Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Vice President Kamala Harris vs Donald Trump 2024

1138139141143144294

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    The gas thing is, if they were honest, they COULD defend Trump. They all could.

    The problem is they know if they are to be honest in their defence, they won't get any votes. The only reason being that the positions that Trump has are not popular positions.

    *Women should not be equal to men.

    *The white race is the top of the food chain.

    *America should be a Christian nation first and foremost.

    *Billionaires and the monied class should have more rights than average people.

    *If you can't afford healthcare, that's your fault.

    *If you can't afford childcare, that's your fault.

    *There should be no such thing as an upwardly mobile society, or society as we know it.

    *People should know their place.

    *Trans and gay people are not real. They're sick people or looking for attention.

    *Profit is the most important item. Everything serves profit.

    The closest thing we've seen them comes to own this is the Project 2025 handbook, which of course, the campaign has distanced itself from as its immensely unpopular and batsh*t insane.

    This is actually the most frustrating thing about arguing with Trumpers. They refuse to actually own the positions they believe in and constantly deny they feel this way because it is completely unpalatable and yes, very f*cking weird to believe this stuff in the 21st century.

    Post edited by Flaneur OBrien on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,175 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Who Trump?

    What had Harris to do with covering up his cognitive decline?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,880 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    Ended diplomatic relations with Iran, used Ukraine as a political plaything, destabilised NATO, wrote love letters to his dear Kim, inflamed the Israel/Palestine situation….That all definitely helped avoid WW3….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,880 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    IMG_7564.jpeg

    Kamabla ? Joe is coming back ?…. Desperate stuff, I really expected better than this junk



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    You seem to get confused on the fact that Dems don't worship their candidate in the same weird way as Republicans. Most would prefer someone younger in 2020 but he had a very solid presidency. I would have preferred he announced stepping back earlier but as soon as he announced he was rerunning it was going to be hard for anyone to gather support against the incumbent. I can have preferred options and still be realistic about the odds of candidates getting elected and nominated.

    I supported him as the best option for Dems to rally behind as the incumbent. I was worried a campaign would be unable to shift away from Biden effectively but I was wrong on that one.

    If via deux ex machina the Dems were forced to run Biden I would support him again but prefer if it was a different candidate.

    Do you have similar issues with Haley and Cruz suddenly changing heart about Trump when they could no longer win?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,175 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Did you sleep through the Worst economic performance since the depression which happened while he was President?

    And the conflict in the middle east was exacerbated by his pulling out of the Iran nuclear deal and his emboldening Israel even more.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,967 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Heres the thing.

    In both 2020 and 2024 , would it have been better all round if a younger more vibrant candidate was selected to run against Trump?

    Absolutely , but in 2020 and until recently this year , the candidate was Joe Biden , who on his absolute worst days is an infinitely better politician and more importantly an infinitely better human being Donald Trump so there really wasn't a decision to be made on preference.

    Do I think Joe Biden is capable of being President for another 4 years ?

    Yes I do.

    Do I think Joe Biden would be capable of winning the Election after the Debate performance and the media furore that followed?

    No , I don't.

    So , he stepped down (or agreed to the request/demand to do so) without causing a fuss and without kicking and screaming and dragging his party into a dirty fight that would have ruined their chances of winning the election.

    He could have refused to listen and taken the fight to the convention and turned it into a utter sh!tshow but he didn't, again proving the measure of the man.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,398 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    So just to recap again. Some billionaire donors and other unelected people such as the Clintons and Obamas, removed the candidate of the Democratic Party that had been voted for by 14 million Democrats because these unelected people thought the candidate selected for the Democratic Party by a democratic process, by Democrats was too risky. That’s what you are saying.
    Explain it to me again.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    A dead skunk would do better, and smell better to boot.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,955 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Ah yes you are factoring Covid and 2020 into the figures which is completely disengenuous.

