Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Sinn Fein and how do they form a government dilemma

1184185187189190391

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,320 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    …for those not wanting indefinite ffg or fgff lead governments, theyll have to put sf somewhere on their ballots, wont happen though, so….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    SF aren’t the only alternative political party to FF/FG. If soc dems and labour merged then they would take a lot of the protest vote and no doubt SF would loose some of the votes it gets from people protesting against Ff/FG.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,523 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    SF will eventually get into power, we still have a health and housing crisis, we now also have a crisis in our tourism industry.

    Some party needs to come up with smart proposals to alleviate all these. If the party that does that is SF they'll storm to power at the next GE



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,523 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    SocDems and Labour are too small, even combined, to go up against the civil war parties, even if they were both of the same wing... SF didn't run enough candidates in the last GE but they still ran far more than the other 2



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    8.7% of local elections vote v SF 11.7%

    If they merged it would definitely take a portion of the protest vote away from SF.

    I agree they wouldn’t take on FF/FG but could easily form a government with them and influence change something that SF are unlikely to do because FF nor FG will go into government with them. It’s another dynamic that we could see that reduce SF votes just like the right immigration candidates did this time around.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,523 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Next GE there will be 174 TDs so 88 needed for a majority, we have 39 Dail constituencies so parties need 2 or 3 elected from every constituency to make a govt... Did social democrats run 14 last time out?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,520 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    the problem for SF after this elections is the voting blocks that were formed and few seems to be transferring to SF. FF and FG are probably looking at 40%+ between them if they go above 45% they will be withing striking distance of an overall majority. They transferred strongly to each other something SF supporters on this forum denied would happen a year ago. 40% with a solid transfer will mean they will be very near 80 seats. Labour, SD's and the Greens transferred to each other solidly at 10-12% vote share they sould hit 15+ seats and looking at transfers they will recieve prefence from FF&FG when they have no other canditate to vote for over SF and some indepents. Independents @20+% would be in the 25-35 seat bracket. Half of these are from the FF/FG gene pool.

    SF could hit 20% or even slightly more but only PBPS give them a preference on transfers. if they only get 15% you are looking at seats in the 20 bracket, @20% maybe 30. everything can and will change between now and the autumn. but the dail will be going into recess in a few weeks until ealy September. it will be hard for SF to change momentum, not impossible but hard. house building is ramping up and there will be tax changes,regularisation of the one off SW payments.

    SF need to get back into the high 20%'s to have a chance of being in government and hope its FG collapse not FF. I think they will struggle to do that.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,214 ✭✭✭✭L1011




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    why vote for a party that you are more or less guaranteed wouldn’t be able to form a government? People aren’t stupid (despite what Mary Lou thinks and lets slip) so are more likely to vote elsewhere with their protest vote. That’s the point I’m making.

    As it stands it looks like FF/FG will remain in power along with a small party + independents. Houses are being built, outrage has moved onto people playing the Direct provision system and SF have lost their USP so unlikely to get populist/protest vote as things stand. People are sick off them talking about a result from 4 years ago so without some change in direction it is an uphill battle and even at that they have probably left it to late.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,473 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    The thread title should be changed from what it is to, who can SF get into government?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,259 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    why vote for a party that you are more or less guaranteed wouldn’t be able to form a government? 

    I'm sure there is a cohort of diehard FF and FG supporters who would love it if any serious opposition just crawled away and allowed them to continue use and abuse the smaller (and so far willing) parties in their coalitions.
    Thankfully the ambition of some opposition parties stretches a bit further than having to make the best of a decimation after an election.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,111 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Sinn Fein don't have the ideas, they don't have the skills and they don't have the experience.

    Their twisting and turning in the wind on so many issues have exposed this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,111 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Labour and Social Democrats are on the way up, Sinn Fein are on the way down.

    The electorate have begun to realise that they are serious politicians while Sinn Fein are not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,523 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Whereas FFG have the skills and ideas? Yeah….

    Labour and SDs fielded 31 and 20 candidates respectively in 2020. 51 candidates is nowhere near enough for a majority, they need to be fielding at least 2 candidates per constituency and 3 in some of them for most people to consider themselves serious parties.

    When Labour last got into coalition with FG they moved considerably to the right on the political spectrum. I think until the old guard in that sense are gone they will fail to attract many progressive voters. Progressive voters aren't the same as FFG voters, if they f**k up the electorate punish them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,111 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Of the current Labour TDs, only Brendan Howlin, who is retiring at the next general election, has held a full Ministry. So what rubbish are you posting about the "old guard"?

    Progressive voters don't vote for Sinn Fein, of that I am certain. Until Sinn Fein get rid of the whiff of the "old guard" who still control the party from Belfast, they won't attract progressive voters, and even then, until they dial down the ethno-nationalist rhetoric, they still won't attract them.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,953 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Who cares if they theoretically have enough candidates for a majority. Majority governments are exceedingly rare in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,111 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    So Labour and the Social Democrats ran 51 candidates between them in 2020 and that is nowhere near enough for most people to consider themselves serious parties even combined.

    Sinn Fein ran 42 candidates in that election. I suppose that means we should treat them less seriously than a combined Labour/SD?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,259 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Personally I got fed up with these smaller parties pretending to be different and then knowingly agree to be mudguards.

    This morning we saw the latest leader having to fall on his sword as a result.

    I don't see SF ever become a mudguard for FF and FG. If they did they lose my vote immediately



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    The Green Party leader is going because he stuck to what the voters wanted him to do even when populist public opinion when against him

    Trying to play this off as a positive for SF is hilarious

    They are the party who are begging either FF or FG to go into government with them and if it does happen SF will have to "become a mudguard"

    What a clueless comment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,259 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    What the Greens SD's Labour do is entirely up to themselves.

    All I said was, I got fed up with them willingly being the mudguards for FF or FG governments.

    It is a huge plus in my view that SF won't do that.

    Who is 'begging'?

    In my view SF will not be entering government unless they are equal or lead party.

    P.S. The Green leader is going because the decimation of his party has left his position untenable. Sorry, I know you want to believe the spin, but I'm more of a real politic guy myself.





  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,111 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Clueless is only the start of it.

    Look at what the Greens have achieved over the lifetime of this government - Climate Action Act, public transport investment in Dart Plus, BusConnects etc., ahead of the game in retrofitting etc. Those are the raison d'etre of the Green Party movement.

    Imagine if SF had been able to make even 1% of that progress on their main issue - a united Ireland - wouldn't that have been worth it just to become a mudguard? However, SF and their supporters are not really interested in achieving change, they are after power for the sake of power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,259 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    No coincidence that the Green leader resigned after Local and European elections, his party did terribly in both. His resignation is directly related to his electoral performance.
    Stop spinning folks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,118 ✭✭✭pureza


    To be fair,I don't think he has the heart to go on

    Greens aren't like any other party in the sense that,they will impliment unpopular things when in government and if they get back in,its a bonus

    They run on a model of green wave,green bust,green wave again



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,503 ✭✭✭✭astrofool




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,259 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Yep.
    11.4% in 2019 EUs to 5.4% in the latest one…very poor performance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,111 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It is supremely ironic that we have SF apologists applauding the resignation of Eamon Ryan (on a SF thread making it further ironic) after a poor election, while defending the right of MLMD to stay on after an appalling election.

    The Greens got 7.1% in 2020 and fell to 3.6%, approximately half their vote. Sinn Fein got 24.5% in 2020 and fell to 11.8%, a bigger percentage loss, and less than half.

    The hypocrisy runs deep.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,088 ✭✭✭Clo-Clo


    SF supporters saying the Green are "mud guards", this is from the flip flop party that haven't a fu*king clue what their own policies are and have spent years now flip flopping around trying to work out what way the wind is blowing and then jump on that

    If they do get into government it will be after begging another party and flip flopping around more on their policies which even Mary Lou admitted are a mess.

    The comment is hilarious and shows a complete lack of awareness of what is going on and what has gone on before.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,118 ✭✭✭pureza


    2019 was peak Gretta Thunberg year,with every mammy and Daddy in the country beseiged by protesting kids to vote green to save the planet

    Where is Gretta now?

    I don't think as I said earlier that they are a normal party in terms of how they get their support



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,320 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    greens movements are fcuked alright, so that means your kids, grandkids, nieces and nephews are to, shur no harm, we ll be long gone by the time the real sh1t hits the fan…..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,259 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Does it matter, they were told what would happen if they went in with FG and FF in this government and it happened.



Advertisement