won't care, but I don't think the average Ivan in Russia is thinking "Oh they invaded us? Now I want to fight back!" as anyone with that spirit likely enlisted already. The ones remaining are far more likely to be thinking "Oh they invaded us? Oh crap, we are in trouble now for kicking a hornets nest"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,771 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    Is the Russian army really this sh1t or is there a chance they're holding back in case of NATO getting directly involved?

    Nukes were mentioned earlier and it made me think of a youtube video I saw a while back, it was about nuclear weapons/technology in general and the host was talking about the behind the scenes regulations/safety procedures that are required to maintain nuclear arsenals. A bit off topic he said that this is why he thinks Russia's nuclear capabilities are overstated as they are such a basket case and with rampant corruption. I know it's just a youtube channel, but it's the kind of thing that wouldn't surprise me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,251 ✭✭✭✭briany


    It's one way that it could go for ordinary Russians to get a taste of this war firsthand and perhaps put pressure on their government to end it…

    But, if anything, I'd say it's considerably more likely that Putin would use this event as a rallying cry for full mobilisation. From a Russian propagandistic perspective, what could be more rousing than hordes of Ukrainian Nazis looking to destroy the motherland directly?

    Though this obviously depends on how much of the Russian population remains who can be mobilised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,423 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    We're into uncharted territory and this is what scares people.

    Western and Russian people have been fed the propaganda of Russia strong for decades and to see Ukraine (a country that Russia depended on for it's military personnel and hardware manufacturing) invade Russia just turns their thoughts upside down.

    Ukrainians figured out how the blanket dumb bombing won't work when it's putin attacking Russian infrastructure and towns. He doesn't really want to go there yet as he knows it means he lied to people that he was a good leader. It means he led to these events. Everytime he throws someone out a window means it's getting closer to him following the same fate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,343 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Hopefully something happens to these on route to Russia.

    Screenshot_20240812_180959_Samsung Internet.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,669 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Thats a lovely ballistic missile mate.

    Be a shame if anything were to happen to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,055 ✭✭✭thatsdaft




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭rogber


    People in Moscow and Petersburg or Ekaterinburg know Ukraine will make no attempt to occupy territory deep in Russia and probably don't really care much what's happening in Kursk, no more than they care about the hundreds of thousands of soldiers killed or injured so far. Russia is very much a society of "keep your head down, don't get involved, just go on as if nothing is happening", and so huge that panic won't spread. There'll be neither patriotic fervour not fear



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,420 ✭✭✭rolling boh


    Russia is such a huge land mass that sowing the fear we would like is not likely in the main cities my concern about this move is can Ukraine cause as much damage as possible but be able to get out without losing their soldiers who must be the more elite ones on this mission .Have Ukraine enough resources to keep fighting on the move hopefully so .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,438 ✭✭✭embraer170


    It would be great to them make it to Kursk, or at least the road and railway junction south of the city.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,055 ✭✭✭thatsdaft




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,343 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    I know it's a bit random. Russia must of paid up front for these. You would think 🇮🇷 ran would want to keep them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,643 ✭✭✭rogber


    This is the key task and question and still too early to tell. If they hold territory or inflict massive damage and escape it'll be seen as masterstroke.

    On the other hand, if hundreds or thousands of elite soldiers get captured or killed it'll be seen as a big mistake and huge blow to morale.

    Hopefully it'll be scenario 1, but who knows



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,167 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,079 ✭✭✭scottser


    Anybody got a link to a list of potential Russian military and strategic targets within missile range of Kursk?

    They're not fukin about, I'd expect UA to absolutely cripple Russian logistics while they're there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,079 ✭✭✭scottser


    To be fair, the Iranian government need manners put on them. The Iranian people however are golden. Decent, lovely people who, to a man would tell you they hate their regime as much as we do.

    Post edited by scottser on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,615 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Tbf about 20% of the population are religious extremists which the government need their support to exist. But the majority don't seem to fond of the brutal islamic dictatorship.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement