Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Revolut Megathread.

1213214216218219253

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,385 ✭✭✭Yggr of Asgard


    Plus, it's even possible to stack multiple different promotions if you look around.

    So, I purchase 200€ worth of gear from Under Amour but instead of going directly to their website I first go to the EI Estores, then when ready to check out I activate the Revolut Shop Discount and voila I just got myself a total 1800 Avios and 6.20 € Cashback.

    EI Estores gives me 8 Avios per € and Revolut 1 Avios per € (after conversion from Rev Points)

    Revolut gives me 3% immediate cashback for Revolut Shop and 0.1% once the payment clears for Ultra.

    So, sorry but 3.1% cashback and a nice chunk of Avios is a good deal.

    Sure the opportunities are limited for EI Estores but where it exists it's easy to take advantage of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,385 ✭✭✭Yggr of Asgard


    New Pricing Plan charts are out for Ireland:

    https://www.revolut.com/en-IE/our-pricing-plans/

    Looks like in Ireland the cashback is gone unlike in other EU countries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,621 ✭✭✭optiplexgx270


    They will make the travel insurance useless like the UK and remove the smart delay and most of the reasons to even have metal I would fully expect over the coming weeks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,514 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I saw something in my app about revpoints. Is there a catch to signing up for them? What exactly is the benefit of them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,385 ✭✭✭Yggr of Asgard


    Yeah, I tried to look up the current terms for the insurance and it's really confusing as it points to different policies that in some cases say 1 hour delay and in other 2 hours and so forth, tricky to find what the actual cover is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,385 ✭✭✭Yggr of Asgard


    Depends on your plan, check the latest price table for the amounts you can earn:

    https://www.revolut.com/en-IE/our-pricing-plans/

    Details about the Rev Points can be found on https://www.revolut.com/en-IE/legal/RevPoints/

    If you are on a standard plan, please take note that it's not great value as discussed in this thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 shanoh


    Yes I am able to read.

    I don't know why you're so defensive about this point, the long wandery reply (twice now) doesn't change anything about the fact that what you said is not true: "if you already have a paid plan then it's free"

    It's not free because there's an opportunity cost. You are effectively paying for revpoints. Fine if you don't agree - I'm not going to waste my time persuading you. But for others reading it's important for them to know. Good luck now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,880 ✭✭✭✭zell12


    Indo launches into Revolut

    Asked whether there is a pattern of people getting brushed off by Revolut when they are scammed, the bank said it took fraud and the industry-wide risk of customers being coerced by organised criminals “incredibly seriously”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,385 ✭✭✭Yggr of Asgard


    The customer, who works in cyber ­security and says he does not respond to suspicious emails or calls, woke up to find his phone was going through a resetting process.

    So, a cyber security professional has his phone compromised and it's Revolut's fault?

    I wonder what other applications of his (and other banks) got compromised too, can't only have been Revolut, but that is conveniently not addressed in this hit piece.

    Plus putting a video pushing a "Bank of Ireland responds to Revolut savings account move" in the middle of the article is clearly a sign of "independent" journalism.

    Now don't get me wrong, using a digital only bank has its security risks, especially if your phone is not protected adequately and you don't use all the security functions (some of which make the day-to-day usage a little bit more inconvenient) but this article is clearly not there to give us a balanced picture.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,609 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I’m wondering do they actually know what’s going on or not - Revolut is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland for business rules - if anyone is having issues with Revolut playing runaround, contact the Central Bank



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,176 ✭✭✭wassie


    The article doesnt need to give a balanced picture, its highlighting what is a clear issue and pattern of behaviour with Revolut.

    i.e. the inability to engage with Revolut when the sh!t hits the fan.

    Also from the article:

    Many of these customers had complained they could not get what they regard as a proper response from the money app when they tried to get funds returned to them after fraudsters struck.

    We are hearing this time and time again.

    Ultimately this comes down to trust, which is why I, and I suspect the vast majority of Revolut customers, will not use them for our primary banking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,385 ✭✭✭Yggr of Asgard


    Log a complaint with Revolut https://www.revolut.com/en-IE/legal/complaints-policy/, there are clear timeline for responses attached and if that fails log a complaint with the Bank of Lithuania or you can even use an out of court dispute resolution process via the Financial Service and Pensions Ombudsman (FSPO) or other European providers.

    But I agree with your sentiment, it's clear that Customer Service and sometimes even Back office does not fully understand what the automatic routines are doing to customer accounts and how their own fraud prevention or resolution actually work.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 11,176 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    I would expect that they do know. But the reality is that the like of Revolut attracts the more promiscuous customers in terms of security! They'll install more apps to try out and forget about, they'll visit more dodgy websites, get more emails and are less security conscious in processing them. So they are going to have a higher portion of the petty fraud stuff. In the end it is a commercial decision - how much of the fraud bill are you willing to cover versus how much you'll leave to the customer?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,514 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I think the issue with articles about Revolut is that there is a common theme put out there that Revolut is less secure - which isn't the case. People are dumb.

    But it is fair to say that Revolut's customer service is appalling. But that is a separate issue.

    If you get stung by a scam it's not Revolut's fault. But it is Revolut's fault that you can't easily contact them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,385 ✭✭✭Yggr of Asgard


    They are not the only neo bank with bad customer service too.

    Just look at Trade Republic, one of their first actions when they finally got their own bank license was to fire the majority of their customer service department, close the company they had created for that and now they use outsourced providers as far away as India.

    Using one of these Neo banks (unless you are on a plan that offers phone support) is always a risk but even established direct banks like Deutsche Kredit Bank have started to limit their customer service. DKB used to offer 24/7 and now their are down to a couple of normal business hours with an emergency service the rest of the time via a 3rd party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,176 ✭✭✭wassie


    The issue here is not bad customer service - I think nearly all of us are in agreeance that customer service standards in the banking sector have been on the decline for many years, with some much worse than others.

    The issue is specifically with Revolut restricting the ability for customers to engage with them when affected by fraud.

    Before calling out the other neobanks, I think perspective is needed here. In terms of numbers of Irish Customers

    • Revolut has at least 2.7 million customers in Ireland.
    • The next biggest neobank would be N26 with a reported 200,000.
    • The rest combined (eg Bunq, Trade Republic etc) I think would be far less again than N26, but I wasnt able to confirm this with a quick search.

    Revolut dwarfs the others. Charlie Weston is right to pursue Revolut over this matter and hold them to held to account as it affects a significant proportion of the Irish population.

    If any other Irish Bank was treating customers like this, I'm sure Weston would be reporting the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,179 ✭✭✭✭Dodge


    I’m not a fan of Weston, and think he tries to sensationalise everything, but he’s certainly not an industry stooge and he’ll attack old banks and insurance companies (and even the state) more than he’ll attack the newcomers.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 7,332 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sheep Shagger


    The indo story doesn't make sense, and I'd love to know the level of the 'IT Expert' as am guessing that term was used purposely to attract more clicks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,929 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    That Indo story reads to me like a planted report by mainstream banks to plant doubts in people's minds about the traditional bricks and mortars banks.

    "A cyber security expert", yea right.

    "€5,000 taken from his account when he was in bed and not using his phone." So do you have to be actually using your phone for payments to come out of your account?

    His phone going through a resetting process shows his phone was compromised in someway and that's not Revolut's fault.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,462 ✭✭✭markpb


    "Do you have to be using your phone for payments to come out of your account?"

    Yes actually, PSD2-SCA says that financial institutions must only allow payments or push transfers when they are approved with 2fa. The reason for the 2fa is to prevent a single compromise from letting someone steal your money. If his phone was compromised like you suggested and that allowed someone to steal his money, 2fa wasn't implemented correctly and that absolutely is Revolut's fault.

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018R0389

    Payment services offered electronically should be carried out in a secure manner, adopting technologies able to guarantee the safe authentication of the user and to reduce, to the maximum extent possible, the risk of fraud. The authentication procedure should include, in general, transaction monitoring mechanisms to detect attempts to use a payment service user's personalised security credentials that were lost, stolen, or misappropriated and should also ensure that the payment service user is the legitimate user and therefore is giving consent for the transfer of funds and access to its account information through a normal use of the personalised security credentials. 

    Furthermore, it is necessary to specify the requirements of the strong customer authentication that should be applied each time a payer accesses its payment account online, initiates an electronic payment transaction or carries out any action through a remote channel which may imply a risk of payment fraud or other abuse, by requiring the generation of an authentication code which should be resistant against the risk of being forged in its entirety or by disclosure of any of the elements upon which the code was generated.

    I don't know why you're so quick to jump to conclusions and defend Revolut when you have almost none of the facts.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,929 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    Direct debits etc come out of your account when not using your account.

    I'd say in this case someone got access to his account login and transferred money on another device through Revolout's own payments system to other Revolut accounts.

    This was not a payment with a debit card that you are referring to.

    The point is his phone was compromised by something he did not Revolut.

    How Revolut handled the complaint after is another matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,385 ✭✭✭Yggr of Asgard


    In this specific case "Payments went to a UK ­Revolut account, he said." which means they were P2P transactions within the Revolut System, at least that is what it can be interpreted as.

    P2P payments only require you to log into the app (with whatever security method you have chosen) and then it's easy to do if you have an identifier for the receivers revolut account.

    Only where there is an usual behavior like for example the account you send to is not in your address book, it's a strange amount, it's small amount after small amount or any other "AI" trigger will you get prompted to watch a video about fraud or asked to validate again. At least in my experience.

    Card Payments are a different story, so are bank transfers where I get this damm same video over and over again when creating a new receiver.

    And it should be extremely easy for Revolut to find out how these were authorized and what the relationship of the receiver is to this person. There should be enough data points available from them hoovering up the data as they do.

    But this person clearly had this phone compromised or maybe his company or a thread actor remotely wiped it (giving how his apps were missing) and the revolut fraud is unrelated to the phone reset or maybe it did not happen this way, we don't know because we don't have the full context.

    All we know is that when we use Revolut we should take every precaution to ensure our accounts are safe, including ensuring we use send / spend limits and protect our phone adequately.

    While the article (still a Bank of Ireland responds to Revolut savings account move video in the middle is dodgy) does not give us enough info, it raises a valid point, revolut is hard to get hold off, their customer service is bad and sometimes they don't even have the ability to understand what the issue is. In addition, their lack of details on how they know that there was no fraud, and these were authorized makes it hard to understand what really happend.

    In the end make sure you follow best practices for your device security and the security of any app you use.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,385 ✭✭✭Yggr of Asgard


    Now they might have 2.7 million customers in Ireland but how many of these are active customers or even use Revolut as a main bank account rather than for occasional P2P or to avoid paying Irish Banks exorbitant foreign currency charges?

    If all 2.7 million would be full bank account users, there would be nearly nothing left for the rest of the banks.

    But yes, Revolut is a dominant player at least in the P2P business, so it's absolutely fair that they get scrutiny from press, regulator and customers alike.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,621 ✭✭✭optiplexgx270


    Is there any merit in placing revolut in the secure folder location on a samsung phone. Would this add any layer of protection over depending on androids sandboxing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,462 ✭✭✭markpb


    Direct debits are not in scope for SCA - that’s why I specifically said payments and push transfers. And with direct debits, you can claw back any payment within six months no questions asked.

    I’m also not sure if ECB would view a transfer to an account in a bank semi-licensed in another jurisdiction as out of scope for SCA.

    Assuming p2p transfers are in scope, it doesn’t really matter how the compromise happened. Unless they can prove that the account holder was negligent, it’s on Revolut to secure the payment. And even if the account holder was negligent, it’s on the bank to have robust fraud detection measures. Transferring all your money to someone you’re never sent money to before is the kind of thing even a basic fraud detection system should be flagging.

    And ultimately, Revolut did refund this guys money. There are numerous cases where people complained to the press and got nowhere but this guy was refunded after one news story. What does that tell you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,929 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    P2P payments on Revolut do not require 2 step verification

    There systems has been like that since day one and they get a banking license after so they must be compliant with all regulations.

    The article reads to me like an anti Revolut/Fintech piece.Nameless cyber security expert, sensationalist tag line with "while he slept".

    Then just says they got refunded after publication. No verified quotes, dates, timelines etc.

    It's a very poor article.

    They clearly stated that something happened to the phone as apps had to be reinstalled so this fictional cyber security expert did something wrong.

    Sames as if you click on a link, it's your fault not the bank.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,986 ✭✭✭bren2001


    How Revolut handled the complaint after is another matter.

    No. That's the point of the article.

    The article doesn't blame Revolut for the fraudulant transactions, it criticizes how they handled it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,176 ✭✭✭wassie


    I think it was reported previously that the average balance from Irish customers was around €600. I wonder if it is a lack of trust in the neo's, for reason such as the Indo piece, being a significant part of the reason why people won't use a neo as a primary bank.

    Personally it is for me - I have no issue using a fully digital service. But I want good customer support when I have an signficiant issue. Its for that reason I have a paid plan with N26 vs Revolut, as I have savings with them @4% plus comfort of knowing I can call them on the phone if there is a problem.

    I accept free plans will have limted customer support, but for me the top tier at very least for Revolut should offer phone support.

    Bunq have limted phone support, but you are able to contact them via chat in the web app, which I find much better than via mobile app only, epecially if I need to explain a lot of details.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,179 ✭✭✭✭Dodge


    a friend worked on the PUP payments 3 years ago. I know times have changed a little but she processed thousands of applications. No more than a handful had revolut as their bank to receive the fund. 70% BOI, about 25% AIB and about 4% between PTSB and other “legacy banks”. 1% between credit unions and revolut (no other online banks)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,929 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    I'd say that's changed a lot now as at the time Revolut did not have Irish ibans only Lithuanian ones and despite SEPA regulations many Irish bodies cannot accept non Irish ibans.



Advertisement
Advertisement