    There is no point me even trying to reason with that sort of reasoning, or shall I say lack of reasoning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,026 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I wouldn't say it's disengenous at all. Every President has to deal with the events which occur before and during their Presidency. You can't tout "No wars started under Trump" when it comes to Ukraine and Israel and then "What the hell, you're counting Covid? That's completely unfair!"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,175 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Explain to us why Trump should not have to answer for his role in allowing Covid to spread and the impact that that had on the economy.

    Like, you could argue about global conflicts that evolve over time, or similar when it comes to financial crashes that have come about after practices that stretched over 10-15 years.

    But Trump was a very active participant in the management of Covid in the US. That's his, he owns it. He sought all the attention through press conferences and the likes, he put himself front and center on that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 339 ✭✭2Greyfoxes


    I hope you are correct. I just don't think Kamala Harris has enough to winthis race, especially after Biden dropped out. From what I remember of USA politics, a candidate dropping out and being replaced has never secured a win for that replacement... especially this close to the election.

    Either way, I think Kamala Harris would be a safe choice for the USA right about now. A calm not going to rock the boat sensible politics with a background as a prosecutor could help fix the divide in the USA.

    I had hoped that she had of chosen Mark Kellyz he seemed like a decent bloke, and him being an astronaut seemed to put him in a place where he is more rational and calm, attributes we need in politics.

    Clever word play may win debates, but it doesn't make it true.

    Understanding and explaining things, is not the same as justifying them, if in doubt… please re-read this statement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Well, if that's true, Kamala should be hated and booed by the *checks notes* over 10,000 DEMOCRATS that were in the arena last night to see the unveiling of her VP pick.

    Is that right?

    Everybody knew it was the right thing for Biden to step down, including him after he had time to think about it. If he really didn't want to step down, don't you think he would have A: fought it through the courts? Or B: hung on til the convention?

    Can you point out one democrat that is campaigning to have Biden as the presidential nominee? If it's as undemocratic as you allude, there must be some movement made up of democrats that have said, "We made our bed, we have to lie in it, come hell or high water".



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,967 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Even if you don't count the Covid period , it was still the weakest economy in 50 years (only GWB had slower growth in the back half of his second term).

    By every single economic measure the "Trump Economy" from 2017 to late 2019 was weaker on every single economic indicator than anyone you care to mention.

    The one thing he was supposed to be good at, he failed at - miserably.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,398 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Or, let’s put aside the preference, never mind votes of 14 million Democrats.
    If, in a months time, for some reason it is decided, again by unelected billionaire donors and unelected Democratic Party grandees, that Kamala Harris is unelectable, too risky, to quote another poster. Would you as a democrat (with large and small d) support the replacement candidate?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,398 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Ah yes, anyone who questions the volte face of Biden loyalists must be a Trump fanboy. Of course.
    Now tell us how a small number of billionaire donors deciding who the Democratic Party presidential candidate will be, against the votes of 14 million Democrats is, eh, democratic.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,676 ✭✭✭circadian




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,574 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Jesus, they must be pumping the cokes and cheese burgers into intravenously.

    Beyond weird.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,543 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Some billionaire donors and other unelected people such as the Clintons and Obamas, removed the candidate of the Democratic Party that had been voted for by 14 million Democrats because these unelected people thought the candidate selected for the Democratic Party by a democratic process, by Democrats was too risky.

    Biden wasn't removed by anyone. He decided not to stand as did Jason Palmer and Dean Phillips. Biden cited his withdrawal as being "in the best interest of my party and the country".

    What we believe is that some senior Dem figures such as Nancy Pelosi spoke with Biden and told him that his numbers were falling (speculation is that his team were shielding him from the full details of this).

    That some are looking to twist this shows how disingenuous they can be - is there that little to support the Rep candidate on?

    Again, you're trying to suggest some conspiracy at work when there is nothing to suggest this.

    Biden withdrew before he recieved the formal approval from the party. Harris now has that formal approval. Are you seriously suggesting that a second conspiracy will look to ignore that approval and have her turfed out?
    FFS 🙄



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,967 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    After the convention?

