Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1113511361138114011411796

Comments

  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I believe it. I'm one.

    Everyone is suited to one system or another. Depending on how long Nienebar stays at Leinster, you will start to see guys get marginalized because of that. Lowe defensively, VdF generally are two guys i'll be watching next year especially.

    Prendergast and Timoney are better system fits. Coombes skillset is something Farrell seems to want in the second row rather than back row. However, that skillset is something very valued outside ireland by other coaches. Or even at leinster, Nienebar would start coombes imo and shift doris to seven.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,942 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I also watched Ruddock and he was a better player than Coombes. As reflected by his caps and being made captain at every level he played at.

    Sorry that Man God incarnate Coombes was tragically not selected for the umpteenth squad in a row. It's obviously everyone else's fault but his.

    Mod: warning.

    Post edited by aloooof on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,739 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    My take is I don't think Coombes was dropped for Munster, there was an evolution in our approach as we got more of our squad fit again and decided to try him (and others) from the bench to close out matches strongly. He was starting for the vast majority of the last few seasons. If Munster made a final versus Leinster or Bulls he'd start. Or if they got to play Glasgow all over again he'd start and so would Snyman (all imo). I wasn't too fond of the approach to be honest and posted as much but it did work on occasion against the weaker sides. I think it was a useful exercise by the coaching staff and I'm not going to complain about innovation but if we were at the business end of the season again next year I'd be hoping Coombes starts every day of the week. Maybe Gleeson/Edogbo/Quinn/Aherne can give us that oomph from the bench that JOD doesn't next season if we can keep a few fit.

    JOD is well down the pecking order at international level and I'm not sure if you're serious there about him over Coombes possibly in green, he's still a good player at URC and Heineken level but those injuries robbed us a bit of his true potential. He's got the Mick O'Driscoll/Billy Holland role in the Munster squad now, he'll lead us in those dirty away nights in Wales and Scotland when our best players aren't available and his versatility means he's a great bench option.

    I think your comment about his game not translating well could be closest to the truth, maybe not the international level bit of it, I think he'd do well internationally (and he has had good performances in green lest we forget, people seem to focus on his last game where he was just back from injury and had an off day as if that's his level and that's that). Just to how Farrell wants his 8 to play. I just think you get Doris to 6 and JvdF at 7 to do the carrying and leave Coombes blitzing attacking and defensive rucks like he's been doing all season maybe there's a fit there. Get him carrying the dirty yards tieing up tackles, offloading, and carrying close to the tryline. I don't think he'd partner well with Baird at 6, Prendergast maybe. Anyway, it's all moot, I don't think he can have done much more to be honest, if it was a player from another team posting those kind of stats I'd wager their fans would be saying the same.

    It's a competitive position and Timoney and Prendergast are fine players too who I admire so good luck to them.



  • Posts: 2,692 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I don't know why you are getting so emotional, but that's fine. You are allowed to have your opinion. I'm allowed to disagree.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,223 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Looking at any of the Irish Squads (and remember we're only talking about a squad here) since Farrell took over I really don't get the "Coombes is on the bench for Munster" stuff, it's a lazy comeback to say the least



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,942 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    What sort of comeback is appropriate to the same tired cries lamented his non-selection, when it's been clear for awhile that he hasn't done what's been required of him in Farrell's view?

    Nothing to be said for another round of Kleyn bitching?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,785 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    I think you'll find we prefer Frisch bitching nowadays.

    I don't get why you're getting so worked up by fans calling for an inform player to be internationally recognised. I disagree with Ulster fans saying to call up Balacoune and Cooney, but I don't go "God, why are they still banging on about Cooney and Balacoune? Ian Dowling and Tomàs O'Leary were far superior players anyways".



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    In fairness Ulster fans complain when their players DO get called up for Ireland squads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Because there is squad number limitations, other players are just better in the eyes of the multiple title winning coach.

    It's not difficult to figure out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Conan Is a far superior player though. That's why



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,712 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Potentially he just thinks that his game wouldn't translate well to international level

    It probably isn’t anything more complicated than this tbh.

    Farrell and POC have seen plenty of him, they know what he’s about and what he can do, they know what they’re looking for, and he’s further away than ever (it would seem).



  • Administrators Posts: 56,215 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    People seem to think that every time Andy Farrell selects an Ireland squad that he starts from scratch. As if he sits down with a blank piece of paper, and fills in 1-23/35 by assessing every single player as if they were being picked for the very first time.

    It cannot work like this. The team isn't selected from scratch every time, the baseline for any Ireland selection is the previous Ireland selection. A few changes are then made based on extreme variances in form (i.e. there's a large gulf between the form of an incumbent and the form of a hopeful in the same position) and injuries. The default mindset for the selectors isn't to try and identify changes all the time. Coaches love continuity and consistency, they'll change things when they have to or when they are trying to mitigate some concern that they have.

    For a new player to get into the squad they need to be playing very well, but they also need some good fortune. They need an incumbent in their position to be out of form, they need an incumbent who hasn't yet established their place in the squad to fail to take the opportunity (this is how Max Deegan got his cap when Coombes made a balls of his chance), or they need injuries. They need something to happen for Farrell to think he needs a change in that position.

    For Coombes this has just never happened. He has never played so well and Doris/Conan played so badly that Farrell has had to seriously consider a change. And while Conan is injured now, so is Henderson, and it so happens that there is an Ireland hopeful who has been in great form in both positions where we are missing established players.

    Honestly, a large chunk of getting into the Ireland team is related to coming along at the right time. Ringrose emerging after BOD. Doris coming along after Heaslip. Sheehan coming along after Best. Keenan coming along after Kearney. If Keenan had emerged 5 years prior to what he did he'd have had a much harder time of it. We see it all the time. If another young bright hooker breaks through now they're going to have a tougher time of it purely for bad timing alone, there are currently 2 established hookers who are young themselves.

    If Stuart McCloskey had come along in the previous generation of players he'd have many more caps IMO, back then Ireland weren't blessed with big, powerful backs.

    There are plenty of players of the past with lots of caps who wouldn’t get a sniff of a cap today too.

    Good fortune plays a big part of it too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,712 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    While you're correct that luck and timing can play a part in things, it also can't be the only explanation.

    Like, you said "Doris coming along after Heaslip" - Doris made his debut three years after Heaslip played his last match, and for his first cap he was picked ahead of Peter O'Mahony in a 6N game. He's proof of the exact opposite of your point, that Farrell will throw a guy in, not because he has to but because the guy is good enough.

    Likewise Sheehan, two years had elapsed between Best's last game and his debut, Herring and Kelleher were battling it out for the starting jersey - two very good hookers - but Sheehan absolutely blew past both of them. He didn't need an injury or a retirement to claim his spot.

    Joe McCarthy started this year's 6N, relegating James Ryan to the bench and a double Lions tourist couldn't even make the 23.

    Ditto Crowley, JGP, Baird - and now apparently Sam Prendergast and Frawley have overtaken Ross Byrne, not because Byrne is injured or playing like a drain, but because Farrell sees more in them, like he saw more in Crowley than he did first in Carbery and then in Byrne.

    For Coombes this has just never happened. 

    It has happened plenty. Every single player will get a 'break' at some point - the difference is that some players will seize the opportunity, others will not. Coombes - like Deegan, Treadwell, Cooney, Baloucoune, Harry Byrne, Hume, Loughman, Burns, Connors, and any number of others - has had opportunities, he just has not seized them.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,215 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    It's not the only explanation, you are correct, but it is a part of it.

    The team selection isn't purely merit based. Taking the spot of an established player requires an element of good fortune or good timing. Doris, for example, would absolutely not have just been thrown in had Heaslip still been playing. Doris broke through at a time when there was an opportunity open.

    The same is not true today. Any back row player breaking through now faces a log jam of quality, established, high-cap-count players ahead of them. Only one of these is of an age where their spot would otherwise be vulnerable, but that one player is also the captain so they are getting picked in squads no matter what.

    For Coombes to get a cap now he needs more than just playing really well.

    I also agree that his performance in the chance he did get will count against him. It'll always be that asterisk in Farrell's mind when he is evaluating Coombes.



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    I dunno - he picked him again in the RWC training squad well after his poor performance against the NZ XV.

    In that case, they went into camp in Carton House in early July (10th July 2023), and Coombes was amongst the players dropped over a month later on August 16th.

    That's a month worth of training etc where he's getting observed incredibly closely by the management team. It has to stand to reason that he isn't doing what they want him to do. He's slipping further down the back row pecking order, as even with Conan missing this squad he is still behind guys like Timoney & Prendergast (who are undisputed back rowers, if you want to say Izuchukwu is included as a quasi-lock).

    They've spent a lot of time looking at Gavin Coombes at this stage, and he doesn't seem to have progressed in their thinking in that time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Likewise Sheehan, two years had elapsed between Best's last game and his debut, Herring and Kelleher were battling it out for the starting jersey - two very good hookers - but Sheehan absolutely blew past both of them. He didn't need an injury or a retirement to claim his spot.

    Small point but that's not my recollection with regards Sheehan; didn't a Kelleher injury afford him an opportunity earlier than he otherwise would have?

    And that's a point I've often made about the back-row before. It's a position of strength, but there was essentially a 2 year period where there were no opportunities outside of the 4 incumbents thru injury.

    Getting any opportunity is way more difficult in that context.

    Being consistent, the same line of argument could've been applied to McCloskey for ages, that he's not good enough. But once he got an opportunity and got in, he showed he was more than capable.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,215 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I don't disagree.

    Don't get me wrong, I am not suggesting that Coombes being overlooked is just down to bad luck. I was making a general point about comments like "why isn't player x, y or z getting a go?" and just using Coombes as an example.

    In Coombes case, it's my personal belief that he is overlooked for a combination of reasons, including that the things he's very good at would be too easily nullified at test level, and outside of that he doesn't bring anything else that's better than what the incumbents bring.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Coombes has been in plenty of squad and around the Ireland team to show what he can/can't do.

    Farrell has pushed players into the team a lot quicker than Coombes so you have to guess he is just not doing it in training or something is up

    In terms of Coombes getting another cap, he needs to get back into the squad again and he needs to prove he is better than Timoney and Predergast, it has nothing at this stage to do with Doris etc

    Harry Byrne just got dumped out of the squad after probably his best season for a long time, he stayed fit and was playing well yet is gone from the squad. He has more caps than Coombes and was playing in the 6 nations. I doubt we will have as many posts about Harry as we will have on Coombes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,712 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Doris broke through at a time when there was an opportunity open.

    He didn't though. No one would have guessed that the starting back-row in 2020 would be anything other than POM/VDF/Stander - but Doris was picked to make his test debut in a Six Nations opener, pushing POM (who was still only 30) to the bench and shifting CJ Stander from 8 to 6, and Doris has been a fixture ever since.

    also agree that his performance in the chance he did get will count against him.

    it wasn't "the" chance though. He had played in the Maori matches the previous summer, he'd been capped in the summer tests the year before, he was in every squad for two years, including the Six Nations squad named two months after the NZ 'A' game when he was supposedly banished to the wilderness. The idea that he was given one go and then cast aside for one bad game is not accurate.

    For Coombes to get a cap now he needs more than just playing really well.

    Well, Conan is out, and he hasn't been picked. I'm not sure what else he needs.



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The most disappointing thing is back row is the only selection worth debating. Nobody is sticking their hand up in other positions right now



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Cooney was in a lot of squad with Farrell before Joe left and afterwards when Farrell was head coach, you have to expect he is not able to provide what Farrell wants. He was capped and given game time as well



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Furlong has been playing better for the last few months than he has in a long time



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    If you were to name your Ireland XV in order of importance (i.e. start with 'first name on the teamsheet') how would it look?

    01. Jamison Gibson-Park

    02. Andrew Porter

    03. Tadhg Beirne

    04. Hugo Keenan

    05. Jack Crowley

    06. Tadhg Furlong

    07. James Lowe

    08. Dan Sheehan

    09. Caelan Doris

    10. Bundee Aki

    11. Mack Hansen

    12. Josh van der Flier

    13. Garry Ringrose

    14. Ryan Baird

    15. Joe McCarthy

    The last three are 50/50 calls.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,430 ✭✭✭paul71


    There are 6 viable centres and a few more sticking their hands up. We also appear to have lost another to France.

    The established first choice wingers are Hansen and Lowe, we have 5 or 6 sticking their hands up too.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,215 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Us mods love it when people ask questions like this. 😫



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,223 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I'd have Aki & Hansen above Lowe in order of importance.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,368 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Based on the last year, probably, yeah. The areas where we have several good players ended up lowest down as their replacements aren't far off them and we don't have a great selection of left wingers hence Lowe's high position as a back 3 player. I'd have Nash as our third best winger both sides combined, which pulled Hansen down a bit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,712 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Well, we named 35 players plus Conan, JGP, Hansen, Henderson, and Keenan would definitely have been named if available and probably Ahern too.

    Have we ever had more than 40 players seriously in the mix?



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    My point wasn't necessarily that we're lacking depth, it's just that outside of the back row we don't have many players smashing the door down to earn a starting position. Front row, half back and back three in particular, not much to argue about !



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    I think alot of people approach Ireland matches like its back in the early 2000s when we had no depth at all and were reliant on certain players being fit.

    Those days are gone and we dont rely on players "X", "Y" or "Z" being fit because we are a world class team which is why we have been top 2 in the world for the last 2 years and been one of the top forces of world rugby in that time.

    We have important players of course we aren't reliant on any of them. We saw with Sexton once he retired, Crowley stepped in seamlessly and Ireland were still as good as ever and the same will happen with JGP & Keenan's replacement…and then the media will move onto the next players to put on a pedestal and claim "Ireland are reliant on". The British media especially will push this as you can tell they just hate them and France being in Ireland's shadow as they desperately want themselves and France to be the dominant forces in NH rugby, sadly for them that will never happen as long as Ireland exists!



Advertisement
Advertisement