Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings - updated 11/5/24*

19669679699719721031

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 270 ✭✭Geert von Instetten


    The purpose of the international protection system is provide protection to those that require it - processing applications is far from the purpose of the system - that the majority of asylum applicants over the decades of the system being in place are ineligible for international protection indicates exploitation. The extent of the exploitation was recently underscored by the fact that between 50% and 70% of asylum applicants are secondary movements from other EU Member States. In other words, the majority of asylum seekers in the State have travelled through multiple EU Member States, often registering asylum claims, only to then apply in Ireland - that is abuse and exploitation of a system that is unfit for purpose. Limiting employment is a deterrent, there are a multitude of policies of deterrence implemented effectively in EU Member States such as Denmark. Ireland has the highest per capita rate of asylum applicants in the EU, Denmark has one of the lowest. It is only recently, as asylum policy in Ireland has become even less effective, that the asylum figures have increased exponentially.

    Post edited by Geert von Instetten on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,524 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    Is there some reason you think it should tally?

    By which I’m guessing you mean the number of applications rejected in any given year should equal the number of deportations in the same year? As Geert points out in their post - applicants whose claims have been rejected have the right to an appeals process, which can take a considerable length of time to get through, as long as ten years in exceptional cases, with applications from some countries having more success than others:

    Natives of the Democratic Republic of Congo enjoyed the highest success rate in their appeals with 73 per cent having the International Protection Office decision refusing them asylum set aside followed by Zimbabwe (60 per cent) and Malawi and Pakistan (both 46 per cent).

    The lowest success rate in appeals was recorded by applicants from Georgia and Algeria with only 15 per cent having the IPO decision on their status overturned.

    Other countries whose applicants had low success rates on appeal included Nigeria and Albania.

    IPAS chairperson, Hilkka Becker, said the tribunal had made a significant contribution to the international protection system in Ireland by making the process more efficient and ensuring its consistency “with fairness and natural justice.”


    https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/number-of-appeals-by-people-denied-asylum-in-ireland-up-over-300-last-year-1640917.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭amykl_1987




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,524 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    It’s like trying to argue human rights with ISIS supporters, the only views acceptable to to them are the ones they agree with.


    Who are the “ISIS supporters” in that argument? Because from what it looks like, it’s the people who are trying to argue that people should be deprived of human rights are trying to make an argument that appeals to the masses.

    It doesn’t make one bit of difference who decides whose point of view is more correct, that’s the beauty of an already existing, established and respected legal system which makes determinations about the validity of any arguments either way, which some people appear quite willing to pretend doesn’t exist as it’s inconvenient for the arguments they’re trying to make.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,524 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    Your figures are clear demonstration that the international protection system isn’t being exploited though? If anything the high number of rejections indicates that anyone attempting to is simply unable to exploit the international protection system. There are ways to get around the system and exploit illegal methods of entering into and remaining in the country illegally, but that is not the system, it’s outside of the international protection system!

    Limiting employment is not a deterrent, limiting employment has a negative impact on the economy of any country, and there’s plenty of evidence to support that, whereas there is no evidence to suggest that limiting employment acts as a deterrent to illegal immigration:

    https://theconversation.com/hotels-and-employment-arent-major-pull-factors-for-refugees-heres-what-really-draws-people-to-move-211796

    https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/scarring-effects-employment-bans-asylum-seekers



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,524 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    I wouldn’t expect they should be though. Is there some reason you think they should be similar? In order to be similar, or even remotely close, there would have to be in place an immediate deportation order on rejection of their application, and deportation proceedings alone take months, on top of an already costly, lengthy and complicated appeals process following rejection of an application.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 270 ✭✭Geert von Instetten


    It absolutely indicates that the system is being exploited, that IPAT are capable of distinguishing between valid and invalid asylum claims is the bare minimum, to present that as evidence of a functioning asylum system is deluded. If the majority of those applying for a Government scheme are ineligible, the scheme is evidently unfit for propose and potentially being exploited - if the overwhelming majority of applicants for Jobseeker’s Allowance were being refused because they were in employment, the Department of Social Protection would be launching an investigation into the issue. At present estimates, between 50% and 70% of asylum seekers in the State are secondary movements from the rest of the EU, that is manifestly exploitation of the system. Policies of deterrence include limiting employment, which the referenced article notes has a “modest” impact, though I’m of the opinion that increasing the threshold for protection is the primary deterrent, these policies are effective, as Denmark demonstrates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭amykl_1987


    7300 rejected applications in last 20 months, under 100 deportations.

    Surely the appeals process isn't that slow given there would already be a stack of rejected applications prior to that or could it be the government want it that way? Is the will to do it there at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,524 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭amykl_1987


    Post edited by amykl_1987 on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,444 ✭✭✭Viscount Aggro


    Dublin airport is pathetic.

    I went through arrivals area recently... a few immigration officers standing around, joking and laughing.

    Yes, they were stopping certain people on the tarmac, and it's racial profiling going on.

    It needs to be more like Frankfurt airport. The self scanning entry gates on arrival. No passport to scan? You are not getting in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,524 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    It isn’t the least bit deluded to present evidence that the system is operating as intended by demonstrating that it is operating as intended, regardless of the number of applications, regardless of the number of applications approved or rejected. There is no indication or reason to suspect exploitation within the system. There is every indication of exploitation outside of the system, which is something which Denmark will find itself having to grapple with in the coming years as a result of it’s immigration policies which have been deemed to be in violation of international human rights law.

    I don’t care one way or the other for your opinion if you haven’t any evidence to support it. As for your argument equating exploitation of the welfare system with exploitation of the immigration system, well that’s an argument that’s been put forward before, without any evidence:

    https://archive.ph/yctAn


    No mystery there, it’s David McWilliams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 270 ✭✭Geert von Instetten


    Assessing the validity of asylum claims is one aspect of the asylum system, that it is functioning properly is the minimum expected. It remains the case that between 50% to 70% of asylum seekers in the State are secondary movements from the EU - to argue that the system is functioning because IPAT are capable of issuing first instance decisions is absolutely deluded. As your own sources indicate, policies of deterrence are effective, Denmark demonstrates that and I expect that the EU will follow eventually.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I believe Ireland had the highest rate for one month recently, is that the case longer term?

    Ireland's not in a position to implement the Danish approach for numerous reasons but the most obvious one is that we can't simply push people towards other EU countries, which is all Denmark appears to be doing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    There's been several posts on this thread of 'research' and 'facts' found to have come from eugenics sites.

    All were under the guise of looking for reasonable debate while demeaning IPAs in some form as an inferior group.

    Personally I just consider it hatemongering and don't think too much about whether it's from people who'd meet the criteria for eugenicist, far-right, xenophobic, white-supremicists, hard right, extremist cult etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,868 ✭✭✭H_Lime


    Purely as a counterpoint in the spirit of fairness....

    What do you think fionnula and fintan would do if an ipas centre was to open up across the road in their leafy suburb of well to do folk? The suburb with tall electric gates, private education and private medical insurance.

    They're not going to be draped in tri colours at a barracade being tear gassed. They're going to pick up the phone and ring the developer friend who's right with (insert any party) and whisper in his shell like that this just won't do.

    Ten or twenty of those phone calls to the right ears is far more effective.

    Never be dismissive of an angry proletariat, let them eat cake tends to lead to problems...

    Just an observation :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Well if they have tall electric gates, they probably wouldn't be that bothered. There is social housing already in those areas. Some "natives" get lucky enough to live in places they could never afford on their own. If you want to kick them back to Coolock and replace them with IPAs then you can break it to them.

    I just think it's kind of silly in this day and age to be falling for grifters' nonsense. It's not some mysterious bogemen of your "Fionnula and Fintan" sipping champagne and thinking 'how can we fuck with the plebs today my dear - oh, I know, wouldn't it be jolly good if we got some Syrians in claim asylum".

    Thinking you would have some kind of victory by putting possible chancers up in expensive luxury accommodation to piss off those imagined bogeymen is bonkers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 114 ✭✭Scar001


    So the 7300 rejections in the last 20 months.

    Have they to fend for themselves and paddle their own canoe??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭amykl_1987


    NO. They appeal courtesy of the support of the NGO sector and drag it out forever. I didn't realise the appeals took so long



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 270 ✭✭Geert von Instetten


    Ireland has the highest per capita rate of asylum applications per recent EU statistics, yes. In as far as deterrence is concerned, Ireland is an island on the edge of the EU, Denmark is a country bordering Sweden and Germany, two perennial asylum destinations, the idea that Ireland is in less of a position to implement policies of deterrence is laughable. Between 50% and 70% of asylum applicants in the State are secondary movements, policies of deterrence would deter that majority from abandoning existing asylum claims in other EU Member States and exploiting the asylum system.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,017 ✭✭✭jackboy


    The majority will stay and eventually will be granted citizenship. They will get all the supports they need until then. Processing applications is a waste of time and money as we will never deport significant numbers. We would actually be better off scrapping processing as in reality it serves no purpose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    It's just when I'd think of somebody with no identity my first thought thought would be the hatebots spewing back whatever the algorithms have told them this week... 'bogus' asylum seekers, burn the mosques, Ireland is full, it's the NGOs, it's ROG, it's the hoteliers, it's the MSM, 'safe' countries...

    Does Ireland even have the best welfare rate? I tried googling myself and actually couldn't find a comparison.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    By recent statistics you mean that one recent month or were there more?

    Ireland can't implement Denmark's approach because we can't simply push people towards other EU countries, we're too dependent on the continued success of the union. Not to mention the folly in investing heavily in something which has no long term future.

    I'm not sure how Denmark even intends to continue it's approach anyway, now that it's had this about turn and wants into the migration pact



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 270 ✭✭Geert von Instetten


    Ah, interesting. I was under the impression you misunderstood your own article, it appears you understood it perfectly well and are engaging in disinformation - I expect it of you, though a little less blatantly perhaps. Please, point out exactly where Denmark has indicated that it intends to opt-in to the EU Migration Pact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭amykl_1987


    And where will we house the many hundreds of thousands of people that will inevitably flood in once that happens?

    I'm currently trying to buy an apartment in Ashbourne. It's a soul destroying process, mental torture. I've been outbid significantly previously as there is huge demand and poor supply currently. This idea will just force an awful lot more Irish people to emigrate, your teachers, nurses etc. to chase better pay, better working condition, better work life balance etc. in the long run thats bad for us who don't want to live in Canada, Australia, new Zealand or Dubai etc

    Govt policy Is just very short sighted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭amykl_1987


    What other European country is promising keys to own door accommodation within 4 months? Rent free too ......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 114 ✭✭Scar001


    And therein lies the crux of the situation.

    7300 scammers who should have all benefits cut.

    They won't be long self deporting when the free handouts stop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    You'll no doubt be able to show me where that's being promised?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,254 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    My apologies, I thought Denmark was trying to join a migration pact 2.0.

    Instead it's working with an alternate smaller group to create 'complimentary' measures.

    Much of a muchness I'd think, neither points to Denmark being so happy with it's independent stance, as we had been led to believe. I guess they see the writing on the wall.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement