Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DAB Thread

1242527293033

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 415 ✭✭PixelCrafter


    I don’t really think there’s much incentive to turn FM off - it’s cheap to run and the technology is still available.

    It won’t be countries turning it off, other than ones that have very state dominated broadcasting like Norway, rather it will be commercial factors.

    If the audiences dry up you could see ILRs begin to fail commercially. They have significant overheads and often quite big rural areas to cover.

    When you look at how long AM transmissions stayed in air, mostly from PSBs, you can see that some FM services could well be on air in 2050 and beyond, but they’re unlikely to be commercial.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 525 ✭✭✭vswr


    5G Broadcast has already been baked into the current 5G 3GPP specs, and kit is available for it's use.

    It will allow video and multimedia broadcast. Ireland has signed up to a Euro wide agreement to make use of a frequency block around 400/500 MHz for this. What will be available is not known.

    Currently though, 5G is only available via a mobile network, how those arrangements with a Broadcaster to allow use of a mobile network, or switch to a broadcasters network when launching an app remains to be seen.

    DTT was also accelerated to allow for the 700Mhz band withdrawal (worlwide mandate, where Comreg would be fined if not adhered to) to allow for 4G and 5G mobile phone operators to use it worldwide. RTE would have happily sat on Analogue otherwise.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 525 ✭✭✭vswr


    From a technical point of view, DAB offers zero real world enhancements to FM - sound quality is very often worse than FM - and whatever limited spectral savings are made are moot as the 88-108MHz band is of limited attraction for alternative use. Ironically - the spectrum DAB would take up would be of more use to other operators than the FM spectrum it would replace.

    Sound quality is actually great if you use a decent bitrate codec for DAB, or some of the more recent DAB+ codecs work great on lower bit rates…. but as always, money wins.

    I wouldn't say 88-108 MHz is of no real use. Europe has run out of frequencies for ATC. There was numerous pushes to try open up 136-143 MHz for ATC use (some countries and military do anyway), but there is far to much established services using it…. going the opposite way, I would see even 3 or 4 MHz being a VERY attractive prospect to European ATC.

    Also, the propagation effects are very well understood and would be idea band for future land based aeronautical data systems. Some services are in use on the continent, but are contending with existing mobile phone spectrum… 88-108 would be ideal for this use.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 415 ✭✭PixelCrafter


    Well, it's not worldwide, rather it's an ITU region and mandatory European standard.

    The bands used are harmonised though to ensure that handsets and devices don't have to be country-specific in the European market.

    The VHF spectrum isn't much use for broadband though.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 525 ✭✭✭vswr


    Was harmonised at WRC 2015…only currently implemented in Europe and parts of Asia

    https://www.telecoms.com/regulation/itu-globally-allocates-700-mhz-band-to-mobile

    Who said they had to be broadband? considering 20Mhz of spectrum was going for millions for mobile. There are numerous ATC applications crying out for bandwidth that VHF-DL cannot satisfy currently, so move to expensive sat services.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,498 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    The BIG killer of radio is that it's not in your iPhone or Android phone. If it isn't there, to a lot of people it doesn't exist. That's the reality of it. What's happening right now is a much bigger deal that the switch from AM to FM or the launch of DAB. It's death of over the air broadcasting and appificiation of 'radio'.

    This is 100% the issue. It's not that long ago that all phones had FM radio, then Steve Jobs decided we didn't need one, and that was the beginning of the end.

    And is anyone buying a 'kitchen radio' or 'alarm clock radio' anymore? Or are they buying an Alexa or Google Home device that can do everything a radio can and infinitely more? And Carplay and Android Auto will become more and more the standard, to the point that car manufacturers will be thinking about removing radio receivers altogether. So everywhere you listen to an FM radio, the internet is chipping away at that market.

    So 5, 10 years from now, the landscape will look very, very different as listening preferences continue to change and 5G and its successors develop to the point that wireless internet is available absolutely everywhere.

    The viability of a DAB rollout depends on convincing the public that this is something they need, but if there's no real selling point for the consumer - either in comparison to internet or FM - why is anyone going to go out and buy a DAB radio? There is no compelling case to do so.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 525 ✭✭✭vswr


    The viability of a DAB rollout depends on convincing the public that this is something they need, but if there's no real selling point for the consumer - either in comparison to internet or FM - why is anyone going to go out and buy a DAB radio? There is no compelling case to do so

    That should be the case, but wasn't for Ireland. Why not provide a compelling case? Rather than doing half arsed "trials" for years on end?

    In Europe and the UK radios are still being bought en-masse.. you can pick up a half decent, loud, DAB/AM/FM radio for 10 or 20 euro easy enough…

    Anyway, I still think it will be a case of the government having to move to a digital medium, rather than want to.

    Most likely as TV licence money declines, and they don't address RTE salaries, first thing that gets looked at is "how can we provide this service for cheaper?".

    The FM kit needs to be maintained/replaced…. someone is going to look at that and think "hmmm, for an initial CAPEX, I can reduce my overall OPEX and run multiple stations for cheaper"… that will be the end for AM/FM in Ireland.

    What that digital solution is, remains to be seen. There are Government policies to be able to provide Broadcast comms in emergency situations, which cellular solutions are not very robust against, so you come back to an FM / DAB broadcast infrastructure type model.

    It's all well and good broadcasting updates over 5G, when the base stations in the area are out of action

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 525 ✭✭✭vswr


    anyone remember London 7/7… where mobile infrastructure was damaged/overloaded/ and purposefully switched off in certain areas?

    edit: similar occurred in Paris in 2015, when they didn't know if remote control devices were still in the area… mobile network was shutdown… while some people were sharing their home wifi, there were reports of complete fixed internet connectivity also being blocked at the time, around areas of interest.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,498 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Why not provide a compelling case?

    What could the compelling case be?

    Let's imagine a scenario in which all the RTE and commercial services are available nationwide on DAB tomorrow, and they're supplemented by a few playlisted music services and some talk radio stations from abroad - this is the absolute best case content-wise.

    And imagine you're a guy working in DID Electrical.

    Now, convince me, as a consumer of content and a purchaser of electronic devices, why I need to buy a DAB radio when I can get every single one of these stations through my phone, Alexa and CarPlay.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,498 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    This is a reason not to shut down the FM network, it is not an argument to implement a DAB network alongside it. No one is suggesting we shut down FM.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 525 ✭✭✭vswr


    Convince you? You've made it plainly clear there is no convincing you.

    You might be happy with setting up all those streaming services, paying your subscription, using your phone all the time as a radio etc…

    However, you personally don't speak for everyone. Some people don't like doing that. There is still a huge market share of people who want to buy a 20 or 30 eur radio and off they go to listen to live radio. What makes it compelling is variety and choice.

    There are numerous studies from around Europe which anticipates DAB to be at least 35-40% of the market share by 2035, where AM/FM is anticipated to be less than 10% (mainly due to cost). Which makes it still commercially viable well into next decade.

    The voluntary offering of DAB in Ireland has sailed though IMO… RTE's "choice offering" was poor, along with limited coverage for trials…. how can you offer to the masses, when you actually don't offer to the masses? Independent offerings were stifled from the get go to even think of becoming commercially viable.

    As I said, it will be a case of some sort of digital offering having to be introduced, rather than wanting to.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 525 ✭✭✭vswr


    I was more inferring to Government policies of a broadcast network being available during emergencies, which would counter any 5G cellular offering.

    ergo, when FM eventually becomes uneconomical to run compared to digital offerings, DAB is a potential option.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,498 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Convince you? You've made it plainly clear there is no convincing you

    Again with the personal antagonism. You don't need to convince me, I already have two DAB radios. I was very clearly referring to a hypothetical customer walking in the door of a shop and you were completely unable to come up with a pitch.

    You might be happy with setting up all those streaming services, paying your subscription, using your phone all the time as a radio etc…

    I don't really use my phone as a radio. I listen to FM a lot, I have an internet radio in my kitchen, and my phone is usually used for Spotify. But what subscription am I paying? TuneIn and the alternatives are all free, and one service gives you pretty much every radio station on the planet, so "all those streaming services" is not accurate, it's one app.

    There is still a huge market share of people who want to buy a 20 or 30 eur radio and off they go to listen to live radio. What makes it compelling is variety and choice.

    Variety and choice is exactly the problem. Best case, you're offering me maybe twenty or thirty stations via DAB when I have 10,000 via the Internet. There's no contest. My 75 year old father loves his Alexa because it's so easy, he just shouts at it to play Newstalk and off he goes, and the proportion of people comfortable with smart tech is only going up.

    I agree that eventually, the EU will probably mandate analogue shutdown but we're at least 10 if not 20 years away from that.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 525 ✭✭✭vswr


    It's not personal at all. You've made your point clear as day as to where you stand. Your bias will feed into this "hypothetical". In what scenario would I present evidence, and you say "well real life me disagrees, but hypothetical me is convinced"…. there is none…

    and before you take this as some sort of attack… the above stance is OK. But, it is not what is currently seen in the market and what market projections hold.

    Like people who don't want to pick a film to watch, but will happily watch Rambo on RTE because it happened to be on. Mass market can actually be stifled by too much choice. Too much noise, too many options, revenue streams stretched far too thin.

    A varied, small size offering is usually key in broadcast.

    TuneIn, while free now, is starting to see a migration of services away to other independent, optional subscription based platforms (point and case the BBC and all Global Radio stations in the UK), but, it's OK, I can access that online only station in Texas, which specialises in line dancing music.

    So if I want to listen to BBC or Heart UK, straight away that's 2 new sign ups.

    You also pay an internet subscription to access these services and need to be able to access said network, which in this day and age, can still be a potential issue.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,498 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    revenue streams stretched far too thin.

    I totally agree - Ireland can barely support the stations we have, so where is the revenue going to come from to make all these new DAB offerings profitable?

    So if I want to listen to BBC or Heart UK, straight away that's 2 new sign ups.

    As of today, BBC radio is coming through loud and clear on TuneIn. I don't listen to Heart UK but I would imagine there are 500 similar stations I could listen to instead. And the suggestion that adding another app to my phone is some major ordeal is a bit odd, most people have dozens already.

    But since DAB can't provide these stations either, how is it better? That's what I'm asking, how do you sell DAB to the average consumer?

    ou also pay an internet subscription to access these services and need to be able to access said network, which in this day and age, can still be a potential issue.

    This is a red herring. The number of people who don't have internet in 2024 is pretty small and only going to get smaller. And the people who don't are absolutely not the ones who will go out and adopt DAB. So who's your target market? Probably the less than 1% who used DAB during its trials.

    And that is where it all falls apart. You're talking huge amounts of public money to provide a service that a tiny, tiny number of people actively want. It's just not a good idea and until we are mandated to switch off FM, it's unlikely to happen.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 415 ✭✭PixelCrafter


    It already is the case that 4G and 5G are pretty much available everywhere and fibre to home rollouts are ramping up. Talking about ultra fast broadband being ubiquitous in the future is a bit of a conversation from 5+ years ago at this stage. It already is the case that most people have access to ultra fast broadband if they want it, either via cellular data or fixed fibre / cable broadband.

    There are a few areas which don't have access, but they're by far the exception and not the norm. Struggling to get access to broadband is just not really a widespread experience anymore, and on mobile networks in Ireland it's quite cheap and in most cases the caps are just quite theoretical, only to be used if you're taking utterly taking the proverbial out the unlimited* data.

    I mean, even looking at rural areas now, there is phenomenally good FTTH in a lot of quite rural areas with that expanding quite rapidly.

    Often the worst spots for broadband at the moment are older urban areas, which are seeing FTTH rollout happening a bit more slowly due to complicated ducts etc, but it's getting there.

    I just find sometimes we have policy discussions based on a decade ago or on situations that are genuinely outliers nowadays.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,751 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Broadcasts advantage now is in dense areas, not rural really.

    Slightly poorer than average car radio (Pioneer, surprisingly) can't hold on to any stations in the middle of Donegal, but I've enough data to play a FLAC album on Plexamp.

    By comparison, I can get ~15 radio stations on my phones FM radio inside my office but two of the three mobile networks only have 2G!

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 415 ✭✭PixelCrafter


    A lot of that issue in urban areas though is to do with the buildings themselves. There is likely 4G/5G it's just being deflected by the structures around you. That can be improved with microcells, but also should really be supplemented with indoor WiFi.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,038 ✭✭✭JDxtra


    I can’t see a DAB network ever launching in Ireland, it simply doesn’t make any sense at this point. It hasn’t made sense for at least 10 years.

    As mentioned by others, there is no real advantage for listeners - so nobody is too bothered. FM works, for anything else they can just use streaming.

    Next, a lot of people have no access to a DAB radio outside of modern cars. FM radios last for years - they are basic electronics that just keep going. If they do break, most likely replacement is an Alexa/Google Home - not a new FM radio.

    Young people really, really don’t care - if it’s not on TikTok, it doesn’t exist in their eyes. Audience for radio broadcasts is getting smaller and smaller.

    Even if there was some mandate from outside the state to shutdown FM, I still can’t see that happening within 5 years. By that point DAB will probably be on the chopping block itself.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,900 ✭✭✭The J Stands for Jay


    When BBC moved off of TuneIn, it just meant I had to be a little more precise: "Ok Google, play BBC radio 6 music". I've never had to sign up to BBC Sounds.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 415 ✭✭PixelCrafter


    The main issue is broadcasters / content trying to cut out the middleman. You’re seeing a lot of that in TV streaming too.

    I assume BBC plans to be able to insert preroll ads outside the UK.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 100 ✭✭Windowsnut


    say "Liza tarbuck radio" to your smart speaker - no need for DAB or FM anymore…

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,989 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    It's possible that the RTE might bring DAB+ up again, at some point. Reason being is that the RTE is in financial difficulty, and if they were ever to introduce a household charge ( irrespective if one owns a TV or radio or not ) they would have to bring a bit more to the table than 4 radio stations and two or three TV channels.

    Operational cost of DAB+ is rather cheap, compared to everything else.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭SimonMaher


    There are a ton of circular discussions in this thread which I obviously enjoy but try to only jump on to once or twice a year :)

    However, I was up Three Rock mountain with an old Pirate buddy on Tuesday afternoon and we got to have a listen to some DAB from Northern Ireland. We were able to pick up the Newry SSDAB Mux and I was interested (and happy) to hear a good amount of local content on it from Wild Country, Lisburn Live, Bounce and Eirewave alongside Caroline, Panjab and Rewind.

    It's good to have the big group brand extensions available on digital but the local stuff is great too and I think there is real potential in the combination of the two when CnaM eventually get around to licencing it all. In London last week, there were 147 stations available on DAB ranging from the big brands to some really good local stuff with a proper London sound to them.

    This is a low risk thing - lets licence the MUXes. People will either take up the MUX licence or they won't, stations will either pay for carriage or they won't and listeners will either tune in or they won't. It's all about the content and that's as it should be.

    Simon

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,989 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    The choice of variety on DAB+ in the UK is amazing. Once you're used to it you'll find that in the Republic of Ireland FM radio is stuck somewhere in 2008 or 2010. In the ROI commercial radio is operating under the idea that every licensed FM station has it's own protected patch, region and territory and DAB+ would be a threat. In reality the end consumer and listener is looking elsewhere like in the internet / smartphone etc…

    I am surprised that you picked up Caroline or Eirewave etc… as they have the weakest signal in Newry. I presume you had a specific antenna?

    BBC can probably be picked up with more ease on the Three Rock either from NI or from Wales.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 201 ✭✭timothydec77


    I bought an Internet Radio and listen to podcasts.

    I wanted choice.

    I want to listen to the content I want when I want to.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,861 ✭✭✭Charles Slane


    I bought a Sony sound system a few years ago - the internet radio service was discontinued a couple of years later.

    I also bought a Roberts internet radio - it can't play the BBC radio stations anymore since they dropped the Shoutcast service.

    I also bought a Marantz sound sytem - now I can't access internet radio on it without subscribing to VTuner.

    Internet radio is great, until it isn't. You're at the mercy of providers and having a broadband connection. There's still so much to be said for broadcast radio, both on FM and hopefully in the future a DAB+ service.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,498 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I also bought a Roberts internet radio - it can't play the BBC radio stations anymore since they dropped the Shoutcast service.

    BBC Radio 2 is coming through loud and clear on my Roberts R100 right now.

    There is no scenario in which the BBC stations will be available on DAB, so if BBC is important for you, then it's a massive plus for internet and a big strike against DAB.

    You're at the mercy of providers and having a broadband connection

    Everyone has broadband and mobile internet. It's like saying getting FM and DAB radio means you're at the mercy of the ESB.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,761 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    I noticed when listening to BBC on Alexa and Google home devices that it now plays through BBC sounds but their radio channels are still available on TuneIn on my car and phone

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 201 ✭✭timothydec77


    Unless there is a directive from EU in relation to DAB and DAB plus I can't see anything happening in Ireland.

    I have no problem with DAB plus.

    Our choice is either FM or some form of intermet based system.

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on


Advertisement