    That would likely be illegal or at the very least legally very dubious - A bit like how Trump is now stuck with Vance regardless of how utterly awful he is as they have now been confirmed at the convention.

    As with the Electoral college (and what prompted the January 6th nonsense) , Party Presidential candidate are not officially confirmed until the electors have cast their votes at the convention.

    So , once we get past next week (the 16th I think) , barring death or serious illness the election will be Harris/Walz vs Trump/Vance.

    But before that convention vote , they can do what they like (legally speaking) although it would likely be very damaging electorally.

    But to answer your question directly - Were I to have a vote (and I don't) ANY Democratic party Candidate running against Trump and the GOP would get my vote and I would hope that a majority of US voters would do the same thing.

    The growing influence of extreme Christian Nationalists in the current GOP should terrify people and anything and everything should be done to ensure that they do not get the opportunity to implement a single iota of their Project 2025 manifesto.

    Given the US voting system, that means voting for the Democrats , no matter what name is on the ballot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    The site is being borky, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and ask again.

    Can you name me one Democrat with an ongoing issue over picking Harris?

    If it's so detrimental to democracy as you are saying, there must be a sizeable underground gathering of democrats that are trying to overturn this, unfair and unjust coup of Joe Biden?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 30,788 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Two things can be true simultaneously:

    There was, unquestionably, a massive pressure campaign by senior Democrats and donors to encourage Biden to drop out.

    That pressure campaign (and eventual decision) was driven by a historically dire debate performance, nosediving polling numbers and a growing public consensus that Biden wasn't up to the job. The 'behind closed doors' scheming was driven by a very clear public reaction to Biden's performance and polling chances. And there was enough time for that fateful debate to actually change the course of the campaign.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,841 ✭✭✭Rawr


    The energy around her ticket lately seems to indicate optimism and even a small degree of excitment about the Harris/Walz ticket. It's going to be a fight still, and their chances of getting the vote out appear to be improving more over time. That's not to say that's quarenteed to continue improving, but compared to the Trump/Vance ticket they seem to have talking points that resonate more and have a VP pick that doesn't reek of MAGA wierdness.

    As long as they can keep this energy going and do at least an OK job in debates, they could actually win it. In comparison the Trump people seriously need to look at their strategy. If our own crop of Trump-fans are anything to go by, they've haven't got much to work on right now.



  • Posts: 832 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I was hoping for Kelly too and he definitely would have been a stronger pick but it's all to fight for and if for no other reason that those that you have stated. Trump has already given the orders for the destruction of America if and when he doesn't win. Kamala may not be everyone's ideal as Commander in Chief but what she does have is the ability to bring everyone together and that is all they have left.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 22,875 ✭✭✭✭2smiggy


    Biden before he dropped out was 4/1 , Harris is now 10/11.

    I know very well odds don't win elections, but for an event with such a large volume of money bet on it, it takes a lot to move the odds. It currently has just under €53M on the betfair exchange. Donald on the other hand is going the other way.

    Things are going very very badly for poor Donald and team weird, and they know it. Anyone else who survived an assassination attempt only a few weeks back would expect to be rocketing in the polls and betting. Donald then choose Vance and it's all shite topped with more shite since then. Marvelous stuff



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,020 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,398 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Sure, everyone believes Biden had a long dark tea time of the soul and decided to step down.

    Are you seriously claiming that all the political insiders and all the veteran American political journalists who reported donors threatening to pull funding unless Biden was replaced are wrong and you are right and MSNBC, CBS, the Washington Post, New York Times, etc, who reported this, are, like me are “disingenuously twisting” the facts?

    Is that really what you are claiming?

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/04/us/politics/biden-donors.html

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,398 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Jason Palmer from American Samoa! Absolutely the same as a sitting US president who was determined to run, had expressed his determination to run in interviews, suddenly deciding not to run. How disingenuous can one get.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement