Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1113511361138114011411855

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Conan Is a far superior player though. That's why



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,083 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Potentially he just thinks that his game wouldn't translate well to international level

    It probably isn’t anything more complicated than this tbh.

    Farrell and POC have seen plenty of him, they know what he’s about and what he can do, they know what they’re looking for, and he’s further away than ever (it would seem).



  • Administrators Posts: 56,559 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    People seem to think that every time Andy Farrell selects an Ireland squad that he starts from scratch. As if he sits down with a blank piece of paper, and fills in 1-23/35 by assessing every single player as if they were being picked for the very first time.

    It cannot work like this. The team isn't selected from scratch every time, the baseline for any Ireland selection is the previous Ireland selection. A few changes are then made based on extreme variances in form (i.e. there's a large gulf between the form of an incumbent and the form of a hopeful in the same position) and injuries. The default mindset for the selectors isn't to try and identify changes all the time. Coaches love continuity and consistency, they'll change things when they have to or when they are trying to mitigate some concern that they have.

    For a new player to get into the squad they need to be playing very well, but they also need some good fortune. They need an incumbent in their position to be out of form, they need an incumbent who hasn't yet established their place in the squad to fail to take the opportunity (this is how Max Deegan got his cap when Coombes made a balls of his chance), or they need injuries. They need something to happen for Farrell to think he needs a change in that position.

    For Coombes this has just never happened. He has never played so well and Doris/Conan played so badly that Farrell has had to seriously consider a change. And while Conan is injured now, so is Henderson, and it so happens that there is an Ireland hopeful who has been in great form in both positions where we are missing established players.

    Honestly, a large chunk of getting into the Ireland team is related to coming along at the right time. Ringrose emerging after BOD. Doris coming along after Heaslip. Sheehan coming along after Best. Keenan coming along after Kearney. If Keenan had emerged 5 years prior to what he did he'd have had a much harder time of it. We see it all the time. If another young bright hooker breaks through now they're going to have a tougher time of it purely for bad timing alone, there are currently 2 established hookers who are young themselves.

    If Stuart McCloskey had come along in the previous generation of players he'd have many more caps IMO, back then Ireland weren't blessed with big, powerful backs.

    There are plenty of players of the past with lots of caps who wouldn’t get a sniff of a cap today too.

    Good fortune plays a big part of it too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,083 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    While you're correct that luck and timing can play a part in things, it also can't be the only explanation.

    Like, you said "Doris coming along after Heaslip" - Doris made his debut three years after Heaslip played his last match, and for his first cap he was picked ahead of Peter O'Mahony in a 6N game. He's proof of the exact opposite of your point, that Farrell will throw a guy in, not because he has to but because the guy is good enough.

    Likewise Sheehan, two years had elapsed between Best's last game and his debut, Herring and Kelleher were battling it out for the starting jersey - two very good hookers - but Sheehan absolutely blew past both of them. He didn't need an injury or a retirement to claim his spot.

    Joe McCarthy started this year's 6N, relegating James Ryan to the bench and a double Lions tourist couldn't even make the 23.

    Ditto Crowley, JGP, Baird - and now apparently Sam Prendergast and Frawley have overtaken Ross Byrne, not because Byrne is injured or playing like a drain, but because Farrell sees more in them, like he saw more in Crowley than he did first in Carbery and then in Byrne.

    For Coombes this has just never happened. 

    It has happened plenty. Every single player will get a 'break' at some point - the difference is that some players will seize the opportunity, others will not. Coombes - like Deegan, Treadwell, Cooney, Baloucoune, Harry Byrne, Hume, Loughman, Burns, Connors, and any number of others - has had opportunities, he just has not seized them.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,559 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    It's not the only explanation, you are correct, but it is a part of it.

    The team selection isn't purely merit based. Taking the spot of an established player requires an element of good fortune or good timing. Doris, for example, would absolutely not have just been thrown in had Heaslip still been playing. Doris broke through at a time when there was an opportunity open.

    The same is not true today. Any back row player breaking through now faces a log jam of quality, established, high-cap-count players ahead of them. Only one of these is of an age where their spot would otherwise be vulnerable, but that one player is also the captain so they are getting picked in squads no matter what.

    For Coombes to get a cap now he needs more than just playing really well.

    I also agree that his performance in the chance he did get will count against him. It'll always be that asterisk in Farrell's mind when he is evaluating Coombes.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    I dunno - he picked him again in the RWC training squad well after his poor performance against the NZ XV.

    In that case, they went into camp in Carton House in early July (10th July 2023), and Coombes was amongst the players dropped over a month later on August 16th.

    That's a month worth of training etc where he's getting observed incredibly closely by the management team. It has to stand to reason that he isn't doing what they want him to do. He's slipping further down the back row pecking order, as even with Conan missing this squad he is still behind guys like Timoney & Prendergast (who are undisputed back rowers, if you want to say Izuchukwu is included as a quasi-lock).

    They've spent a lot of time looking at Gavin Coombes at this stage, and he doesn't seem to have progressed in their thinking in that time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,014 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Likewise Sheehan, two years had elapsed between Best's last game and his debut, Herring and Kelleher were battling it out for the starting jersey - two very good hookers - but Sheehan absolutely blew past both of them. He didn't need an injury or a retirement to claim his spot.

    Small point but that's not my recollection with regards Sheehan; didn't a Kelleher injury afford him an opportunity earlier than he otherwise would have?

    And that's a point I've often made about the back-row before. It's a position of strength, but there was essentially a 2 year period where there were no opportunities outside of the 4 incumbents thru injury.

    Getting any opportunity is way more difficult in that context.

    Being consistent, the same line of argument could've been applied to McCloskey for ages, that he's not good enough. But once he got an opportunity and got in, he showed he was more than capable.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,559 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I don't disagree.

    Don't get me wrong, I am not suggesting that Coombes being overlooked is just down to bad luck. I was making a general point about comments like "why isn't player x, y or z getting a go?" and just using Coombes as an example.

    In Coombes case, it's my personal belief that he is overlooked for a combination of reasons, including that the things he's very good at would be too easily nullified at test level, and outside of that he doesn't bring anything else that's better than what the incumbents bring.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Coombes has been in plenty of squad and around the Ireland team to show what he can/can't do.

    Farrell has pushed players into the team a lot quicker than Coombes so you have to guess he is just not doing it in training or something is up

    In terms of Coombes getting another cap, he needs to get back into the squad again and he needs to prove he is better than Timoney and Predergast, it has nothing at this stage to do with Doris etc

    Harry Byrne just got dumped out of the squad after probably his best season for a long time, he stayed fit and was playing well yet is gone from the squad. He has more caps than Coombes and was playing in the 6 nations. I doubt we will have as many posts about Harry as we will have on Coombes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,083 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Doris broke through at a time when there was an opportunity open.

    He didn't though. No one would have guessed that the starting back-row in 2020 would be anything other than POM/VDF/Stander - but Doris was picked to make his test debut in a Six Nations opener, pushing POM (who was still only 30) to the bench and shifting CJ Stander from 8 to 6, and Doris has been a fixture ever since.

    also agree that his performance in the chance he did get will count against him.

    it wasn't "the" chance though. He had played in the Maori matches the previous summer, he'd been capped in the summer tests the year before, he was in every squad for two years, including the Six Nations squad named two months after the NZ 'A' game when he was supposedly banished to the wilderness. The idea that he was given one go and then cast aside for one bad game is not accurate.

    For Coombes to get a cap now he needs more than just playing really well.

    Well, Conan is out, and he hasn't been picked. I'm not sure what else he needs.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The most disappointing thing is back row is the only selection worth debating. Nobody is sticking their hand up in other positions right now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Cooney was in a lot of squad with Farrell before Joe left and afterwards when Farrell was head coach, you have to expect he is not able to provide what Farrell wants. He was capped and given game time as well



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Furlong has been playing better for the last few months than he has in a long time



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,495 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    If you were to name your Ireland XV in order of importance (i.e. start with 'first name on the teamsheet') how would it look?

    01. Jamison Gibson-Park

    02. Andrew Porter

    03. Tadhg Beirne

    04. Hugo Keenan

    05. Jack Crowley

    06. Tadhg Furlong

    07. James Lowe

    08. Dan Sheehan

    09. Caelan Doris

    10. Bundee Aki

    11. Mack Hansen

    12. Josh van der Flier

    13. Garry Ringrose

    14. Ryan Baird

    15. Joe McCarthy

    The last three are 50/50 calls.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,430 ✭✭✭paul71


    There are 6 viable centres and a few more sticking their hands up. We also appear to have lost another to France.

    The established first choice wingers are Hansen and Lowe, we have 5 or 6 sticking their hands up too.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,559 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Us mods love it when people ask questions like this. 😫



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,575 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I'd have Aki & Hansen above Lowe in order of importance.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,495 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Based on the last year, probably, yeah. The areas where we have several good players ended up lowest down as their replacements aren't far off them and we don't have a great selection of left wingers hence Lowe's high position as a back 3 player. I'd have Nash as our third best winger both sides combined, which pulled Hansen down a bit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,083 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Well, we named 35 players plus Conan, JGP, Hansen, Henderson, and Keenan would definitely have been named if available and probably Ahern too.

    Have we ever had more than 40 players seriously in the mix?



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    My point wasn't necessarily that we're lacking depth, it's just that outside of the back row we don't have many players smashing the door down to earn a starting position. Front row, half back and back three in particular, not much to argue about !



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,122 ✭✭✭Shehal


    I think alot of people approach Ireland matches like its back in the early 2000s when we had no depth at all and were reliant on certain players being fit.

    Those days are gone and we dont rely on players "X", "Y" or "Z" being fit because we are a world class team which is why we have been top 2 in the world for the last 2 years and been one of the top forces of world rugby in that time.

    We have important players of course we aren't reliant on any of them. We saw with Sexton once he retired, Crowley stepped in seamlessly and Ireland were still as good as ever and the same will happen with JGP & Keenan's replacement…and then the media will move onto the next players to put on a pedestal and claim "Ireland are reliant on". The British media especially will push this as you can tell they just hate them and France being in Ireland's shadow as they desperately want themselves and France to be the dominant forces in NH rugby, sadly for them that will never happen as long as Ireland exists!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    Herring is certainly going after the hooker spot and would start in most of the top 10 international teams in the World…..he is a great player just some better ones at the moment in front of him



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,979 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Purely for his pace. v Benetton he looked like lightning again. Injured his hamstring but I hadn't realised he's been training with 7s since.

    Anyway it was a very long shot. Stockdale's left foot is getting him in the door. I would taken Shane Daly instead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I'd have taken Loughman. I think the more exposure he gets, the better he'll be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭thePigeon_


    Certainly hope you're right about JGP's replacement. I'm far less optimistic but ready to be proven wrong!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,189 ✭✭✭typhoony


    Just realised Stockdale was included, I think he had maybe 2 good games all season for Ulster. Personally I would not have him anywhere near the team even taking into considerations injuries to other players.

    Delighted for Izzy, is he backrow or 2nd row. Will probably end up a utility forward so can see him being involved for Ireland. Still has to improve his overall game but he's taken a big step this year



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 252 ✭✭thehairygrape


    correct me if I’m wrong but I think Stockdale is left footed. Having a left footed kicking option would bring some balance I presume. Lowe can’t play every time.



  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    The stats thing has been trotted out a lot here on Coombes over the past day or so, but they're really just pure volume stats.

    I had a look comparing the 23/24 season for all three of Gavin Coombes, Jack Conan and Caelan Doris.

    Coombes played in 25 games, 1,700 minutes, starting 20 of those 25. While his carry and tackle volume are huge (293 carries and 287 made tackles), once again when you look at the actual impact of those carries, you see he carries for 2m per carry on average.

    Jack Conan didn't play a lot of minutes this season - 829 mins for both Leinster and Ireland, but he averages 3.5m per carry, so while he played 871 minutes less than Coombes (almost 11 full games less), he only carried for 119 less metres. His tackle volume isn't as high as Coombes, but his completed tackle percentages are slightly higher (both are very good at 92% and 91%).

    But the comparison to Caelan Doris is the one that really shows up the disparity - Doris played in an extra 3 games and played 298 minutes more than Coombes. He has 10 more carries than Coombes over that period (303 v 293), made 25 tackles more, and had more clean breaks (5 v 2), defenders beaten (59 v 25) and offloads (18 v 12). His tackle completion stats are 90% (v Coombes at 91%). He had 10 carries more than Coombes, but carried for 438m more than him - his average is 3.4 metres per carry versus Coombes' 2.0m.

    So - statistically, he outperformed him on every single metric (only negative is his penalty count is almost twice as high as Coombes, and is pretty high overall at 25 on the season).

    However - when you step into the actual games, it's even more telling. Of Coombes' 25 games played, he carried over his 2.0m per carry season average on 12 occasions (Dragons, Ulster x2, Glasgow x2, Connacht, Scarlets, Zebre, Ospreys, Toulon, Northampton (knock out), Bulls, Lions).

    His best days - days where his carry average was higher than Jack Conan's or Caelan Doris' level happened only 4 times - Toulon away (he was excellent that day), Bulls away, Lions away and Glasgow. In all three of the latter games however he started on the bench and had a very low volume of carries (6, 3 and 1 respectively).

    Caelan Doris only had 4 games all year where his per carry average for the game was below Coombe's season mark (2.0m per carry).

    Doris also played a considerably more difficult slate of fixtures than Coombes - his stats include games against New Zealand, South Africa, La Rochelle x2, Toulouse etc.

    I know these are relatively simplistic stats (would love to have access to better data) - but they do serve to show that the people claiming Coombes' stats are incredible are missing the mark.

    Doris is by any metric a more effective carrier and is just as efficient a tackler off an even larger sample size. He offloads more, passes more and beats more than twice as many defenders off a really similar carry count.

    I know some of Coombes' numbers are coloured by the period he played in the row (his stats were particularly poor for the games against Exeter, Leinster (in Thomond) and Connacht on NYD), but there were plenty of games where he was definitely exclusively at 8 where his numbers are incredibly underwhelming too.



  • Posts: 10,091 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    Coombes also carrys inside in traffic a lot as munster rely on him as a heavy carrier where doris and in particular conan carry in outside channels more.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭ Benjamin Cold Sorbet


    Doris absolutely doesn't carry in outside channels, I genuinely struggle to even think of a handful of examples of when he does that. He typically carries right in the middle of the pitch and typically off set pieces etc.

    I know average carry stats are prone to scrutiny - i.e. one big carry could skew the sample in a whole game, but we're talking about guys here who play the same position and we're talking over a full season.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


Advertisement
Advertisement