Sinn Fein and how do they form a government dilemma

On the subject of defamation,a bill has been aporoved by cabinet to end Slapp's and is expected to be passed in the next session,I heard on the wireless this morning

I was talking about them not chasing the far right vote. The poster contradicted that.
Speaking up for their electorate is not 'chasing a far right vote', it's representing people.

Your personal anecdotal experiences nor mine is going to get the information required.

Lets see if these 'audits' get produced and we see how locations are actually chosen.

What relevance does this have to anything here? So what you once voted for another party other than SF. The fact is for years you have been defending SF and promoting their policies. Personally I don't have a problem it's a politics forum and anyone interested to post here is going to care some what about politics. With that goes support for certain political policies/parties.

The hard fact is for SF is they are the main opposition party. We will have an election sometime in the next year. If we are going to have an alternative government that does not include FF or FG bar some political earthquake SF will be in that alternative government.

With that comes certain responsibilities and also scrutiny. If SF can't tolerate expected questions on a new policy on a hot topic how will they cope in government?

From reading the thread I don't see any differences between SF and the current government policy on immigration. A bit about not using the private sector less. But even on point SF can't answer questions on costs.

What relevance does this have to anything here?

I was asked a question, I answered it.

I already said that I agree with MLMD assessment, the policy is similar the difference is that what the government say they are doing and will do is different to what they are actually doing.
Is, for instance, 'invite only' consultation good policy?

The poster has made previous stereotyping comments that I am not able to ignore,

The residents destabilise their communities themselves

That is classic stereotyping, the poster of course should have said 'some residents'

It is up to the poster to clarify what they meant this time.

You said 2 posts up that SF aren't chasing the far right vote

How is what they are doing not abandoning voters,traditionally core SF who have followed pyed piper style, the flag usurpers down the garden path after being offered a false promise rage machine ?

Thats Kamikaze behaviour for a party,if you ask me

If the poster clarifies and I am wrong, I have no issue withdrawing what I said.
The poster has form as shown by a direct quote from them with stereotyping a community.

That is all I am saying to you on this. Let the poster clarify.

No interest in disuading them from the new error of their ways then?

I'd have thought it an easier path than trying to attract wealthier voters

Oh and of course you can choose who votes for you and doesn't it seem a lot of traditionsl SF voters hoodwinked by the flag usurpers are being abandoned?

Let them off is the new strategy?

No interest in disuading them from the new error of their ways then?

Back in January MLMD called the far right out and said they 'are not republicans', has criticised and condemned their activity in Coolock and elsewhere and has received an overt death threat as a result.

Are you for real here Pureza?